Republicans trying to eliminate minority businesses!

BENBRIZZLE said:
Why Would Elimating Aa Be So Bad. Blacks Are Not The Biggest Minority Anyway? And Aa Isnt Used As It Was Intended Anyway Other Minority Groups Benefit Way More From Aa Than Blacks Anyway.

I'm a minority business owner, who dialogues with a lot of others like me. The loss of set asides for minority business would kill a lot of the fledgling black owned businesses out there. Quite a few of us work with the state and the Feds to provide goods and services. Without a requirement to have small business set asides how long do you think it would take for the larger, more established (read white) companies to take that market?

In addition, the large companies are required to use a certain percentage of minority subcontractors. Without this requirement a bro or sister wouldn't be able to approach these larger businesses and have a hope of being a subcontractor.

I also know several small businesses who have grown because of being able to get their product into larger companies such as Jewel Foods or Target (e.g. Reggio's Pizza, ComfortCake, Crystal Water, Glory Greens). Without mandated minority inclusion programs, I know for fact that none of these businesses would have lasted for more than a year (I know because I know each of the owners).

Our people, our businesses use these programs and grow because of them. I've seen it myself. This bill would have literally killed a lot of small businesses out here within a year.
 
Last edited:
thoughtone said:
Illegal immigration IS NOT the most important issue along with globalization, Iraq War, and health care.

We do not have an illegal immigration problem, we have an illegal employment problem. If the government fined every company $10,000 per head of illegal worker and hired 1000 more federal marshals to enforce this, there would be very little reason for them to come here. This is just another wedge issue designed to deflect from the multinationals shipping American jobs and our standard of living overseas.


lol...whatever.

So....you would rather have immediate amnesty granted for 12,000,000 people so that that they can work legally...and still taking jobs away from citizens who have been oppressed for generations?

Logic would tell us that the illegals are either going to HAVE to work or get deported, so what good would the federal marshals do in policing the workforce?

How would one expect illegalsto sustain themselves if they are to remain here without working?

Illegals either need to work or they need to get deported!

Amnesty or deportation.

Our most rational choice for the American people is deportation to keep the few jobs left that we have here!

I swear...democrat logic is so "rosy"....but so many of you cant see the forest for the trees.

and Like I said (and you are saying now)...globalization is one of our biggest issues.

Do you even know what it means?

Come on, guy.

And guess what else Ron Paul is against?
 
Last edited:
GreedySmurf said:
I'm a minority business owner, who dialogues with a lot of others like me. The loss of set asides for minority business would kill a lot of the fledgling black owned businesses out there. Quite a few of us work with the state and the Feds to provide goods and services. Without a requirement to have small business set asides how long do you think it would take for the larger, more established (read white) companies to take that market.

In addition, the large companies are required to use a certain percentage of minority subcontractors. Without this requirement a bro or sister wouldn't be able to approach these larger businesses and have a hope of being a subcontractor.

I also know several small businesses who have grown because of being able to get their product into larger companies such as Jewel Foods or Target (e.g. Reggio's Pizza, ComfortCake, Crystal Water, Glory Greens). Without mandated minority inclusion programs, I know for fact that none of these businesses would have lasted for more than a year (I know because I know each of the owners).

Our people, our businesses use these programs and grow because of them. I've seen it myself. This bill would have literally killed a lot of small businesses out here within a year.
BUT, IS THE AA PROGRAM THE ONLY PROGRAM THAT IS ALLOWING YOU TO GET THESE CONTRCATS? AND IF SO, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN BIGGER MINORITIES GET BIGGER i.e (LATINOS AND WHITE WOMEN) AND THE BLACK MINORITY GROUP GETS SMALLER. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT SHOULDNT WE BE PUSHING FOR MORE LAWS THAT FOCUS ON THE "SMALL BUSINESSES" INSTEAD OF LAWS THAT FOCUS ON WHAT MINORITY GROUP THE SMALL BUSINESSES OWNERS ARE IN? BECAUSE LIKE SOMEONE STATED EARLIER THEIR ARE ALOT OF WHITE MEN SENDING THEIR WIVES OUT TO GET THESE CONTRACTS AND BENEFITS, AND WHEN LATINO'S REALLY GET ON THIS IT'S GOING TO BE REALLY HARD FOR BLACKS. AND THE GOVERMENT WILL HAVE TH ELAST LAUGH BECAUSE THEIR FOLLOWING THAT GOOD AA LAW.
 
