Some say black politicians unfairly targeted

tian

Star
Registered
10:29 PM CDT on Wednesday, August 24, 2005

By GROMER JEFFERS Jr. / The Dallas Morning News


Black leaders in Dallas and across the country are crying foul as a string of federal corruption investigations have targeted black politicians.

"Our leadership is being attacked all over the country," said Dallas Nation of Islam minister Jeffrey Muhammad. "We need to realize this and come together with a local and national agenda for the betterment of our own community."

Most of the people named so far in the FBI's investigation into corruption at Dallas City Hall and the city's tax-credit housing program are black. They include four black City Council members and three black members of the powerful City Plan Commission.

The predominance of blacks named in the investigation has stunned veteran black politicians.

"That's just crazy," said Ron Kirk, who in 1995 was elected the city's first black mayor.

"I'm just not a conspiracy believer, but I'm also not unfamiliar with how unfair these types of investigations can be," he said. "Certainly they [the FBI] are not blind to the way these investigations are going. This cannot be stretched out over a long period of time."

After FBI officials met this week with concerned local civil rights leaders, U.S. Attorney Richard B. Roper defended his investigation, saying it was fair and impartial.

"While I will not comment on any particular investigation, grand jury subpoenas are routinely issued in federal investigations," he said in a written statement. "It would be inappropriate to draw any inference from the mere fact that a particular individual's name is, or is not, included in a grand jury subpoena."

'More at play than race'
David Bositis, a senior researcher for the Washington-based Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, said the targeting of black officials may be based more on politics and demographics than race.

Many black elected officials are most influential in urban areas, which is the starting point for numerous FBI corruption inquiries.

"There may be more at play than race," he said.

But such sentiments, some say, give little comfort to those who watch as their names are linked to federal investigations in news reports.

"It's them today," said Joyce Foreman, president of the local chapter of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. "It's you tomorrow."

Maxine Thornton-Reese, who has been named in the investigation with fellow council members Don Hill, Leo Chaney and James Fantroy, said the stain of the investigation will be hard to remove.

"I know there is a God," she said. "And there are people in Dallas who will right the wrong."

Others share her views
Dr. Thornton-Reese's attitude is similar to that of black elected officials in other cities.

"Historically, there has been racial targeting of public officials," said Texas A&M political science professor Kenneth Meier. "I've never seen any evidence that black officials are any more or less corrupt than white officials."

Officials being targeted by federal investigations across the country range from big city mayors to civil rights icons.

•In Atlanta, former Mayor Bill Campbell faces trial in September on charges of racketeering, tax evasion and accepting bribes. That probe has netted the convictions of 10 city officials and contractors, most of whom are black.

•The long-running investigation of former New Orleans Mayor Marc Morial, now president of the Urban League, led to four indictments.

•In Philadelphia, an FBI investigation included the bugging of the office of John Street, the city's second black mayor.

•In Birmingham, former Jefferson County Commissioner Chris McNair, the father of Denise McNair, one of the four young girls killed in the 1963 church bombing, faces trial in a federal investigation into a county sewer program.

Political motivations
Ron Walters, a political science professor at the University of Maryland, said he is convinced such investigations are politically motivated.

In the 1980s and early 1990s, he conducted a study that showed only 8 percent of blacks named in investigations were convicted. Former Agriculture Secretary Mike Espy and former Tennessee Congressman Harold Ford Sr. were among those charged in federal corruption cases but later acquitted.

"Law enforcement is used as a tactic to destabilize, intimidate and weaken political power, and that's what's happening in Dallas," he said. "Even if there is one rotten egg in the bunch, the people of Dallas shouldn't just stand by and do nothing."

Mr. Kirk said the investigation could make it difficult to revitalize the southern sector, which has become one of the city's top priorities.

He said private businesses will not want to invest in an area perceived to be a haven for crooks and chiselers.

"It would be very difficult to improve the schools and the overall economic climate with this cloud hanging overhead," he said.

E-mail gjeffers@dallasnews.com


Uhmm-Uhmm! Bill Campbell needed to be targeted. Uhmm-Uhmm!!

tian
 
FBI raids Maryland residence of Nigerian VP
2 hours, 32 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI has raided the Maryland residence of Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubakar as part of a probe into whether a U.S. congressman made or approved payments to officials in West Africa, a U.S. newspaper reported.

The raid, which took place on August 3 but has only just come to light, was in connection with an investigation into William Jefferson, a democratic congressman from New Orleans, the city's Times-Picayune newspaper said on Saturday.

The Nigerian vice president was not available for comment on Sunday, but a Nigerian presidential spokeswoman said:

"The presidency has been notified of the incident and is using diplomatic channels to find out the reason and the findings surrounding the incident."

A State Department official confirmed Abubakar's house in the affluent Potomac district just outside Washington had been searched, but referred questions to the Justice Department, which declined to comment, the newspaper said.

A source familiar with the investigation said subpoenas showed federal agents were looking for records indicating whether Jefferson paid, offered to pay or authorized payments to Nigerian or Ghanaian government officials, The Times-Picayune said.

Agents were seeking documents related to Jefferson's dealings with Abubakar and the vice president of Ghana, Aliu Mahama. Jefferson returned from a five-day visit to Ghana in mid-July, about three weeks before the FBI raided his homes, according to the newspaper.

The subpoenas focused in part on a telecommunications deal Jefferson was trying to engineer in Nigeria over the past year, according to documents and those familiar with details of the investigation.

According to The Times-Picayune, sources familiar with the telecommunications deal said Jefferson was attempting to smooth the way for iGate Corp., a small Kentucky company, to offer its high-speed broadband technology to Nigeria's fast-growing telecommunications market.

Jefferson's spokeswoman, Melanie Roussell, said the eight-term congressman would continue to decline comment on the federal probe. He has only said he is cooperating with federal investigators, according to the newspaper.

Jefferson's attorney, Mike Fawer, has said he believes the FBI had been conducting a sting operation against his client.

Abubakar and his wife, Jennifer, a doctoral student at American University in Washington, were said to be in Nigeria.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050828...m1Z.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 
to add to this, i can see why people might complaign, but if your hands are dirty, your hands are dirty.
 
Lawmaker sought cut of Nigerian deal: aide

Lawmaker sought cut of Nigerian deal: aide
By Andy Sullivan
Wed Jan 11, 7:26 PM ET

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (Reuters) - Louisiana Democratic Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) sought a cut of a Nigerian telecommunications venture in return for his help setting it up, a former aide said on Wednesday as he pleaded guilty to bribery charges.

In return for lobbying Nigerian officials and arranging a loan through the U.S. Import-Export Bank, Jefferson demanded an ownership stake in a venture by two U.S. companies to provide high-speed Internet and cable television to Nigeria, former aide Brett Pfeffer said.

"The congressman told me he would require 5 to 7 percent of ownership of the company," Pfeffer told U.S. Judge T.S. Ellis. "He was to help promote the business opportunity to Nigerian officials."

Pfeffer, 37, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery and aiding and abetting the solicitation of bribes by a member of Congress for his role as a go-between in the deal, and agreed to cooperate in the investigation.

He faces up to 20 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

According to a statement of facts released in the plea deal, Jefferson sought to place a relative on the company's payroll at a salary of $2,500 to $5,000 per month and steer legal work toward another relative.

Jefferson also lobbied government officials in Ghana to try to set up a similar venture there, according to the plea deal.

A Jefferson spokeswoman declined to comment.

The agreement comes as Congress faces the largest corruption scandal in decades. Lobbyist Jack Abramoff pleaded guilty to fraud last week and admitted that he provided golf trips, campaign contributions and other gifts to lawmakers in exchange for favorable treatment for his clients.

The Abramoff scandal so far has largely implicated Republicans like former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, but Pfeffer's agreement could make it difficult for Democrats to portray corruption as a strictly Republican issue as they try to win back control of Congress.

Jefferson is not named in Pfeffer's plea agreement, which only describes a "Representative A" who employed Pfeffer from 1995 to 1998.

News accounts from that period cite Pfeffer as Jefferson's legislative director.

According to court papers, Pfeffer's investment firm in 2004 agreed to invest $45 million to provide high-speed Internet and cable TV service to Nigeria over the existing copper telephone wires there.

Jefferson recruited Pfeffer's company for the deal and connected it to a Kentucky technology provider whose equipment would be used in the venture. As the agreement was signed he told Pfeffer he would require an ownership stake, according to court papers.

"Pfeffer understood that Representative A was soliciting a bribe in return for Representative A's official assistance in furthering the Nigerian Deal. Pfeffer .... later advised (his boss) that it was part of the cost of doing business with Representative A," the plea deal said.

Pfeffer's boss is not named in the plea deal but is described as a witness cooperating in the investigation.

Pfeffer's lawyer declined to comment after the hearing.

U.S. Assistant Attorney Mark Lytle also declined to comment.

Jefferson has held his seat since 1990, representing many New Orleans neighborhoods that were devastated by Hurricane Katrina. He serves on the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee.

An August 2005 FBI raid on his homes in Washington and New Orleans found thousands of dollars in cash stored in a freezer, according to news reports.

Jefferson traveled to Nigeria in February 2004 and Ghana in July 2005, according to congressional campaign-finance records.

The $9,248 Ghana trip was paid for by Win Win Strategies Foundation, which did not return a call seeking comment.

A Kentucky technology company called iGate Inc. helped underwrite the Nigeria trip. News accounts indicate that iGate participated in the venture with Pfeffer's company. The company could not be reached for comment.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060112/pl_nm/crime_congress_dc_1
 
Businessman Pleads Guilty To Bribing Rep. Jefferson

Businessman Pleads Guilty To Bribing Rep. Jefferson
By Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, May 4, 2006; A01

A Louisville man pleaded guilty yesterday in federal court to bribing Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) with more than $400,000 in payments, company stock and a share of the profits to promote the Kentucky firm's high-tech business ventures in Africa.

Vernon L. Jackson, 53, owner of Louisville-based iGate Inc., pleaded guilty to conspiracy to bribe and bribery in U.S. District Court in Alexandria. Federal sentencing guidelines call for a prison term of up to nine years for the crimes, which occurred from 2001 to 2005.

Jackson is the second person to plead guilty to charges of bribing the eight-term Democrat to promote iGate's broadband technology -- including Internet and cable television -- in Nigeria, Ghana and Cameroon. Jefferson denied any wrongdoing in the case yesterday, but his legal problems are steadily mounting and have undercut his party's efforts to portray the Republicans as the party of political corruption.

"I was surprised and disappointed to learn of Vernon Jackson's guilty plea and of his characterization of our relationship," Jefferson said in a statement issued by his office. "As I have previously stated, I have never over all the years of my public service, accepted payment from anyone for the performance of any act or duty for which I have been elected. I am confident and am trusting God, that this simple fact will be established in the proper forum as I am innocent in the matter to which Vernon Jackson has plead guilty."

Jefferson, 58, co-chairman of the congressional Africa Trade and Investment Caucus, met with African officials to promote iGate. He has not been charged, but he is a target in the case, according to law enforcement authorities. Sources familiar with the case have said a plea agreement with the lawmaker has been explored.

Jackson, who agreed to cooperate with authorities, declined to comment yesterday as he walked out of the courtroom with his wife.

Alice S. Fisher, the assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's criminal division, said in a statement: "Vernon Jackson got favorable treatment from a Congressman because he paid for it. Public corruption is not a victimless crime -- all of us lose when people believe public officials can be bought."

