does that proof you speak of have been replicated by self? Or have you just blindly believed said information with your own free will thinking?It's already been proved
does that proof you speak of have been replicated by self? Or have you just blindly believed said information with your own free will thinking?It's already been proved
why do we see the moon in phases?There is a difference between being round vs. sphere. The flat earth itself is theorized to be round, but just flat.
I don't know. I don't know if we are on an infinite plane or if we are floating in "space". Personally I lean towards there being no such thing as space.
does that proof you speak of have been replicated by self? Or have you just blindly believed said information with your own free will thinking?
Organic matter cannot go thru the Van Allen belt. We have never left this plane(et), which means small portion of a "plane".
You dumb as fuck bruh
You might be the dumbest one yet
10 pages.
But damn, a 1-hour video? OP, we need cliff notes so we can debate civilly.
someone telling me something is fact just to turn around and tell me "I just know it" when questioned with nothing to back up what he claimed..... No matter WHAT it is.... Is childish. Don't quote me in shit until you realized that.I know it is.
And I don't blindly believe anything.
You shole do avoid my questionsSee, you haven't stated you believe the earth is flat and I respect you if you don't.
But you see how even though you're just trying to be accurate in your analysis how hard it is to maintain pinning down a basic idea, even though you're likely on the same side??
Now he's calling you a flat earther, rather than staying focused in the chain of logic.
See this is the bullshit I'm talking about. You use stars to prove your point but they disprove your fucking point.
Stand in your yard and spin in a circle. Can't see your house when your back is to it but if you look up you can see the clouds the entire time, can't you?
Why do you see different stars in Australia?
Yall don't even bother to think this shit through and steady be accusing everybody else of not thinking.
This is where this gets exhausting, because you keep exposing your lack of understanding of the very things you use as the pillars of your argument.
If you know what the equation is to measure density, then you should realize that it is not the same equation used to measure weight.
What is a scale measuring when you sit something on it? Because it is not measuring density. This is proved by the very definition you posted, as the physical mechanism of scales do not measure what you posted as density.
So again, what is weight? What is a scale actually measuring?
why do we see the moon in phases?
how do we experience days and nights? why do we have seasons? why are days, nights and seasons different depending on your location?
nah...You ever played baseball? 1st base, 2nd base, 3rd and back home?
See, again, you just using words you heard but don't understand. That's irresponsible at best, homie.Weight is the equivalent of buoyant force. Gravity is simply density.
someone telling me something is fact just to turn around and tell me "I just know it" when questioned with nothing to back up what he claimed..... No matter WHAT it is.... Is childish. Don't quote me in shit until you realized that.
This dude said “twinkling energy particles that you call stars...”
Man I can’t even take a day trip with my girl without BGOL foolishness going down.
Hilarious
It's absurd
These niggas is wilding man. Bouyancy. Bouyancy.
I wanna find a flat earther with a science degree.
Dammit manbuoyancy but don't believe in gravity.
![]()
And he can't take gravity out the equation because that would become mass
![]()
Dammit man
Stealing my gotcha moments
The nigga is tryna explain how a car works by disproving the existence of engines lol
My bad but that was too good.
These niggas is wilding man. Bouyancy. Bouyancy.
I wanna find a flat earther with a science degree.
@cashwhisperer bout to slip out the side door again lol
nah...
![]()
@cashwhisperer bout to slip out the side door again lol
See, again, you just using words you heard but don't understand. That's irresponsible at best, homie.
You can't possibly understand bouyant force to make this statement.
My bad but that was too good.
Should we use old world technology to give you your much needed cat scan?Disprove the info then. After looking at an "old world map"
You guys are comedians. You criticize with no scientific proof.
Nigga
You dumb
What is north? Why do compasses only point toward the north pole?
I'm gonna nail down this bouyancy/density shit once and for all so y'all can shut up. Gimme a minute. Bout to go down.
OH SHIT... NASA is fucking TROLLING the Flat Earthers..
Look at that glorious CURVE
See Astonishing Images of the California Wildfires From Space
By JEFFREY KLUGER and JOSH RAAB
December 8, 2017
The high ground of space often makes the Earth’s grandest features shrink to invisibility. You can’t really see the great Wall of China from orbit—at least not with the unaided eye. You certainly can’t see Hoover Dam or the Empire State Building or Beijing’s sprawling Forbidden City. But you can see nature—both at its magnificent best and its terrifying worst.
That’s the case with the wildfires that are currently blowtorching their way through southern California. The Ventura County fire is now twice the size of Washington, D.C. Nearly 23,000 homes and businesses are threatened and 260,000 people have been evacuated—the equivalent of the population of St. Petersburg, Fla. A decade of drought and powerful Santa Ana winds are being blamed for the disaster.
Multiple satellites, along with astronauts aboard the International Space Station, have been monitoring the hellscape below from the cold and quiet of space. Here are just a few of the images they’ve returned.
Tuesday, Dec. 5
![]()
Joshua Stevens—NASA images modified using Copernicus Sentinel data processed by ESA
The European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellite captured the visible, shortwave infrared, and near infrared light for an image of the burn scar in Ventura County, California. Active fires appear orange; the burn scar is brown. Unburned vegetation is green; developed areas are gray. Powerful winds fanned the flames. A prolonged spell of dry weather also primed the area for major fires. This week’s winds follow nine of the driest consecutive months in southern California history.
Tuesday, Dec. 5
![]()
Adam Voiland—Suomi NPP - VIIRS
The Suomi NPP satellite captured this nighttime image of the fire Ventura fire. After burning for roughly one day, the blaze had charred 50,000 acres (20,000 hectares), destroyed at least 150 structures, and forced more than 27,000 people to evacuate. The fire was imaged by a “day-night band” in the satellite’s optics that detects light in a range of wavelengths from green to near-infrared and uses light intensification to detect dim signals.
Wednesday, Dec. 6
![]()
Expedition 53 Commander Randy Bresnik—ISS
Expedition 53 Commander Randy Bresnik aboard the International Space Station took this photo of the California wildfires in the Los Angeles area on Dec. 6, 2017.
Thursday, Dec. 7
![]()
Nasa/Planet Pix/ZUMA Wire
Smoke from massive fires burning across southern California seen from the International Space Station. The Thomas fire carved a path of destruction from the Pacific Ocean to 10 miles inland south along the coast, forcing mandatory evacuations for tens of thousands of residents.
Thursday, Dec. 7
![]()
Jeff Schmaltz—LANCE/EOSDIS MODIS/GSFC/NASA
NASA’s Terra satellite collected this natural-color image of the California wildfires. Actively burning areas are outlined in red. Each hot spot is an area where the satellite’s thermal detectors recognized temperatures higher than background. When the picture was taken, none of the fires was even 15 percent contained.
http://time.com/5056165/california-wildfires-space/
But you know... CGI!!!