*** Solar Eclipse Caught On My Satellite Data Feed ***

No.

I'm saying if they're taking all the math down from the internets, why aren't they taking all of the videos down as well?

Answer that question first.

Then also..

I'm saying if you can't find any actual scientific math data showing how the flat Earth works - not TikTok videos and hypotheticals from your own imagination, but actual math will you ever question all these unproven claims?

Like this plane example of yours. You're just imagining things. So prove with math why you should see what you're claiming you should see.
i can show you all the math etc. you guys will still say something so ill pass on that...
Those idiots think just because they have sataloons (basically glorified weather balloons) there cannot be satellites, this is like supposing planes must be fake because there are blimps. What kills me is the way these idiots say it, thinking they are schooling someone with top secret information classified information.:D
well sir we we know you cant school anyone on here lol you cant say anything but what the others done said lol you're like the mascot..yea team globe you got one......
 
All explained by math. Now post the math that explains your bullshit

"Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

- Nikola Tesla

"Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists."

-Nikola Tesla


Wait. Are you saying that "gravity" is due to the electrostatic force? So every object on the planet and every object gravitationally bound to the Earth, including the Moon, does so via electrostatics? Where is all this excess charge? Most objects are electrically neutral and we can measure this quite easily.

But for the sake of argument let's play along. Is the Earth negatively charged and every other object positively charged? If so everything would be attracted to the Earth but would be repulsed from each other. Every other object would be driven away from every other object. But once objects made contact with the Earth, the charges would tend to move in a way to achieve equalization and cancel. At the point you would have neutrally charged objects that would experience no force. In fact, it would be quite easy to make an anti-gravity device that cancelled out the electrostatic force. Lastly, where is the electrical discharge from all the charged masses. You think touching someone after rubbing your foot across a carpet in the winter gives you a nasty shock.

Let's get into it...

 
"Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

- Nikola Tesla

"Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists."

-Nikola Tesla




Let's get into it...


You still didn't post any math Cashie. If Einstein is wrong, then post the math proving him wrong, not a Tesla quote.
 
Last edited:
That same FLERF tribal leader also wrote this...

The Bun in His Oven: A Tale of Male Maternity: A Social Construct Deconstructed​

by Steven Alonzo (they/them) (Author)

6165ehxmgiL._SL1500_.jpg

dead-winnie.gif
 
Get ahold of how this smug, overconfident, idiot falls flat on his face!
This is how imagine cashwhisper to look like, because it sure sounds like him.


:roflmao2::lol2::roflmao3::lol2::roflmao2::roflmao:
 
math math math thats all yall say and its not YALLS MATH so your going on what there telling you and another thing is they can make any number up to make it fit the globe

bible nuts huh well when your on your deathbed i bet you change your tune then so all i am saying is careful what you say and just cause we believe dont insult us with th bible nut stuff please and thank you....you sir are a atheist i pity you brother..

I'm going to give you an example of brainwash if you're on your phone type in the word world and watch the emoji give you a globe.
you talk like a nigga that stay with somebody

this shit is BONKERS
 
it be funny when a nigga jump in double dutch with cashie but start out-stupiding him lol I know he be mcnultying his engineer's desk
 
That same FLERF tribal leader also wrote this...

The Bun in His Oven: A Tale of Male Maternity: A Social Construct Deconstructed​

by Steven Alonzo (they/them) (Author)

6165ehxmgiL._SL1500_.jpg

IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
I'm in tears laughing. This shit is better than TV. BTW I still cant seem to find an accredited FLERF Physicists. At this point I am beginning to see FLERF Physicist as oxymoronic at the least.
 
E = MC Ren dumb ass nigga type that shit into google like you shoulda been when you was asking kerney thomas why oceans don't fly away

Okay that was funny I can't front :rolleyes:,

Look, the bottom line is that an equation was found that matched what was observed, but what was observed was misinterpreted.

That's why you guys think you have the answer to everything, because you parrot whatever NASA tells you that you see along with an accompanying equation, even though you all are just as baffled as them when there are anomalies that don't match up with the expected mathematical outcome. There is plenty of legitimate pushback to Einstein's theory. And yes, even though E = MC Ren :rolleyes: was derived from relativity theory, later on in his life Einstein HIMSELF also derived it without relativity. And Michelson thought there should be a variation in the observed speed of a light beam's back and forth motion within the interferometer, which was supposed to be produced by the earth's forward motion during the period of transmission. The difference in light speed was supposed to produce a "fringe shift" in the interferometer, which was sensitive enough to detect it. But there was no effect. That "null result" fucked up the world of theoretical physics. And further, Michelson never even accepted relativity theory.
 
Okay that was funny I can't front :rolleyes:,

Look, the bottom line is that an equation was found that matched what was observed, but what was observed was misinterpreted.

That's why you guys think you have the answer to everything, because you parrot whatever NASA tells you that you see along with an accompanying equation, even though you all are just as baffled as them when there are anomalies that don't match up with the expected mathematical outcome. There is plenty of legitimate pushback to Einstein's theory. And yes, even though E = MC Ren :rolleyes: was derived from relativity theory, later on in his life Einstein HIMSELF also derived it without relativity. And Michelson thought there should be a variation in the observed speed of a light beam's back and forth motion within the interferometer, which was supposed to be produced by the earth's forward motion during the period of transmission. The difference in light speed was supposed to produce a "fringe shift" in the interferometer, which was sensitive enough to detect it. But there was no effect. That "null result" fucked up the world of theoretical physics. And further, Michelson never even accepted relativity theory.

Cashie you googled strong, but you googled wrong.

Morely and Michelson were trying to prove the Earth moved through an aether. (Sound familiar?) The "null result" you talked about proved the speed of light was constant regardless of the motion of the Earth. So they actually proved the flat earth aether claim wrong.


And your point about E=MC2 being derived from relativity theory makes no sense. Einstein's works ARE relativity. First, special relativity proves that space and time are connected in one fabric he called spacetime and then general relativity proving that mass warps the fabric of spacetime. It's called relativity because events in time happen at different rates for different observers based on the speed they are traveling - hence time is relative.

And people can push back on it, but no one proves it wrong. The only variation is that the laws of physics act differently on a quantum level.

Einstein's work was so right, that it proved things he didn't believe or would conceive of. His math proves that black holes exist but he couldn't conceive of anything that powerful.

Lastly..

Your cell phone proves Einstein right constantly.

When the GOS system was first deployed, the location were always a little off. Then they realized that because time moves more slowly for the GPS satellites that it does for people on Earth due to the speed of their orbit. So the GPS data is constantly adjusted to account for the relative difference in the passage of time between the satellite and you, Cashie.
 
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
IRklMc.gif
I'm in tears laughing. This shit is better than TV. BTW I still cant seem to find an accredited FLERF Physicists. At this point I am begging to see FLERF Physicist as oxymoronic at the least.

Fam, when I first noticed that other book that FLERF tribal leader wrote, I was struggling to write that reply from laughing so hard :roflmao: :lol: :roflmao: :lol:

Their outspoken FLERF leaders have FAILED them beyond the obvious GRIFT.
 
Back
Top