It was crazy, even after the game he was still talking about that one touchdown.
Dude took three steps and dove, it can’t be anything other than a touchdown!
The NFL needed the Eagles to win.
- Thread starter yeahman727
- Start date
-
- Tags
- kaepernick nfl super bowl superbowl
It was crazy, even after the game he was still talking about that one touchdown.
Dude took three steps and dove, it can’t be anything other than a touchdown!
Bitch nigga it was the 2004 seasonalternative facts...
or did you mean colonial times Philly vs. Boston in 1804 ??
CAN YOU READ???
In 2004 Patriots beat Panthers.
I guess you'll double-down on stupid by saying the Panthers were in the NFC East then.
GTFOH~
Who are the people who would've stopped watching? Certainly not anyone on this board lol
Oh my bad. Yep I remember. Donovan throwing up like Willie Beamen and shit
You dumb ass nigga you don't see 2004 season and the original argument was that Tom Brady was 0-3 against the NFC East when he clearly beat the Eagles.
I’m dyyyyyi
0-3 vs. NFC East IN THE SUPER BOWL!!!
WHY THE FUCK WOULD BRADY'S REGULAR SEASON RECORD BE PART OF ANY DISCUSSION
THE DAY AFTER THE SUPER BOWL???!
EAT A DICK, alexw!!!
I never respond to idiocy in this way but you're SO WRONG I gotta stoop to your level!
Superbowl 39, the pats cheated, I mean beat the eagles. They are 1-3 against the NFC east in the Superbowl. Their one win being against Philly. 2 losses to the Giants and last night.
I think that's what @alexw is referring to.
Bruh, Pats beat the Eagles in the super bowl, when T.O. played with a bum ankle
~thanx! TimRock & TimDawg187
I stand corrected.
I went by the year he posted; shoulda known better than trust Devin Nunez...
Sports are overpriced. You need to spend hundreds of dollars a month in many cases just to watch your team play. The people who really love it can't afford it and the people who can afford it really don't love it. Yes, the Superbowl is the most watched event on TV in the US, but ad revenues have doubled in 10 years while the number of viewers has not.
That is not a sustainable model. Having migrated to UK from US I thought I should try the English Premier League but they are not better, they have the exact same issue. I love EPL and Arsenal, in particular, but living in London I couldn't see myself shelling out £120 a month to watch Arsenal take the piss 4 times a month on 3 different channels. And don't get me started on attending an actual game.
NFL will run you $100 for a ticket in the top corner, then $40 for parking, $15 for a 12oz beer. Quadruple that if you are naive enough to bring your family to the game. So what, I can sit in the sun and watch through my binoculars? The people and culture that made these sports popular mass market events have been priced out.
Now the stadium is full of NYT readers who are on their phone for half the match, golf clapping at random intervals along with the rest of the crowd. It's not even competitive in many cases.
That is not a sustainable model. Having migrated to UK from US I thought I should try the English Premier League but they are not better, they have the exact same issue. I love EPL and Arsenal, in particular, but living in London I couldn't see myself shelling out £120 a month to watch Arsenal take the piss 4 times a month on 3 different channels. And don't get me started on attending an actual game.
NFL will run you $100 for a ticket in the top corner, then $40 for parking, $15 for a 12oz beer. Quadruple that if you are naive enough to bring your family to the game. So what, I can sit in the sun and watch through my binoculars? The people and culture that made these sports popular mass market events have been priced out.
Now the stadium is full of NYT readers who are on their phone for half the match, golf clapping at random intervals along with the rest of the crowd. It's not even competitive in many cases.
I 1000% agree. Superb observation(s).
Shut yo dumb ass up bitch nigga~thanx! TimRock & TimDawg187
I stand corrected.
I went by the year he posted; shoulda known better than trust Devin Nunez...
I have no problem admitting when I'm wrong.
But I'll also point out why.
ALWAYS consider the sources.
OK, Nunez Jr.?
i told you it was the 2004 season but if you want to play semantics it was the 05 superbowl
i told you who they beat
you couldve googled the shit
you had the nerve to mention idiocy
so are you slow or just stupid?
I'm happy the Patriots lost but can
someone explain this to me? Why would the coach bench a key player who participated in most of the season? It's
more like the NFL wanted the Patriots to lose.
Bill Belichick’s decision to bench Malcolm Butler cost the Patriots another Super Bowl title
MANISH MEHTAFEB 5, 2018 8:00 PM
Bill Belichick has put opposing coaches in a trance for the better part of four decades, paralyzing them with his genius, but the Dark Lord of football’s Evil Empire finally met a formidable foil that cost him the biggest prize of them all: Bill Belichick.
Belichick out-smarted himself with his unorthodox decision to bench cornerback Malcolm Butler that cost the Patriots a sixth Super Bowl title.
The Hoodie typically outwits, out-coaches and outlasts opponents with frightening precision, but his curious choice to sit the guy who had played more defensive snaps than anyone on his roster this season (97.8 percent, in case you were wondering) loomed large in New England’s 41-33 loss to the Eagles Sunday night.