At yesterday's plea hearing, Jackson, in a black suit, stood erect and answered the judge's questions in short, but polite responses, frequently saying "Yes, your honor." When U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III asked how he was doing, Jackson replied: "I feel fine, sir, other than a little nervous standing before you."

The charging papers refer to a "Representative A" who received the bribes, but court documents and law enforcement authorities previously confirmed that it is Jefferson. Jefferson's Washington attorney, Robert P. Trout, sat in the courtroom observing, but he declined to comment afterward.

During the proceedings, the judge asked Jackson not to mention any names of parties he dealt with while admitting his guilt.

But at one point, Jackson apparently slipped and mentioned "Andrea," the name of Jefferson's wife.

Jackson later agreed with the "statement of facts" in the case that was read aloud by Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Lytle.

According to that document, Jackson met Jefferson in 2000. The Democratic lawmaker later persuaded the Army to test iGate's broadband technology. Eventually, Jefferson helped iGate land a contract at Fort Stewart, an Army base in Georgia.

In early 2001, Jefferson told Jackson he would no longer use his position to help the company unless Jackson agreed to pay money to the ANJ Group, whose principals included Jefferson's wife and children, the document stated.

Jackson signed a "professional services agreement" to conceal the illegal nature of the payments," which included $7,500 a month to the Jefferson family company, 5 percent of gross sales over $5 million each year and 5 percent of all capital investments in iGate, the court document said.

In addition, Jackson agreed to transfer options for 1 million shares of iGate stock over five years.

To collect the bribes, Jefferson's family company sent numerous fake invoices to iGate that appeared to be signed by Jefferson's wife, the document said.

"Jackson believed that in the event Jackson did not pay these invoices [Jefferson] would stop performing official acts on behalf of iGate and take affirmative steps to impede the success of iGate," the document said.

Around June 2003, Jefferson brought together iGate and Netlink Digital Television, a Nigerian company seeking Internet technology for Africa. The company agreed to invest $45 million in iGate and put up $6.5 million.

Anticipating that the venture would reap handsome profits, Jefferson successfully demanded that Jackson increase the congressman's cut of the company profits in Africa from 5 percent to 35 percent, the document said.

In the spring of 2004, iGate and the Nigerian digital television company quit doing business after a dispute. The same year, Brett Pfeffer, a former aide to Jefferson, came into the picture.

Pfeffer, 37, worked for Lori Mody, a wealthy Northern Virginia woman who invested in iGate's ventures in Nigeria and Ghana. In early 2005, Mody became concerned about the business arrangement, went to the FBI and agreed to record conversations.

In January, Pfeffer pleaded guilty to bribing Jefferson and agreed to cooperate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6/05/03/AR2006050301055.html?nav=rss_politics
 
Re: Businessman Pleads Guilty To Bribing Rep. Jefferson

<font size="5">
<center>Va. Woman Wore a Wire In Rep. Jefferson Inquiry</font size></center>


PH2006050801576.jpg

Vernon L. Jackson, owner of iGate Inc., pleaded guilty to charges that he bribed
Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) to promote his firm in Africa. Photo Credit: By
Caleb Jones -- Associated Press


Washington Post
By Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, May 9, 2006; Page A03

A wary Northern Virginia investor agreed to cooperate with the FBI in a public corruption investigation of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) and wear a "wire while engaged in face-to-face meetings with the Congressman," according to a court document filed yesterday.

The woman also recorded telephone conversations, as did the FBI through court-authorized wiretaps, the document said. The woman is identified only as a "cooperating witness" in the document, but people familiar with the case previously have identified her as Lori Mody, 42.

The disclosures provided new insights into the mounting case against Jefferson. In the past few months, two people have pleaded guilty to bribing the eight-term congressman to promote iGate Inc., a Kentucky-based high-tech company that sought broadband business in Africa.

Jefferson, 59, has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing. His office declined to comment yesterday. His lawyer, Robert P. Trout of Washington, did not return a phone message left at his office.

The latest information, cited from a sealed affidavit, surfaced in a ruling yesterday from U.S. Magistrate Judge William Connelly in Greenbelt. The judge agreed to unseal most of the affidavit for a search warrant executed Aug. 3 at the Potomac home of Jennifer Douglas, a wife of Nigerian Vice President Atiku Abubaker.

The judge ruled that the affidavit would be unsealed Thursday unless someone appeals his ruling. The Washington Post had filed a motion to unseal the affidavit. Jefferson's attorneys opposed it, saying the release would "taint him for life and the harm done will not be remedied by the decision of a grand jury not to indict."

The judge stopped short of releasing the entire affidavit, saying he would unseal information including Mody's recordings, but not the court-authorized wiretaps.

The ruling is the first public document to mention Jefferson by name in the ongoing inquiry. Previous court documents in the two guilty pleas referred to "Representative A."

The judge noted that "Congressman Jefferson is a target of" an inquiry and is being investigated for allegedly committing several crimes including bribery, a scheme to defraud, wire fraud and "bribery of a foreign official," the document said.

The judge did not mention any link between Jefferson and the Nigerian vice president in his ruling. But law enforcement authorities, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the inquiry is ongoing, said investigators were scrutinizing business dealings between Jefferson and Abubaker. The Nigerian Embassy did not return several calls seeking comment.

Jefferson, concerned about an iGate business deal falling through in Nigeria, sent a letter on official House stationery to Abubaker and met with him July 18 at his Potomac home, where the search warrant was executed, according to a court document filed last week in the case of Vernon L. Jackson.

Jackson, owner of Louisville-based iGate, pleaded guilty to bribing Jefferson to promote his broadband technology for Internet and cable television in Africa. In January, Brett Pfeffer, a former Jefferson aide, who was looking for investments for Mody, pleaded guilty to bribing Jefferson.

Mody, the court document indicates, "was defrauded out of $3.5 million by persons connected to the case," the document said. Mody, who has declined to comment in the past, did not return a phone call seeking comment.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6050801573.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
 
Re: Businessman Pleads Guilty To Bribing Rep. Jefferson

<font size="5"><center>FBI Searches Office of La. Congressman</font size></center>



CONGRESSMAN_PROBE.sff_LAAB106_20060515172924.jpg

U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, walks away after a
news conference in New Orleans on Monday, May 15, 2006.
Jefferson declared his innocence in light of a federal bribery
probe.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)


May 20, 11:41 PM (ET)
Associated Press
By MARK SHERMAN

WASHINGTON (AP) - FBI agents searched the congressional office of Rep. William Jefferson of Louisiana Saturday evening in connection with a public corruption investigation that has already netted two guilty pleas by two associates, authorities said.

The search began at 7:15 p.m. EDT in the Rayburn House Office Building, where Jefferson's office is located, said Debra Weierman, an FBI spokeswoman.

It was not clear what agents were looking for and Weierman said she could provide no additional details because the affidavit supporting the search warrant was sealed.

But she indicated the search could take several hours.

Jefferson's lawyer, Robert Trout, complained that FBI agents refused to allow him or the general counsel of the House of Representatives to witness the search.

"The government's actions in obtaining a search warrant to search the offices of a United States Congressman were outrageous," Trout said in a statement issued late Saturday. "There were no exigent circumstances necessitating this action. The government knew that the documents were being appropriately preserved while proper procedures were being followed. We are dismayed by this action. The documents weren't going anywhere and the prosecutors knew it."

FBI agents searched Jefferson's homes in Washington and New Orleans last August, hauling away boxes and bags from one of the residences.

Jefferson, a Democrat in his eighth congressional term, declared his innocence Monday during news conference outside the federal building in New Orleans and said he will not resign in the face of the investigation that has resulted in guilty pleas from two people who implicated him in a bribery scheme.

"I would take full responsibility for any crime that I committed, if that were the case. But I will not plead guilty to something I did not do, no matter how things are made to look and no matter the risk," Jefferson said the news conference.

He took no questions and said he was there "to declare, among other things, my continued intention to serve."

Jefferson said if indicted he was "prepared to answer these charges formally when and if the time comes."

Jefferson said he was addressing the situation because he believed his constituents deserved to hear some response to recent publicity about the case.

He said the guilty pleas in federal court in Virginia came from friends who succumbed to enormous pressure from the federal government.

"In order to protect themselves, they have now characterized their relationship with me, or with my family, in ways that fit neatly within the government's mistaken legal theories," he said.

In January, former Jefferson aide Brett Pfeffer pleaded guilty to bribery-related charges, saying Jefferson demanded money in exchange for help in brokering two African telecommunications deals.

Vernon Jackson, chief executive of iGate Inc., a Louisville, Ky., telecommunications firm, subsequently pleaded guilty to bribery, admitting he paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to Jefferson and his family members in exchange for the congressman's help obtaining business deals in Nigeria, Ghana and Cameroon.

The House Ethics Committee has opened an inquiry into the case.

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20060521/D8HNU35G2.html?PG=home&SEC=news
 
Some say black politicians unfairly targeted but the Govt says "fuck yourself darky"

meanwhile this filthy scumbag

nationaltrust%202.jpg


remains free to help cover up torture in Chicago. This guy is probably the dirtiest non-federal politician in modern history and the FBI has to go after Campbell who got a bigtime tax-evasion conviction after all that bullshit.

Show me a politician that ain't dirty. One.
 
Re: Some say black politicians unfairly targeted but the Govt says "fuck yourself darky"

they'll get him.

the same guy that indicted scooter libby and got governor george ryan convicted is after daley. they've been indicting his aides for the last 2 years. its only a matter of time.
 
Re: Some say black politicians unfairly targeted but the Govt says "fuck yourself darky"

BTW, this dont make us cool dolemite.
 
Re: Some say black politicians unfairly targeted but the Govt says "fuck yourself darky"

<font size="4">
The following was posted by Pitchdogg in a new thread
but was moved to this thread on the same subject for
continuity of debate and discussion.
_______________________________________________

</font size>

Congressman Jefferson from the NO caught up with 100K!!

Yeah well Ray Nagin may have won, but Congressman Jefferson gets caught redhanded. I think this is a ploy by the Republicans to regain some ground during the upcoming midterm elections. Jack Abramoff is still helpin out his boys on the hill. :smh:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/21/AR2006052100167.html
 
Lawmaker taped accepting cash: court document

Lawmaker taped accepting cash: court document
By Doug Palmer
Sun May 21, 9:10 PM ET

FBI agents videotaped Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record), a Louisiana Democrat, accepting $100,000 in cash they said was intended as a bribe for a Nigerian official and later found $90,000 of the money hidden in his freezer, according to a court document released on Sunday.

The document said the eight-term congressman received the cash from an FBI informant, who approached the bureau in March 2005 with her suspicion that Jefferson and two business associates conspired to defraud her out of $3.5 million.

Jefferson, a senior member of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, has been under investigation for his role in helping a Nigerian company with an Internet venture. He has maintained his innocence in the matter.

The court document was the basis for an FBI search of Jefferson's congressional office on Saturday and Sunday. The FBI had no comment on what it found in the 18-hour search.

According to the document, the FBI recorded a series of conversations between Jefferson and the informant, leading up to a July 30, 2005, meeting at a hotel in the Virginia suburbs of Washington. What happened next was captured by the FBI on videotape, the document said.

"At the close of the meeting, (the informant) and Congressman Jefferson exited the building and stood before the open trunk of (the informant's) car. At that time, Congressman Jefferson reached in and removed a reddish-brown colored leather briefcase which contained $100,000 cash in denominations of $100 bills," according to the court document.

