The Trump Dump (Take em. Post em)
- Thread starter bgbtylvr
- Start date
-
- Tags
- the trump dump
https://www.palmerreport.com/analys...committee-has-been-doing-all-this-time/43011/
So what exactly has the January 6th Committee been doing with its time behind the scenes these past few months? It’s confirmed that it’s interviewed hundreds of witnesses and obtained huge amounts of evidence, but what’s come of it? Now, as these things tend to work, we’re getting our answers.
Yesterday the committee revealed that it’s learned of a January 4th White House meeting between Donald Trump and multiple January 6th planners and organizers. This is the kind of meeting that Trump and his closest people were certainly hoping would never come to light. But through its due diligence of interviewing witness after cooperating witness, the committee unearthed the meeting, learned who all was in attendance, and is going after them. These are people who, if pushed into flipping, can give up Trump directly.
This week we also learned that while Mark Meadows was cooperating with the committee, he was the one who turned over the PowerPoint presentation that incriminates the Trump White House. This means that Meadows’ cooperation, while very brief, was also very fruitful. So how did the committee manage to scare Meadows into even briefly being willing to cough up evidence like this? It surely did so by talking to all those lower level cooperating witnesses, some of whom must have provided evidence against Meadows, which the committee then used to pressure him into handing over evidence like the PowerPoint document.
This is how these probes work. If you want to succeed, you have to start from the bottom up and gather as much evidence against the higher level people as you can, so when you do make a run at them, you can actually take them down. If you just go after the top dogs first, you’ll swing and miss. Working from the bottom up isn’t guaranteed to work, but it gives you a realistic chance. Working from the top down is guaranteed to fail. This is simply how these kinds of probes work. It’s time for media pundits to acknowledge this, instead of grandstanding by absurdly demanding that the committee go straight for the top dogs.
So what exactly has the January 6th Committee been doing with its time behind the scenes these past few months? It’s confirmed that it’s interviewed hundreds of witnesses and obtained huge amounts of evidence, but what’s come of it? Now, as these things tend to work, we’re getting our answers.
Yesterday the committee revealed that it’s learned of a January 4th White House meeting between Donald Trump and multiple January 6th planners and organizers. This is the kind of meeting that Trump and his closest people were certainly hoping would never come to light. But through its due diligence of interviewing witness after cooperating witness, the committee unearthed the meeting, learned who all was in attendance, and is going after them. These are people who, if pushed into flipping, can give up Trump directly.
This week we also learned that while Mark Meadows was cooperating with the committee, he was the one who turned over the PowerPoint presentation that incriminates the Trump White House. This means that Meadows’ cooperation, while very brief, was also very fruitful. So how did the committee manage to scare Meadows into even briefly being willing to cough up evidence like this? It surely did so by talking to all those lower level cooperating witnesses, some of whom must have provided evidence against Meadows, which the committee then used to pressure him into handing over evidence like the PowerPoint document.
This is how these probes work. If you want to succeed, you have to start from the bottom up and gather as much evidence against the higher level people as you can, so when you do make a run at them, you can actually take them down. If you just go after the top dogs first, you’ll swing and miss. Working from the bottom up isn’t guaranteed to work, but it gives you a realistic chance. Working from the top down is guaranteed to fail. This is simply how these kinds of probes work. It’s time for media pundits to acknowledge this, instead of grandstanding by absurdly demanding that the committee go straight for the top dogs.
dude has some serious balls
https://trumpfile.org/folders/russia/
In a phone call with The Guardian, former KGB spy Yuri Shvets claims that Donald Trump began operating as a Russian asset over 40 years ago.
The interview with Shvets is promotion for a new book by Craig Unger, American Kompromat. Shvets is one of Unger’s sources in the book. Trump File has obtained a copy and will add pertinent information to the site in coming weeks.
In the meantime, here’s what we know from The Guardian:
According to Shvets, Trump first appeared on the Russians’ radar in 1977 when he married his first wife, Ivana. We already knew that Czechoslovakia’s intelligence agency was spying on Trump at that time. Shvets reveals that the Czech operation was coordinated with the KGB.
In 1980, Trump bought 200 television sets for the Grand Hyatt New York hotel. The store he bought them from, Joy-Lud electronics on Fifth Avenue, was controlled by the KGB. The store co-owner, Semyon Kislin, allegedly worked as a “spotter agent” and identified Trump as a possible asset.
When Donald and Ivana visited Moscow and St. Petersburg in 1987, Trump was “fed KGB talking points and flattered by KGB operatives who floated the idea that he should go into politics.” That’s when he was hooked. For the KGB, it was a charm offensive. They had collected a lot of information on his personality so they knew who he was personally. The feeling was that he was extremely vulnerable intellectually, and psychologically, and he was prone to flattery. This is what they exploited. They played the game as if they were immensely impressed by his personality and believed this is the guy who should be the president of the United States one day: it is people like him who could change the world. They fed him these so-called active measures soundbites and it happened. So it was a big achievement for the KGB active measures at the time. Yuri Shvets, The Guardian
External Source
The Guardian
https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news...er-kgb-spy-new-book?__twitter_impression=true
... and yet still Trumpers say he is the best-est, most smart-est prezeedent ever
WTF? 
Last edited:
... and yet still Trumpers say he is the best-est, most smart-est prezeedent ever
The only person who has more disdain for Trump supporters than people who oppose Trump, is Trump himself.
Source : https://www.rawstory.com/trump-fundraising-2656933151/
Similar threads
