The color of health: Racial disparities abound

  • Thread starter Thread starter tehuti
  • Start date Start date
T

tehuti

Guest
CDC finds gaping racial disparities in health

Government report confirms sobering trend seen across nation

ATLANTA - Black people in the United States are far more likely than whites to die from strokes, diabetes and other diseases, according to a federal study that shows wide racial disparities persist in health care.

The finding, released Thursday in a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, confirms a sobering decade-long trend seen by public health officials throughout the nation.

U.S. researchers have been warning that high-fat diets, smoking and poor access to quality health care were leading to gaping racial disparities in the rates for heart disease, stroke and cancer.

In its report, the CDC revealed that the number of potential years of life lost in 2002 due to strokes, diabetes and perinatal diseases was three times higher for black Americans under 75 than for whites of the same age.

That gap increased to about 11 times for AIDS and nine times for homicide, the CDC said. African-Americans also had substantially higher rates of some types of cancer in 2001, including stomach and colon/rectal cancer.

The CDC also noted black Americans were less likely to have health insurance, get vaccinated for influenza and pneumococcal disease, receive prenatal care in the first trimester and engage in regular moderate physical activity in adulthood.

Fewer resources, poorer care
“Insufficient resources at the community level and unequal use of effective interventions maintain the black-white gap in avoidable illness, injury and premature death,” said Dr. Ben Truman of the CDC’s office of minority health.

An estimated 35 million black people live in the United States, or 13 percent of the population, Census figures show.

Separate but related CDC studies released Thursday found that blacks suffer higher rates of hypertension and appear to have a greater likelihood of getting gonorrhea, chlamydia and a number of other reportable infectious diseases.

They also report greater disability after a stroke. Strokes, which occur when blood supply to the brain is suddenly cut, are the third-leading cause of death in the nation after heart disease and cancer and a major cause of disability.

High blood pressure and cholesterol, diabetes and smoking are major risk factors.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6823541/
 
Did you hear the latest GW town hall fuckup? He admits the society is against black men and kills us
 
Blacks Get Less Aggressive Heart Attack Treatment

Blacks Get Less Aggressive Heart Attack Treatment
Fri Mar 11,10:34 AM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - The gap is narrowing, but African Americans who suffer a heart attack are still getting less aggressive treatment compared with whites, according to a new study.

In an analysis of hospital discharge records in 23 states, researchers found that black patients hospitalized for a heart attack were 13 percent less likely than white patients to have received an invasive procedure to open up blocked heart arteries.

The data, which covered the years 1995 through 2001, revealed a smaller treatment gap between white and black patients than studies had found in the 1980s and early 90s. However, racial disparities persist, and the reasons are still uncertain, the study authors report in the Journal of the National Medical Association.

"There is still work to be done to understand why this disparity exists," lead author Dr. Alain G. Bertoni, of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, said in a statement.

Differences in illness severity, as well as patient preferences, may help explain the racial gap, according to Bertoni. However, he and his colleagues note in the report, studies have also suggested that doctors refer women and minorities for heart catheterization less often.

Cardiac catheterization involves inserting a thin tube through an artery, usually in the groin, and snaking it up to the arteries supplying the heart. This allows doctors to view the heart and coronary arteries on a screen, and it is often used as a diagnostic procedure.

When a patient has just had a heart attack, however, doctors may also perform angioplasty -- in which a balloon inserted into a special catheter is inflated in order to push fatty deposits aside and clear a wider path for blood flow. Then, doctors may implant mesh tubes called stents, which help keep diseased blood vessels propped open.

In the current study, patients whose records stated that they had had angioplasty or stenting were considered to have had cardiac catheterization.

Overall, Bertoni's team found, 58 percent of white patients received catheterization, versus 50 percent of black patients and 55 percent of Hispanic patients.

When the researchers weighed other factors -- such as age and co-existing health conditions that could make catheterization risky -- black men and women were still 13 percent less likely than white patients to have the procedure.

In contrast, the disparity between Hispanic and white patients was less significant and faded over time -- with the rate of catheterization among Latinos nearing that of whites after 1999, according to the report.

Finding out why racial disparities in heart attack treatment persist will be increasingly important as the U.S. population ages and grows more ethnically diverse, Bertoni and his colleagues write.

In their study, differences in insurance coverage and hospital characteristics did not explain the racial gap, nor did measures of overall health -- though, the researchers note, they were not able to account for all the health factors that could have swayed decisions on catheterization.

According to Bertoni, increasing African Americans' awareness of their heart attack treatment options could further close the racial gap.

"If African-American patients are more informed," he said, "they can have improved dialogue with the medical team deciding how to care for them."

SOURCE: Journal of the National Medical Association, March 2005.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...&u=/nm/20050311/hl_nm/heartattack_blacks_dc_1
 
Blacks hardest hit by HIV in US - report

Blacks hardest hit by HIV in US - report

By Paul Simao 17 minutes ago

ATLANTA (Reuters) - Blacks account for nearly half of the more than 1 million Americans with HIV, according to federal data released on Monday that suggests the battlelines of the nation's AIDS epidemic are marked as much by race as by sexual preference.

An estimated 1,039,000 to 1,185,000 Americans were living with HIV at the end of 2003, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said at the 2005 National HIV Prevention Conference in Atlanta.

Forty-seven percent were black, a disproportionate figure considering that blacks make up about 13 percent of the U.S. population. Whites accounted for 34 percent of the HIV-positive population and Hispanics 17 percent.

Gay and bisexual men made up 45 percent of the total.

"The HIV epidemic, initially most prominent among white gay men, has expanded to affect a wide range of populations, with African-Americans now most severely impacted," Dr. Ron Valdiserri, deputy director of the CDC's HIV, STD and TB prevention programs, told reporters in a conference call.

In a separate analysis of 1,767 men who have sex with men, CDC researchers found that 46 percent of blacks were infected. That compared to 21 percent of whites in the group and 17 percent of the Hispanics, according to the study, which was carried out in five U.S. cities and presented at the conference.

MOST UNAWARE

The researchers also discovered that 67 percent of the black men in the group did not know they were infected before participating in the study, more than three times the percentage of whites who were unaware.

Valdiserri said providing gay and bisexual black men and other high-risk subgroups with testing and prevention services was a key step to halting the spread of HIV.

AIDS, which destroys the immune system and leaves victims vulnerable to opportunistic infections and cancers, has killed about a half million Americans and at least 22 million people worldwide since 1981.

Health experts have been warning of a possible resurgence of the epidemic, which eased in the early 1990s following the development of antiretroviral drugs targeting the disease.

Since the late 1990s, when U.S. deaths from AIDS stabilized at 16,000 per year and new HIV infections stabilized at 40,000 per year, the disease has shown signs of a comeback among gay and bisexual men and intravenous drug users.

The CDC, however, said it was possible that the make-up of the HIV positive population would shift in coming years to reflect a higher proportion of infections among blacks, women and individuals infected by high-risk heterosexual contact.

To combat the changing scope of HIV, the U.S. government is emphasizing programs that focus on testing and counseling people who are already infected.

AIDS activists, however, attack the approach, which was introduced two years ago, because they believe it leads to reduced funding for programs that emphasize condom use and other safe-sex practices for uninfected people.

The government recommends that pregnant women, intravenous-drug users and anyone who engages in unsafe sex receive routine HIV testing.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050613...btZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 
U.S. failing to meet infant mortality goals

U.S. failing to meet infant mortality goals
States unlikely to reach 2010 target, CDC report says

ATLANTA - The infant mortality rate will have to drop 36 percent overall and even more in the black and Native American communities for the United States to meet a key 2010 health target, federal health officials said Thursday.

In a sobering study published in its weekly health report, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention noted that as of 2002 no state had reached the government’s decade-end target of 4.5 infant deaths per 1,000 live births.

Only a handful, mostly those with relatively small numbers of blacks, Hispanics and Native Americans, are within reach, CDC researchers added. The U.S. infant mortality rate was 7 per 1,000 in 2002, the latest year that full data was available.

'Aggressive' action needed
“It’s going to take aggressive public health measures to lower it to that target by the end of the decade,” said T.J. Mathews, a CDC demographer and lead author of the study.

Besides improving access to the health care system and reemphasizing the importance of prenatal care, the CDC study suggested the United States could not address infant mortality as long as gaping racial disparities in such deaths persist.

Although infant mortality fell across racial lines during the 1995-2002 period, there was little change in the gaps between the races.

Non-Hispanic blacks accounted for 29 percent of the 225,534 infant deaths reported in the nation between 1995 and 2002, more than double this group’s percentage of the total population, according to the CDC.

Non-Hispanic whites made up about half of the deaths, while Hispanics represented about 16 percent. Asians and Pacific Islanders had a disproportionately low infant mortality rate, while Native Americans had a relatively high one.

Focus on expecting mothers
The study came less than two years after the Atlanta-based CDC reported that infant mortality had risen for the first time in 44 years. Preliminary data for 2003 indicates the 2002 rise may have been an aberration.

Some health experts have urged the United States, which has a higher infant mortality rate than many other Western nations, to allocate more medical resources to prenatal care than to intensive newborn care.

Focusing on the health of expectant mothers could improve the survival rate of infants delivered with low birth weights, one of the risk factors for infant mortality.

Smoking, stress, certain infections and lack of access to prenatal medical care are factors believed to increase the likelihood that an expectant mother will deliver a baby with a low birth weight.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8159952/
 
Racial Gap Shrinks for Some Medical Care

Racial Gap Shrinks for Some Medical Care
By JEFF DONN, Associated Press Writer
33 minutes ago

BOSTON - The health care gap between blacks and whites is closing on many simple, cheap medical treatments, but deeper disparities stubbornly persist for more complex and costly procedures, new research suggests.

The findings from three large federally funded studies indicate it's possible to equalize health care between races, but it won't happen quickly or easily.

"Things that are simpler and less expensive ... are easier fixes," said Dr. Ashish Jha, of the Harvard School of Public Health. He said more progress probably won't happen "by small tinkering with the system."

He led one of the three studies published in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine. The research offers some of the first evidence that racial disparities have narrowed, at least for some patients and treatments.

Since the 1980s, many studies have documented racial gaps in the standard of health care. They are blamed on economic, cultural and even biological differences between races. Blacks have less access to better doctors, hospitals and health plans, studies indicate.

Research also shows that the medical system treats whites and blacks differently, even when they are the same in nearly every way. Examining only those two races, the new studies took into account differences like health plans, hospitals, regions and wealth.

The researchers mostly compared treatment of whites and blacks by assessing how often accepted professional standards were met for each group. In the study finding the most equality, Harvard researchers analyzed records from 1.5 million patients in 183 Medicare managed-care plans between 1997 and 2003.

They found narrowed racial gaps for mammograms and diabetics' eye exams, blood-sugar tests, and testing and control of diabetics' cholesterol. Gaps were also reduced for prescribing beta-blocker heart drugs and cholesterol testing after heart attacks.