"He placed the briefcase in a reddish-brown colored cloth bag, then took the bag, containing the briefcase and the $100,000 in cash and placed it inside the passenger compartment of his 1990 Lincoln Town Car and drove off."

According to the document, the money was to be used to bribe a high-ranking Nigerian government official who had agreed to help an American telecommunications company do business in Nigeria.

FBI agents searched Jefferson's Washington residence on August 3 and found $90,000 of the cash in his freezer, stuffed in frozen food containers and aluminum foil, the document said.

'OBVIOUS ATTEMPT TO EMBARRASS'

Jefferson's attorney, Robert Trout, criticized the FBI for releasing the court document, which he said was "an obvious attempt to embarrass Congressman Jefferson" on the part of prosecutors who have not charged the lawmaker with any crime.

"It would not be appropriate to comment on the details in the affidavit at this time," Trout said. "The congressman has consistently maintained his innocence, and if he is charged he will respond at the appropriate time."

In a statement last week, Jefferson denied any wrongdoing and said he had no intention of stepping down.

"I wish to say emphatically that in all of my actions here under scrutiny, that I never intended to dishonor my office, or you, the public, and I certainly did not sell my office," Jefferson said.

A Kentucky businessman pleaded guilty earlier this month to bribing Jefferson.

Louisville technology executive Vernon Jackson, who faces up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000, has agreed to help federal investigators as they examine Jefferson's dealings with Jackson's company, iGate Inc.

According to court records filed in the plea deal, Jefferson helped secure a deal with a Nigerian company called Netlink Digital Television and in return demanded payments to a company maintained in the name of his wife and children.

Brett Pfeffer, a former Jefferson aide, pleaded guilty in January to bribery charges for his role in the deal, and seven Jefferson staffers told the House in March they had been served with subpoenas.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060522...4FZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
I hate it when black people wanna sound like they are the victim.

If you did something MAN UP...Take yo shit nigga!!!


Perhaps if more black politicians will get the balls to become republican, they might have smart political advisors *like Mr. Rove* who will get them out of situations. Hell It worked for Bush....
 
House speaker protests to Bush over raid

House speaker protests to Bush over raid
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
2 hours, 31 minutes ago

The FBI's raid on a congressman's office is rippling through Capitol Hill, with majority Republicans in the House complaining to a GOP president and predicting a constitutional showdown in the Supreme Court.

Democrats, hoping to exploit Republican scandals on Capitol Hill and regain control of Congress, are making it known that Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record), D-La., is no longer welcome on the House's most prestigious committee, the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee.

For his part, Jefferson remains defiant.

"I will not give up a committee assignment that is so vital to New Orleans at this crucial time for any uncertain, long-term political strategy," Jefferson said Tuesday. "If asked, I would respectfully decline."

His spokeswoman, Melanie Roussell, added that Jefferson will not resign from Congress.

The developments are the beginning of what lawmakers predict will be a long dispute over the FBI's search of Jefferson's office last weekend. Historians say it was the first raid of a representative's quarters in Congress' 219 years.

FBI agents searched Jefferson's office in pursuit of evidence in a bribery investigation. The search warrant, signed by U.S. District Court Judge Thomas Hogan, was based on an affidavit that said agents found $90,000 in cash wrapped and stashed in the freezer of Jefferson's home.

Jefferson has not been indicted and has denied wrongdoing. The search brought Republican and Democratic leaders together in a rare alliance, fighting what they branded a breach of constitutional boundaries between branches of government.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., was so angry that he complained to Bush about the FBI's conduct.

"My opinion is that they took the wrong path," Hastert said of the FBI, after meeting with Bush in the White House. "They need to back up, and we need to go from there."

White House officials said they did not learn of the search until after it happened. They pledged to work with the Justice Department to soothe lawmakers.

"We are hoping that there's a way to balance the constitutional concerns of the House of Representatives with the law enforcement obligations of the executive branch," White House press secretary Tony Snow said. "Obviously we are taking note of Speaker Hastert's statements."

House Democrats reacted particularly quickly, in keeping with their election-year pledge to campaign against what they call a Republican "culture of corruption."

Officials said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had discussed Jefferson's situation with several fellow senior lawmakers and there was a consensus that he should step aside, preferably voluntarily, at least until his legal situation was clarified. It was not clear whether she or an emissary approached Jefferson. The officials who described the developments did so on condition of anonymity, citing the delicacy of the situation.

Pelosi had no immediate comment.

Jefferson is on the Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over taxes, trade, Medicare and more.

Pelosi moved aggressively recently when questions were raised about financial dealings of Rep. Alan Mollohan (news, bio, voting record). The West Virginian quickly announced that he was voluntarily stepping aside as the senior Democrat on the ethics committee.

Whatever Jefferson's fate, the weekend raid stirred bipartisan expressions of concern.

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales tried to strike a conciliatory tone, saying, "We have a great deal of respect for the Congress as a coequal branch of government."

But he also defended the search: "We have an obligation to the American people to pursue the evidence where it exists."

Justice Department officials said the decision to search Jefferson's office was made in part because he refused to comply with a subpoena for documents last summer. Jefferson reported the subpoena to the House on Sept. 15, 2005.

The House and Senate Judiciary committees were looking at the ramifications of Hogan's action. Also, House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters that Hastert's aides are reviewing several responses, including legal options.

"I've got to believe at the end of the day it's going to end up across the street at the Supreme Court," Boehner said. "I don't see anything short of that."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060524...oVI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
Bush orders FBI-Congress documents sealed

Bush orders FBI-Congress documents sealed
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
23 minutes ago

President Bush stepped into the Justice Department's constitutional confrontation with Congress on Thursday and ordered that documents seized in an FBI raid on a lawmaker's office be sealed for 45 days.

The president directed that no one involved in the investigation have access to the documents taken last weekend from the office of Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record), D-La., and that they remain in the custody of the Justice Department's solicitor general.

Bush's move was described as an attempt to cool off a heated confrontation between his administration and leaders of House leaders of both parties, particularly Speaker Dennis Hastert.

Hastert and Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said they were asking the House counsel to meet with the Justice Department to work out a resolution.

Bush's order "gives us some time to step back and try to negotiate with the Department of Justice," said Hastert.

Likewise, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said it would "provide additional time to reach a permanent solution that allows this investigation to continue while accommodating the concerns of certain members of Congress."

The president said he recognized that Republican and Democratic leaders have "deeply held views" that the search violated the Constitution's separation of powers principles. But he stopped short of saying he agreed with them, declaring the end goal was to provide materials relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation to prosecutors "in a manner that respects the interests of a coequal branch of government."

"Our government has not faced such a dilemma in more than two centuries," Bush said in a statement. "Yet after days of discussions, it is clear these differences will require more time to be worked out."

Hastert, R-Ill., and Pelosi, D-Calif., responded with their own statement: "Today, we are directing the House counsel to begin negotiations with the Department of Justice regarding the protocols and procedures to be followed in connection with evidence of criminal conduct that might exist in the offices of members."

The FBI executed a search warrant to raid Jefferson's office Saturday night as part of a bribery investigation against the congressman. Earlier, authorities said they had videotaped Jefferson last summer taking $100,000 in bribe money and that agents had found $90,000 of that cash stuffed in a freezer in his Washington apartment.

Two people have pleaded guilty to bribing Jefferson to promote a high tech business venture. Jefferson has not been charged and has denied wrongdoing.

The raid, which historians said was the first such search of a congressman's Capitol quarters in the more than two centuries since the first Congress convened, set off loud complaints from both Republicans and Democrats that the executive branch was overstepping its authority.

Hastert and Pelosi issued a rare joint statement Wednesday demanding that the FBI return the documents and saying that Jefferson then should cooperate more fully with the investigation.

Other lawmakers warned that the constitutional confrontation could spark a voter backlash, if Congress was seen as protecting its own at all costs.

Bush urged the Justice Department and the House to continue discussions and to resolve the matter quickly.

"Those who violate the law — including a member of Congress — should and will be held to account," the president said. "This investigation will go forward and justice will be served."

The dispute had continued to escalate — raising concerns for Bush and his legislative agenda on Capitol Hill — when Hastert earlier Thursday accused the Justice Department of trying to intimidate him in retaliation for his criticism.

The speaker was responding to an ABC News report that quoted an unnamed law enforcement source as saying that he was "in the mix" of the department's separate investigation into influence peddling by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

"This is one of the leaks that come out to try to, you know, intimidate people," Hastert said on Chicago's WGN radio.

Later, he said, "All I'm saying is, here are the dots. People can connect any dots they want to."

White House spokesman Tony Snow called the accusation "false, false, false."

"They're not leaking information to try to undermine the House speaker," Snow said. "I got pretty categorical denials."

"We are not going to dignify or speculate about the motives of anonymous sources providing inaccurate information," said Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse.

The department issued its first denial of the ABC story minutes after it aired. The speaker demanded a retraction from ABC News, which stood by its story. Hastert threatened in a letter from his lawyers to sue the network and reporters and executives for libel and defamation.

"Our response to the letter is our reporting on the story," said ABC News Vice President Jeffrey Schneider.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060525...jVI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
House leaders concede FBI right to search

can you believe these bitches defending this weak ass position.

House leaders concede FBI right to search
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
1 hour, 10 minutes ago

House leaders acknowledged Friday that FBI agents with a court-issued warrant can legally search a congressman's office, but they said they want procedures established after agents with a court warrant took over a lawmaker's office last week.

"I want to know exactly what would happen if there is a similar sort of thing" in the Senate, Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said Friday, shortly after summoning Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to his office.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., concurred: "I am confident that in the next 45 days, the lawyers will figure out how to do it right."

Gonzales was similarly optimistic. "We've been working hard already and we'll continue to do so pursuant to the president's order," he told The Associated Press.

In an editorial page article in USA Today on Friday, Hastert said he and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have directed House lawyers "to develop reasonable protocols and procedures that will make it possible for the FBI to go into congressional offices to constitutionally execute a search warrant."

Until last Saturday night, no such warrant had ever been used to search a lawmaker's office in the 219-year history of the Congress. Without advance notice, FBI agents then arrived at a House building to conduct an overnight search at the office of Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record), D-La., an eight-term lawmaker accused of bribery.

They carted away computer and other records in their pursuit of evidence that Jefferson accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for helping set up business deals in Africa.

Hastert and Pelosi, striking rare, election-year unity, protested that the FBI had not notified them and that the search violated the Constitution's separation of power protections. Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, suggested the matter would be resolved by the Supreme Court.

"No one is above the law," Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a letter Friday to members in her party. "Democrats will not support any position that allows members of Congress to use their office to shield illegal activity, period."

But, she added that "unlike the rights afforded a private citizen," neither Capitol Police, Jefferson, his staff or attorney nor the House's general counsel were allowed to be present. She said any procedures must establish that lawmakers can assert that documents in their office are part of the legislative process protected from disclosure to the executive branch by the Constitution.

"The courts must decide if the documents sought are part of the legislative process," Pelosi said. "When subpoenas are at issue, almost all courts have held that as a constitutional issue is being decided, the documents should remain in the possession of the House. In last Saturday's search, this precedent was ignored."

U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan on Friday set a schedule that could lead to a hearing by mid-June on whether the FBI must return all the confiscated material to Jefferson. Hogan, who a week ago issued the warrant for the search of Jefferson's office, had wanted to hold a hearing on the issue on Tuesday, but prosecutors asked for more time.

