But homie, you're making my point for me, Charlamagne Tha God being the Jordan figure had more leverage than Rodman & that's the same with the Breakfast Club, where is Angela Yee's leverage? Who is clamoring to hire her at more than her current salary, huh? She was expendable.
I guess, if you say so, I never saw it.
Jordan and pippen didn’t win a chip without an exceptional rebounder.. if Rodman needed more money he would’ve got paid it cause the bulls knew they needed that extra piece to get them over the top.. if you the bulls and Rodman asked for a 10-20 percent raise to give you a guaranteed chip are you gonna give it to him or say fuck it we don’t need no more rings?
We are talking the Most Valuable Person which is Charlamagne Tha God, and the Bulls it was Michael Jordan, they knew they could build a team around Jordan. & it's the same with the Breakfast Club, can you build a new Breakfast Club around Angela Yee? Nooooooo. They are going to build it around Charlamagne Tha God, he is the bedrock of the show like Job Budden is the bedrock of his show. Charlamagne Tha God has all of the leverage.
We not comparing the two..we are saying she serves a purpose.. and to only offer her the same amount of money when everybody in the entertainment biz is getting raises is a smack in the face..her being there 10 yrs should automatically jump up her pay..but somehow you think her money should stay the same and she should be happy..nig you wouldn’t even allow your job to do that shit to you
We are comparing the two, in talking about leverage you have to compare what people bring to the table, that's just business. & you saying "her being there 10 yrs should automatically jump up her pay" is not good business in entertainment, it's not merit based. It's about what types of audiences are you bringing in, and what type of platforms do you have that people view. That's it. & then you said to me "somehow you think her money should stay the same and she should be happy," it's not about what I want, it's what her leverage is, that's what you don't seem to understand.
Yee is hilarious? For real?
Yea, good. Fuck ny
They all some herbs. She be asking some off the wall messy questions, envy often out of touch, ctg just a hoe
Oh ok, well, she was decent on her sex podcast, I peeped it a couple of times.
Everybody pay goes up..that’s actually a natural thing in the entertainment biz especially for longevity..notice on tv shows, radio after certain amount of yrs contracts are renewed and the money goes up..for you to think otherwise is crazy..that’s like thinking the people on friends or Seinfeld was gonna be paid their last yr the same money they got on their first yr.. like I said money natural goes up.. for them to offer her the same exact contract is a crime..that’s why she was sad cause it was utter bullshit.. if that’s the reason she is out or why breakfast club ends watch how mad people slaughter the suits for their response.. everybody in the industry gonna look at them sideways..cause that’s very bad bizzness
Homie, if you want to believe the Entertainment business is merit-based and the longer you're in the business, the more you get paid, that's on you. You're really treating the Entertainment business like a person who works at pension-based office job, a person whose merit and pay can increase with time. When in reality, those who get paid the most are the ones with the most leverage: for example, singer Katy Perry had much less experience as the previous judges of American Idol, but guess what they paid her? $25 million per season. Why did they paid her that much, was it merit based? No. Was it how long she's been on her judging job? No. It was because she had the leverage and the show knew she would bring-in viewers, hence the $25 million per season. So, it's not about a natural progression in salary, it's about what the market will bear in terms of your leverage.
its obvious some individuals get paid for their popularity or how much they make for a company... never did I say that.. anybody knows I would know this and have said this on here b4.. you keep bringing up the popularity convo and leverage.. im bringing up the pay raises that individuals get for being on shows, series, radio when contracts are renewed.. this happens all the time..you keep trying to argue against truth and what’s been going on for yrs.. people money rises naturally overtime especially with renewals.. them not doing this is bullshit period.. you keep shitting on her cause you don’t personally like her or see value in her.. im going off of just natural contract negotiations.. oh yeah being that I’m currently dealing with a series it has already been discussed about a money increase if a particular show gets ok for future seasons.. that’s natural progression in this game
Naw, Shawney contributes nothing
The pay raises in terms of the Breakfast Club are related to the leverage that they have, that's what you don't understand. Again, if you want to believe in the natural merit system for the entertainment business, that's on you.
You keep saying merit system.. when it’s just part of the renewal and negotiation process.. it’s why nba players don’t get paid the same salaries as the 80s.. magic Johnson , kareem are all time greats are better than 99 percent of todays players.. but due to the natural renewal and negotiation process today players make more even though they are not as talented or valuable as them dudes.. it’s part of the natural process.. if you can’t comprehend or understand that concept than that’s on you
We are not talking about the NBA, we're talking about The Breakfast Club and their leverage for payment, you want to switch the subject to something else. & again, Angela Yee didn't have levage so she could not continue her career. So you want to pay her for her years for being on the show? You're living in a fairy tale! Plus you're discounting popularity, IT IS THE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS!!! With your popularity can come money, because eyes are on them, it's not about merit and how long you've been there.
I keep giving examples of entertainment and pointing out diff situations that all come to the same conclusion all entities pay higher when it comes to contract renewals and negotiations.. todays price is not yesterday price literally is a concept that pretty much explains that.. shit like the minimum wage going up over time explains why that is.,everything around you explains why that is..but you want to go against it.. keep bringing up popularity and other shit that has nothing to do with the inevitable pay hike that occurs with renewal of contracts.. if you want to agree with the Jew man about keeping someone pay the same while everybody else’s go up than that’s fine..just say that..just say you don’t want her to get a pay raise..im just explaining the inevitable of pay raises when it comes to negotiations
What you're doing is creating red herrings, you're not staying on the subject. Instead of staying on the Breakfast Club, you're bringing up random things that has nothing to do with leverage in the entertainment business. Then you say, "inevitable pay hike that occurs with renewal of contracts," my point is that it's NOT evitable, it's about what you can negotiate and the power to negotiate is based on leverage.
When it’s all said and done if the breakfast club dosent continue without yee than it clearly will show her importance and it clearly will show she deserved a pay hike.. no need to go back and forth let’s see if this show will still exist in a few months.. than there will be no more speculations just truth
& let's see then, time will tell. & we'll both come back to this thread and talk about it.
To you, her leverage is their chemistry. To iHeart radio, her leverage is not there and can be replaced when she demands a higher salary.