The most dramatic improvement came for beta blockers. By the end of the study, 93 percent of blacks met standards, compared to 94 percent of whites — an improvement of 11 percentage points for blacks.

Progress wasn't apparent everywhere, though. Racial disparities widened by three percentage points for both control of diabetics' blood sugar and of heart patients' cholesterol.

The other two studies, led by Harvard and Emory University in Atlanta, show persistent disparities in mostly expensive and elaborate procedures like some blood vessel repairs, heart and back surgeries, and joint replacements.

"The more invasive the procedure was, the more difference we found," said Dr. Viola Vaccarino, who led the Emory study.

By contrast, with a simple treatment like aspirin, blacks and whites were handled similarly.

The studies weren't designed to pinpoint the precise reasons for the gaps or changes over time. However, researchers said more elaborate treatments are harder to improve quickly because they involve multiple steps and resources. They may require coordination between doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies.

"Ordering a test is ... relatively easy, compared to controlling the level of cholesterol," said Dr. Amal Trivedi, lead researcher in the managed-care study. "With cholesterol control, it's quite costly to take regular medicine."

Alan Nelson, a retired doctor who oversaw a congressionally mandated report in 2002 on racial differences in care, agreed that more expensive care may be harder to upgrade quickly. But he said he believes that cost doesn't drive the doctors to handle patients differently.

The managed-care study also suggests that better medicine can close racial gaps, doctors said. The federal government required Medicare managed-care plans to measure and report more on their performance starting in 1997, at the beginning of the study. Care for whites also improved, though not as much as for blacks.

Doctors said treatment can be further equalized with universal insurance coverage, more data on race, more awareness of disparities, and medical improvements like linking doctor and hospital payments to performance.

"No one should fool anyone that this is going to happen overnight ... because the health system is so complex," added Dr. Georges Benjamin, director of the American Public Health Association.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050817...WxI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 
Mood Disorders Often Misdiagnosed in Blacks

Mood Disorders Often Misdiagnosed in Blacks
Fri Aug 26, 7:02 PM ET

FRIDAY, Aug. 26 (HealthDay News) -- Researchers are planning to find out why black Americans seeking help for depression and other mood disorders are often misdiagnosed with schizophrenia.

A team of University of Cincinnati investigators will lead a four-year national study to determine why these misdiagnoses occur and whether they lead to the excessive use of antipsychotic drugs among blacks.

"Research has already shown that African-American patients are being improperly diagnosed, but we need to find out why," said Dr. Stephen Strakowski, the study's lead investigator.

Previous studies have suggested that misdiagnosis occurs when doctors overemphasize certain symptoms often associated with schizophrenia, while overlooking the symptoms of mood disorders.

The researchers will also look into whether Hispanics also experience an excess number of these types of misdiagnoses as well.

The study is funded by a $10 million grant from the National Institute of Mental Health and will include researchers from five other universities across the country.

More information

The National Institute of Mental Health has more about depression.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...hl_hsn/mooddisordersoftenmisdiagnosedinblacks
 
Higher Risk of Lung Cancer Among Blacks Explained

Higher Risk of Lung Cancer Among Blacks Explained
Wed Oct 19, 7:02 PM ET

WEDNESDAY, Oct. 19 (HealthDay News) -- High rates of lung cancer in black Americans may be the result of faulty cell cycle "checkpoints" that don't respond effectively to DNA damage, according to a report in the Oct. 15 issue of Cancer Research.

This study, by researchers at Georgetown University and the U.S. National Cancer Institute, is the first epidemiological study to identify an association between the efficiency of the G2/M checkpoint and lung cancer risk in black Americans.

The investigation, which included 216 lung cancer patients and 340 cancer-free people, found that the G2/M checkpoint was less effective in black lung cancer patients. This association was especially strong in black women. Those with a faulty G2/M checkpoint had nearly five times the risk of lung cancer compared to women with an efficient G2/M checkpoint.

The researchers did not find any association between this checkpoint and lung cancer risk in whites.

"Although the study has limitations, our findings suggest one possible explanation for the higher incidence of lung cancer in African-Americans, who as a group smoke less than whites, yet still develop more lung cancer at comparatively younger ages," study author Dr. Yun-Ling Zheng, an assistant professor in the department of oncology at the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University, said in a prepared statement.

The incidence of lung cancer in black American men was 42 percent higher than in white men, and the risk of lung cancer for black women was 13 percent higher, said a 2002 report by the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program.

"Epidemiologists have long known that cancers are expressed at varying rates in different racial groups, but we are only now able to use advanced research techniques to look at the molecular reasons for these disparities. The value of such research is that it can provide new tools for risk calculation," Zheng said.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=sto...sn/higherriskoflungcanceramongblacksexplained
 
Race and Mental Health in Katrina' Aftermath

Race and Mental Health in Katrina' Aftermath
by Alix Spiegel

Morning Edition, November 18, 2005 · In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, almost half the residents of New Orleans are in need of mental health services. Health experts say African Americans experiencing emotional problems are not likely to seek care. This is the final of four reports in a series on mental health after the storm. 5 min 27 sec

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5018274
 
Blacks Are More Likely to Get Lung Cancer

Blacks Are More Likely to Get Lung Cancer
By ALICIA CHANG, AP Science Writer
2 hours, 57 minutes ago

Blacks who smoke up to a pack a day are far more likely than whites who smoke similar amounts to develop lung cancer, suggesting genes may help explain the racial differences long seen in the disease, researchers say.

The largest study ever done on the subject also found that Hispanic and Asian smokers were less likely than black smokers to develop the disease — at least up to a point. The racial differences disappeared among heavy smokers, or those who puffed more than a pack and a half per day.

Doctors have long known that blacks are substantially more likely than whites to develop lung cancer and more likely to die from it. But the reasons for the disparity are unclear.

Some say the difference is a matter of genetics, while others contend smoking habits may play a role. For example, researchers say blacks tend to puff more deeply than whites, which may expose them to more carcinogens. Smoking rates are also slightly higher among blacks, but whites tend to smoke more cigarettes a day.

In the latest study — published in Thursday's New England Journal of Medicine — researchers compared the lung cancer risk among ethnic groups who smoked the same amount.

While the study did not address the possible reasons for the racial disparity, lead researcher Christopher Haiman, an assistant professor of preventive medicine at the University of Southern California, said the findings suggest genes may be one of the factors that explain the phenomenon.

The study involved more than 180,000 people, more than half of them minorities. Patients filled out questionnaires about their smoking habits, diet and other personal information.

Researchers from USC and University of Hawaii analyzed lung cancer cases over an eight-year period. After adjusting for diet, education and other factors, the researchers found that whites who smoked up to a pack a day had a 43 percent to 55 percent lower risk of lung cancer than blacks who smoked the same amount. Hispanics and Japanese-Americans were 60 percent to 80 percent less likely than blacks to develop the disease.

The study found no difference in lung cancer risk among the various ethnic groups for those who smoked more than three packs a day.

Black, Hispanic and Japanese-American men who never smoked had higher risks of lung cancer than white men, but hardly any difference was seen in women in the same ethnic groups.

According to the American Lung Association, black men are 50 percent more likely to develop lung cancer and 36 percent more likely to die from the disease than white men.

Previous studies have suggested that black smokers tend to absorb more nicotine and tobacco carcinogens than whites, geneticist Neil Risch of the University of California, San Francisco noted in an accompanying editorial.

The effect of race on the risk of disease is controversial, in part because race was used to discriminate in human experiments. Now it is increasingly being exploited in the emerging field of medicine that tailors drugs to a person's genetics. Last year, the Food and Drug Administration approved a heart-failure drug specifically for blacks. Different response rates also have been seen among certain ethnic groups to cancer drugs.

Two other reports in the journal link ethnic groups to increased risks of another disease — Parkinson's.

Researchers found that Eastern European Jews and North Africans of Arab descent were far more likely to have a gene mutation linked to the neurological disease than whites and other ethnic or racial groups.

The studies were separately done by scientists at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City and INSERM, the French equivalent of the National Institutes of Health.

If larger studies confirm the findings, it could lead to the offering of genetic testing to high-risk groups, as is done now for breast cancer gene mutations among Eastern European Jewish women.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060126...mBI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 
Race and Gender May Play a Role in Survival for the Smallest and Youngest Premature

great info, great thread........here's my contribution

WHITE PLAINS, N.Y.,-- Extremely premature baby
girls, especially those who are African American, are much more likely to
survive than extremely premature white boys, according to research published
in the January issue of Pediatrics.
Although the findings are consistent with past research, no one knows
exactly what role race and gender play in the survival rates of the premature
babies born at the currents limits of survival (less than 28 weeks gestation)
with extremely low birthweight (ELBW), said the March of Dimes in commenting
on the report.
"We need to understand what gives African-American baby girls a better
chance of survival at the earliest extreme of viability. If we can understand
the differences in genetic or other influences during gestation between
African-American girls and white boys, maybe we can improve outcomes for all
premature babies, regardless of their race or gender," said Nancy Green, MD,
medical director of the March of Dimes. "That's why the March of Dimes
continues to support research on the causes of prematurity."
Additional time in the womb can improve the chances of survival for all
premature babies, regardless of race or gender, Dr. Green said. The study in
Pediatrics found that for extremely premature infants, as gestational age and
birth weight increase, so did the chances of survival.
Some 12.5 percent of all babies -- about 508,000 -- were born prematurely
in 2004, according to the latest government statistics. About 1 percent of
these babies are considered ELBW.
In this study, 11 percent of babies born at 22 weeks gestation or less
survived, compared to 27 percent at 23 weeks gestation. Survival rates reached
85 percent at 28 weeks gestation. Also, about 60 percent of the ELBW babies,
those that weighed two pounds or less, survived.
The study also found that extremely premature baby girls were 1.7 times
more likely to survive than baby boys. However, African-American baby girls
were 2.1 times as likely to survive as white boys. The study only reported on
infant mortality. Quality of life or other outcomes, such as complications of
the developing brain or lungs, were not assessed.
The study, led by Steven B. Morse, MD, MPH, of the University of Florida,
looked at the one-year survival rate of 5,076 ELBW babies born in Florida
between 1996 and 2000. "Racial and Gender Differences in the Viability of
Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Population-Based Study," appeared in the
January issue of Pediatrics, volume 117, number 1.

The March of Dimes is a national voluntary health agency whose mission is
to improve the health of babies by preventing birth defects, premature birth
and infant mortality. Founded in 1938, the March of Dimes funds programs of
research, community services, education, and advocacy to save babies and in
2003 launched a campaign to address the increasing rate of premature birth.
For more information, visit the March of Dimes Web site at
http://www.marchofdimes.com or its Spanish language Web site at
http://www.nacersano.org.
For additional national, state, county and city level statistics related
to perinatal health visits March of Dimes PeriStats at
http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats.