BENBRIZZLE said:
BUT, IS THE AA PROGRAM THE ONLY PROGRAM THAT IS ALLOWING YOU TO GET THESE CONTRCATS? AND IF SO, WHAT HAPPENS WHEN BIGGER MINORITIES GET BIGGER i.e (LATINOS AND WHITE WOMEN) AND THE BLACK MINORITY GROUP GETS SMALLER. I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE SAYING, BUT SHOULDNT WE BE PUSHING FOR MORE LAWS THAT FOCUS ON THE "SMALL BUSINESSES" INSTEAD OF LAWS THAT FOCUS ON WHAT MINORITY GROUP THE SMALL BUSINESSES OWNERS ARE IN? BECAUSE LIKE SOMEONE STATED EARLIER THEIR ARE ALOT OF WHITE MEN SENDING THEIR WIVES OUT TO GET THESE CONTRACTS AND BENEFITS, AND WHEN LATINO'S REALLY GET ON THIS IT'S GOING TO BE REALLY HARD FOR BLACKS. AND THE GOVERMENT WILL HAVE TH ELAST LAUGH BECAUSE THEIR FOLLOWING THAT GOOD AA LAW.

Bruh, the ONLY reason gov't contracts aren't 100% dominated by political cronies and the old boys network IS set asides. Take away mandatory set asides and the only "small businesses" that would get these contracts are "spinoffs" of larger contractors and Vinnie, the Mayor's son-in-law. Anybody that has ever worked with gov't agencies knows how bad shit is out there even with AA, imagine how bad it would be if left to their own devices Doesn't matter which minorities get the contracts, only thing that really matters is a mechanism being in place that keeps the people who make decisions about getting these contracts (primarily white owned men) in check.

Hell, Cleveland had a black mayor and was black dominated and STILL got in trouble because they were peddling influence and selling contracts (and cheating QUALIFIED black owned small businesses out of contracts so that UNQUALIFIED black contractors who make a living starting minority front companies for white businesses could get ahead). Shit is hectic enough as it is, at least there is a LITTLE recourse to the BS written into the law, take that away and small business would be even less of an option than it is now.
 
Dr. Munhihausen II said:
They need to hire 1000 border patrol and deportation agents...thats what the government needs to do!


And build a fence too, right? Eliminate the incentive for them to come here. Why do they let Cubans in and not Haitians?
 
thoughtone said:
And build a fence too, right? Eliminate the incentive for them to come here. Why do they let Cubans in and not Haitians?

Because this country doesn't want any more black people. They have enough of us. Hispanics are the new slave race for this country...for now.
 
Zero said:
Bruh, the ONLY reason gov't contracts aren't 100% dominated by political cronies and the old boys network IS set asides. Take away mandatory set asides and the only "small businesses" that would get these contracts are "spinoffs" of larger contractors and Vinnie, the Mayor's son-in-law. Anybody that has ever worked with gov't agencies knows how bad shit is out there even with AA, imagine how bad it would be if left to their own devices Doesn't matter which minorities get the contracts, only thing that really matters is a mechanism being in place that keeps the people who make decisions about getting these contracts (primarily white owned men) in check.

Hell, Cleveland had a black mayor and was black dominated and STILL got in trouble because they were peddling influence and selling contracts (and cheating QUALIFIED black owned small businesses out of contracts so that UNQUALIFIED black contractors who make a living starting minority front companies for white businesses could get ahead). Shit is hectic enough as it is, at least there is a LITTLE recourse to the BS written into the law, take that away and small business would be even less of an option than it is now.
I CAN DIG THAT. :cool:
AND IT ALSO SOUNDS LIKE YOU KNOW ALOT ON THE SUBJECT,HOW DOES ONE GO ABOUT GETTING GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS, DO YOU HAVE TO BE IN OPERATION FOR A CERTAIN AMONT OF TIME TO GET ONE?
 
Illegal immigrants are not taking jobs away from Black kids. No way.

A mufucka brand new to this country who can barely speak fuckin English if at all, and has no education whatsoever?

Taking jobs AWAY?

Try this on for size: Young niggas refuse to work those jobs in the first place. :I aint no slave, fuck that shit, etc."

Meanwhile the immigrant is like "Sending home $100 a week to Puebla is gonna take care of my whole extended family."

All a matter of perspective I guess.
 
Dr. Munhihausen II said:
Logic would tell us that the illegals are either going to HAVE to work or get deported, so what good would the federal marshals do in policing the workforce?

Who said you need Federal Marshals patrolling the workforce to levy fines? All you would need is a government employee to show up to a strawberry field, and ask the owner to produce the documents for the workers that they have hired...they did check to see if they were here legally didn't they? The state already sends out people to check restaurants to check and see if they are up to Health Code Standards...they can collect worker documentation while they're there. I've had to provide my social security card for every job I've worked.

I swear...democrat logic is so "rosy"....but so many of you cant see the forest for the trees.

and Like I said (and you are saying now)...globalization is one of our biggest issues.


