Sprint is reportedly bringing back two-year service plans

thismybgolname

Rising Star
OG Investor
Just weeks after Sprint (NYSE: S) discontinued offering two-year wireless service contracts, the carrier told FierceWireless that it has reinstated those options in order to give its customers more choices.

"We listened to our customers and are giving them more choices to get their new device," Sprint spokeswoman Michelle Leff Mermelstein told FierceWireless. "Sprint is the only carrier to offer the most choices to obtain a new device -- lease, installment bill, two-year contract or pay full retail price."

Indeed, Sprint's website this morning shows four options for customers to buy a new phone: They can lease devices, pay for them in monthly installments, ink a 24-month service contract, or pay for the full price for the gadget. For example, Sprint is selling the 16 GB iPhone 6s under a leasing model ($26.39 monthly), an installment model ($27.09 for 24 months), a contract model ($199.99 through a two-year contract), and full price for $649.99.


The news is noteworthy considering that Sprint in early January appeared to have joined the rest of the nation's tier-one carriers in discontinuing two-year contracts. Citing a leaked internal document, Android Central reported in January that the operator had ceased giving new customers the option of buying a subsidized phone and signing a two-year deal. Sprint will continue to offer contracts for tablets, according to the document, and additional phone lines and upgrades may still be offered contracts "on a reactive basis only." Subsidized handsets sold through two-year contracts were no longer being offered on Sprint's website as of Jan. 8.

Moreover, Sprint's CFO Tarek Robbiati essentially confirmed the move a day earlier at an investor conference, noting the advantages of the leasing program the carrier has increasingly turned to during the past year. Leasing is a "churn killer," Robbiati said, because it allows Sprint to re-engage with subscribers once the lease period is complete. And leasing also provides a way for Sprint to generate revenue by selling refurbished products, he added.

"It is apparent to the market now that we are eliminating subsidies moving forward, which is in line with the rest of the industry," Robbiati noted at the time.

Sprint had previously said it would kill the contract model by the end of 2015, but it missed that deadline. Now, though, Sprint appears to have reversed that plan.

T-Mobile (NYSE:TMUS) dumped the two-year contract model in early 2013, and its competitors began to follow suit in 2015. Verizon (NYSE: VZ) in August largely discontinued offering contracts, though will provide them to existing customers who wish to continue using them. And AT&T (NYSE: T) earlier in January too stopped offering contracts, virtually at the same time Sprint dropped them from its website.

The move to reinstate two-year service contracts and subsidized device pricing likely is an attempt by Sprint to set itself apart from the competition by offering what they do not. However, the nation's wireless carriers have largely moved away from two-year contracts because most Americans don't appear to like them much; AT&T and Verizon offered installation plans alongside two-year contracts for years, and their results largely showed that customers preferred installation plans.

"The percentage of phone activations on installment plans increased to 67 percent in the fourth quarter compared with about 58 percent in the third quarter and about 25 percent in the fourth quarter of last year," Verizon CFO Fran Shammo said during the carrier's fourth-quarter conference call with analysts, according to a Seeking Alpha transcript of the event. "The fourth quarter take rate accelerated but was below our expectation of 70 percent, which contributed to equipment revenue growth that was lower than expected. We expect the first quarter take rate for device installment to be above 70 percent."

He said Verizon counted 25 million device installment phone connections in total at the end of the fourth quarter, representing around 29 percent of Verizon's postpaid phone base. Overall, he said, more than 40 percent of Verizon's postpaid phone customers are on "unsubsidized service pricing."
 
I am waiting for my stock to rebound. I bought sprint stock over a year ago and it has tanked. Last I checked it was $3 and I bought it at 7. I'm trying to think long term, but it is getting really hard
 
Sprint dont know what the hell they want to do.
Yep tryn to follow others.. sometimes u gotta stick with wut wrks for u!! Itz cool to add things but not always cool to take away.. they may learn one day!!
 
This is Sprint:

water%20ocean%20hands%20drowning%203854x2579%20wallpaper_www.wallpaperhi.com_47.jpg


Sprint needs to either embrace its role as the discount carrier of choice and align themselves with the Crickets and Boost Mobiles of the world or they are finished. When your service is shit and everyone else has the same devices you do, and they can offer a superior service and CS experience, your options are few.

Remember when they had a) the best phones b) decent nationwide coverage AND c) unlimited data? The iPhone going to ATT, along with the cluster fuck that was their WiMax/4G, started the end of S. Oh well, fuck em, they caused me much heartbreak and I won't be sorry to see them go.
 