SOURCE March of Dimes
Web Site: http://www.marchofdimes.com http://www.nacersano.org
http://www.marchofdimes.com/peristats
 
Blacks mistrust health care system: study

Blacks mistrust health care system: study
Mon Apr 24, 10:21 PM ET

Black Americans are more likely than whites to distrust the health care system, in part because a lack of insurance forces them into emergency rooms or clinics where they build up no rapport with doctors and nurses, researchers said on Monday.

A national survey of 432 blacks and 522 whites found the former "were significantly more likely than whites to report low trust in health care providers," wrote Chanita Hughes Halbert of the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia and colleagues.

The survey found low levels of trust among nearly 45 percent of blacks compared to 33.5 percent of whites. Trust is important, the researchers said, because it influences the degree to which patients follow doctors' orders.

The lowest level of trust among blacks was found in those who sought care somewhere other than in a doctor's office, according to the survey, published in the Archives of Internal Medicine.

"The interpersonal relationship between patients and health care providers is a critical component of patient trust," Hughes Halbert and colleagues wrote.

They said it was possible the "environmental characteristics of hospital emergency departments," known for their frequent shift changes and harried staff, may interfere with doctor-patient relationships.

The survey did not find the race of the health care providers was a factor in the distrust found among black Americans.

"This suggests that increased access to health care in settings where there is greater opportunity to develop effective interpersonal relationships with providers, regardless of the provider's racial or ethnic background, may improve trust," the report reads.

But getting access to those more personal and private settings is a significant challenge for blacks because they are less likely than whites to have insurance coverage and more likely to rely on public programs.

Training designed to improve communication with patients may be needed for providers to help both black and white patients, the report concluded, but it may be especially important to focus such efforts on those working in settings more likely to be used by black patients.

The survey figures did not list a margin of error.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060425...BFZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
U.S. Newborn Survival Rate Ranks Low

Greed said:
U.S. failing to meet infant mortality goals
States unlikely to reach 2010 target, CDC report says
U.S. Newborn Survival Rate Ranks Low
By LINDSEY TANNER, AP Medical Writer
Tue May 9, 4:19 AM ET

America may be the world's superpower, but its survival rate for newborn babies ranks near the bottom among modern nations, better only than Latvia.

Among 33 industrialized nations, the United States is tied with Hungary, Malta, Poland and Slovakia with a death rate of nearly 5 per 1,000 babies, according to a new report. Latvia's rate is 6 per 1,000.

"We are the wealthiest country in the world, but there are still pockets of our population who are not getting the health care they need," said Mary Beth Powers, a reproductive health adviser for the U.S.-based Save the Children, which compiled the rankings based on health data from countries and agencies worldwide.

The U.S. ranking is driven partly by racial and income health care disparities. Among U.S. blacks, there are 9 deaths per 1,000 live births, closer to rates in developing nations than to those in the industrialized world.

"Every time I see these kinds of statistics, I'm always amazed to see where the United States is because we are a country that prides itself on having such advanced medical care and developing new technology ... and new approaches to treating illness. But at the same time not everybody has access to those new technologies," said Dr. Mark Schuster, a Rand Co. researcher and pediatrician with the University of California, Los Angeles.

The Save the Children report, released Monday, comes just a week after publication of another report humbling to the American health care system. That study showed that white, middle-aged Americans are far less healthy than their peers in England, despite U.S. health care spending that is double that in England.

In the analysis of global infant mortality, Japan had the lowest newborn death rate, 1.8 per 1,000 and four countries tied for second place with 2 per 1,000 — the Czech Republic, Finland, Iceland and Norway.

Still, it's the impoverished nations that feel the full brunt of infant mortality, since they account for 99 percent of the 4 million annual deaths of babies in their first month. Only about 16,000 of those are in the United States, according to Save the Children.

The highest rates globally were in Africa and South Asia. With a newborn death rate of 65 out of 1,000 live births, Liberia ranked the worst.

In the United States, researchers noted that the population is more racially and economically diverse than many other industrialized countries, making it more challenging to provide culturally appropriate health care.

About half a million U.S. babies are born prematurely each year, data show. African-American babies are twice as likely as white infants to be premature, to have a low birth weight, and to die at birth, according to Save the Children.

The researchers also said lack of national health insurance and short maternity leaves likely contribute to the poor U.S. rankings. Those factors can lead to poor health care before and during pregnancy, increasing risks for premature births and low birth weight, which are the leading causes of newborn death in industrialized countries. Infections are the main culprit in developing nations, the report said.

Other possible factors in the U.S. include teen pregnancies and obesity rates, which both disproportionately affect African-American women and also increase risk for premature births and low birth weights.

In past reports by Save the Children — released ahead of Mother's Day — U.S. mothers' well-being has consistently ranked far ahead of those in developing countries but poorly among industrialized nations. This year the United States tied for last place with the United Kingdom on indicators including mortality risks and contraception use.

While the gaps for infants and mothers contrast sharply with the nation's image as a world leader, Emory University health policy expert Kenneth Thorpe said the numbers are not surprising.

"Our health care system focuses on providing high-tech services for complicated cases. We do this very well," Thorpe said. "What we do not do is provide basic primary and preventive health care services. We do not pay for these services, and do not have a delivery system that is designed to provide either primary prevention, or adequately treat patients with chronic diseases."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060509...YhI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
US 4 black life expectancy lower than other racial groups

from Washington post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/11/AR2006091101297.html
Wide Gaps Found In Mortality Rates Among U.S. Groups
By David Brown

Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, September 12, 2006; Page A01


A black man living in a high-crime American city can expect to live 21 fewer years than a woman of Asian descent in the United States. The man's life expectancy, in fact, is closer to that of people living in West Africa than it is to the average white American.

Inhabitants of what a new report calls "Black Middle America" -- African Americans who live outside inner cities and the rural South -- also have a life expectancy five years shorter than those in "Middle America," which encompasses the vast majority of urban and suburban whites.




Even between groups that appear quite similar there are wide differences in the risk of early death. A farmer from a Great Plains state such as North Dakota is likely to live four years longer than a farmer living in Appalachia or the Mississippi Valley.

Those are among the observations of the study, which examines death in the United States through an unusual lens that refracts the population into eight demographic groups, or "Eight Americas."

The differences in life expectancy across that spectrum are as wide as the difference between Iceland and Uzbekistan. The study, based on 2001 data, reveals a United States that is pocked by places where millions of adults face a risk of premature death like that in Angola, Mexico, Nigeria and other parts of the developing world. Furthermore, those differences -- the most obvious sign of the health disparities that have captured the attention of policymakers -- have not changed in two decades.

"I think it's pretty fair to say we're failing," said Christopher J.L. Murray, a researcher at the Harvard School of Public Health. "The score card on the macro level has been failure."

One of the reasons for the persistence of the disparities, Murray says, is that the biggest difference in mortality is seen among people in middle age. That part of the population has not been a major focus of new investment in government health programs in the past two decades.

Instead, children and the elderly -- among whom the disparities are less severe -- have been the principal targets of new and innovative health spending. Those include free vaccines for poor children, the state and federal governments' Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and the drug benefit (Part D) recently added to the Medicare program.

A decade ago, Murray and his colleagues looked at life expectancy county by county. In this study, they began with 2,000 geographical units -- counties or groups of counties. They then divided them into eight groupings based on ethnicity, race and income. Some were broad geographical areas, while others were essentially demographic archipelagos stretching across the nation.

The Eight Americas were: Asians, scattered throughout the country; rural whites in the Northern Plains and the Dakotas; white Middle America, consisting of 214 million people not assigned to other categories; low-income whites in Appalachia and the Mississippi Valley; Western Indians (the smallest group, with 1 million people); black Middle America; low-income rural Southern blacks; and high-risk urban blacks -- those living in places where a person has a 1 percent or greater risk of being killed between 15 and 74 years of age.

The study, by Majid Ezzati, also of Harvard, along with Murray and five other researchers, is published in the Public Library of Science's online journal, PLoS Medicine. It includes a list of the counties with the highest and lowest life expectancies in the nation.

Montgomery County is tied for first (81.3 years), with Fairfax County not far behind at 80.9. Baltimore City is next to last (68.6). The District, at 72 years, is also among the 50 jurisdictions with the shortest life expectancies.



As previous studies have shown, Asians have by far the longest life expectancy -- 87.4 years for women and 82.1 for men. Black urban men have the shortest (66.7), followed by Southern rural black men, at 67.7. Indian men in the West are next, at 69.4.

Curiously, Asian women in the United States -- many of whom are second-generation and have spent their whole lives here -- have a life expectancy that is three years longer than Japanese women, who, as a national group, are the longest-living in the world. Previous research suggests that Asians lose their "survival advantage" after they are in the United States for a long time and have adopted an American diet and habits, but the new study suggests that is not happening with Asian women.








Among the more interesting comparisons, however, are those among whites.

Northern Plains whites have a per capita income below that of Middle America whites (about $18,000 vs. $25,000), and essentially the same percentage who are high school graduates (83 vs. 84). But they live longer -- 79 years vs. 77.9 years.

The comparison is even more dramatic with the Appalachian and Mississippi Valley group. The latter has a per capita income only $1,400 less than the Northern Plains group, but a markedly lower high school graduation rate, at 72 percent.

The gap in life expectancy between those groups in 2001 was 4.2 years for men and 3.8 years for women. This is not far off the overall gap of 6.4 years between black men and white men, and the 4.6-year gap between white women and black women.

The paper did not examine the causes of death between the groups. But the researchers note that high mortality in urban black men persists even when homicide and AIDS are removed. Heart attack, stroke, diabetes, cirrhosis and fatal injuries are the major causes of reduced life expectancy in that group.

The huge strides in cutting infant mortality in the past 50 years are clearly evident in the findings. The risk of dying between birth and age 4 is extremely similar among all Eight Americas -- much more similar than at any other age.

While black inner-city men have a mortality risk similar to that of West Africans, that is true only once they reach their forties. West Africans have a risk of dying in childhood more than 10 times that of even the most disadvantaged African Americans.

Interestingly, there was less variation among the Eight Americas in the rate of health insurance coverage and the frequency of routine medical appointments than there was in life expectancy. That finding suggests that access to care does not explain most of the differences in mortality.

Others in the field found the study informative and not surprising -- and also somewhat frustrating.

"The magnitude of the life expectancy disparity is most striking and is perhaps a bit larger than I might have guessed," said Mitchell Wong of the University of California at Los Angeles, who has studied how various diseases contribute to disparities in mortality. "However, it is not surprising that by combining race and geography, disparities are even larger."

Richard Cooper, chairman of preventive medicine at Loyola University School of Medicine, said that "the problem with these sorts of analyses is that they don't tell you anything very illuminating about the underlying social process" that leads to differences in life expectancy.
 