It seems that you are missing the big picture. Hiring 1,000,000 border agents will not stop illegals from making it into the country. We've spent billions of dollars on drug interdiction and have failed miserably there as well. Illegals come here because they can get work. If the employers would not hire them, then they would have no reason to come. But our system is set-up to feed on slave labor. Our produce, construction, and Wal-Mart type industries thrive on it. We need to cut off the problem at the head, as opposed to the foot.

We will not be able to stop globalization...in fact it's too late. A significant portion of our major companies are already foreign owned. Are we going to make the foreign companies give ownership back? Case in point, one of the largest US mortgage lenders went belly up (New Century) and they owed $900mil apiece to Credit Suisse Group and Deutsche Bank AG. http://usmarket.seekingalpha.com/article/30969

That leads to people's mortgages being held directly by foreign corporations. What is to be done about that? Now we can change HOW we are going to integrate into the global economy, but saying globalization itself is the biggest problem we face is trying to close the door after the horses have already left the barn.
 
The employers HAVE to hire them. No one else wants to do those jobs for that kind of pay. Don't you know the California economy would collapse if it weren't for cheap illegal immigrant labor in those strawberry fields?
 
DaleMabry said:
The employers HAVE to hire them. No one else wants to do those jobs for that kind of pay. Don't you know the California economy would collapse if it weren't for cheap illegal immigrant labor in those strawberry fields?

:hmm:

I'm 100% sure California's economy would be fine without illegals in those strawberry fields.

It's not as if Californians are running strawberry powered cars or computers. :rolleyes:
 
histick said:
:hmm:

I'm 100% sure California's economy would be fine without illegals in those strawberry fields.

It's not as if Californians are running strawberry powered cars or computers. :rolleyes:

Produce is a major part of the California economy, and for the dirt wages and no benefits they pay those immigrants, no American, black white or otherwise would be willing to do it. Cali couldn't take the hit. You should read REEFER MADNESS, there's a great case for this in that book.
 
DaleMabry said:
Produce is a major part of the California economy, and for the dirt wages and no benefits they pay those immigrants, no American, black white or otherwise would be willing to do it. Cali couldn't take the hit. You should read REEFER MADNESS, there's a great case for this in that book.

The problem with this is that our economy should not (and never have been) based on the use of slave labor. Thats what these immigrants are and thats why the whole immigration issue isn't going anywhere. You've got PACs in Washington representing the big farmers, dropping money all over the place and crying that they have to have these workers otherwise they'll go out of business. Its the same bullshit we see in the IT industry with regards to the H1B issue.

American business, in the pursuit of globalism, wants to drop the workers wages such that they can make a product for sale in countries that can't currently afford them. Instead of reducing their profits, they reduce their direct labor costs (i.e. lower salary, no retirement benefits, no health care, no putting into Social Security). Unfortunately they're killing the american worker by doing this.

Of course these workers don't care because when our country goes to shit, they'll take their american dollars and head back down to Mexico where they can then live in a much better way than we can. :smh:
 
Dr. Munhihausen II said:
lol...whatever.

So....you would rather have immediate amnesty granted for 12,000,000 people so that that they can work legally...and still taking jobs away from citizens who have been oppressed for generations?

Logic would tell us that the illegals are either going to HAVE to work or get deported, so what good would the federal marshals do in policing the workforce?

How would one expect illegalsto sustain themselves if they are to remain here without working?

Illegals either need to work or they need to get deported!

Amnesty or deportation.

Our most rational choice for the American people is deportation to keep the few jobs left that we have here!

I swear...democrat logic is so "rosy"....but so many of you cant see the forest for the trees.

and Like I said (and you are saying now)...globalization is one of our biggest issues.

Do you even know what it means?

Come on, guy.

And guess what else Ron Paul is against?

Damn, you assumed a lot. I never said I was for amnesty. Send there ass back. Make them run for the border. This is what I mean by republican hypocrisy. You want to let the source of the illegal immigration of the hook, the employers. Every morning where I live you can see tens of hundreds of illegals standing outside in groups waiting for some guy in a big SUV or pick up truck to hire them for a few hours of work for little or no pay, or at least below the minimum wage and pay them in cash. You can bet these guys that hire those illegals under the table don’t send campaign donations to Democratic Party. One of the main reasons illegal immigration is up since the late 1980s is due to the union busting of republicans and big business. If we had strong unions, there is no way illegals would be allow to work in large numbers. GW wants amnesty for them though. He wants to drive down the wages and create an employment pool of low wage workers that will under cut American workers. I agree globalization is a major issue, but, some republicans are against it not for the sake of the American worker, but for racial reasons. You need to wake up! And if Paul is against it, why didn’t he go on record and vote on the amnesty bill?
 
DaleMabry said:
The employers HAVE to hire them. No one else wants to do those jobs for that kind of pay. Don't you know the California economy would collapse if it weren't for cheap illegal immigrant labor in those strawberry fields?

