*** Solar Eclipse Caught On My Satellite Data Feed ***

I told you exactly what the gif is,

It's a sphere scaled to the size of the earth.
The camera originates at the top center on the surface of the sphere, and then ascends at a 90 degree angle until the horizon is no longer visible.


But you're more concerned with where the gif came from.



How bout this,
  1. go in a 3D program, create a sphere.
  2. Scale it to the size of the supposed globe earth (24,901 miles = 131,477,280 feet).
  3. Add a camera and set it at the top of the sphere.
  4. Animate the camera so that is ascends along the Y axis until the sphere is no longer visible.
  5. Render it.
  6. Convert it to a gif.
  7. Upload the results and show me what you got.

That doesn't make any sense. In one set of key strokes you say round Earth doesn't exist. Yet in another set of keystrokes you say, "Scale it to the size of the supposed globe earth (24,901 miles = 131,477,280 feet)." Why does any part of your explanation of flat Earth include specs of global Earth? Especially the circumferential distance which leaves you with half a globe if looking from the top of a sphere. If I take a ball and draw a circle around the center of that ball. Then hold it from the bottom and face it to you. You will not see the line or the bottom of the ball. Therefor taking the face value of that ball would leave out the total mass of the other side of the ball. There are over 196,000,000 square miles of global Earth, that will not fit on flat Earth you describe.
 
Where this come from, Cashie? Did you make this?

J6H8gyu.gif
 

Now Ghost, why can’t he just answer that with a simple yes or no?

Is that supposed to be the view of flat Earth from a camera high above "the top of the sphere", scaling to the edge of flat Earth?

cashie’s words, not mine

It's a sphere that is the same size of the earth. The beginning of the gif has the camera at 1 foot high, then ascends until the horizon disappears.

This is what happens on a globe. We don't live on no goddamn globe.

my favorite part of that response was the camera at 1 foot high. Which suggest he did make that gif because if he didn’t then he just making shit up as he go.
 
You can't have it both ways.

Throughout the day atmoplanic conditions are constantly changing. That is minuscule in the big picture as it relates to the horizon raising vs. lowering. If it rises you're on a plane. If it lowers you're on a ball.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A HORIZON TO RAISE IF YOU ARE ON A GLOBE, regardless of refraction. Refraction does not extend the horizon and flatten the curve.

PLUS there is no parallax between the earth and the sun.

FLAT.
Atmospheric refraction has already been quantified to the point that if you can provide the correct laps rate what you see and how much you can see can be calculated to great accuracy. So if you really want to destroy the globe with visual evidence over water where the refraction is typically highest, at least be smart enough to include pertinent information such as water temp, air temp, and humidity level not only at the water level but as high as you and the target and if you don't trust other people making the calculations for you, learn how to calculate it yourself or use one of the online calculators. But no you just can't eyeball shit thinking it looks 'bout right, and think this is how real science is conducted.
 
Last edited:
Now Ghost, why can’t he just answer that with a simple yes or no?



cashie’s words, not mine



my favorite part of that response was the camera at 1 foot high. Which suggest he did make that gif because if he didn’t then he just making shit up as he go.

One foot high? I would like to know what their scales look like. Also how high does the camera have to be above flat Earth to get that scale of view of flat Earth in the YouTube video. So far none that shit adds up.
 
Now Ghost, why can’t he just answer that with a simple yes or no?



cashie’s words, not mine



my favorite part of that response was the camera at 1 foot high. Which suggest he did make that gif because if he didn’t then he just making shit up as he go.


In response to your SIMPLE questions, CashieB went FULL...


giphy.gif



giphy.gif


:roflmao: :lol: :roflmao: :lol:

I suspect he's being protective of the FLERF leader that sourced the gif, after their last FLERF tribal leader, Mad Mike (R.I.P.) literally went out with a bang.
 
Last edited:
Atmospheric refraction has already been quantified to the point that if you can provide the correct laps rate what you see and how much you can see can be calculated to great accuracy. So if you really want to destroy the globe with visual evidence over water where the refraction is typically highest, at least be smart enough to include pertinent information such as water temp, air temp, and humidity level not only at the water level but as high as you and the target and if you don't trust other people making the calculations for you, you can either learn how to calculate it yourself or use one of the online calculators. But no you just can't eyeball shit thinking it looks 'bout right, and think this is how real science is conducted.

I find the simplest answer for atmospheric refraction in the fact the Sun is white even though it appears be yellow to us. As we view the Sun through our atmosphere which gives the sun appearance of yellow. When viewed from outside the Earths atmosphere the Sun is white. Just like the other stars. If the sun was yellow snow would be yellow and so would water.

Trees, water and light are the most precious things in the universe to sustain the life of people. The known universe is mostly dark matter and dark energy. With us having about 4% percent knowledge of it all to the best of our ability.
 
I find the simplest answer for atmospheric refraction in the fact the Sun is white even though it appears be yellow to us. As we view the Sun through our atmosphere which gives the sun appearance of yellow. When viewed from outside the Earths atmosphere the Sun is white. Just like the other stars. If the sun was yellow snow would be yellow and so would water.