Re: US 4 black life expectancy lower than other racial groups

Bump -- World Aids Day 2006
 
Re: US 4 black life expectancy lower than other racial groups

<center><font size=4 color=blue>!Listening involves hard work .. Using hearing, sensing, interpretation, evaluation and response!</font></center>

<center>

<font size=4 color=blue>!! .... When I become a legislator .... !!
</font>
<font size=4 color=blue>!! .... Caveat Emptor .... !!
</font>
<img src="http://www.siu.edu/~bas/Images/bpfist.gif">
!There is nothing new under the sun!
Biblically! The so-called American Blacks are descendants of Abraham, namely Jacob (Israel) and his twelve sons and their wives, 70 in all, migrated from Canaan to Egypt around the year 1827 B.C. During their sojourn in Egypt the Children of Israel multiplied from being a family of 70 souls to a nation of over 3 million people at the time of the Exodus which took place in 1612 B.C.
This truth is grossly neglected, suppressed, and distorted in most European and American historical texts which are flavored with race prejudice. Fortunately, however, there are enough well authored and highly researched works by Black historians that challenge the Eurocentric revisions of history and correct the various erroneous views regarding the ethnic identity of the Hebrews.

</center>
 
Re: US 4 black life expectancy lower than other racial groups

<iframe width="780" height="1500" src="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/6220072.stm" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Last edited:
Since we are on the subject of health...
LINK
Then this link

Between 1882 and 1968, 3,446 Blacks were lynched in the U.S. That number is surpassed in less than 3 days by abortion.

1,452 African-American children are killed each day by the heinous act of abortion.

3 out of 5 pregnant African-American women will abort their child.

Since 1973 there has been over 13 million Black children killed and their precious mothers victimized by the U.S. abortion industry.

In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King said, "The early church brought an end to such things as INFANTICIDE." What would Martin Luther King say to the church today?

The Rev. Jesse Jackson once said:
"That is why the Constitution called us three-fifths human and then whites further dehumanized us by calling us 'ggers'. It was part of the dehumanizing process.

The first step was to distort the image of us as human beings in order to justify that which they wanted to do and not even feel like they had done anything wrong.

Those advocates of taking life prior to birth do not call it killing or murder, they call it abortion. They further never talk about aborting a baby because that would imply something human. Rather they talk about aborting the fetus. Fetus sounds less than human and therefore abortion can be justified".

Jackson's massive flip-flop on the abortion issue is further proof that his political future is far more important to him than are his principles.

With 1/3 of all abortions performed on Black women, the abortion industry has received over 4,000,000,000 (yes, billion) dollars from the Black community.

-VG
 
I think abortion is a personal choice made by the individual. Each person has to weigh that option for her/himself and should be left in peace to make the decision, either way. What scares me, however, is those who believe so passionately one way or the other on the abortion issue to the point where they invade the private decision making space to push their particularly bias on the issue off as the absolute truth, the only way, end of the story.

QueEx
 
QueEx said:
I think abortion is a personal choice made by the individual. Each person has to weigh that option for her/himself and should be left in peace to make the decision, either way. What scares me, however, is those who believe so passionately one way or the other on the abortion issue to the point where they invade the private decision making space to push their particularly bias on the issue off as the absolute truth, the only way, end of the story.

QueEx

Personal choice or not, it's the death of a child. I don't care how you clean it up, rename the act to something more politically correct that helps to assuage guilt of the act itself, it is the termination of the least protected in our society.

We got laws that protect the life of a damn fly here in Nevada. The construction of a much needed major highway was recently halted because of some "fly" that frequents the area. But the moment someone mentions killing unborn children, we are invading private decisions.

I won't keep on with it in this forum because I accept the majority here have no problem with killing unborn children and frankly it pisses people clean off to hear it. So I'll stop. But I'll never accept the practice of controlling our population. It is a MAJOR public health / mental health issue and if you look out and see how our youngest sisters behave these days, maybe you'll see it too.

-VG
 
VegasGuy said:
Personal choice or not, it's the death of a child.
No, its NOT the death of a CHILD. Saying that is mere emotional appeal. Whether a fetus (thats what it is, a fetus) is viable human life is stage-development-debatable. I really question those who insist on saying a 2, 4, 8, etc., cell division of an egg is a child, though clearly they are entitled to their belief system, but that doesn't make it so -- and it doesn't give them any right to up-in-the-face of people exercising their constitutionally priotected right entering a clinic. The extreme of that naturally leads to domestic terrorists like the Eric Randolphs of the world.

I don't care how you clean it up, rename the act to something more politically correct that helps to assuage guilt of the act itself, it is the termination of the least protected in our society.
And, I don't care how hard or how long you argue the contrary, LOL, neither will make it something that its not. Why, however, inject the argument with the subjective feeling of "guilt of another" if you were relying on anything other than emotions ??? Base your argument on science; base your argument on Biblical passages; or base your argument on a legal analysis or combinations of them all -- but don't base it on emotion.

-----

I will come back to this latter; just looked at the clock;
gotta take my boys to their recitals.

QueEx
 
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
Peeps- the predominant white AmeriKKKan, fake Christian (Baptist, Catholics etc.) hysteria about abortion is all about the shortage of white babies to adopt. If you want to legally adopt a “beautiful white baby” you have to wait 5 to 6 years!
Meanwhile the orphanages and foster homes a full of ‘non-white’ children.

If your significant other is an infertile white woman and you want a white baby, and you don’t want to wait 6 years, then you purchase a baby; if you can afford it.

The anti-abortion rant is 95% about increasing the pool of adoptable ‘white babies’.

That’s it.
Case Closed!

The big-pimping fake Christian ministers, FLAWwell, Robertson and recently disgraced Haggard all have admitted this in the so-called “Christian?” media.

The going rate to purchase a white baby is $50,000. - $130,000. per child. The whiter the child is (blond, red-head) the more expensive the child is.

Records show that, Supreme Court chief justice John Roberts purchased (adopted) his two blond babies, allegedly of Irish descent, in a unnamed Latin American country.

<img src="http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2006/08/06/PH2006080600757.jpg">

The RepubliKlan went into a high-pitched hysterical screech when the New York Times, during Roberts’ confirmation hearings had an investigative reporter start to track down the full details of Roberts <s>adoption</s> purchase to find out if he violated any international adoption laws.

Since purchasing babies is illegal, although it is occurring as I type this, and the odds of Roberts legally adopting two “super-white” blond babies is very, very, slim; the reality that Roberts broke the law like thousands of other affluent white couples is extremely high.

Now as far as the legality of abortion goes, only Neanderthal misogynists and self-hating, low self-esteem females would even think of making abortion illegal.

As Senator John McCain said in 1999, when he still was riding “the straight talk express” in his effort to deny baby bush the RepubliKlan nomination for President. -

<i><u>Paraphrase</u></i>
‘The legality of abortion is irrelevant to me, it’s a bogus wedge issue, If I had a daughter who needed an abortion and it was illegal in the US, which I believe will never happen, then I would give her a first-class plane ticket to the country of her choice to get the procedure done’
</font>
<table border="4" width="600" id="table1" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="3" bordercolorlight="#0000FF" bordercolordark="#0000FF" bgcolor="#D2FFC4"><tr><td>
<font face="verdana" size="3" color="#000000">
<h3>WHO HAS ABORTIONS</h3>

Fifty-two percent of U.S. women obtaining abortions are younger than 25: Women aged 20–24 obtain 33% of all abortions, and teenagers obtain 19%.

Black women are almost four times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.5 times as likely.

Forty-three percent of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Protestant, and 27% as Catholic.

Two-thirds of all abortions are among never-married women.

Over 60% of abortions are among women who have had one or more children.
<span style="background-color: #FFFF4A"><b>
The abortion rate among women living below the federal poverty level ($9,570 for a single woman with no children) is more than four times that of women above 300% of the poverty level (44 vs. 10 abortions per 1,000 women).</b></span>

On average, women give four reasons for choosing abortion. Three-fourths of women cite concern for or responsibility to other individuals; three-fourths say they cannot afford a child; three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or the ability to care for dependents; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner.</font>

<font face="arial" size="3" color="#ff0000"><b> Full Report Link Below -
Facts on Induced Abortion in the United States</b></font>

</td>
</tr>
</table>
 
Disparities in health care: The black population Jia Conway, DNP, FNP-BC, AOCNP, NP-C

The odd number placements are for the references which I' m not posting. Click on the link for them.

On another note, this article make black people out to be from another planet on how to interact with black patients.


Disparities in health care: The black population
Jia Conway, DNP, FNP-BC, AOCNP, NP-C October 01 2012

Racial and ethnic disparities can be multifactorial, encompassing socioeconomic factors (eg, education, income, and employment), lifestyle behaviors (eg, physical activity and alcohol intake), social conditions (eg, neighborhoods and work conditions), and access to preventive health care services (eg, cancer screenings and vaccinations).1 Leading health indicators of progress toward national health objectives for 2020 continue to reflect racial and ethnic disparities.1 Eliminating disparities requires culturally appropriate health initiatives and community support, in addition to equal access to health care.1 Furthermore, disparities are not equal among all racial and ethnic populations, and prevalence and incidence of various diseases are also different across the different populations.

As we continue to make strides in oncology care (eg, prevention, screenings, and treatment outcomes from diagnosis through end of life), we must do so with the intention that no racial or ethnic group is left behind in this progression. Health care disparities for black persons in the United States can mean loss of economic opportunities, lower quality of life, perceptions of injustice, and earlier death.1 From a societal perspective, health care disparities for the black population translates into less than optimal productivity, higher health care costs, and social inequities.1

The literature suggests the heritage and history of black persons dating as far back as 1619-1860 had an impact on the black experience in America, thus making their life stories markedly different from that of other immigrants.2 Elimination of disparities for this group is intertwined with knowledge and awareness that focuses on integration of health-related cultural values and practices, disease incidence and prevalence, and treatment efficacy.2 This article focuses on the disparities in oncology care that exist for black and non-Hispanic black persons in the United States, and the interventions that may reduce such disparities.