Earlier in the week, Hastert lodged a protest directly with Bush during a meeting at the White House and demanded that the FBI return the materials. Bush struck a compromise Thursday, ordering that the documents be sealed and turned over to the custody of Solicitor General Paul Clement until congressional leaders and the Justice Department agree on what to do with them.

"Our government has not faced such a dilemma in more than two centuries," Bush said in a statement. "Yet after days of discussions, it is clear these differences will require more time to be worked out."

The new talks are aimed at establishing guidelines for any future searches that might stem from federal investigations, including a widening Capitol Hill influence-peddling probe centered on convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

Meanwhile, a former aide to Jefferson was sentenced Friday to eight years in prison for his role in the bribery scandal investigation involving the congressman.

Brett Pfeffer, 37, of Herndon, Va., pleaded guilty in January to two bribery-related charges: conspiracy to commit bribery and aiding and abetting bribery of a public official. Jefferson's name did not come up in the hearing in federal court, but other documents have made clear he is that public official.

Pfeffer admitted to helping broker deals between Jefferson and a northern Virginia investment executive for whom Pfeffer worked. That executive, who has not been identified in court documents, agreed to pay bribes to Jefferson after Pfeffer said the congressman would require it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060527...itI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
Re: House leaders concede FBI right to search

<font size="5"><center>Defiant Stance In Jefferson Probe</font size>
<font size="4">Justice Dept. Talked of Big Resignations
If White House Agreed to Return Papers</font size></center>

Washington Post
By Dan Eggen and Peter Baker
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturday, May 27, 2006; Page A01

The Justice Department signaled to the White House this week that the nation's top three law enforcement officials would resign or face firing rather than return documents seized from a Democratic congressman's office in a bribery investigation, according to administration sources familiar with the discussions.

The possibility of resignations by Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales; his deputy, Paul J. McNulty; and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III was communicated to the White House by several Justice officials in tense negotiations over the fate of the materials taken from Rep. William J. Jefferson's office, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Justice prosecutors and FBI agents feared that the White House was ready to acquiesce to demands from House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and other lawmakers that the materials be returned to the Louisiana congressman, who is the subject of a criminal probe by the FBI. Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, David S. Addington, was among the leading White House critics of the FBI raid, telling officials at Justice and on Capitol Hill that he believed the search was questionable, several sources familiar with his views said.

Administration officials said yesterday that the specter of top-level resignations or firings at Justice and the FBI was a crucial turning point in the standoff, helping persuade President Bush to announce a cease-fire on Thursday. Bush ordered that the Jefferson materials be sealed for 45 days while Justice officials and House lawmakers work out their differences, while also making it clear that he expected the case against Jefferson to proceed.

Spokesmen for the White House, Cheney's office, the Justice Department and the FBI declined to comment, saying they would not discuss internal deliberations.

White House officials were not informed of the search until it began last Saturday and did not immediately recognize the political ramifications, the sources said. By Sunday, however, as the 18-hour search continued, lawmakers began lodging complaints with the White House.

Addington -- who had worked as a staffer in the House and whose boss, Cheney, once served as a congressman -- quickly emerged as a key internal critic of raiding the office of a sitting House member. He raised heated objections to the Justice Department's legal rationale for the search during a meeting Sunday with McNulty and others, according to several sources.

The talk of resignations adds another dramatic element to the remarkable tug of war that has played out since last Saturday night, when about 15 FBI agents executed a search warrant on Jefferson's office in the Rayburn House Office Building.

The raid -- the first physical FBI search of a congressman's office in U.S. history -- sparked an uproar in the House, where Hastert joined Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in demanding that the records be returned because they viewed the search as an illegal violation of the constitutional separation of powers.

Hastert wrote in an article published in USA Today yesterday that House lawyers are working with the Justice Department to develop guidelines for handling searches of lawmakers' offices. "But that is behind us now," Hastert wrote. "I am confident that in the next 45 days, the lawyers will figure out how to do it right."

Also yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) met with Gonzales at the senator's Capitol Hill office.

"We've been working hard already, and we'll continue to do so pursuant to the president's order," Gonzales told reporters on his way into Frist's suite just off the Senate floor.

Jefferson, 59, has been under investigation since March 2005 for allegations that he took hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in exchange for using his congressional influence to promote business ventures in Africa. Two people have pleaded guilty to bribing him, including Brett Pfeffer, one of his former aides, who was sentenced yesterday to eight years in prison by a federal judge in Alexandria.

An FBI affidavit released this week alleged that Jefferson was videotaped taking $100,000 in bribe money and that a search of his Washington apartment turned up $90,000 of that money wrapped in foil inside his freezer. Jefferson, who has not been charged, has denied any wrongdoing.

The unprecedented FBI raid on Jefferson's office triggered an extraordinary chain of events. Hastert, long one of the president's staunchest allies in Congress, and his chief of staff, Scott Palmer, were immediately angered by the tactic. On Monday, Hastert pushed Bush strongly on the issue during a trip the two shared on Air Force One coming back from Chicago. "Hastert was white-hot," said a senior administration official.

Bush expressed sympathy but did not take sides, the official said: "He did not say, 'I share your view.' He said, 'Look, we're going to try to work with you to help resolve this.' "

The view of the emerging political landscape was notably different at Justice, where officials feared they were quickly losing the debate. Prosecutors and FBI agents felt the materials were obtained from Jefferson through a lawful and court-approved search and that returning them -- as demanded by Hastert and others -- would amount to an intolerable political intervention in the criminal justice process.

Justice had one ally at the White House in Frances Fragos Townsend, the homeland security adviser and former prosecutor, who spoke in defense of the raid's legality at a meeting on Monday, according to two sources familiar with her remarks. Townsend was not invited to participate in subsequent discussions on the issue, however. A senior administration official said she would not normally be involved in the topic.

At a particularly contentious meeting Monday night at the Capitol, Palmer angrily upbraided William E. Moschella, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, and two other Justice officials, saying they had violated the Constitution, several sources said.

As the week progressed, the confrontation escalated further. At some point in the negotiations, McNulty told Palmer that he would quit if ordered to return the materials to Jefferson, according to several officials familiar with the conversation.

McNulty, a former Alexandria prosecutor who was recently named Gonzales's deputy, was a central player in the contentious negotiations with Capitol Hill and the White House, sources said. He had also worked in the House for 12 years, as chief counsel for both the majority leader's office and a crime subcommittee.

A message that McNulty might quit was passed along to the White House, along with similar messages for Gonzales and Mueller. Sources familiar with the discussions declined to say which Justice officials communicated those possibilities to the White House.

The discussion of Gonzales and the others resigning never evolved into a direct threat, but it was made plain that such an option would have to be considered if the president ordered the documents returned, several sources said. "It wasn't one of those things of 'If you will, I will,' " one senior administration official said. "It was kind of the background noise."

"One of the reasons the president did what he did was these types of conversations and other types of conversations in the House were escalating," the official said, referring to murmured threats by some House Republicans to call for Gonzales's resignation.

The desire to do something before the Memorial Day recess also created an "artificial deadline" that Bush considered counterproductive. "As the week moved on," the official said, "there's no question emotions were running high on both sides. . . . People had a gun to their head, and it was really making people not more flexible but more intense. It was his view to say let's get more time."

The White House grew especially concerned about a House Republican Conference meeting scheduled for 11 a.m. Thursday and later rescheduled for 3:30 p.m. In the heat of the moment, it could have gotten out of hand and wound up with some sort of resolution demanding that Gonzales step down. "You never know what's going to happen in a conference," the official said.

Bush decided to head off the situation. He summoned Cheney, Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten, Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, counselor Dan Bartlett, legislative director Candida Wolff, White House Counsel Harriet Miers, Deputy White House Counsel William K. Kelley and some other staff members to the Oval Office on Thursday morning and announced that he had decided to seal the Jefferson documents.

"I'm going to put an end to the escalation," one official quoted Bush as saying. "We've got to calm this down."

Bush directed Cheney to inform Hastert, while Bolten told Gonzales.

Bush aides were also worried about a war with the Republican House if the president did not act.

"If you tell the House to stick it where the sun don't shine, you're talking about a fundamentally corrosive relationship between two branches of government," the senior administration official said. "They could zero out funding; they could say, 'Okay, you can do subpoenas, so can we.' "

Staff writer Jim VandeHei and researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6052601016.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
 
Re: House leaders concede FBI right to search

<font size="5"><center>Congressman Tried to Hide Papers,
Justice Dept. Says</font size>
<font size="4">
Court Filing in Response to Jefferson Lawsuit Defends Raid</font size></center>

Washington Post
By Allan Lengel and Charles Babington
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, May 31, 2006; Page A04

The Justice Department yesterday vigorously defended the recent weekend raid of Rep. William J. Jefferson's Capitol Hill office as part of a bribery investigation, asserting that the Democratic lawmaker attempted to hide documents from FBI agents while they were searching his New Orleans home last August.

The government questioned in a 34-page motion filed in U.S. District Court here whether it could have obtained all the materials it had sought in a subpoena if it had not launched the surprise raid on Jefferson's congressional office May 20. According to the government filing, an FBI agent caught Jefferson slipping documents into a blue bag in the living room of his New Orleans home during a search.

"It is my belief that when Congressman Jefferson placed documents into the blue bag, he was attempting to conceal documents that were relevant to the investigation," FBI agent Stacey E. Kent of New Orleans stated in an affidavit that was part of the government's court submission. The document was filed in response to Jefferson's lawsuit demanding that the government return to him documents seized during the raid on his Capitol Hill office 11 days ago.

Robert P. Trout, Jefferson's attorney, said he would refrain from commenting pending further review of the government's documents. Meanwhile, the recent FBI raid spurred new tensions between Congress and the administration, as a House committee chairman vowed to interrogate top Justice Department officials.

Judiciary Committee Chairman F. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) said he wants Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales and FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III to appear "up here to tell us how they reached the conclusion" to conduct the raid, which Sensenbrenner called "profoundly disturbing" on constitutional grounds. The chairman also said that his committee "will be working promptly" to draft legislation that would clearly prohibit wide-ranging searches of lawmakers' offices by federal officials pursuing criminal cases.

Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse reiterated the agency's defense of the search as legal and necessary. He cautioned that Gonzales would not be able to go into detail about the Jefferson probe if he were to testify.

As part of its response to Jefferson's lawsuit, the government offered to provide a "filter team" -- to be made up of an FBI agent and two Justice Department lawyers not part of the investigation -- which would allow Jefferson to examine all the seized materials. If Jefferson thought legislative materials were "privileged" and unrelated to the criminal investigation but the government disagreed, a judge would be the final arbiter, under the proposal.

The Justice Department's court filing and Sensenbrenner's comments -- made during a hearing in which constitutional scholars sharply criticized the May 20 raid -- ran counter to recent efforts by President Bush and key lawmakers to calm down talk of a constitutional standoff. Bush last week ordered the seized materials to be sealed for 45 days, allowing time for tempers to cool and for lawyers and elected officials to confer.

But Sensenbrenner and several committee colleagues yesterday described the FBI's weekend search of Jefferson's office in the Rayburn House Office Building as an arrogant, unnecessary breach of tradition and vital constitutional protections. The FBI had several other ways to compel Jefferson to surrender specific items, they said. The copying of Jefferson's computer hard drive, they said, was akin to rifling through every file cabinet, including files dealing with matters unrelated to the alleged crimes.

The Constitution says House and Senate members "shall not be questioned . . . for any Speech or Debate in either House." Bruce Fein, one of the constitutional lawyers who testified yesterday, said that "when it comes to documents, the only way you can search is to read everything. And when you read everything, you encroach on the 'Speech or Debate' clause."

