Is there a scale key to this map, like all other maps or is it simply more derp pulled out the anus?
*** Solar Eclipse Caught On My Satellite Data Feed ***
- Thread starter 4 Dimensional
- Start date
Is there a scale key to this map, like all other maps or is it simply more derp pulled out the anus?
Explain it when you have time. I don't need a second or third party to explain myself.
He doesn't have time, the man is a busy man, do you know how long it takes to properly bake crayons in a candle box stove?
And that gif is the best you got on what we should see? Where did you get that gif from?
It's a sphere that is the same size of the earth. The beginning of the gif has the camera at 1 foot high, then ascends until the horizon disappears.
This is what happens on a globe. We don't live on no goddamn globe.
It's a sphere that is the same size of the earth. The beginning of the gif has the camera at 1 foot high, then ascends until the horizon disappears.
This is what happens on a globe. We don't live on no goddamn globe.
Where did you get that gif from? Did you make it?
Don't know, you have your CGI phony "satellite" feeds and he has cartoons, keeping it 100, in terms of functionality and predictability power, I'm gonna have to call it a tie.
Cashie: Missles are fake, have you ever touched, smelled, or even licked one? Until you are able to drop one on my head and have it explode like NASA claims they do, I'm calling them all fake!
Why??
Because you’re using it as part of your argument.
It’s a straightforward question.
Where did you get it or did you create it?
I'll tell you if you explain to me why we don't observe this movement in real life.
You are waaaaay to defensive over a joke, kinda makes me think you really believe that. But to be sure, for the record, can you tell your fans what you think about nuclear weapons/radiation and wheather you believe its another lie by NASA.
Same reason why you don't don't feel jet planes when they are cruising at over 500 mph. Our bodies only feel exelation motion this includes bumps and rocking from side to side, but if your speed is steady and smooth there is no way to tell if your moving, of course without visual aids.
I’m asking you a very simple technical question. Where did you get the gif or did you create it?
Yes you should. You should be able to recreate this in ANY reputable 3D software - Blender, Maya, C4D, etc.
So you created it? Which one of those software did you use?
Reminder: I'll tell you if you explain to me why we don't observe this movement in real life.
So you didn’t create that gif?
I have a question for you to once again dodge, how fast is the sun moving on your pizza world of make believe and how come it doesn't produce a fire trail with the speed it's traveling?
And that gif is the best you got on what we should see? Where did you get that gif from?
It's a sphere that is the same size of the earth. The beginning of the gif has the camera at 1 foot high, then ascends until the horizon disappears.
This is what happens on a globe. We don't live on no goddamn globe.
Did you create it and what software did you use? If you didn’t, where is you get it from?
No where in this conversation so far have you said “Yes, I created that gif and used this specific software.” Or said “I got the gif from this specific place.”
Cashie ain't got time for this.
He's about to be done with this thread
He'll be back within two hours with a new video from the internet, some new memes, and new emojis
He can’t or refuse to answer that simple technical questions. There are no concepts involved here. It’s no different than asking a person which software they use to make a beat or did they get the beat from someone else.
Instead, he chooses to be vague and deflect.
I already said you can use any of the programs I named if you want to recreate it. Very simple to replicate.
You're more concerned with where the gif came from rather than proving it to be correct. Why us that? It supports your globe model right?
We are trying to figure out is what it's supposed to depict, and how you conclude what you mean by supposed to be seen as well as how you determined that it's somehow an accurate representation of the Earth.
This may come to you as a big surprise to you, but intelligent people question things before buying into things, while learning about it's mechanism before trying to debunk, but neither is possible with your cartoon because there isn't enough information to determine what the fuck it's supposed to be and what it represents.
So did you make the gif? I’m not sure why you can’t just say yes or no.
That’s all. All I’m looking for is scientific merit.
The technical part of science is just as important as the concepts people try to explain.
So, I'm pressing on the merit of the GIF created (whether by him or someone else). If it can't be supported technically by science, then why present it and say it explains something?
It is like asking me to explain this on how planes fly.
Last edited:
So, I'm pressing on the merit of the GIF created (whether by him or someone else). If it can't be supported technically by science, then why present it and say it explains something?
It is like asking me to explain this on how planes fly.
I told you exactly what the gif is,
It's a sphere scaled to the size of the earth.
The camera originates at the top center on the surface of the sphere, and then ascends at a 90 degree angle until the horizon is no longer visible.
But you're more concerned with where the gif came from.
How bout this,
- go in a 3D program, create a sphere.
- Scale it to the size of the supposed globe earth (24,901 miles = 131,477,280 feet).
- Add a camera and set it at the top of the sphere.
- Animate the camera so that is ascends along the Y axis until the sphere is no longer visible.
- Render it.
- Convert it to a gif.
- Upload the results and show me what you got.
Did you create that gif or not? If not where did you get it from?
Did you account for atmosphere refraction because the Earth is not a vacuum, also you never give any hard explanation for how high the camera would be to scale nor how large the camera would be on this version of earth. This is why peer review is essential to every so called experiment, because if you do not account for conflicting variables and cognitive bias your experiment will be flawed.
You can't have it both ways.
Throughout the day atmoplanic conditions are constantly changing. That is minuscule in the big picture as it relates to the horizon raising vs. lowering. If it rises you're on a plane. If it lowers you're on a ball.
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A HORIZON TO RAISE IF YOU ARE ON A GLOBE, regardless of refraction. Refraction does not extend the horizon and flatten the curve.
PLUS there is no parallax between the earth and the sun.
FLAT.
Cashie's troll level is 1 trillion at this point. I might have to book a trip to the South pole just to shit all over these folks. BTW, if you stand at the south pole, it will take 24 hour for you to spin once. Same as the Equator, but at the Equator you're actually going faster.
y'all are trolling yourselves at this point.
And obsessed.
2 +2 = 5 in your world at this point. No point in debating.
We should just come to a happy medium, agree that the world is at the very least round and move the fuck on.