Look if the CEO of General Electric’s job paid $5 an hour, very few Americans would want that job either. This myth that we have to have illegals is right out of the corporate talking points manual. California has always had immigrants in the fields. Florida had them too. They just don’t want them to unionize. Remember Caesar Chavez?
 
GreedySmurf said:
The problem with this is that our economy should not (and never have been) based on the use of slave labor. Thats what these immigrants are and thats why the whole immigration issue isn't going anywhere. You've got PACs in Washington representing the big farmers, dropping money all over the place and crying that they have to have these workers otherwise they'll go out of business. Its the same bullshit we see in the IT industry with regards to the H1B issue.

American business, in the pursuit of globalism, wants to drop the workers wages such that they can make a product for sale in countries that can't currently afford them. Instead of reducing their profits, they reduce their direct labor costs (i.e. lower salary, no retirement benefits, no health care, no putting into Social Security). Unfortunately they're killing the american worker by doing this.

Of course these workers don't care because when our country goes to shit, they'll take their american dollars and head back down to Mexico where they can then live in a much better way than we can. :smh:

thoughtone said:
Look if the CEO of General Electric’s job paid $5 an hour, very few Americans would want that job either. This myth that we have to have illegals is right out of the corporate talking points manual. California has always had immigrants in the fields. Florida had them too. They just don’t want them to unionize. Remember Caesar Chavez?

Both of these are very good points and I will reflect on them. Thank you.
 
DaleMabry said:
histick said:
:hmm:

I'm 100% sure California's economy would be fine without illegals in those strawberry fields.

It's not as if Californians are running strawberry powered cars or computers. :rolleyes:

Produce is a major part of the California economy, and for the dirt wages and no benefits they pay those immigrants, no American, black white or otherwise would be willing to do it. Cali couldn't take the hit. You should read REEFER MADNESS, there's a great case for this in that book.

DaleMabry...

Obviously, humor is lost on you. :rolleyes:

As a Californian, I am fully aware that agriculture is a big part of our economy.

Small business is a big part of the American way just as much as is big business is. Small business is the reason America is America. It's the reason there is a big fucking line to come here. People have too many hurdles to jump through for very little benefit in other countries. People rather start a business in America or China where they can reap the benefits of owning a successful business.

Glad to see some congress members voting in favor of keeping this program going which aids a starting business.
 
DaleMabry said:
Illegal immigrants are not taking jobs away from Black kids. No way.

A mufucka brand new to this country who can barely speak fuckin English if at all, and has no education whatsoever?

Taking jobs AWAY?

Try this on for size: Young niggas refuse to work those jobs in the first place. :I aint no slave, fuck that shit, etc."

Meanwhile the immigrant is like "Sending home $100 a week to Puebla is gonna take care of my whole extended family."

All a matter of perspective I guess.
Nah dawg. Its tough for young black men to find jobs in Houston.I talk to young dudes all the time. Its truly a struggle to find a job for many black youth. Many Whites and Mexicans are turning them down at the door
 
This just in from the National Black Chamber of Commerce:

Where are the Minority Advertising Firms?

Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee Chair John Kerry, senior Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer and Congressional Black Caucus Chair, Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick called out the US Dept. of Defense and the Treasury for their dismal performance in utilizing minority owned advertising firms. This is in response to a GAO report that will be released today that shows these two agencies have contracted less than 2% with minority owned firms and that 2% represents very small dollars per contract in comparison to majority own firms. This comes from a GAO study of the implementation of Executive Order 13170 which directs agencies to take an aggressive role in ensuring substantial participation in federal advertising contracts by businesses certified as 8(a) or SDB by the Small Business Administration. It’s time to implement!


As you can see, even with federally mandated quotas, getting our fair share is still a bitch!
 
GreedySmurf said:
This just in from the National Black Chamber of Commerce:

Where are the Minority Advertising Firms?

Yesterday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee Chair John Kerry, senior Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer and Congressional Black Caucus Chair, Representative Carolyn Kilpatrick called out the US Dept. of Defense and the Treasury for their dismal performance in utilizing minority owned advertising firms. This is in response to a GAO report that will be released today that shows these two agencies have contracted less than 2% with minority owned firms and that 2% represents very small dollars per contract in comparison to majority own firms. This comes from a GAO study of the implementation of Executive Order 13170 which directs agencies to take an aggressive role in ensuring substantial participation in federal advertising contracts by businesses certified as 8(a) or SDB by the Small Business Administration. It’s time to implement!


As you can see, even with federally mandated quotas, getting our fair share is still a bitch!


Doubly more difficult when republicans are involved. Are we as Black folk better off with republicans in charge?
 
Back
Top