Noting that Gonzales, Mueller and Deputy Attorney General Paul J. McNulty signaled that they would resign if they were forced to return the Jefferson documents, Fein said: "Well, let them resign. I am astonished that the president would not have fired them for undertaking this action without consulting him in advance."

In yesterday's court filing, the government argued that law enforcement authorities should not be barred from conducting searches of congressional offices simply because they contain legislative materials -- such as committee reports, internal memos and drafts of bills -- that are protected under the "Speech or Debate" clause. "If his argument is accepted by this court, members of Congress and their staffs would be able to create search-free zones wherever they go by bringing along some legislative materials," the government said of Jefferson, 59, who has been under investigation since March 2005 over allegations that he took hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes in exchange for using his congressional influence to promote business ventures in Africa. A key part of the FBI probe has centered on Jefferson's dealings with iGate Inc., a Louisville high-tech company that was marketing broadband technology for the Internet and cable television in Africa.

Last Aug. 3, FBI agents searched Jefferson's New Orleans home while the congressman and family members were present. Kent said she was assigned to watch Jefferson and his family during the search, according to her affidavit accompanying the government motion yesterday.

She said she observed him looking at several pieces of paper on a table. At one point, she said, he asked to see a copy of the subpoena.

"After a copy had been brought to him and he reviewed it, I observed Congressman Jefferson then take the subpoena and the documents he had been reading earlier and place them together under his elbow on the kitchen table."

At one point, she said, he moved to the living room, which had just been searched, and sat on a recliner. While sitting, he slipped the subpoena and the documents into a blue bag that he knew had already been searched, Kent's affidavit said.

"After several minutes, I approached Congressman Jefferson and told him that I needed to look at the documents that he had placed into the bag," the agent stated. "Congressman Jefferson told me the documents were subpoenas."

He finally pulled out the documents that were from a B.K. Son. The search warrant had asked for all communications between Jefferson and Son, the affidavit said. Son is the chief technology officer of iGate.

U.S. District Judge Thomas F. Hogan set a June 16 hearing to address the motion by Jefferson's attorney seeking the return all the seized documents.

Staff writer Dan Eggen contributed to this report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6053001236.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
 
Re: House leaders concede FBI right to search

I wondered why we didn't hear much from the Culture Of Corruption crowd lately. Then there is also this about the minority leader, the author of this Culture Of Corruption campaign.

Reid Defends Free Tickets From Boxing Regulators
From the Associated Press
May 31, 2006


LAS VEGAS — Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said it was his official duty to attend boxing matches in Nevada and that he did nothing wrong when he accepted complimentary ringside seats from a state agency that was lobbying him.

"I would be criticized if I didn't go," the Nevada Democrat told reporters Tuesday after addressing a veterans group in Las Vegas.

"It's just like going to an Ohio State football game, an Arizona State football game — in Nevada, boxing is it," Reid said. "I have an obligation to make sure boxing is conducted properly not only in Nevada but around the country."

Man, give me a fuckin break. Free tickets in the VIP section? Fuck out of here.

Reid was responding to an Associated Press story that detailed how the senator had accepted free tickets, possibly valued at several thousand dollars, from the Nevada Athletic Commission, the agency that regulates boxing in the state.

At the time, the agency was lobbying Reid to drop his support for the creation of a federal boxing commission that could have undermined the powerful Nevada agency's authority.

Senate rules instruct senators and staff to "be wary" of accepting gifts that may be intended to influence official action.

-VG
 
Re: House leaders concede FBI right to search

<font size="5"><center>For Deals, Jefferson Built Web Of Firms</font size></center>

Washington Post
By Allan Lengel and Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, June 5, 2006; Page A01

On May 12, 2005, over dinner with business partner and FBI informant Lori Mody, Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.) furtively scrawled the letter "c" on a sheet of paper, and next to it wrote some numbers indicating that he was demanding a much larger personal stake in an African business deal than previously agreed to.

As court records, sworn affidavits, plea agreements and search warrants attest, it was quite a deal, one of several involving at least seven business entities, nearly a dozen family members and hundreds of thousands of dollars sloshing through bank accounts, all for Jefferson's personal benefit.

An FBI raid on Jefferson's congressional office last month triggered a constitutional showdown between the White House and congressional leaders from both parties over separation of powers. But as that controversy subsides, the focus has shifted back to Jefferson and the corporate labyrinth that federal authorities say he erected to secretly receive illegal payments for promoting high-tech ventures in Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria.

For Jefferson, 59, the money-making schemes were supposed to be all in the family, involving his wife, two brothers, five daughters and two sons-in-law. As a member of the House Ways and Means trade subcommittee, Jefferson has traveled repeatedly to Nigeria and other western African countries and met with their leaders.

Jefferson's secretive business negotiations have already yielded guilty pleas from one business partner, Vernon L. Jackson, and a former top aide, Brett M. Pfeffer. Both have confessed to conspiring to bribe the congressman. Jackson admitted giving Jefferson more than $400,000 in exchange for using his official position to promote high-tech business ventures in Africa.

Jefferson has repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Late last week, his attorney, Robert P. Trout, complained that the Justice Department has leaked grand jury information and "has not passed up any opportunity to further its public relations campaign to justify the unprecedented -- and we believe illegal -- search of a congressman's office."

"The congressman has not been charged with any offense, and now is not the time to respond to the ever-growing number of inappropriate and improper disclosures by the government," Trout said. "Congressman Jefferson continues to maintain that he has never accepted payment from anyone for the performance of any act or duty for which he was elected."

To political observers in his native New Orleans, the recent revelations of a sprawling corruption investigation fit neatly into the biography of a politician who has been bedeviled by personal finance controversies his whole career. The son of impoverished Louisiana sharecroppers and a graduate of Harvard Law School, Jefferson has never been content to live off the salary of a public servant, nor did he want to leave his family in the financial straits he pulled himself out of, observers say.

He broke with his mentor, Ernest N. "Dutch" Morial, New Orleans's first black mayor, in the late 1970s over a steep bill Jefferson delivered for legal work that Morial had assumed was free. He was sued in 1990 by the federal government for failing to pay the mortgage on his dilapidated rental properties, and eventually settled. He took heat for a business he ran renting appliances to poor people who could not afford their own, according to local news accounts.

"That's why we call him 'Dollar Bill,' " said Allan Katz, an independent New Orleans political consultant, who chronicled Jefferson's early political career for the Times-Picayune.

But Jefferson's recent ventures show a level of sophistication that puts his landlord days in the distant past.

In the 1990s, Jefferson made a name for himself on Capitol Hill as an ardent promoter of Africa as a huge new market for trade and investment. In 2000, that caught the attention of Jackson, whose company, iGate Inc., sold technology to deliver high-speed Internet access over ordinary copper wires. Jefferson saw the technology as a way for poor West African countries to skip the huge investments needed to install fiber optic cables or wireless relay stations, court records show.

At first, Jefferson promoted iGate's technology without asking for anything in return. But in early 2001, according to court documents, he informed Jackson that his services would no longer be free. On Jan. 19 of that year, the Jefferson family started the ANJ Group, with Jefferson's wife, Andrea Green Jefferson, as manager, and his five daughters listed as company members.

On Rep. Jefferson's instructions, court records show, ANJ was to receive $7,500 a month in consulting fees from iGate, along with 5 percent of gross sales over $5 million a year, 5 percent of capital investments in iGate secured by Jefferson and 1 million shares of the company.

Between 2001 and 2005, iGate transferred $455,446 to ANJ, some of which covered Jefferson's travel costs to Africa, according to an FBI search warrant.

Jackson traveled to Africa with Jefferson, who met with officials to promote the deals, according to court documents. But there were tensions between the two.

"Jackson believed that in the event Jackson did not pay these invoices, [Jefferson] would stop performing official acts on behalf of iGate and take affirmative steps to impede the success of iGate," said a court document in Jackson's guilty plea.

The seed of Jefferson's current troubles was planted in 2004 when Netlink Digital Television abruptly backed out of a one-year-old agreement with iGate to provide access to Nigeria's cable television and Internet market. That breach sent Jefferson and Jackson scrambling for new investors, court records show. They found Lori Mody.

Mody, 42, had co-founded the information technology company Signal Corp. with her late father, Win Remley, out of their house in McLean and built it up with defense contracts. In 2002, Veridian Corp. bought it for a reported $227 million.

Mody hired Pfeffer, a gregarious friend and former Jefferson staffer, in 2003 to help her invest in start-up companies and charitable ventures. When Pfeffer told Jefferson of Mody's investment interests, the congressman jumped, according to court records. In June 2004, Pfeffer introduced Jefferson to Mody over lunch in New Orleans.

Jefferson spelled out iGate's potential in Africa as "a deal you can't refuse," according to an FBI search warrant. Mody's company agreed to invest $45 million for the right to use iGate's technology and equipment in Nigeria, with $3.5 million paid up front.

That August, Jefferson, with the help of one of his daughters, a lawyer, established W2-International Broadband Services Ltd., (W2-IBBS) under Mody's ownership, to partner with a Nigerian telecommunications firm, Rosecom.

Mody then transferred $3.5 million to iGate with the understanding that those funds would be forwarded to Netlink Digital Television to buy back the rights to iGate's technology. FBI documents say only half that money reached the television company.

Four months later, over lunch in a congressional dining room, Jefferson informed Mody that he wanted a 5 percent to 7 percent stake in W2-IBBS in the name of his five daughters. That stake would be channeled through their own African company, Global Energy & Environmental Services LLC, which would be run by his son-in-law, according to court documents.

Over the ensuing months, Mody increasingly questioned Pfeffer and Jackson about the deal and her $3.5 million. In March 2005, she went to the FBI. From then on, Jefferson's ever-more-complex business dealings unfolded under the watch of federal investigators.

On May 12, 2005, Jefferson demanded that his stake in the Nigerian deal rise from 7 percent to as much as 20 percent, "for my children," according to court documents. The figure eventually reached 30 percent.

On July 12, after a trip to Ghana, Jefferson met with Mody to inform her she now owned a company there, International Broad Band Services, which, like W2-IBBS, would be partially owned by the Jefferson family, according to the search warrant.

On July 26, Jefferson and Mody met to discuss Jefferson's formation of a new company, Multimedia Broadband Services Inc., to buy out iGate's role in the African venture and relegate Jackson to an employee of his own operation, court records show.

On July 30, Mody met Jefferson at the Ritz-Carlton in Pentagon City to deliver a briefcase containing $100,000 in FBI-marked bills, allegedly to be used to bribe Nigerian officials, records show.

On Aug. 3, 2005, the FBI raided Jefferson's residence and found $90,000 of those bills in a freezer. Agents also found a document detailing still more corporate entities: Diverse Communications, which was to receive a percentage of Nigerian operating profits plus $5 per television set using iGate technology; and Jefferson Interests Inc., operated by Jefferson and his brothers, whose bank account was listed as a destination for Nigerian cash.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...6060400816.html?referrer=email&referrer=email
 
Black Caucus opposes Jefferson treatment

Black Caucus opposes Jefferson treatment
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
29 minutes ago

A drive by the Democratic leadership to strip embattled Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) of his committee post triggered a backlash Thursday as the Congressional Black Caucus opposed the move and said the Louisiana lawmaker deserves a "presumption of innocence."

