The FBI just raided Mar-A-Lago


I swear watching white people burn down America is so much fun. Black people will survive because we always do

But this fuck shit is funny.

So many white people worship this mother fucker, and why?

He's not smart.

He's not wise.

He's not strong.

And until his presidency he wasn't even really rich, he was like a dude gambling in Vegas whose markers haven't been called in. Just because he has the dice still in his hand doesn't make him a winner.

I personally wonder if he or his minions sat down with all the Republicans in the House and Senate with dirt on each one of them and dared them to speak up against him.

That's what I would have done if I were him. Republican politicians fear Him and fear pissing off the millions of followers this dumbass has.

For me, he can't die soon enough.
 

Let's poke another hole in this. He said none of his staff or lawyers were allowed in while the fbi was there, but his lawyers are claiming the documents were secured. How did they get the documents if no one was there to unlock some biometric, 7 bolt, bank vault door that lead to a room that housed the documents? It sounds like they walked into a room and the documents were sitting around like magazines at a doctor's office.
 
I think it's fair to say Trump has ruined the traditional Republican Party. In the last 6 years we've witnessed some of the craziest theories, non-facts, projections, and idol worshipping than ever before. Don't ever doubt the power of certain individual to carry some people along in creating a new sets of beliefs. Even with all these incriminating evidence, some people are willing to bend the truth.

 
Let's poke another hole in this. He said none of his staff or lawyers were allowed in while the fbi was there, but his lawyers are claiming the documents were secured. How did they get the documents if no one was there to unlock some biometric, 7 bolt, bank vault door that lead to a room that housed the documents? It sounds like they walked into a room and the documents were sitting around like magazines at a doctor's office.
some were hidden inside of magazines
 
Let's poke another hole in this. He said none of his staff or lawyers were allowed in while the fbi was there, but his lawyers are claiming the documents were secured. How did they get the documents if no one was there to unlock some biometric, 7 bolt, bank vault door that lead to a room that housed the documents? It sounds like they walked into a room and the documents were sitting around like magazines at a doctor's office.
:lol:
 
I think it's fair to say Trump has ruined the traditional Republican Party. In the last 6 years we've witnessed some of the craziest theories, non-facts, projections, and idol worshipping than ever before. Don't ever doubt the power of certain individual to carry some people along in creating a new sets of beliefs. Even with all these incriminating evidence, some people are willing to bend the truth.


:roflmao:
Them lincoln project cacs are somethin else.
 
I proved it by his record. It shows a consistency to side with Democratic issues. The JCS has already confirmed this. I don't need a piece of paper saying he's a Democrat to know he will side with their issues.
oh my. most folks dont know what liberal, moderate and conservative pertains to.

being a constitutional liberal, moderate or conservative DOES NOT prove a judge's political party. hell, Antonin Scalia had very impactful liberal moments. those cases might have had more impact on our society than all his constitutionally conservative rulings in total.

when it comes to federal criminal cases Garland has been strictly conservative, which is why liberal democrats were belly aching at Obama about him being nominated.

as for your not needing a piece of paper, sir, thats called evidence. you absolutely need evidence to prove a point.

without concrete evidence all we can do is speculate. youre entitled to your opinion, but your opinion isnt fact.
 
oh my. most folks dont know what liberal, moderate and conservative pertains to.

being a constitutional liberal, moderate or conservative DOES NOT prove a judge's political party. hell, Antonin Scalia had very impactful liberal moments. those cases might have had more impact on our society than all his constitutionally conservative rulings in total.

when it comes to federal criminal cases Garland has been strictly conservative, which is why liberal democrats were belly aching at Obama about him being nominated.

as for your not needing a piece of paper, sir, thats called evidence. you absolutely need evidence to prove a point.

without concrete evidence all we can do is speculate. youre entitled to your opinion, but your opinion isnt fact.
Real shit... and totally off topic but how are you so religious? This flies in the face or your faith, but I totally agree. Don't worry I don't expect a sincere reply. I've got demons I don't like wrestling with either.
 
oh my. most folks dont know what liberal, moderate and conservative pertains to.

being a constitutional liberal, moderate or conservative DOES NOT prove a judge's political party. hell, Antonin Scalia had very impactful liberal moments. those cases might have had more impact on our society than all his constitutionally conservative rulings in total.

when it comes to federal criminal cases Garland has been strictly conservative, which is why liberal democrats were belly aching at Obama about him being nominated.

as for your not needing a piece of paper, sir, thats called evidence. you absolutely need evidence to prove a point.

without concrete evidence all we can do is speculate. youre entitled to your opinion, but your opinion isnt fact.
i showed you an article to show you that wasn't true, democrats were not belly aching, and they all wanted him in. so stop the lies.

supreme court is about idealogy not criminal punishment.

and sir, you don't need a piece of paper for evidence. I don't know what court system you went to but you can convict someone based the evidence provided which is his record.

