ROAD RAGE GONE HORRIBLY WRONG!!
- Thread starter Deezz
- Start date
I believe both parties should be held accountable for the accident. While the individual on the left-hand side was undoubtedly the instigator, the person who struck the children also contributed to the escalation of the situation. Therefore, both parties should be held responsible for the incident.
By the way, why did this dumbass post the video telling on himself? You’re driving a car and filming someone not looking at the road yourself.
By the way, why did this dumbass post the video telling on himself? You’re driving a car and filming someone not looking at the road yourself.
Nah, dude.
The motorist who struck the family is the one at fault. He let his emotions run wild and decided to respond to the 1st guy's taunts by pulling out his phone and filming, instead of ignoring him and just driving off.
Ain't no court in the land gonna go easy on him after hitting a blonde haired little white girl AND her momma 'cuz he was "provoked"...
There’s no doubt that the driver who hit the children and the mother in the crosswalk should bear the majority of the blame. However, if this was indeed a road rage incident, both parties should be charged with appropriate offenses.
So, you don’t believe that the other driver was harassing the driver who hit the mother and child? If that’s the case, is it not considered road rage under the law?
Homosexual mows down a flock of innocent bike riding children and this is what this guys concerns are.and I guess in Trumps Amerikkka it's ok to say that and not be fired
and telling a gay dude to SMD
Fagget.
Dumbest post of the week. By far.
He will get off because he's a fagHomosexual mows down a flock of innocent bike riding children and this is what this guys concerns are.
Fagget.
Homosexual mows down a flock of innocent bike riding children and this is what this guys concerns are.
Fagget.
Your gaydar alerted you to this topic I'm sure
Is your faggot ass donating to his gofundme for his bail, or what else should we be talking about?
Trump is President and those are white babies. That faggot is cooked.
Do you know the law?
Hey man, i just saw a video of children getting run over and your immediate cries were to criticize gay bashing..
You sir are a bitch.
No educate me. What criminal charges should each party face sir?
Hey man, i just saw a video of children getting run over and your immediate cries were to criticize gay bashing..
You sir are a bitch.
Yeah, because I'm wondering why the dumb ass uploaded a video risking his job and doxing showing someone elses fuck up while possibly fucking up his life
You're just dumb as fuck worried about some white kids who don't give a fuck about your old ass
People have accidents every day, you sheding tears for them bitch ass muthafucka?
Yeah, white on white road rage seems to "hit" different....
This literally makes no sense and is a sweeping contradiction to boot. You insult me for caring about white kids while you're caring about a white road raging imbecile possibly losing his job. Man just say the gay bashing struck a nerve Twan and move on to the next thread.
Light as you take it, bro.
The 1st guy didn't commit any crime.
He's ONLY guilty of being an asshole. That's all.
The 2nd guy let his emotions run wild, started to film the guy and hit an innocent WHITE child and her momma.
And when that white jury is shown that video, this is ALL they'll see:
Ain't no WHITE jury gonna care about him (a gay man) being "provoked".
Damn it must suck being old and stupid. In your little pea brain, that's what you had the ability to grasp?
Go hug your Lebron doll to help you deal with the sadness from those white kids
Holy shit
If I was the camera man I wouldn’t have uploaded the video
If I was the camera man I wouldn’t have uploaded the video
Fruits still have a stronghold on the local level
The first guy broke two laws: filming while driving and harassing the other driver. If the prosecutor considers this road rage, both drivers will be charged with crimes. If both drivers are charged with road rage, I believe both insurance companies will be liable in some way. Maybe 80-20 or 90-10. The guy was an idiot for uploading that video.Light as you take it, bro.
The 1st guy didn't commit any crime.
He's ONLY guilty of being an asshole. That's all.
The 2nd guy let his emotions run wild, started to film the guy and hit an innocent WHITE child and her momma.
And when that white jury is shown that video, this is ALL they'll see:
Ain't no WHITE jury gonna care about him (a gay man) being "provoked".
No.
You are completely wrong and I'll try to explain why.
#1. Filming while driving IS NOT a crime. It happens every day and everywhere.
Prime examples:
#2. Insulting a driver in another car is NOT a crime. For all you know, the driver in car #2 may have initially started/instigated the whole incident to began with.
#3. The prosecutor might investigate driver #1, but they will not be able to convict him of anything because HE DID NOTHING ILLEGAL.
#4. The insurance company of driver #1 WILL NOT be held liable because driver #1 did nothing illegal.
#5. They are both idiots, but only one committed an actual crime.
Nah.
Blonde-haired, little white girl beats fag in the game of Amerikkka. Fag beats everything else.
You are correct. Handsfree filming itself is not a crime while operating a vehicle. However, we are unaware of the specific device used to capture the footage. Nevertheless, we did notice that the camera zoomed in and out during the recording. I suppose we’ll have to wait and see what the outcome turns out to be.No.
You are completely wrong and I'll try to explain why.
#1. Filming while driving IS NOT a crime. It happens every day and everywhere.
Prime examples:
Damn shame, keep a cool head out here 'cause anything bad can happen quick.
Unless the other driver is doing something to endanger you, you can't justify not paying attention to the road ahead because you wanted to hurl some zingers at the other car.
Lock boffum up....
for the culture
Similar threads