The caucus chairman, Rep. Melvin Watt (news, bio, voting record) of North Carolina, told reporters that some black voters might ask why action was sought against "a black member of Congress" when there was neither precedent nor rule for it.

Jefferson has not been indicted and has denied all wrongdoing in connection with a federal bribery investigation that has netted two convictions. He has rebuffed repeated calls from Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and others to step aside until any involvement is clarified.

Watt spoke after a Democratic leadership group voted to strip Jefferson of his committee post, at least temporarily. The entire rank and file was then summoned to debate the issue but postponed a vote until next week.

A vote by the full House would be required to force Jefferson to step aside.

"I can guarantee" he will not voluntarily step aside, said Melanie Roussell, Jefferson's spokeswoman.

The maneuvering came as part of a determined attempt by Pelosi, D-Calif., to ease Jefferson from his position. "I feel he should step aside," the minority leader told reporters. She declined further comment, but spokeswoman Jennifer Crider said any charge that race was involved was "absolutely untrue. This is about upholding the highest ethical standard for every member of the Democratic caucus."

Democrats intend to campaign against Republicans this fall by accusing them of presiding over a "culture of corruption." Jefferson's continued presence on the committee presumably would allow Republicans to blur the issue in the midterm elections.

Several officials said Watt had spoken up at the meeting of the rank and file to invoke a rule that provides for a five-day delay.

Emerging from the session, he distributed a statement that said the Congressional Black Caucus perhaps has a "unique appreciation of our nation's constitutional guarantee of the presumption of innocence."

The statement added the group "therefore opposes suggestions that some have made to force Rep. Jefferson to resign from Congress or to remove him involuntarily from his position on the Ways and Means Committee in the absence of precedents that have been historically applied and will be consistently applied in the future."

Speaking for himself, Watt was more pointed.

He said the leadership was open to a charge that it was acting out of political expedience. "It's about to blow up in their face," he added.

Referring to black voters, who are among the most loyal Democrats in the electorate, he added, "You've got a whole base of people out there who believe that the Democratic Party takes them for granted already."

If action is taken only against someone who "is a black member of Congress, then our community will legitimately ask what in the world are you doing?"

While Jefferson has not been indicted, two men have been found guilty in the probe.

Brett Pfeffer, a former Jefferson aide, was sentenced to eight years in prison last month for conspiring to commit bribery and aiding and abetting the bribery of a public official.

Vernon Jackson, 53, chief executive of iGate Inc., a Louisville, Ky.-based telecommunications company, pleaded guilty May 3 to paying more than $400,000 in bribes to Jefferson.

Additionally, the FBI claims that it videotaped the Louisianian last summer taking $100,000 in bribe money and that agents later found $90,000 of the money stashed in a freezer in his home.

FBI agents carried out a weekend search of Jefferson's congressional office last month, triggering an outpouring of criticism from congressional leaders claiming they had encroached on Congress' constitutional powers.

In response, Bush ordered the material taken be turned over the a Justice Department official not involved in the investigation.

Race was a further complication in the episode. Jefferson is black, and some Democrats say that black voters could be alienated if he is forced aside.

"The rule is you lose your leadership position or chairmanship" after indictment, said Rep. Bobby Scott (news, bio, voting record) of Virginia, who is also black.

Pelosi recently prevailed on Rep. Alan Mollohan (news, bio, voting record) of West Virginia, to step aside as senior member of the ethics committee after questions were raised about some of his legislative actions. But he remains a member of the Appropriations Committee, with broad authority over the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060609...LdI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
From my perspective blacks are being unfairly targeted when they are innocent of any wrong doing but are constantly being harassed. From the examples posted all them MF's were doing some serious shit and need to spend some time in jail. You can start complaining when they start framing black politicians. As much as they hate Cynthia McKinney you don't see them trying to pin some bogus shit on her.. Bill Campbell needs to spend some time in jail and we all know he was doing some shady shit when he was mayor here. That is why he left for FL after his term was up.
 
`

<font size="5"><center>Former Atlanta Mayor Sentenced to Prison</font size></center>


PH2006061400327.jpg

Former Atlanta mayor Bill Campbell, right, addresses the media
as his wife Sharon listens at the federal courthouse in Atlanta
after Campbell was sentenced to 30 months and fined $6300
for tax evasion, Tuesday, June 13, 2006. Campbell said the
sentence was an attempt "to undo the jury's verdict." (AP
Photo/John Amis) (John Amis - AP)


ap.gif

By ERRIN HAINES , 06.13.2006, 05:17 PM

ATLANTA -- A federal judge said he believed Bill Campbell helped make Atlanta a world-class city but wasn't convinced the former mayor had accepted responsibility for his misdeeds.

Judge Richard Story on Tuesday sentenced Campbell to 2 1/2 years in prison and fined him $6,300 for tax evasion

Story said he was overcome with a "pall of disappointment" over the breadth of misconduct during Campbell's administration. Campbell, 52, was convicted in March.

"Within my heart, I am not sure you have accepted responsibility," he told Campbell.

Campbell was cleared of charges he lined his pockets with payoffs as he guided Atlanta during the 1990s, years that included the 1996 Summer Olympics. But he was found guilty of failing to pay taxes on what prosecutors said were his ill-gotten gains.

Sentencing guidelines had called for 2 1/2 years to 3 years and one month in prison. The judge also ruled that Campbell owed $62,823 in back taxes.

Campbell, who was ordered to voluntarily surrender to police at a later date, said he was confident he would prevail on appeal.

"What we saw today was an attempt, unfortunately, to undo the jury's verdict," Campbell said. "This is not justice. I never betrayed the public trust."

Campbell's defense team argued that his two decades of public service were grounds for leniency. But Assistant U.S. Attorney Russell Vineyard said that if the former mayor "seeks credit for the good things that happened on his watch, he must also take credit for the bad."

During the trial, prosecutors tried to prove that Campbell had taken more than $160,000 in illegal campaign contributions, cash payments, junkets and home improvements from city contractors while he was mayor from 1994 to 2002.

Instead, he was convicted on just three counts of federal tax evasion, and acquitted on racketeering and bribery charges _ a verdict he and his attorneys painted as a vindication.

The government's seven-year investigation into city hall corruption also led to the conviction of 10 of Campbell's subordinates.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/14/AR2006061400324.html
 
House Dems strip Jefferson of assignment

House Dems strip Jefferson of assignment
By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent
1 minute ago

House Democrats, determined to make an election-year point about ethics, voted 99-58 Thursday night to strip Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) of his committee assignment while a federal bribery investigation runs its course.

The rank and file acted despite a last-minute plea by the embattled Louisiana lawmaker and persistent complaints from the Congressional Black Caucus that there neither rule or precedent for the action.

Jefferson has not been indicted and maintains his innocence. In remarks to reporters, he conceded that "serious allegations" swirl around him.

After weeks of defiance, he also left open the possibility that he might at last surrender the seat voluntarily before the issue reaches the House floor for final action. "I don't want to speculate," he said.

The three-hour closed door meeting marked the culmination of a drive by the Democratic leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record) of California, to take action. "This isn't about proof in a court of law. This is about an ethical standard," she told reporters.

"I wish the White House would follow our lead on this," she added. Demorats have vowed to make ethics a cornerstone of their campaign for control of the House this fall and have repeatedly accused Republicans of presiding over a "culture of corruption."

Rep. James Clyburn (news, bio, voting record) of South Carolina, who is a member of the Democratic leadership as well as the black caucus, said the rank and file had confronted "two competing interests, the legal interest and the political interest."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060616...1VI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
N. Orleans mayor endorses lawmaker under FBI probe

N. Orleans mayor endorses lawmaker under FBI probe
By Russell McCulley
Sat Oct 7, 11:17 PM ET

A U.S. congressman from Louisiana, under investigation by the FBI after they found $90,000 in cash in his freezer, was endorsed by New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin on Saturday and vowed that allegations of bribery would not hurt his re-election campaign.

"I have been effective, and I will continue to be," Democratic Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) said as he opened his campaign for re-election in November 7 congressional election.

"It's really based on knowledge of the Congress and relationships with members, and that doesn't change."

The eight-term Democratic congressman has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with any crimes. But the FBI is investigating him for allegedly taking bribes to help promote business deals in Nigeria.

Federal agents have raided Jefferson's Capitol Hill office and his homes in New Orleans and Washington, carting out boxes of documents and the $90,000 in frozen cash.

Two former associates of Jefferson's have pleaded guilty to bribery charges and agreed to cooperate with investigators. In June, Jefferson was removed from the powerful House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee.

Nagin, who an won an uphill re-election bid in hurricane-ravaged New Orleans last spring, told reporters he was returning a favor by endorsing Jefferson.

"He was one of the few elected officials that supported me during the mayor's race, and I told him that if he needed my support, I would reciprocate," Nagin said. "Until he's indicted, I think we ought to presume he's innocent until proven guilty."

Jefferson said he was counting on Nagin to help him mobilize votes from the city's black population, which is scattered around the country after Hurricane Katrina forced most people to evacuate when it struck on August 29, 2005.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061008...CdZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement

Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement
By DOUG SIMPSON, Associated Press Writer
6 minutes ago

An eight-term Democratic Louisiana congressman whose Capitol Hill office was raided earlier this year as part of a bribery investigation failed Saturday to win the endorsement of the state's Democratic Party.

Rep. William Jefferson (news, bio, voting record) was passed over by the party's State Central Committee in favor of state Rep. Karen Carter. The committee voted 69-53 to endorse Carter in the Nov. 7 election.

"I am absolutely humbled," she said.

Jefferson, who has denied the bribery allegations and has not been charged, will still appear on the ballot as a Democrat and will not lose campaign funds because of the vote. But it marks the first time in recent memory that an incumbent failed to win the state party's endorsement, said party member Elsie Burkhalter.

An FBI affidavit alleges that Jefferson took a $100,000 bribe in 2005 to help promote a cable television and Internet business in Nigeria and Ghana. It says all but $10,000 of the cash was found four days later in the freezer of his Washington home.

The investigation became public with separate raids on Jefferson's homes in New Orleans and Washington during the summer of 2005. In May, the FBI made an unprecedented raid on his Capitol Hill office.

In June, he was ousted from the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.

Jefferson released a statement after the vote accusing Carter of relying on statewide, rather than local, Democratic committee support to earn its endorsement.

"Karen Carter — as she has always done — has sold out the interests of local people for those of people elsewhere in our state," the statement said.

Carter is one of three prominent Democrats challenging Jefferson for the seat. The others are state Sen. Derrick Shepherd of Marerro and Troy Carter, a former New Orleans City Council member. If no candidate earns more than 50 percent of the vote Nov. 7, a second vote will be held in December with the top two candidates.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061014...9RI2ocA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
 
Re: Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement

[frame]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/08/AR2006120801496.html?referrer=email[/frame]
 
Re: Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement

<font size="5"><center>
La. Dem Incumbent Wins House Runoff</font size>

<font size="4">"Jefferson drew widespread support among blacks
who are skeptical of the federal government's
motives in its investigation of him."</font size></center>


LOUISIANA_HOUSE.sff_NY107_20061207231336.jpg
aptopix_Louisiana_House_Jefferson.sff_LAAB124_20061209235857.jpg

Rep. William Jefferson, D-La., and his wife, Dr. Andrea Jefferson, acknowledge the crowd at his election night headquarters in New Orleans in this Nov. 7, 2006, file photo. Jefferson, the target of FBI raids, is set for a runoff to hold onto his seat and salvage his political career. (AP Photo/Bill Haber)


By CAIN BURDEAU
Associated Press
Dec 10, 10:16 AM (ET)

NEW ORLEANS (AP) - U.S. Rep. William Jefferson easily defeated his fellow Democratic opponent in a runoff election Saturday, despite an ongoing federal bribery investigation.