If anything, this proves my point even more. If Garland is conservative criminally as you say, and he skates on this, then he is weak. More reason he should indict.
 
I proved it by his record. It shows a consistency to side with Democratic issues. The JCS has already confirmed this. I don't need a piece of paper saying he's a Democrat to know he will side with their issues.
oh my. most folks dont know what liberal, moderate and conservative pertains to.

being a constitutional liberal, moderate or conservative DOES NOT prove a judge's political party. hell, Antonin Scalia had very impactful liberal moments. those cases might have had more impact on our society than all his constitutionally conservative rulings in total.

when it comes to federal criminal cases Garland has been strictly conservative, which is why liberal democrats were belly aching at Obama about him being nominated.

as for your not needing a piece of paper, sir, thats called evidence. you absolutely need evidence to prove a point.

without concrete evidence all we can do is speculate. youre entitled to your opinion, but your opinion isnt fact.
243059868_6402511313155954_7622484256571714820_n.png
 
i showed you an article to show you that wasn't true, democrats were not belly aching, and they all wanted him in. so stop the lies.

supreme court is about idealogy not criminal punishment.

and sir, you don't need a piece of paper for evidence. I don't know what court system you went to but you can convict someone based the evidence provided which is his record.

If anything, this proves my point even more. If Garland is conservative criminally as you say, and he skates on this, then he is weak. More reason he should indict.
people have varying opinions. i also showed you an article where liberal democrats were upset with Garland's nomination. but you didnt read it, and are calling me a liar...which makes YOU a liar.

and this is not a court of law. there are no judges nor jury. you cannot SAY something is true based on opinion alone.

reality is, if his sister cant prove it, you certainly cant prove Merrick Garland is a democrat.

why cant you admit that?
 
Last edited:
To point out the level of stupidity of Trump.

He was POTUS for 4 years. Had access to all classified information and documents.

Because he is a ignorant moron, his immediate impulse is to grab documents on US Nuclear secrets and dirt on French President Marcon.

Yes, it’s information that is valuable….but if you got that type of access….Get The Shit Mofo’s Want To See!!!!

Grab the files on Extraterrestrial existence including Roswell and whatever information there is of the Government making contact with Aliens.

Grab the files providing proof of US Government operations on the Moon, Mars or secret Space Stations out there.

Grab the files that prove the Government knows what actually is at the bottom of the oceans and who/what is down there.

Grab the files on why a section of the Grand Canyon is off limits to the general public.

Grab the files that prove if there actually is Gold in Ft. Knox. And if there is no Gold, grab the files on where that Gold went.

Grab the files on what actually they are doing down in Antarctica.

This dumb fuck grabs files the average person don’t gives two fucks about.

HaHa!!! :cool:
 
people have varying opinions. i also showed you an article where liberal democrats were upset with Garland's nomination. but you didnt read it, and are calling me a liar...which makes YOU a liar.

and this is not a court of law. there are no judges nor jury. you cannot SAY something is true based on opinion alone.

reality is, if his sister cant prove it, you certainly cant prove Merrick Garland is a democrat.

why cant you admit that?
you are a liar that you framed as if their "concerns" was enough for them to change their vote. it wasn't. because at the end of the day, they knew he had a liberal bias.

there is no court here so I don't have to show you anything to prove anything. His record speaks for itself. If you want to ignore it and pretend like he wasn't chosen because of his liberal bias, you are free to be delusional. But Democrats wanted him and Barack and Clinton, and Biden.. Republicans didn't. It's kind of obvious he's not a Republican.

whatever his sister is relevant as she said what she needed to say so that he can be hired. that's irrelevant. my siblings don't know my political preference either. has nothing to do with nothing.
 
you are a liar that you framed as if their "concerns" was enough for them to change their vote. it wasn't. because at the end of the day, they knew he had a liberal bias.

you do not KNOW for certain what anyone is thinking. you can only speculate.

whatever his sister is relevant as she said what she needed to say so that he can be hired. that's irrelevant.
sir, you do not know this to be true. this is your opinion.

you do not know for certain ANYTHING about this man's political affiliation.

why cant you admit this?
 
you do not KNOW for certain what anyone is thinking. you can only speculate.


sir, you do not know this to be true. this is your opinion.

you do not know for certain ANYTHING about this man's political affiliation.

why cant you admit this?
their vote is enough. I don't need to know what they think.

I don't need to see a voter registration card. His record shows he sides with democrats. Democrats continue to hire him. That's all I need to know.
 
Back
Top