DEMOGRAPHICS
The black population is estimated to be 61 million people by 2050 and will account for 15% of the total US population.1 The 2000 Census indicated 36.4 million persons, approximately 12.9% of the population, identified themselves as Black or African American, 35.4 million of whom identified themselves as non-Hispanic.1 Cancer is the second leading cause of death in both non-Hispanic blacks and non-Hispanic whites.1 In 2001, the age-adjusted incidence per 100,000 population for various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), was substantially higher in black females than in white females.1,3 Disaggregation studies are examining the relationship between black-white cancer health disparities.3

Recent studies disaggregating the US population based on region showed foreign-born people have better general health outcomes than US-born people; but as the number of years living in the United States increases, health status mirrors that of the US-born population.3 Approximately 6% of persons who identified themselves as Black in the 2000 Census were foreign born.1 What ultimately has emerged from these studies is that despite the limited studies among US black people, a specific subgroup of the black population remains at risk. Health promotion efforts need to overcome barriers for specific groups.3

CANCER IN THE BLACK POPULATION
A variety of demographic and sociocultural factors are commonly reported barriers to adherence to suggested cancer screenings. These factors include lack of knowledge or awareness of cancer screenings, lack of access to general preventive health care services, institutional or system barriers, socioeconomic status, language barriers, immigrant status, and cultural beliefs.2-4 Related specifically to the black population, researchers believe social isolation leads to a lack of social support.4 This lack of support negatively impacts worries and concerns often encountered by patients with cancer.4

Black persons experience higher overall cancer incidence and mortality rates, excessive burden of disease, and lower 5-year survival rates compared with non-Hispanic white, Native American, Hispanic, Alaskan Native, Asian American, and Pacific Islander populations.2,5 Approximately 168,900 new cases of cancer were diagnosed among black persons in 2011.6 The most commonly diagnosed cancers in the black population are prostate (40%), lung (15%), and colorectal (9%).6 In 2010, 142,570 new cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed and an estimated 51,370 patients died from their disease; in 2011, colorectal cancer lead to 7,050 deaths.5,6 Lung cancer is the leading malignancy among both black men and black women, attributing to 65,540 deaths in black persons.6

Colorectal cancer is the third leading type of cancer and cause of cancer-related deaths in the black population.7 A 20% higher incidence and a 40% higher overall mortality are attributed to disparities in access, high-quality screening, and treatment, as well as later stage disease at diagnosis, in this group.3,5,6

Incidence of cervical cancer in black women is 11.1 cases per 100,000 population compared to 8.7 cases per 100,000 population for white women. Mortality rate for cervical cancer in black women is more than twice that of white women.8 The 5-year survival rate is 66% for black women compared with 74% for their white counterpart; in addition, advanced stage disease at diagnosis occurs more frequently in black women.5,6,8 In 2011, 860 deaths in black women were reported as a result of cervical cancer.6

As recently as 5 years ago, a review of studies yielded an increased incidence of oral cancers among black men. Oral cancers are ranked as the 10th leading cause of death among black males.7 Age-adjusted incidence of oral cancer in black males was more than 20% higher than that of white males from 1998 to 2002.7

Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in black women, with an estimated 26,840 new cases diagnosed in 2011.6 Breast cancer incidence increased rapidly among black women during the 1980s largely due to higher detection rates as the use of mammography screening increased.6 Incidence stabilized among black women 50 years and older from 1994 to 2007, while rates decreased by 0.6% per year from 1991 to 2007 among women younger than 50 years.4,6 However, among women younger than 45 years, incidence rates are higher for African American women compared with white women.6 Breast cancers in black women are more likely to be associated with poor prognosis, such as higher grade, distal stage, and negative hormone receptor status.6 Risk for basal-like breast cancer (ie, triple-negative cancers), an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with shorter survival in premenopausal black women, is even more prevalent.6

Lung cancer kills black persons more than any other malignancy.6 In 2011, 23,220 new cases of lung cancer were reported, and an estimated 16,790 deaths occurred. The convergence of lung cancer death rates between young black persons and white adults is the result of faster progression of disease in black persons, likely reflecting a greater reduction in smok ing initiation among blacks since the late 1970s.6 Also, as with most of the malignancies diagnosed in blacks, increased mortality is also associated with advanced stage at time of diagnosis.6

Black men and men of Jamaican African descent have the highest occurrence of prostate cancer worldwide. An estimated 35,110 new cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in 2011, accounting for about 40% of the cancer incidence in the black population.6 The only risk factors linked with prostate cancer are age, race, and family history.6

UNDERSTANDING BLACK CULTURE
Examining the cultural practices within a racial or ethnic group that impact the group's belief system is essential to addressing the disparities that exist among any culture. Models that explain preventive behaviors, such as CRC screening, do not account for all social and cultural factors relevant to the black population.9 Culturally sensitive skill is defined as the ability to collect relevant data regarding patients' presenting problem and accurately conduct a physical assessment in a culturally sensitive manner.2 This skill coupled with a model of cultural competence and desire can allow clinicians to meet the health care needs of a given population.2

The literature alludes to a consensus that most black persons tend to be suspicious of health care professionals. Black persons tend to visit a physician or nurse only when absolutely necessary and may use home remedies to maintain their health and to treat specific health conditions.2,8-10 The provider-patient relationship with black persons is also influenced by the perception of a lack of respect.10 One study yielded findings that black persons felt they would have received better or different care if their race was different.10 The perceived lack of quality care (a possible result of biased, incomplete, or deficient treatment services) is associated with health care providers' failure to recognize the sociocultural differences between black persons' perception of illness and white persons' perception of illness.10

Acculturation barriers include beliefs about the causes of disease (eg, cancer is caused by bad blood or evil spirits), inaccurate self-estimate of risk, and the belief that cancer-preventive measures are ineffective or nonexistent.8 These barriers contribute to the health care disparities among the black population and are attributed to a history of being disenfranchised, emancipated, enfranchised, and empowered politically.10 The migration of black people from the rural south to the urban north, economic gains, and shift from caste segregation to social desegregation has had a significant impact on how black people continue to perceive their social, political, and health status.10

In an attempt to assimilate into society, black persons created an environment of existence socially and politically, as well as in health care practices. As residents of the United States for more than 400 years, black people have developed and maintained a cultural environment unique to how they cope with their perceived social status by the larger society.10 The black population has developed its own view and judgment of the larger American society and cultural guidelines for interacting within the boundaries of the health care institution.10 The black culture is established around community and social support networks, family and kinship networks, health beliefs, and practices related to understanding health and illness, as well as their understanding of who influences their health-related decisions.4,10

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
Health care practices aimed toward reducing or eliminating health care disparities in oncology care among the black population must focus on these barriers. Given the variability of influences that contribute to health disparities among the black population, from socioeconomic to historical racial roots, including lack of physical activity and poor dietary habits, the health care arena must go deeper into the barriers of health care that exist within this population. Addressing concerns of trust and mistrust within the health care provider relationship, issues of respect, lack of understanding of susceptibility to disease and its impact on one's life, treatment adherence inclusive of preventive measures, and social support systems proven to have positive benefits for patients with cancer regardless of racial or ethnic background can begin to bridge the gaps in care that exist within the black population.2,4,7 These efforts should focus on these key attributes of this ethnic group.

• Improve your understanding of the heterogeneity within the black population to foster more effective nursing care across the cancer continuum in primary care, as well as oncology, settings.3

• Recognize the diversity of the US black population and operationalize black ethnicity to determine ethnic subgroup differences that may affect usage of cancer services.3

• Develop cultural skills for performing physical assessments of black patients, especially in relation to variabilities in skin color, and diagnosing various disease states.2

• Deliberately seek face-to-face interactions with black patients, which can help establish trusting relationships with a black patient.2

• Understand cultural preferences for greeting black patients. Many prefer to be greeted formally (ie, Doctor, Reverend, Pastor, Mr., Mrs.), and also prefer to be addressed by their surname because family names are highly respected and connotes pride in their heritage.2

• Accept cultural influences on nonverbal expressions, such as a louder voice (not necessarily a sign of anger), the comfort level in close spaces, and intimate interactions without misjudgment is an important factor in building a therapeutic relationship with black patients.2

• Understand the social structure of the black community to develop appropriate educational strategies that improve health outcomes. Black patients rely on people with similar backgrounds to reassure them that information is accurate.4

• Respect the importance of church and religious practices during times of illness. Studies have shown that prayer and constant contact with the church are pivotal to these patients' psychological well-being during cancer treatments.4

CONCLUSION
The delivery of oncologic nursing care must strive for cultural sensitivity and diversity to close the biases of cultural indifference, increase awareness, and continue to advocate for programs that span across all racial and ethnic populations regardless of socioeconomic status, disease status, or cultural beliefs. The discipline of oncology must continue to promote early prevention and screening modalities in combination with consistent health care access and follow-up. Oncology education must extend beyond our individual institutions and permeate our surrounding communities for better overall health outcomes for the various racial and ethnic populations we serve. ONA

Jia Conway is a nurse practitioner at Cancer Care Associates of York in York, Pennsylvania.

http://www.oncologynurseadvisor.com...h-care-the-black-population/article/260001/2/
 
Tackling Infant Mortality Rates Among Blacks

Tackling Infant Mortality Rates Among Blacks
By TIMOTHY WILLIAMS
Published: October 14, 2011

PITTSBURGH — Amanda Ralph is the kind of woman whose babies are prone to die. She is young and poor and dropped out of school after the ninth grade.

But there is also an undeniable link between Ms. Ralph’s race — she is black — and whether her baby will survive: nationally, black babies are more than twice as likely as white babies to die before the age of 1. Here in Pittsburgh, the rate is five times.

So, seven months into her first pregnancy, Ms. Ralph, 20, is lying on a couch at home as a nurse from a federally financed program listens to the heartbeat of her fetus.

The unusual attention Ms. Ralph is receiving is one of myriad efforts being made nationwide to reduce the tens of thousands of deaths each year of infants before age 1. But health officials say it is frequently disheartening work, as a combination of apathy and cuts to federal and state programs aimed at reducing infant deaths have hampered progress, with dozens of big cities and rural areas reporting rising rates.

The private nature of infant mortality has made it a quiet crisis, lacking the public discussion or high-profile campaigns that accompany cancer, autism or postpartum depression.

The infant mortality rate in the United States has long been near the bottom of the world’s industrialized countries. The nation’s current mark — 6.7 deaths per 1,000 live births — places it 46th in the world, according to a ranking by the Central Intelligence Agency.

African-Americans fare far worse: Their rate of 13.3 deaths per 1,000 is almost double the national average and higher than Sri Lanka’s.

Precisely why the black infant mortality rate is so high is a mystery that has eluded researchers even as the racial disparity continues to grow in cities like Pittsburgh, Los Angeles and Boston.

In Pittsburgh, where the unemployment rate is well below the national average, the infant mortality rate for black residents of Allegheny County was 20.7 in 2009, a slight decrease from 21 in 2000 but still worse than the rates in China or Mexico. In the same period the rate among whites in the county decreased to 4 from 5.6 — well below the national average, according to state statistics. Figures for the past two years, which are not yet available, have most likely increased the gap significantly, county health officials said.

While Pittsburgh’s struggles are illustrative of problems in other cities, it also faces its own particular issues, including the county’s privatization of many of its health care services over the years.

With the county taking a reduced role, Healthy Start, a federally financed national nonprofit group, is now responsible for Pittsburgh’s most vulnerable pregnant women. None of its $2.35 million budget, much of which is used for 6,000 annual home visits, comes from the county. The group’s budget has not increased since 1997.

Even with its high-risk clients, Healthy Start has had success: in 2007 there were no child deaths among its participants countywide. The numbers though, have begun to creep up, and in 2010 the mortality rate among participants was 13.9.