In complete but unofficial returns, Jefferson, Louisiana's first black congressman since Reconstruction, received 57 percent of the vote over state Rep. Karen Carter, who had 43 percent.

Carter was unable to capitalize on a scandal that included allegations the FBI found $90,000 in bribe money in Jefferson's freezer.

In a concession speech, Carter embraced family members and pledged to work with Jefferson, especially on the area's recovery from Hurricane Katrina.

"I guess the people are happy with the status-quo," she said.

The eight-term incumbent was forced into the runoff against Carter when he failed to win 50 percent of the vote in a crowded open multiparty primary. Carter had sought to become the first black woman from Louisiana elected to Congress.

Jefferson described his win as "a great moment and I thank almighty God for making it possible." He called for regional unity to focus on the hurricane recovery and in bringing back evacuees who are still scattered across the country.

His presence in Washington could be embarrassing for Democrats, who won control of Congress on a platform of cleaning up corruption. In June, incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., led a successful effort to remove Jefferson from the powerful House Ways and Means Committee as the probe unfolded.

He was accused of taking bribes from a company seeking lucrative contracts in the Nigerian telecommunications market. He has not been charged with any crime and denies any wrongdoing.

The scandal turned the race into a debate largely divided along racial lines, an age-old dynamic in this city that has intensified since Hurricane Katrina displaced large numbers of blacks and upended their demographic and political dominance.

Whites, who overwhelmingly voted for Carter in the primary and have been her most enthusiastic financial backers, believed a Jefferson win would confirm this city's image as corrupt and untrustworthy as it asks the nation to fund its recovery from Katrina.

City Councilman Oliver Thomas said Jefferson's victory would make the recovery more difficult.

"People are watching this election all around the country and I can only imagine what they are thinking," Thomas said. "It will be very difficult to go back to them and ask them to trust us with the money we need here."

Carter's campaign spokesman and father, Ken Carter, said he felt they had done all they could to compete against Jefferson, but regretted the tone of the campaign in the final stages.

"Race is all too often a factor in campaigns in New Orleans," Ken Carter said. "Here we had a candidate that tried to paint this young African-American woman as a pawn of the white establishment."

One white voter, George Christen, a registered independent, cast his ballot in a predominantly white precinct in the Algiers neighborhood, just across the Mississippi River from the French Quarter.

"I just didn't want Jefferson in. Period," said Christen, 42. "Jefferson is an embarrassment. He needs to be out."

Jefferson did get a vote from Jene Allen, who is black.

"He started the job. Let him finish it," said Allen, who wouldn't give her age. "I know Karen Carter would be the first black woman, but I think she played it dirty, too dirty."

Jefferson, 59, drew widespread support among blacks who are skeptical of the federal government's motives in its investigation of him. He repeatedly suggested the probe is groundless because he has yet to be indicted more than a year after the FBI raided his home in New Orleans.

Carter, 37, raised nearly five times as much money as Jefferson, but she was largely outflanked in the endorsement game. Jefferson picked up the backing of Mayor Ray Nagin and other prominent black politicians.

The endorsements spoke to Jefferson's solid footing in New Orleans politics. He arrived here in the 1970s as a Harvard-educated lawyer from rural north Louisiana, the sixth of 10 children brought up in a three-room country home. By 1980, he represented New Orleans in the state Senate. At 42, he became the first black from Louisiana in the House since Reconstruction.

The law firm Jefferson founded became the largest black-owned practice in the South. He created a political organization, the Progressive Democrats, which fielded candidates for the school board, assessors' races, state House seats and mayoral contests.

Before the bribery scandal erupted, Jefferson had climbed to the pinnacle of the Democratic Party. He was a confidant of former President Bill Clinton.

---

Associated Press writer Mary Foster contributed to this report.


http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20061210/D8LU29PG0.html
 
Re: Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement

<h1>House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment</h1><h2></h2><P><FONT SIZE="2">
<div id="byline">By <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/staff/email/lyndsey+layton/" title="Send an e-mail to Lyndsey Layton">Lyndsey Layton</a></div>Washington Post Staff Writer<br/>
Thursday, March 1, 2007; Page A04</FONT><P>
<div id="article_body"><p>House Republicans plan to force a floor vote on the appointment of <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/j000070/" target="">Rep. William J. Jefferson</a> (D-La.), who is the subject of a federal bribery investigation, to a seat on the Homeland Security Committee.</p><p>The decision to put Jefferson on the panel was made by Speaker <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/p000197/" target="">Nancy Pelosi</a> (Calif.), and House Democrats endorsed the move at a private meeting Tuesday night, but his appointment must be confirmed by a vote on the House floor. Such an action would normally be a formality, but Republicans said yesterday that they would pursue a rarely used maneuver to force a recorded vote on the matter.</p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="right" width="238"><tr><td width="10"></td><td width="228">
<div class="media_photo"><!--link rel="image_src" href="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2007/02/28/PH2007022801946.jpg"/--><a href="javascript:void(popitup('http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/postphotos/orb/asection/2007-03-01/index.html?imgId=PH2007022801951&imgUrl=/photo/2007/02/28/PH2007022801951.html',650,850))"><img src="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/largerPhoto/images/enlarge_tab.gif" width="103" height="12" border="0" align="bottom" alt=""></a><br/><a href="javascript:void(popitup('http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/photo/postphotos/orb/asection/2007-03-01/index.html?imgId=PH2007022801951&imgUrl=/photo/2007/02/28/PH2007022801951.html',650,850))"><img src="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2007/02/28/PH2007022801946.jpg" border="0" alt="Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) is under federal investigation on suspicion of bribery." height="144" width="228" align="top"></a><div id="caption">Rep. William Jefferson (D-La.) is under federal investigation on suspicion of bribery.<span id="credit"> (By Chip Somodevilla -- Getty Images) </span></div></div>
<title></title><div>
<div class="sidebarhack"><b></b></div>
<div class="sidebar">
<h2>Capitol Briefing</h2>
<div class="sidebarcontent">
<a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/"><img src="http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/01/18/GR2007011800747.gif" width="80" height="88" border="0" alt="Capitol Briefing by Paul Kane" class="imgfloatleft" /></a>
Paul Kane reports from the halls of the U.S. Capitol, updating readers on what's new in the House and Senate.
<br clear="all" />

• <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/03/cornyn_could_miss_us_attorneys.html">White House Ally Could Miss Justice Hearing</a>
<br>
• <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/03/obamas_streak_ends_at_56.html">Obama Says Goodbye to His Voting Streak</a>
<br>
• <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/03/sanchez_wins_subpoena_sweepsta.html">Sanchez First Out of the Gate With Subpoenas</a>


<br />
• <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/">Capitol Briefing Archive</a><br /><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/index.xml"><img src="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2005/06/13/GR2005061300865.gif" border="0" valign="center" align="left" border="0" ALT="xml">Sign Up for RSS Feed</a><br/>
<div class="clearboth"></div>
</div></div>
</div>

<script src="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/technorati/Technorati.js"></script><script>
var technorati = new Technorati() ;
technorati.setProperty('url','http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945_Technorati.html') ;
technorati.article = new item('House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment','http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html','House Republicans plan to force a floor vote on the appointment of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who is the subject of a federal bribery investigation, to a seat on the Homeland Security Committee.','Lyndsey Layton') ;
</script><script src="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945_Technorati.js"></script><script>document.write( technorati.getDisplaySidebar() );</script>
<link href="http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/css/bookmarking.css" rel="stylesheet" media="all"/><div class="sidebarhack"><b></b></div><div class="sidebar"><h2><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="right" border="0" width="222"><tr><td class="sb-left" align="left">Save &amp; Share Article</td><td class="sb-right" align="right"><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/community/saveandshare.html">What's This?</a></td></tr></table></h2><div class="sidebarcontent"><div class="sidebarbox"><div class="bookmark"><div class="generic_bookmark digg_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html%3Freferrer=digg&title=House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment&bodytext=House Republicans plan to force a floor vote on the appointment of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who is the subject of a federal bribery investigation, to a seat on the Homeland Security Committee." target="new">Digg</a></div></div><div class="generic_bookmark google_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks/mark?op=add&title=House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment&labels=&annotation=House Republicans plan to force a floor vote on the appointment of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who is the subject of a federal bribery investigation, to a seat on the Homeland Security Committee.&bkmk=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html%3Freferrer=google" target="new">Google</a></div></div><br clear="all"/><div class="generic_bookmark delicious_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="http://del.icio.us/post?v=4&partner=wpni&noui&jump=close&url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html%3Freferrer=delicious&title=%22House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment%22 By Lyndsey Layton&notes=House Republicans plan to force a floor vote on the appointment of Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), who is the subject of a federal bribery investigation, to a seat on the Homeland Security Committee." target="new">del.icio.us</a></div></div><div class="generic_bookmark yahoo_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="http://myweb2.search.yahoo.com/myresults/bookmarklet?u=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html%3Freferrer=yahoo&title=House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment&popup=true" target="new">Yahoo!</a></div></div><br clear="all"/><div class="generic_bookmark reddit_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="http://reddit.com/submit?url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html%3Freferrer=reddit&title=House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment" target="new">Reddit</a></div></div><div class="generic_bookmark facebook_bookmark"><div class="pad_bookmark"><a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="void(window.open('http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u='+encodeURIComponent('http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html?referrer=facebook')+'&t='+encodeURIComponent('House GOP Pushes Floor Vote For Rep. Jefferson Appointment'),'sharer','toolbar=no,width=642,height=436'));">Facebook</a></div></div><br clear="all"/></div></div></div>
</td></tr></table>
<p>&quot;This is a terrible mistake by the Democratic leadership, to take someone with serious ethical allegations against him and put him on one of the most sensitive and important committees in Congress,&quot; said <a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/k000210/" target="">Rep. Peter T. King</a> (N.Y.), the ranking Republican on the committee.</p><p>Pelosi ousted Jefferson from his seat on the powerful Ways and Means Committee in June after federal investigators raided his Capitol Hill office. In an earlier search of his home, $90,000 was found in a freezer. The money allegedly was accepted in a bribery sting involving an African technology company. Jefferson, who has not been charged, has maintained his innocence and was elected to a ninth term in December after a runoff election.</p><p>&quot;You gotta wonder where Jefferson's gonna store all those homeland security secrets,&quot; said Rep. Patrick T. McHenry (N.C.), a deputy Republican whip. Other Republicans said Pelosi's decision contradicted her promise to create &quot;the most ethical Congress in history.&quot; Said King: &quot;It shows hypocrisy. Before the election, they made a big point of pulling him from Ways and Means and after the election, they put him on Homeland Security.&quot;</p><p>A spokesman for Pelosi said she opted to place Jefferson on Homeland Security because the panel oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Jefferson had been a vocal critic of FEMA's performance during Hurricane Katrina, which affected thousands of his constituents.</p><p>But his appointment must be formally approved by the House, and Republicans said they would take the rare step of challenging the vote and requiring members to record their votes so Democrats will be forced to go on the record in their support of Jefferson.</p><p>Such appointments usually are ratified on the House floor by unanimous consent.</p><p>&quot;I have a hard time seeing how the Democrats will vote in the open to put a person with serious ethical charges against him on Homeland Security,&quot; King said. &quot;If he was too unethical to be writing tax law, he certainly shouldn't be on Homeland Security where he has access to intelligence materials and ongoing operations. Even with FEMA, we're going to be looking into allegations of corruption related to contracting around Hurricane Katrina.&quot;</p><p>Brendan Daly, a spokesman for Pelosi, said that if Republicans follow through on their threat, they would set a &quot;dangerous precedent. A number of their own members are under investigation,&quot; he said, referring to Republicans allegedly under scrutiny by the Justice Department.</p><p>Jefferson called the Republican criticism &quot;politics as usual.&quot;</p><p>&quot;Speaker Pelosi did the right thing by placing the congressional member who represents hurricane-ravaged New Orleans on this committee,&quot; he said. &quot;My district desperately needs a voice on this panel.&quot;</p></div></div><br clear="all">
<div style="clear:both"></div>