I am waiting for my stock to rebound. I bought sprint stock over a year ago and it has tanked. Last I checked it was $3 and I bought it at 7. I'm trying to think long term, but it is getting really hard
Unless you willing to take a huge loss nothing you can do but wait and hope that they get their shit together enough for you to break even or hopefully at a profit.
 
Naw they're trying to trap you. They ain't slick.

I also wonder if their primary customer base was having issues getting approved for financing via the credit check for their installment plans. Most people I know above a certain income level (and that's not saying it's super high) have ditched Sprint at this point.
 
I also wonder if their primary customer base was having issues getting approved for financing via the credit check for their installment plans. Most people I know above a certain income level (and that's not saying it's super high) have ditched Sprint at this point.

I didn't think about that.

I got Sprint back in the day when they offered free Sprint to Sprint when you had a minute limit for month. It was good because so many people had Sprint and the price was cheaper than the others. I kept them so long because they were allowing me to get a new phone every year instead of every two like the other companies. Once they got rid of that shit, it was time to bounce. Shitty service along with no perks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cnc
lol

they dont realize people are fucking tired of contracts?

i liked how they offered free phones if you renewed your plan, but that model is obselete

tmobile changed the whole cell phone game with their lease program
 
They are probably going to merge with one of the other big four cell phone companies. I was with them for 10 years strong - but the service was so bad, even with an iPhone 6, I had to say fuck it and left for ATT.

 
lol

they dont realize people are fucking tired of contracts?

i liked how they offered free phones if you renewed your plan, but that model is obselete

tmobile changed the whole cell phone game with their lease program

That lease program and monthly installment shit is some bullshit
 
That lease program and monthly installment shit is some bullshit

I prefer it. I pay monthly the extra money I was gonna pay if I bought the phone anyway, except I also get insurance included, and I can trade my phone in and get the next iphone when it comes out. I don't have to keep my phone and pay it off for a year or no bullshit like that
 
Not in the sense we are speaking. You can cancel it anytime. You aren't locked in.

You cancel it and you pay a penalty, just like an early termination fee from the two year contracts.

At least with 2 year agreements you got to keep your device once it was over, with the lease you turn it in or pay another fee.
 
You cancel it and you pay a penalty, just like an early termination fee from the two year contracts.

At least with 2 year agreements you got to keep your device once it was over, with the lease you turn it in or pay another fee.

I'm pretty sure no-ETFs were a big part of their marketing plan, which is how they were getting customers by paying other peoples ETFs with other companies.

Also, it's 2016. Who the hell keeps their devices for more than 2 years?
 
I'm pretty sure no-ETFs were a big part of their marketing plan, which is how they were getting customers by paying other peoples ETFs with other companies.

Also, it's 2016. Who the hell keeps their devices for more than 2 years?

Not more than 2 but Every other year i get that years galaxy for $1 around black Friday.

I'm guessing you need that updated iPhone camera every year?
 
WiMax was one hell of a mistake :smh:


Ive been hearing that but I liked it. It allowed me to surf and talk at the same damn time which I can not currently do on the Sprint network. Ive been with Sprint for at least 6 yrs and although they dont have the best quality, my phone bill is only $25 a month before taxes and surcharges. It works for me. Why do u say WiMax was such a big mistake? Sprint Spark was supposed to be some great new service...what happened to it is what I wanna know.
 
I'm pretty sure no-ETFs were a big part of their marketing plan, which is how they were getting customers by paying other peoples ETFs with other companies.

Also, it's 2016. Who the hell keeps their devices for more than 2 years?

If you cancel your lease before the lease is up then you pay a fee, call it what you want.

T-Mobile notes that: “If customers terminate the lease early, they must pay T-Mobile an early termination amount which is the sum of the following: Any past due payments or other unpaid amounts due under this lease, plus the remaining unpaid scheduled lease payments for the remaining items, plus any excess wear and use charges, plus any additional fees or taxes related to the payment of these amounts.”

Ive been hearing that but I liked it. It allowed me to surf and talk at the same damn time which I can not currently do on the Sprint network. Ive been with Sprint for at least 6 yrs and although they dont have the best quality, my phone bill is only $25 a month before taxes and surcharges. It works for me. Why do u say WiMax was such a big mistake? Sprint Spark was supposed to be some great new service...what happened to it is what I wanna know.

Wimax was a mistake because LTE was adopted by the majority of the world and the other three major carriers in the states.

Making wimax devices & network equipment more expensive.

Voice and data could have been done on the Sprint network without Wimax but it's been disabled.