“As a city you want to be known for your football and baseball teams, but you don’t want to be known as a place where babies die,” said Cheryl Squire Flint, who leads the group’s Pittsburgh branch.

That, however, is precisely what is happening.

“We have one of the top schools of public health and one of the top schools of medicine, yet the problem is hidden,” said Angela F. Ford, executive director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Center for Minority Health, which works to address health disparities.

Recent studies have shown that poverty, education, access to prenatal care, smoking and even low birth weight do not alone explain the racial gap in infant mortality, and that even black women with graduate degrees are more likely to lose a child in its first year than are white women who did not finish high school. Research is now focusing on stress as a factor and whether black women have shorter birth canals.

“It is truly one of the most challenging issues, because it is multifactorial,” said Dr. Garth Graham, a deputy assistant secretary in the Office of Minority Health at the Department of Health and Human Services. “And nationally, the disparity has remained despite our best efforts.”

Dr. Bruce W. Dixon, Allegheny County’s health commissioner for the last 19 years, said the primary cause for the growing disparity is an inequity in health care access.

“It’s not medical care, it’s social issues,” he said.

Dr. Dixon, who is white, has supported shifting much of the county’s previous health care burden to private providers like Healthy Start because he believes they are able to deliver medical services more effectively and at lower cost. He said his department’s mainly white, middle-age bureaucrats had failed to adequately reduce mortality rates, which he blamed on their inability to communicate effectively. Black residents, however, say the disparity is not perceived as a problem because it is limited to a marginalized group.

“It wasn’t affecting whites, so no one really cared because they didn’t know about it,” said Wilford Payne, who operates 11 community health centers in Pittsburgh.

Some here say black women are reluctant to seek prenatal care because they fear they will be mistreated.

“People who need the services are the ones least likely to get them,” said Dannai Harriel, 34, who was a Healthy Start client when she became pregnant at 17, and later worked for the organization.

Ms. Ralph, who expects to deliver a healthy baby girl around Christmas, said when she first found out she was pregnant she hid her face under a blanket and lay motionless on her living room floor.

But after meeting with Healthy Start nurses and outreach workers, who provide as much psychological support as health care, Ms. Ralph said, she became excited about having a child.

Her living room floor is now full of little pink boxes and brightly colored bags filled with lotions and candles — party favors she bought for guests to her forthcoming baby shower. Among the guests will be her obstetrician. While Ms. Ralph is doing well, Healthy Start workers still have concerns. Because she drinks too much soda and does not appear to be eating nutritious foods, Ms. Ralph has gained 50 pounds during her pregnancy and now weighs 181. She has been told that overweight women have a higher risk of complications during pregnancy.

But Ms. Ralph has few healthy food options. The nearest grocery store is a 15-minute walk from the home she shares with her mother. Local shops sell little more than soda, chips and candy. Ms. Ralph, who said she was eating plenty of fruits and vegetables, acknowledges a taste for tacos and comfort foods.

“I can’t help it,” she said. “I love my mama’s cooking.”

At the end of a 45-minute visit with Dradia Tomblin, her caseworker, and Clara Brown, a registered nurse, she was told that her baby — whom she has decided to name Kaylah — is now able to open her eyes and practice her breathing.

“You are doing a good job,” Ms. Brown tells her. “You are growing a good baby.”

Others, however, may not be so fortunate, and without focused attention, infant deaths in the county — now more than 100 each year — may continue to rise, advocates say.

“We’re not looking and thinking long-term,” said Carmen Anderson, who previously led Healthy Start and is now a senior officer with the Heinz Endowments of Pittsburgh. “We are in day-to-day crisis mode. Sometimes those who scream the loudest get the attention. And there’s no screaming.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/15/u...ty-rate-among-blacks.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
 
<iframe width="1000" height="700" src="http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/content.aspx?ID=3021" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Racial Disparities Seen in U.S. Lung Cancer Treatment

Racial Disparities Seen in U.S. Lung Cancer Treatment
May 21, 2013

TUESDAY, May 21 (HealthDay News) — Racial disparities exist in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer among hospitals in the United States, according to a large new study.

Although most patients with this condition undergo surgery as part of their initial treatment, researchers found that blacks were less likely than Hispanics or whites to have surgery in the early stages of the disease. Hispanics were more likely to undergo surgery for stage 1 and stage 2 disease than white patients.

“In our study of more than 1.2 million patients diagnosed with [non-small cell lung cancer] in U.S. hospitals between the years 2000 and 2010, we found statistically significant racial disparities in the surgical management of these patients,” researcher Jayanth Adusumalli said in an American Thoracic Society news release.

Up to 90 percent of lung cancers are non-small cell, according to the American Cancer Society.

The new study involved 1.2 million patients from a national cancer database, about 975,000 of whom received their initial treatment following a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Eighty-two percent of white patients received treatment, as well as 79 percent of black patients and 76 percent of Hispanics.

However, 82 percent of Hispanics and 78 percent of whites with stage 1 disease underwent surgery, compared to 73 percent of blacks who had surgery as their initial form of treatment. For patients with stage 2 disease, 67 percent of Hispanics, 64 percent of whites and 56 percent of blacks had surgery.

The study was scheduled for Tuesday presentation at the annual meeting of the American Thoracic Society in Philadelphia. The data and conclusions should be viewed as preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.

“The significant racial differences in the initial treatment of [non-small cell lung cancer] that we found in our study may contribute to the recognized racial disparities in cancer patient outcomes,” said Adusumalli, of the Creighton University Medical Center in Omaha, Neb. “Further research into the underlying causes of these treatment disparities may help improve the treatment and prognosis of all lung cancer patients.”

http://news.health.com/2013/05/21/racial-disparities-seen-in-u-s-lung-cancer-treatment/
 
Black Prostate Cancer Patients More Likely to Delay Treatment

Black Prostate Cancer Patients More Likely to Delay Treatment: Study
They're also less likely to undergo prostate cancer screening, research shows
By Mary Elizabeth Dallas
Tuesday, May 28, 2013

TUESDAY, May 28 (HealthDay News) -- Black men with prostate cancer wait a bit longer to begin treatment following their diagnosis than white men, a new study shows.

Researchers said racial disparities in cancer care must be eliminated so black men receive treatment for prostate cancer sooner.

"This study contributes to a growing body of studies demonstrating the disparities in care and outcomes among African-American and Caucasian prostate cancer patients in this country," study author Dr. Ronald Chen, of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, said in a university news release.

In conducting the study, the researchers analyzed data from a registry that links information on cancer diagnoses with Medicare records. The study included about 2,500 black men and more than 21,000 white men diagnosed with early prostate cancer from 2004 to 2007. All of the men were treated within 12 months of their diagnosis.

The researchers found, however, that, on average, black men waited seven days longer than white men to begin treatment. Among the patients with an aggressive form of the disease, the average number of days from diagnosis to surgery or radiation therapy was 96 days for white men, compared to 105 days for black men.

The study authors also pointed out that black men are less likely than white men to undergo prostate cancer screening and more likely to be diagnosed with an advanced form of the disease. Black men also are less likely to receive aggressive treatment.

"All of these factors together can contribute to an increased rate of dying from prostate cancer in African-American compared to Caucasian prostate cancer patients," Chen said.

The researchers said more studies are needed to determine why treatment for prostate cancer is delayed for black men, and what can be done to eliminate this health care disparity.

The study was published online May 28 in the journal Cancer.

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/news/fullstory_137238.html
 
Racial Disparities In Health Care: Justin Dimick And Coauthors’ June Study

Racial Disparities In Health Care: Justin Dimick And Coauthors’ June Health Affairs Study
June 4th, 2013
by Ashish Jha

Racial disparities in health and healthcare are a persistent and troubling problem for the U.S. Despite substantial policy efforts to the contrary, racial and ethnic minorities, especially African-Americans, often receive a lower quality of care and have worse outcomes. The key questions, of course, are why do these disparities exist, and what might we do about them?

Over the past decade, two primary theories have emerged to explain disparities and propose solutions to address them. The first focuses on issues around cultural competence, and suggests that many of the gaps in care are due to poor communication between providers and patients. Given the long history of discrimination against black Americans, the cultural competency theory argues that low trust on the part of patients, combined with the ineffective communication and lack of cultural sensitivity, leads to black patients receiving worse care with resultant poor outcomes. Ultimately, the cultural competency theory begs an approach to health disparities that requires more effective training of providers that care for minority patients.

The second theory of racial disparities in care suggests that the site of care really matters, that disparities are driven by the fact that black patients are more likely to receive care at poor quality hospitals. There is ample evidence for this theory as well — our prior work showed that care for black patients is highly concentrated among a small number of hospitals and these places generally provide a lower quality of care for all their patients. This theory calls for a somewhat different set of solutions: focusing on helping the subset of “minority-serving” providers to improve.

The Dimick Study

Of course, there need not be any contradiction between these two theories and one may suspect that both are likely at play. It is in this context that we have a terrific new study by Justin Dimick and colleagues from the University of Michigan, in the newly released June issue of Health Affairs, that helps us better understand why black patients generally have higher mortality after major surgeries than their white counterparts, and how we might try to reduce this gap.

Dimick and coauthors began with the observation that we’ve known for some time: that black patients more often receive surgical care at lower-quality institutions (that is, hospitals that have high mortality for both their white and black patients). What we haven’t known is why black patients end up at lower-quality hospitals. The conventional wisdom has been that black patients live in neighborhoods with poor quality institutions, and they, like everyone else, usually use the nearest hospitals. So, Dimick and colleagues sought to test this hypothesis.

Their results? In fact, they found the opposite: when it comes to surgical care, black patients are more likely to live near a high-quality hospital with lower mortality rates for all patients. Yet, surprisingly, they are likely to bypass these institutions to receive care at lower-quality hospitals. How could this be? And, what might we do about it?

One might question whether a large part of why black patients receive care at lower-quality hospitals is historical. Until 1964, hospitals were legally segregated institutions, with most hospitals only caring for white patients and a smaller number caring only for black patients. Even with the advent of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which ended formal segregation in U.S. hospitals, long-standing patterns have proven hard to change.

Doctors who work and serve in predominantly black communities may continue to make referrals to traditional “minority-serving” hospitals. Patients may choose to go to these institutions because they are familiar with them and may feel more comfortable receiving care there. Indeed, in my own clinical experience, I have known several black patients to be more likely to seek care at what they perceive to be traditionally ‘black-serving hospitals,’ in spite of the proximity and availability of other, sometimes higher-quality, hospitals. Their rationale had more to do with their comfort and historical precedent than actual hospital quality.

Finally, there is the issue that many of these traditional minority-serving hospitals care for large proportions of patients on Medicaid or with no insurance at all, creating substantial financial stress on their capability to provide high-quality care.