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022801945.html?referrer=email
 
Re: Rep. Jefferson loses party endorsement

<font size="5"><center>Ex-Tenn. Legislator Convicted of Bribery</font size>
<font size="4">Ford comes from a politically powerful Tennessee family
that includes brother Harold Ford Sr. and nephew
Harold Ford Jr., both former Tennessee congressmen</font size></center>


PUBLIC_CORRUPTION_FORD.sff_NY124_20070419203618.jpg

Sen. John Ford, D-Memphis attends a committee
meeting, in this file photo from May 25, 2005, in
Nashville, Tenn. A second FBI agent testified
Thursday April 12, 2007 that he didn't know
who Ford was when Ford approached the sham
company the bureau had set up. Joe Carroll told
a federal jury the first time he met Ford was at
a Nashville dinner arranged by another lawmaker.
Ford is accused of taking a $55,000 bribe from
agents posing as crooked businessmen seeking
state business. (AP Photo/Mark Humphrey-File)


Apr 27, 5:52 PM (ET)
Associated Press
By WOODY BAIRD

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) - Former state Sen. John Ford, a prominent member of a politically powerful family, was convicted Friday of accepting bribes in a statewide corruption investigation.

But the federal jury deadlocked on the more serious charge of extortion, creating a mistrial on that count. It also acquitted him of three counts of witness intimidation.

Ford, 64, was convicted of accepting $55,000 in bribes and could be sentenced to prison time and a fine.

The once-influential state senator left the courtroom surrounded by relatives and refused to comment. His lawyer was expected to talk to reporters later.

The prosecution's case depended heavily on giving jurors an up-close look at Ford stuffing his pockets with $100 bills counted one by one by an undercover FBI agent.

Ford's defense contended he thought he was being paid as a business consultant for a computer recycling company called E-Cycle Management. But the company was a fake, created for an FBI investigation of corruption among state officials.

The sting, code-named Tennessee Waltz, resulted in the arrest of five sitting or former lawmakers and several local government officials.

The jury had been deliberating since Wednesday afternoon in the case against Ford, a Memphis Democrat who served in the Legislature from the 1970s until he resigned a few days after his arrest in May 2005.

Ford comes from a politically powerful Tennessee family that includes brother Harold Ford Sr. and nephew Harold Ford Jr., both former Tennessee congressmen.

Prosecutors played for the jury video clips of eight meetings between Ford and undercover agent L.C. McNiel during which stacks of cash changed hands.

Jurors also listened to dozens of undercover audio recordings in which Ford and McNiel talked about E-Cycle's desire to change state law for a business advantage. They asked to review the recordings again during deliberations.

Defense lawyer Michael Scholl argued that the FBI was overzealous in going after Ford and selectively recorded his conversations with undercover agents. He accused an informant of working with the FBI to avoid prosecution for lying to a grand jury during a related investigation.

Just because Ford took his consulting payments in $100 bills does not mean they were illegal, Scholl argued.

"There's nothing wrong with paying somebody with cash," he said.

The bribery conviction carries a maximum sentence of 10 years and a $250,000 fine, but the sentence is likely to be less than that for a first-time offender. The extortion count could have resulted in up to 20 years in prison. Sentencing was set for July 31.

The Tennessee Waltz investigation began in 2004, became public in May 2005 and set off a scandal that led to a special legislative session on ethics reform.

In all, 11 people have been charged, including several local officials in Memphis and Chattanooga. Two former state lawmakers have been sent to prison, but Ford is the best-known defendant to have gone to trial.



http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20070427/D8OP71S80.html
 
"Some say black politicians unfairly targeted."

I don't agree with that!

My point is that Washington is a place that in time would corrupt Jesus.

They only work 3 days a week and make over 100K.

I wish I Had a 3 days week like that.

But I understand why power corrupts.

It's not just Blacks politicians leaving Washington or where ever else in handcuffs, it's whites, Latinos and what ever other mix that's out there.

We need term limits in the congress and in all State Houses.

Something like the presidency.
 
makes me wonder sometimes, everytime they come together to try to fix the NOPS they wave the corruption flag, Marc Morial probably the greatest mayor in NOLA history again corruption. hell maybe after Nagin leaves office we'll hear of corruption with him too
 
Negmarron said:

It was amazing how many white people they caught after they targeted Bill Campbell. I realized that though Bill Campbell may not have been as terrible as others who they actually caught with their hands in the cookie jar, his subordinates/cabinate were very very shady. Those white people were buying them left and right and then the white people were the first to rat them out.
 
<font size="5"><center>Lawmaker Indicted on Corruption Charges</font size>
<font size="4">Rep. Jefferson Accused Of Bribery, Racketeering</font size></center>


PH2007060402009.jpg

William Jefferson (D-La.) is charged with
16 counts, including bribery.



By Jerry Markon and Allan Lengel
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, June 5, 2007; Page A01

Federal authorities accused Rep. William J. Jefferson yesterday of using his congressional office and staff to enrich himself and his family, charging the Louisiana Democrat with offering and accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes to support business ventures in the United States and several West African nations.

The 16-count indictment also accused Jefferson, a former co-chairman of congressional caucuses on Nigeria and African trade, of racketeering, money laundering and obstruction of justice. The indictment was handed up by a federal grand jury and capped a long and tumultuous FBI investigation

The grand jury said Jefferson, 60, had solicited a bribe for himself and family members in a congressional dining room, falsely reported trips to Africa as official business, sought to corrupt a senior Nigerian politician and promoted U.S. financing for a sugar factory in Nigeria whose owner paid fees to a Jefferson family company in his home state.

The indictment said that at one point, Jefferson drove in his Lincoln Town Car through the streets of Arlington with $100,000 in marked FBI bills meant for a top Nigerian official whose assistance Jefferson needed for a business venture. The lawmaker allegedly stowed $90,000 in his home freezer, wrapped in aluminum foil and concealed inside frozen-food containers.

The funds would be a down payment, Jefferson is accused of explaining to an associate, to ensure that "the little hook is in there."

The indictment came after a lengthy investigation that became public in 2005 with an FBI raid on Jefferson's homes. A separate raid in May 2006 on his quarters in the Rayburn House Office Building provoked a political and legal debate over the seizure of his computer hard drive and office files, with House leaders raising questions about the constitutionality of such an intrusive act. President Bush sealed the seized documents, but a federal judge later declared the raid constitutional. Some documents were eventually released to investigators, but others are held up in a legal challenge over the raid.

Jefferson, a low-key legislator who won reelection with 57 percent of the vote in November while under investigation, declined to comment yesterday. His attorney, Robert Trout, said Jefferson intends to fight on.

"They picked the wrong congressman, and they picked the wrong facts," Trout said at a news conference in Los Angeles.

"The Department of Justice has inspected every aspect of Mr. Jefferson's public and private life" but has not alleged that the lawmaker "promised anybody any legislation," Trout said. "There is no suggestion that he promised anyone any appropriations. There were no earmarks. There were no government contracts."

The federal indictment is the first in which a U.S. official is charged with violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bars bribery of foreign officials. Jefferson, federal officials said yesterday, collected about $400,000 as the result of the schemes at issue and was slated to collect much more if all his business deals came to fruition.

A 1972 graduate of Harvard Law School, Jefferson obtained a master's degree in taxation from Georgetown University's law school in 1996, four years before the indictment says his alleged conspiracy began. Jefferson became in 1990 the first black congressman elected in Louisiana since Reconstruction, and the soft-spoken lawmaker retained the strong support of other members of the Congressional Black Caucus after the FBI raid.

But House Democratic leaders orchestrated his removal last year from the Ways and Means Committee, and congressional sources said they may seek in coming days to strip him of his sole remaining committee assignment.

If convicted on all counts, Jefferson could face more than 200 years in prison, but under federal sentencing guidelines the term would probably be much less. The 94-page indictment details 11 alleged bribery and fraud schemes involving his business interests in at least seven West African countries, including telecommunications deals in Nigeria and Ghana, oil concessions in Equatorial Guinea, waste-recycling systems in Nigeria and the Nigerian sugar plant for which he sought Export-Import Bank financing.

Federal investigators based their accusations on recorded conversations, e-mail messages, documents, faxes and a cooperating witness -- Lori Mody -- who wore an electronic listening device when she conferred with Jefferson, according to the indictment and sources familiar with the probe. As outlined by authorities, the bribery schemes unfolded in meetings in Potomac, New York, London and Africa, and letters promoting business ventures were sent on congressional stationery by Jefferson's aides.

The indictment says Jefferson told the cooperating witness that he had "a lot of folks to pay off" in connection with a Nigerian cable television and Internet deal involving Louisville-based iGate. At another point, he is said to have described his role in packing family members onto the board of a company he had allegedly been shaking down for bribes. "I'm in the shadows behind the curtain," he reportedly said.

In May 2005, while discussing the possibility of bribing Nigerian officials to support the venture, Jefferson said he wanted to handle the matter personally. "I would rather take care of it," he is alleged to have told the witness. "I'm talking about with elected people and big shots, okay?"

The next month, Jefferson allegedly told the same witness that he outlined the project to the spouse of a Nigerian official he wanted to bribe so the official would "salivate over what the opportunities are there." Describing his efforts to get Nigerian and other African officials to support his business interests, Jefferson is accused of saying at one point: "I will try my very best to deliver for you and not disappoint you."

Mody is a wealthy investor from McLean who did business with Jefferson and iGate but eventually became suspicious and went to the FBI. That triggered the start of the investigation in March 2005. The Nigerian official that Jefferson allegedly sought to bribe has been identified in court records as Atiku Abubakar, who served as Nigeria's vice president from 1997 until this year.

Edward Weidenfeld, the attorney for Abubakar, said last night that "Vice President Abubakar is innocent of any wrongdoing, period."

"The schemes charged are complex," Chuck Rosenberg, the U.S. attorney in Alexandria, said at a news conference. "The alleged criminal behavior is spread over time and distance. But the essence of the charges in this case are really rather simple. Mr. Jefferson corruptly traded on his good office and on the Congress, where he served as a member of the United States House of Representatives, to enrich himself and his family through a pervasive pattern of fraud, bribery and corruption that spanned many years and two continents."

Jefferson business associates Vernon L. Jackson, owner of iGate, and Brett Pfeffer, a former congressional aide, pleaded guilty last year to bribery and are serving time in prison.

Joseph Persichini Jr., head of the FBI's Washington field office, said the investigation is continuing. Jefferson is scheduled to be arraigned Friday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria.

Staff writer Sonya Geis in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/04/AR2007060400683.html?referrer=email
 
Back
Top