 
I also wonder if their primary customer base was having issues getting approved for financing via the credit check for their installment plans. Most people I know above a certain income level (and that's not saying it's super high) have ditched Sprint at this point.
Good damn point
 
  • Like
Reactions: cnc
If you cancel your lease before the lease is up then you pay a fee, call it what you want.

T-Mobile notes that: “If customers terminate the lease early, they must pay T-Mobile an early termination amount which is the sum of the following: Any past due payments or other unpaid amounts due under this lease, plus the remaining unpaid scheduled lease payments for the remaining items, plus any excess wear and use charges, plus any additional fees or taxes related to the payment of these amounts.”

Yeah but if I cancelled today and give them back the phone I wouldn't owe anything. My early termination amount would be $0 because I'm caught up with all my payments. The "lease schedule" is just the $15 they add to your regular billing schedule, you aren't tied to it.

They also have other perks and really good deals. I pay 50/mo for unlimited LTE data.
 
Not in the sense we are speaking. You can cancel it anytime. You aren't locked in.
Contracts a better deal tho... You get a current phone for free or $99... Worst case you break contract early and pay the $250 etf... You still have a phone worth $200-$500 with a $250-$350 cost... and thats worst case.

Theres a reason why all carriers stopped supplementing phones.
 
Contracts a better deal tho... You get a current phone for free or $99... Worst case you break contract early and pay the $250 etf... You still have a phone worth $200-$500 with a $250-$350 cost... and thats worst case.

Theres a reason why all carriers stopped supplementing phones.

Ok lets say you get the phone free or for $130 (which is how much it comes out to with tax and fees)

You still don't have any insurance on the phone. So if it gets broken you have to buy a whole new phone. Otherwise you gotta buy the insurance which is gonna cost you an extra $12/month.

With Tmobile's Lease program you don't have to pay for the phone up front. They lease you the phone for $15/mo and insurance on the phone is already included. With that deal you are able to trade in your for 3 times a year to upgrade to the newest iPhone.

So what's better?:

Paying an extra $12/mo and be forced in a 2 year contract and have to use the same phone for 2 years.

or

Paying an extra $15/mo with no contracts and you can upgrade your phone up to 3 times that same year.

(not to mentions sprints network and customer service sucks)

Originally, T-Mobile used to "get" you by making you have to pay for your own phone, and most just did the monthly installments which usually was paid off over a 2-year time period. Now they switched the game up with the lease program and all the other companies are following it.
 
ive had sprint since 2001, other than 1 time when the first got the iphone and i was about to leave, i never had any maior problems, unlimited data on all my lines, when i got rid of att internet i hit em for almost 70gb downloading torrents, not a peep was said, only gripe i have is when they took away the perks when you were a longtime cust and let you upgrade every year
 
Ok lets say you get the phone free or for $130 (which is how much it comes out to with tax and fees)

You still don't have any insurance on the phone. So if it gets broken you have to buy a whole new phone. Otherwise you gotta buy the insurance which is gonna cost you an extra $12/month.

With Tmobile's Lease program you don't have to pay for the phone up front. They lease you the phone for $15/mo and insurance on the phone is already included. With that deal you are able to trade in your for 3 times a year to upgrade to the newest iPhone.

So what's better?:

Paying an extra $12/mo and be forced in a 2 year contract and have to use the same phone for 2 years.

or

Paying an extra $15/mo with no contracts and you can upgrade your phone up to 3 times that same year.

(not to mentions sprints network and customer service sucks)

Originally, T-Mobile used to "get" you by making you have to pay for your own phone, and most just did the monthly installments which usually was paid off over a 2-year time period. Now they switched the game up with the lease program and all the other companies are following it.
I hear you bro.. but its always better to own that phone all things equal. Atleast imo. two years on lease you already at near $400 sunk cost in a device you dont own . Again, they went to the lease standard for a reason.
 
Yeah but if I cancelled today and give them back the phone I wouldn't owe anything. My early termination amount would be $0 because I'm caught up with all my payments. The "lease schedule" is just the $15 they add to your regular billing schedule, you aren't tied to it.

They also have other perks and really good deals. I pay 50/mo for unlimited LTE data.

On contracts every month that you were a customer your ETF was reduced.

How long had you made payments of $15?

With a lease you hand back the device and you're left with nothing where as with the old contracts you at least got to keep your device.

Theres a reason why all carriers stopped supplementing phones.
Bingo, carriers were losing money subsidizing that equipment and taking a lost.

Now people are paying for it out right or getting ripped off by leasing.
 
Back
Top