The Path Forward

So given the entrenched patterns of care, the complex issues around doctor referral, patient choice, and hospital financial capabilities to deliver high-quality care, what might we do? I think the solutions, while appearing quite straightforward, have been hard to implement. Dimick identifies a few, and it’s worth going into greater detail with the hope that they may become a reality sooner rather than later.

First, we can work on improving referral patterns. It’s possible that doctors who refer black patients to low-quality hospitals are unaware of the consequences of their referrals on their patients’ outcomes. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) could easily send each physician an annual report card about the outcomes of care at the institutions where they commonly refer their patients. A report card to a cardiologist showing that 80 percent of their patients received surgery at a high-mortality hospital when other, low-mortality hospitals were available nearby may offer an important incentive to change.

Improving referrals is unlikely to be enough and we have to acknowledge that many patients will continue to get treated at low-quality hospitals. Therefore, we need to simultaneously work to ensure that these hospitals improve. For things that are largely within the hospital’s control, such as surgical mortality, we should have a national standard and hold every hospital accountable for meeting it. And this needs to be given teeth, by putting substantial payments at risk for poor patient outcomes.

But large penalties for poor performance are not enough and may worsen disparities if hospitals don’t know how to respond effectively. CMS needs to help these hospitals get better. CMS can use its convening power to bring minority-serving institutions together to learn from each other. With large financial penalties at stake for those who fail to improve, hospitals will be motivated to collaborate. Asking these institutions to learn from each other is far more likely to generate effective solutions than asking one of these institutions to learn from a wealthy neighbor across town that cares for a very different patient population.

The factors underlying healthcare disparities are many, complex, and shaped by the long history of race relations in the U.S. Luckily, there are concrete actions policymakers can take to make things better. We have broad consensus that the color of your skin should not determine the quality of care that you receive. Yes, there have been efforts to reduce racial disparities, but they have clearly not been enough. The time to redouble these efforts is now.

http://healthaffairs.org/blog/2013/...mick-and-coauthors-june-health-affairs-study/
 
Infant deaths spike in Leon County; racial disparity in mortality persists

Infant deaths spike in Leon County; racial disparity in mortality persists
Racial disparity in infant mortality persists as overall long-range trend continues downward
Written by Jennifer Portman - Democrat senior writer
Jun. 13, 2013

While Leon County’s infant death rate over the last decade continues a downward trend, the number of babies that died before their first birthday spiked last year.

Recently released state Department of Health data for 2012 showed 28 babies born in the county died compared to 18 in 2011. The increase drove the county’s overall infant mortality rate to 9.3 per 1,000 live births, a nearly 60 percent increase from 2011 and higher than the state average of six deaths per 1,000 births.

“We were a little shocked to see the increase,” said new Capital Area Healthy Start Coalition Executive Director Kristy Goldwire. “But the increase makes you want to get out in the community even more, because apparently we are missing someone or something.”

A vexing racial disparity in birth outcomes also continued. The county’s black infant death rate was about three times that of white babies, a gap that has remained even as death numbers for both races have fluctuated over the years. The mortality rate for black infants was 15.7 per 1,000 live births; for whites it was 5.7 per 1,000 births. The 2012 numbers reflected an increase in deaths for black and white infants compared to 2011, when each saw record lows.

Dr. Edward Holifield, who has worked for years to raise awareness about the problem, said he was not surprised by the surge in black infant deaths.

“The root causes including poverty, racism and indifference by the political power structure persist,” said Holifield, who noted that a third of blacks in Leon County from 2006-10 lived below the poverty level compared to less than 20 percent of whites. “If there are no changes in the causes of racial disparities in health care, one should not anticipate long-lasting improvement in the effects.”

The increase in deaths was driven by a sharp rise in the number of tiny, preterm babies. In 2011, five babies were born weighing less than 500 grams — about a pound or less — and ultimately died. In 2012, the number of micro-preemies more than doubled to 12, of which all but one died.

Leon County Health Department Administrator Homer Rice presented the latest infant mortality numbers to community members at this week’s local Healthy Start Coalition annual meeting. After examining all the deaths from last year, he said the only statistically relevant risk factor was preterm delivery, which afflicts black mothers at a higher rate than white mothers. Rice, however, also noted the potential impact of obesity on birth outcomes. The mothers of five of the babies that died were obese, one morbidly so, and, he noted, she is pregnant again.

The problems of low birth weight, prematurity and poor preconception health care remain key areas of concern, he told the group.

“Those are cultural issues and community issues we need to address,” Rice said. “We’ve got to explain to these women that if you are not healthy your baby is not going to be healthy.”

Healthy Start’s Goldwire said the coalition, which is dedicated to improving maternal and infant health and is charged with helping to reduce infant death rates in the state, said the agency must work to become more visible in the community and do a better job of providing information and spreading awareness.

“We definitely want to have more of a presence in the community. Just handing out the brochures, I don’t think is working. It has to be a more in-your-face presence,” she said. “As soon as a woman becomes pregnant she has to know there is support. Sometimes women get pregnant and there is a gap in between her becoming pregnant and knowing what information there is for her in the community.”

The coalition has formed a Health Education Working Group and plans to partner with local universities to train students and others as volunteer health educators. She also said more community awareness events will be planned to talk about the importance of safe sleep practices and the impact of chronic health problems on birth outcomes. Additionally, the coalition wants to partner with primary care doctors to further emphasize and facilitate better pre-pregnancy care.

“We have to make sure that women understand what we do now affects our pregnancies two years, three years from now,” Goldwire said.

Holifield said institutions at all levels should be held accountable. Hospitals, he said, need to do a better job promoting breastfeeding, which is known to help reduce Sudden Infant Death Syndrome and benefit infant health. “Draconian cuts” by the state to Healthy Start and other programs, he said, need to stop. The coalition received a $50,000 state budget cut for its new fiscal year beginning July 1.

The failure of the Legislature to expand Medicaid as provided in the federal Affordable Care Act, Holifield added, only will make matters worse for poor women and children.

“The result would be an exacerbation of the already deplorable racial disparities in health care,” he said.

Because of the relatively small number of infant deaths in the county, Rice said it is difficult to tease out exactly what drives the numbers. Poverty rates in Leon County are higher than the state average, but health insurance coverage and access to care are on par with Florida averages.

“We are not out of line with the rest of the state, but the rest of the state sucks,” Rice told the coalition meeting audience. “Alcoholism, the stress of poverty, the historical and a cultural stress of being a black woman, all those things we have to address. But I will stand here and tell you, I don’t know how; I really don’t know what to do.”

Healthy Start and other groups work hard to address the multifaceted problem, he said, but the efforts aren’t reaching everyone, and not all women choose to participate in the program.

“There is an attitude of ‘I’m fine; I don’t need anything.’ But participating in Healthy Start gives them access to so many educational resources and to so many support resources,” Rice said. “ I’m not going to eliminate poverty and racism, I know that, but I think that culturally we need to see what we can do about support.”

http://www.tallahassee.com/article/...on-County-racial-disparity-mortality-persists
 
Research Finds Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Among Older Male Cancer Survi

Research Finds Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Among Older Male Cancer Survivors

WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. - July 12, 2013 - Older African-American and Hispanic men who have survived cancer are less likely than their white counterparts to see a specialist or receive basic preventive care, such as vaccinations, according to new research from Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center.

Researchers examined racial/ethnic disparities in health care receipt among a nationally representative sample of male cancer survivors. They found that disparities are evident among older, but not younger, cancer survivors, despite their access to Medicare.

Lead author Nynikka Palmer, Dr.P.H., a postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest Baptist, said they identified 2,714 men 18 and older from the 2006-2010 National Health Interview Survey who reported a history of cancer. The researchers looked at health care receipt in four self-reported measures: primary care visit, specialist visit, flu vaccination and pneumonia vaccination.

"Overall, our results suggest that older minority male cancer survivors may need specific support to ensure they receive necessary post-treatment care," Palmer said.

The study was recently published online ahead of print in the American Journal of Public Health.

Even when the researchers adjusted for factors that contribute to disparities, such as education and health insurance, they found that African American and Hispanic male cancer survivors 65 years and older may not be receiving appropriate follow-up care and preventive care. Palmer said this is a concern "because regular follow-up care is important to monitor for recurrence, new cancers, and late and long-term effects of cancer and its treatment, particularly for those with more co-morbidities."

Overall, among older survivors, approximately 39 percent of African-Americans and 42 percent of Hispanics did not see a specialist, compared with 26 percent of older non-Hispanic whites. Likewise, about 40 percent of African-American and Hispanic cancer survivors did not receive the flu vaccination, compared with 22 percent of non-Hispanic white cancer survivors.

Similarly, 51 percent of African-Americans and 59 percent of Hispanic cancer survivors did not report receiving the pneumonia vaccine, compared with 29 percent of non-Hispanic whites.

"These findings are consistent with other reports of health care use among cancer survivors and suggest there may be differences in types of Medicare health plans, supplemental insurance and out-of-pocket costs among older survivors that could be contributing to this disparity," Palmer said.

Palmer said further study is needed to identify other factors that may influence racial/ethnic disparities among male survivors, such as patients' beliefs about care after cancer and patient-provider communication.

http://www.wakehealth.edu/News-Rele...th_Care_Among_Older_Male_Cancer_Survivors.htm
 
Feds, family reach deal on use of DNA information

Feds, family reach deal on use of DNA information
By MALCOLM RITTER | Associated Press
2 hrs 39 mins ago

NEW YORK (AP) — Some 60 years ago, a doctor in Baltimore removed cancer cells from a poor black patient named Henrietta Lacks without her knowledge or consent. Those cells eventually helped lead to a multitude of medical treatments and lay the groundwork for the multibillion-dollar biotech industry.

It's a saga made famous by the 2010 best-seller "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks."

Now, for the first time, the Lacks family has been given a say over at least some research involving her cells.

Lacks' family members have never shared in any of the untold riches unlocked by the material, called HeLa cells, and they won't make any money under the agreement announced Wednesday by the family and the National Institutes of Health.

But they will have some control over scientists' access to the cells' DNA code. And they will receive acknowledgement in the scientific papers that result.

The agreement came after the family raised privacy concerns about making Henrietta Lacks' genetic makeup public. Since DNA is inherited, information from her DNA could be used to make predictions about the disease risk and other traits of her modern-day descendants.

Under the agreement, two family members will sit on a six-member committee that will regulate access to the genetic code.

"The main issue was the privacy concern and what information in the future might be revealed," David Lacks Jr., grandson of Henrietta Lacks, said at a news conference.

Jeri Lacks Whye, a granddaughter who lives in Baltimore, said: "In the past, the Lacks family has been left in the dark" about research stemming from HeLa cells. Now, "we are excited to be part of the important HeLa science to come."

Medical ethicists praised the NIH action. There was no legal obligation to give the family any control over access to the genetic data.

"They're doing the right thing," said Dr. Ellen Wright Clayton of Vanderbilt University's Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Society. "Having people at the table makes a difference in what you do," she said, noting that some Native American groups have a similar arrangement with researchers.