Trees, water and light are the most precious things in the universe to sustain the life of people. The known universe is mostly dark matter and dark energy. With us having about 4% percent knowledge of it all to the best of our ability.
How about this, with just 1% of light bend light can be lifted 69 miles allowing you to see 69 miles past the horizon. In actuality we seldom if ever get 1% light bend, but you can see how little light bend it would take for us to see a lot further than the geometric horizon.
 
How about this, with just 1% of light bend light can be lifted 69 miles allowing you to see 69 miles past the horizon. In actuality we seldom if ever get 1% light bend, but you can see how little light bend it would take for us to see a lot further than the geometric horizon.

Just as well even on the flattest parts of Earth we can't see more than three miles from a height of five feet. Due to the curvature of the Earth. Which leads me to wonder if flat Earth is flat or concave @cashwhisperer ?
 
Don't bother trying to nudge that guy, he's too busy trying to Google Flat Earf Mats For Big Dummies.

Gravity shapes celestial entities such as stars and their planets into spherical entities. That is the consequential reality and ever present reality and force that is gravity throughout the universe. We have the math to prove it. All I have been trying to do is get the math on Flat Earth. How high is flat Earth atmosphere and how far does it span? What are the depths of oceans on flat Earth? These questions I need answers to. Not YouTube videos @cashwhisperer .
 
Gravity shapes celestial entities such as stars and their planets into spherical entities. That is the consequential reality and ever present reality and force that is gravity throughout the universe. We have the math to prove it. All I have been trying to do is get the math on Flat Earth. How high is flat Earth atmosphere and how far does it span? What are the depths of oceans on flat Earth? These questions I need answers to. Not YouTube videos @cashwhisperer .
Yeah, good luck with him trying to answer an intelligent question, especially one that's light-years above his pay grade. Expect another dumb cartoon gif or silly video without a single shred of scientific evidence backing up any of their claims.
 
y'all are trolling yourselves at this point.

And obsessed.

2 +2 = 5 in your world at this point. No point in debating.

We should just come to a happy medium, agree that the world is at the very least round and move the fuck on.
Why does the sun and moon fucking hover in your model? Ra? Helios? Magic? Why is that shit doing what you're saying it does, Jesus? Seriously what is your sun and moon made of? How has that shit been burning for at least the 6 thousand years bible thumpers think the Earth is that old?

It's beyond stupid. A child can use a prism and see the absorption lines in the sun. We know it's made of Hydrogen. There's no way something as small ass the flat erf sun could start nuclear fusion. My gawd man, I hope you're trolling and are not teaching kids this insanity.
 
Que'd at 4:55

This is your atmospheric refraction that's apparently making your globe appear flat.




200w.gif

Actually atmospheric refraction doesn't make the Earth look flat, as you claim, what it does is change the distance to the horizon (as in the photo of the so-called black swan). Because even in that photograph there is still a horizon that causes the bottom of the ships to disappear just at a further point than normal.
In reality, there isn't a single effect from refraction, moon dust, or unicorn farts that allows you to see the world as if it were flat. As I said, if this were true the sun and the moon would shrink into the horizon not get cut off by the curve of the earth.
Oh btw nice claim by Witless but where is the evidence to back his claim, that lasers cannot bend over lakes, I forgot to cult members, dogmatic claims is all you need for proof.

:smh: :lol: :roflmao::lol2::roflmao2:
 
Actually atmospheric refraction doesn't make the Earth look flat, as you claim, what it does is change the distance to the horizon (as in the photo of the so-called black swan). Because even in that photograph there is still a horizon that causes the bottom of the ships to disappear just at a further point than normal.
In reality, there isn't a single effect from refraction, moon dust, or unicorn farts that allows you to see the world as if it were flat. As I said, if this were true the sun and the moon would shrink into the horizon not get cut off by the curve of the earth.
Oh btw nice claim by Witless but where is the evidence to back his claim, that lasers cannot bend over lakes, I forgot to cult members, dogmatic claims is all you need for proof.

:smh: :lol: :roflmao::lol2::roflmao2:

FLERF tribal leader, Witless, truly loves up to his username in posting numerous YouTube vids, where he basically claims that things such as Mathematics, Civil Engineering, etc. do not exist and provides no proof of the flat pizza, just an empty claim.

He prob believes the earth is only 6,000 years old and dinosaurs never existed, like these other Jesus-freaks.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I missed this, but does the gif show the camera height in real time? If I have time maybe I'll replicate this in STK.

This is what he explained.

“It's a sphere that is the same size of the earth. The beginning of the gif has the camera at 1 foot high, then ascends until the horizon disappears.

This is what happens on a globe. We don't live on no goddamn globe.”
 
That video is complete nonsense. I watched it from the point you set. Then from the begging. He is talking complete nonsense that probably sounds great to those who do not understand physics.

Explain why it's nonsense.

The refraction, the laser, and the ascending drone.

Break down why it's nonsense to these flerf ass niggas...
 
Also, Cashie, if the Erf is flat, you should be able to pick up radio waves transmitted in NYC all the way in Australia. There is nothing to block them.

Explain that.....

Wattage has nothing to do with it huh? And the Ionoplane has no limitations?
 
Back
Top