It seemingly made absolutely no sense, fueling speculation about the real reason for Butler’s benching. Belichick maintained that the nobody-turned-Super Bowl hero three years ago was not marginalized for disciplinary reasons.
“I respect Malcolm’s competitiveness and I am sure that he felt like he could have helped,” Belichick said Monday after Philly carved up the Patriots for 373 passing yards and four touchdowns. “I am sure other players felt the same way, but in the end, we have to make the decisions that we feel are best for the football team and that is what we did… that is what I did. That’s really all I can say about it.”
(Full Article)
https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...-butler-cost-patriots-title-article-1.3800804
someone explain this to me? Why would the coach bench a key player who participated in most of the season? It's
more like the NFL wanted the Patriots to lose.
Bill Belichick’s decision to bench Malcolm Butler cost the Patriots another Super Bowl title
MANISH MEHTAFEB 5, 2018 8:00 PM
Bill Belichick has put opposing coaches in a trance for the better part of four decades, paralyzing them with his genius, but the Dark Lord of football’s Evil Empire finally met a formidable foil that cost him the biggest prize of them all: Bill Belichick.
Belichick out-smarted himself with his unorthodox decision to bench cornerback Malcolm Butler that cost the Patriots a sixth Super Bowl title.
The Hoodie typically outwits, out-coaches and outlasts opponents with frightening precision, but his curious choice to sit the guy who had played more defensive snaps than anyone on his roster this season (97.8 percent, in case you were wondering) loomed large in New England’s 41-33 loss to the Eagles Sunday night.
It seemingly made absolutely no sense, fueling speculation about the real reason for Butler’s benching. Belichick maintained that the nobody-turned-Super Bowl hero three years ago was not marginalized for disciplinary reasons.
“I respect Malcolm’s competitiveness and I am sure that he felt like he could have helped,” Belichick said Monday after Philly carved up the Patriots for 373 passing yards and four touchdowns. “I am sure other players felt the same way, but in the end, we have to make the decisions that we feel are best for the football team and that is what we did… that is what I did. That’s really all I can say about it.”
(Full Article)
https://www.google.com/amp/www.nyda...-butler-cost-patriots-title-article-1.3800804
Last edited:
[QUOTE="alexw, post: 18680948, member: 1205"]i told you it was the 2004 season but if you want to play semantics it was the 05 superbowl
i told you who they beat
you couldve googled the shit
you had the nerve to mention idiocy
so are you slow or just stupid?[/QUOTE]
no, I actually thought you were someone who knew WTF you were talking about.
I wasn't out to prove you wrong; just following the evidence presented.
let's see ; google 2004 super bowl...
we got a fukkin' Devin Nunez outbreak on the board! BAD INTEL spreading like the flu!
I admitted I was wrong when presented the CORRECT info.
It takes a man to do that, but you don't know about that I guess.
carry on. continue to be the last word gettin' bitch - the 3rd I had fun with today!
you another fool who had lumpy oatmeal for breakfast today?
try Cream of Wheat tomorrow, O.K.?
i told you who they beat
you couldve googled the shit
you had the nerve to mention idiocy
so are you slow or just stupid?[/QUOTE]
no, I actually thought you were someone who knew WTF you were talking about.
I wasn't out to prove you wrong; just following the evidence presented.
let's see ; google 2004 super bowl...
we got a fukkin' Devin Nunez outbreak on the board! BAD INTEL spreading like the flu!
I admitted I was wrong when presented the CORRECT info.
It takes a man to do that, but you don't know about that I guess.
carry on. continue to be the last word gettin' bitch - the 3rd I had fun with today!
you another fool who had lumpy oatmeal for breakfast today?
try Cream of Wheat tomorrow, O.K.?
Last edited:
The year was 2005 but it was the O4 season they beat the panthers in the 03 seasons super bowl remember them cheating fuckers went back to back
Malcolm Butler wasn't gonna do shit. He was on the other end of the stupidest play call in Super Bowl history. The Pats defense been ass all season and the Eagles defense showed up big when it counted it. On the last Pats drive they let the Pats oline hold the shit out of the Eagles dline.
this retard is still doubling down on stupid
you clearly rode the short bus and im serious
you cant even quote shit correctly and that just takes the click of one button
niggas are slow as fuck today
YOU typed 2004 -so sure of your facts.
QUOTE this Devin:
and YOU get crickets today too!
BYE BITCH!
He was annoying me
Dude seemed upset when the calls weren't going the Trumps way.
and the Brady shit the whole game
That shit was just indicative that the bum ass patriots need the refs to win...
Let teams play and those fuck boys lose every fuckin time.. You could see the Patriots was getting flustered because the refs weren’t reversing those calls and the eagles defense wasn’t getting penalizing to death..
But why didn't he play ? He played throughout the season. Malcolm's back up was shocked that he got the call to start.Every team expects who they consider their best players to start so why not him? Even if your defense is half ass Malcolm have SuperBowl experience.
Last edited:
Similar threads