Rebecca Skloot, author of the acclaimed 2010 book, sat in on the negotiations leading to the agreement, and she said family members never demanded money.

"This discussion wasn't about money for them," she said. Skloot noted that family members are earning income from a packed schedule of speaking engagements and have also received donations from a foundation the writer established.

Henrietta Lacks, who died in 1951 at age 31, was being treated for aggressive cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital when the cells were removed. The lack of consent was typical of the time, long before modern-day rules were put in place.

The cells were the first human cells that could be grown indefinitely in a laboratory. They became crucial for key developments in such areas as vaccines and cancer treatments.

HeLa cells are the most widely used human cell line in existence today. But Lacks died of her disease without knowing about them, and family members didn't learn of them until 25 years later.

They weren't told in the 1970s, when doctors did research on Lacks' children. And in the 1980s, family medical records were published without family consent, according to Skloot.

The story took a new turn in March, when German researchers published the DNA code, or genome, of a strain of HeLa cells. The researchers hadn't sought permission from the Lacks family before publishing, and the family found out about it from Skloot.

"It was shocking and little disappointing, knowing that Henrietta's information was out there," Whye said. "It was like her medical records are just there to view with the click of the button. They didn't come to the family. ... It was like history was repeating itself."

After complaints, the researchers removed the genome data from public databases.

Meanwhile, a team from the University of Washington had derived a genome from a different HeLa strain with funding from the NIH and submitted it for publication.

The new agreement will restrict access to the genome data from both studies. Researchers who want to use that data will have to ask permission from the six-member committee.

Applicants will have to agree to restrictions such as not sharing the DNA information with others, reporting back on their results, and acknowledging the Lacks family in their publications.

The deal also covers any future HeLa genomes produced with NIH funding.

"They've basically put (the family) at the table where the decisions are going to be made. That's really a common-sense thing to have done," said Dr. Robert Cook-Deegan of Duke University's Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy.

The family has a legitimate right to say, "We want this to be a partnership, not an exploitation," Cook-Deegan said.

He and Clayton said the Lacks saga was so unusual that they don't expect the agreement to be repeated for other cases. But they said the deal highlights the ethical issues surrounding the handling of DNA and other biological samples from patients in research.

Clayton said she thinks it will promote the idea of controlling access to genome information, or at least obtaining explicit and informed consent from donors before putting such information in publicly accessible databases.

Cook-Deegan said the agreement promotes the idea that donors or their family should have some kind of say over how their DNA or tissue is used for research.

http://news.yahoo.com/feds-family-reach-deal-dna-information-170226854.html
 
1006036_10151590947981275_263069927_n.jpg
 
Peter Attia: What if blaming the obese is blaming the victims?

Peter Attia: What if blaming the obese is blaming the victims?
FILMED APR 2013 • POSTED JUN 2013 • TEDMED 2013

As a young ER doctor, Peter Attia felt contempt for a patient with diabetes. She was overweight, he thought, and thus responsible for the fact that she needed a foot amputation. But years later, Attia received an unpleasant medical surprise that led him to wonder: is our understanding of diabetes right? Could the precursors to diabetes cause obesity, and not the other way around? A look at how assumptions may be leading us to wage the wrong medical war.

http://www.ted.com/talks/peter_attia_what_if_we_re_wrong_about_diabetes.html

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/UMhLBPPtlrY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Babies Pay for Detroit’s 60-Year Slide With Mortality Above Mexico's

Babies Pay for Detroit’s 60-Year Slide With Mortality Above Mexico's
By Esmé E. Deprez and Chris Christoff
Jun 10, 2014 11:01 PM CT

Detroit’s 60-year deterioration has taken a toll not just on business owners, investors and taxpayers. It’s meant misery for its most vulnerable: children and the women who bear them.

While infant mortality fell for decades across the U.S., progress bypassed Detroit, which in 2012 saw a greater proportion of babies die before their first birthdays than any American city, a rate higher than in China, Mexico and Thailand. Pregnancy-related deaths helped put Michigan’s maternal mortality rate in the bottom fifth among states. One in three pregnancies in the city is terminated.

Women are integral to the city’s recovery. While officials have drawn up plans to eliminate blight, curb crime and attract jobs, businesses and residents, they’re also struggling to save mothers and babies. The abortion patients awaiting ultrasounds at the Scotsdale Women’s Center and the premature infants hooked to heart monitors at Hutzel Women’s Hospital must be cared for before the bankrupt city can heal itself.

“Detroit is a bad place,” said Crystal Cook, 20, as she waited for an appointment at Scotsdale. Men in the city are “out of control. Most of them don’t have jobs, most of them couldn’t provide. Basically in Detroit, women have to do everything themselves.”

City Life

The crisis transcends the personal, said Gilda Jacobs, a former state senator from suburban Huntington Woods who heads the Michigan League for Public Policy.

“If you have families that are suffering, who aren’t going to work, who aren’t being trained for jobs, they’re never going to be taxpayers,” she said. “You need a holistic approach to improving a city. You need jobs, you need good infrastructure, you need transportation, you need good schools -- and you need healthy human capital.”

A campaign called Make Your Date begun last month is the latest attempt to prevent premature births, the leading cause of infant deaths, with hormone therapy and counseling.

“We want every kid to get off to a healthy start,” said Mayor Mike Duggan, who ran the Detroit Medical Center before taking office in January. “There are lots of things we’ve got to fix, but this is one that’s important to me.”

The initiative’s co-chairwoman is Sonia Hassan, a doctor who directs a National Institutes of Health research branch on maternal and fetal medicine. Make Your Date seeks to reach every pregnant woman by bringing together hospitals, insurers, foundations and advocacy groups.

“These are the children of Detroit,” Hassan said. “They are the future of it.”

Short Lived

The effort must counter an economic and social slide in the former auto capital that resulted in a record $18 billion municipal bankruptcy.

In Detroit, 60 percent of children live in poverty, according to U.S. census data. Nationwide, 22 percent do.

The city had the lowest rate of adults working or looking for work -- 49.4 percent -- among 41 cities examined in 2012 by the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. Physically larger than Manhattan, Boston and San Francisco combined, just 700,000 people call it home, down 60 percent from 1950.

Public transportation is unreliable, and 26 percent of households lack a vehicle, compared with 9 percent nationally, according to the Ann Arbor, Michigan-based Transportation Research Institute. That makes for an immobile population, hard for medical workers to reach and with few resources of its own for visiting doctors. Overall life expectancy is the lowest of the top 25 most populous metropolitan areas.

Race Matters

Detroit’s crisis is a foot on the neck of women and children. Mothers’ obesity, diabetes, poverty-related stress and poor nutrition can harm infants even before they are born.

While the raw number of births declined with the population, children have grown more likely to be raised in female-headed households, in high-poverty neighborhoods and to rely on public assistance, according to a 2012 report from the Skillman Foundation, which seeks to improve the well-being of the city’s youth.

Health isn’t determined just by poverty, but by race, which plays a disproportionate role in Detroit. Blacks composed 84 percent of residents in 2010, according to the census.

Black babies in neighborhoods with the lowest poverty level are more likely to die than white infants in neighborhoods with the highest poverty, according to a state report last year. In 2010, non-whites made up 21 percent of Michigan’s population but 43 percent of infant deaths.

“Reducing these disparities requires an explicit focus on the role of race,” the report said.

Abortions Surge

The end of many Detroit pregnancies is intentional.

In 2012, Detroit women had 5,693 abortions out of 18,249 pregnancies, according to state statistics. The rate rose to 37.9 per 1,000 women that year, up from 27.5 in 2001.

Nationally, increased use of contraception pushed down the rate to its lowest -- 16.9 per 1,000 women in 2011 -- since the procedure was legalized in 1973, according to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health researcher.

Abortion patients from Detroit said in interviews last week that they were unable to afford birth control.

Sole Support

“I can make ends meet, but have no room to save,” said Cook, who was 12 weeks and four days pregnant.

Her father and two friends helped pay the $275 she owed for the procedure at the Scotsdale Women’s Center on the northwest side, she said, and her sister drove her there.

Cook didn’t graduate from high school, she said, and now travels 90 minutes each way by bus to work at an auto-wire company, earning $9 an hour, about $280 a week after taxes.

She’s the sole provider for her 2-year-old daughter, whose father -- also the would-be father this time -- is jobless. She said she wants to return to school to become a therapist or social worker.

Many women don’t learn about family planning, or are encouraged by peers or relatives to have babies when young or unmarried, said Danita Jackson, a social worker at Cody High School. She recalled a tearful talk with a 15-year-old who bore a second child 10 months after her first.

“A baby having a baby,” she said. “A lot of these young ladies have absent parents or parents that are not really parenting them, giving them guidance.”

Widest Net

Almost half of Detroit women who move forward with pregnancy don’t receive adequate prenatal care, according to the Skillman report. That can lead to premature birth, the leading cause of infant mortality, whose rate hit 15 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2012, state data show. That’s the highest of any U.S. city and more than double the national average.

It also compares unfavorably to Mexico’s 14 deaths per 1,000 live births, China’s 12 and Thailand’s 11, according to the World Bank.

Work began on the Make Your Date campaign, which Hassan called an unprecedented cooperation, before Duggan took office. The goal is to screen all pregnant women for short cervixes, a risk factor for preterm birth. The condition is particularly common in Detroit for unknown reasons, and can be treated with the hormone progesterone, Hassan said.

All women regardless of financial or insurance status are eligible. Participants attend small-group classes, which have been shown to reduce preterm birth among black women by more than 40 percent, Hassan said. The campaign will work with churches, schools and homeless shelters to get its message out to people not already receiving medical care.

Catalina’s Moment

Make Your Date joins a catalog of initiatives to give the guarantee of growing up to more children. Governor Rick Snyder, a Republican, has a statewide campaign to curb accidental crib suffocations. The Women-Inspired Neighborhood Network targets Detroit’s poorest areas to mentor pregnant women and educate doctors and nurses about racial disparities.

Paris Rutledge, a social worker reared on Detroit’s east side, is in her 25th year of visiting new and soon-to-be mothers as part of the Infant Mortality Program at St. John Providence Health System, which is participating in Make Your Date. It’s her job to enroll women in parenting classes, test whether their babies are developing on track and connect them with aid if their utilities are about to be shut off.

A recent afternoon found Rutledge near where she grew up, where Sherita Mason, 29, was temporarily living at a friend’s house with her three daughters, including 7-month-old Catalina.

The older two children watched cartoons in the next room as Rutledge peppered Mason with questions: “Does your baby make high-pitched squeals? Does your baby make deep-tone sounds?”

Yes and yes, said Mason. Good news.

Catalina sat on the glass table in front of her mother, her curly hair pulled tight into pigtails, gnawing on a piece of paper, paying the adults no mind.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-...troit-s-fall-with-mortality-above-mexico.html
 
Back
Top