Rape charged dropped after video comes out

whoa... wait, they said it wasnt even the GIRL that pressed charges..

it was probably some hating ass incel faggot that caused all this...

that bruh wasnt even tryin, that was your typical pussy all in my

face moment...

but that shit is crazy, they say somebody asked the girls roommate

for his name..

Im thinkin she was probably seeing an incel cop who got way out of line,

Homie needs to sue!!

His frat brothers turned him in. He fucked her while she was passed out and later she went to the hospital for alcohol poisonings.

That makes a lot of sense as well... It was like hey fuck if you innocent or not,

we dont want our name involved in this... which is understandable but fucked up...!!

I wouldnt join a frat that doesnt stand by its innocent members... in the long run

it may hurt em...

Good point there bruh!!!

Word, he fucked her while she was passed out.
 
Bitch should go to jail fuck that!!! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

6bPaFd.jpg
 
The video in the OP is from 5 years ago. It seems there's more to the story. Here's what's transpired since...

  • In March 2018, Premjee was expelled from USC when the Office of Equity and Diversity found him responsible for policy violations
  • When he was expelled, he was 6 credits away from graduation
  • Statement from the "victim" (named Arshia) after he was expelled
“I couldn’t have possibly gave consent, but I personally feel like he shouldn’t go to jail for something like this,” she said. “I don’t want to feel guilty for something like that.”

“That’s the thing that bothers me psychologically,” Doe said. “A lot of people think I was the one who forced, who wrongly accused him of something he didn’t do, when I didn’t accuse anyone of anything in the first place.”

  • On 12/18/2018, USC retracted its own decision to expel following a case hearing with the Los Angeles County Superior Court
  • Premjee filed suit against the City of LA and LAPD

Some interesting things came out during Premjee's lawsuit...

  • Shortly after Premjee left Arshia's dorm, she ended up in the ICU with "a blood alcohol level of 0.325 and tested positive for cannabinoids, and that her diagnosis was alcohol poisoning"
  • Two of Premjee's frat brothers reported him to the University because "she was incoherent and it appeared she could not understand anything said to her"
  • Plaintiff also provided the officers his phone, which showed that he sent the following WhatsApp messages to a friend starting at 1:29 a.m., right after he left Arshia's apartment: “Bro I fucked up. Or at least I think I did ... I don't know if this qualifies as sexual assault or not: this girl was blackout drunk but really wanted me to fuck her. Initially I said no way because she was so drunk and I didn't want her to make a decision she would regret the next day. After constant persuasion by her I finally agreed. And eve during sex, she was sloppy and all over the place But I did it anyways. And I feel so bad When she met me she was blackout drunk, when we had sex she was still blackout drunk. She could not walk straight ...”


https://titleixforall.com/in-civil-...jee-following-recent-court-of-appeals-defeat/

https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreut...fault&contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true
This is still some bullshit, because if you are drunk and a female was drunk, you both fuck, why is it the man who raped the woman? Now dudes have to be pyscotheropist (not to be confused with phyco the rapist) just to figure out if her cognitive skills are impeared to the point that its effecting her judgment to have sex or not, in other words the man has to be accountable for both himself and her, while she has no blame in the matter what so ever.
For example how many of you guys got so drunk you let a homo fuck you in the ass? None, right, you know why? Because men know that we are always accountable for our actions, and if we are dumb enough to get so drunk that we don't know what we are doing, then what even happens after that is our fault!
Maybe if we hold women accountable for their dumb choices, then they will be more cautious and less likely to do some dumb shit like this.
BTW I am not talking about men who deliberately get women drunk or men who prey on drunk women, but in this case she was the aggressor and she was doing exactly what she wanted to do, in that state! So the problem is not him, but rather her for allowing her to get into that state, just like a drunk driver who accidently hits a kid while drunk!
 
His frat brothers turned him in. He fucked her while she was passed out and later she went to the hospital for alcohol poisonings.



Word, he fucked her while she was passed out.

So you dont think the fact she didnt report anything, and never

claimed to be a victim is an issue??
 
Good answer, and I don’t think there has ever been a case where a woman has been charged with "date rape."
I can tell you this, in accordance with section 130.10 (New York State Penal Code), it is an affirmative defense that the defendant, at the time he or she engaged in the conduct constituting the offense, did not know of the facts or conditions responsible for such incapacity to consent.
By no means am I condoning violating women, but I do believe this subject should be examined more by the court system (this would be difficult because how many men would come forward to say a woman took advantage of them. This is tantamount to asking, Can a prostitute be raped?).

Oh you would be wrong.

There has been date rape accusations on woman
 
They said the friend gave them his name.
He's lucky though because in reality the video shown proves nothing about what happened in the room.
Remember a woman can give and take away consent at any point prior to and during sex. I can see the ethics committee kicking him off campus.

Since the only thing that would matter is what he or she said (alleged victim).
What else is left to prove if the girl is not saying he raped her?
 
So you dont think the fact she didnt report anything, and never

claimed to be a victim is an issue??

Did you read about the case?

The basic facts are as follows. Sometime shortly after midnight on April 1, 2017, Plaintiff and the alleged victim, Arshia, met at the Banditos bar near the USC campus. They did not know each other prior. Arshia had consumed some amount of alcohol. After a short time, by around 12:38 a.m., they decided to have sex. Plaintiff ordered an Uber to take them to his fraternity house where he lived. Plaintiff's fraternity brothers told him that Arshia could not stay at the fraternity house because she was too intoxicated, so Plaintiff called another Uber to take Arshia back to her dorm at Fluor Tower, and Plaintiff accompanied her.

After they reached Arshia's dorm suite, Plaintiff and Arshia had sex on an air mattress in the common area (or living room) of the suite. Subsequently, two or three of Arshia's roommates, who were in their own rooms, realized Arshia was having sex with someone in the common area. Moments after it was over, at least two of the roommates went into the common area and saw Arshia on the air mattress, and chided Plaintiff for having sex with her because she was intoxicated.

Plaintiff left the building shortly thereafter, at about 1:28. a.m. The roommates tried to rouse Arshia, but she was not responding to them. They called the resident assistant for help, and then called an ambulance, which took Arshia to the hospital. Arshia was diagnosed with alcohol poisoning.

Thereafter, Plaintiff was arrested and ultimately charged with violating Cal. Penal Code § 261(a)(3) (rape of an intoxicated person).
At the preliminary hearing, the judge dismissed the case for lack of probable cause.

“I couldn’t have possibly gave consent, but I personally feel like he shouldn’t go to jail for something like this,” she said. “I don’t want to feel guilty for something like that.”

“That’s the thing that bothers me psychologically,” Doe said. “A lot of people think I was the one who forced, who wrongly accused him of something he didn’t do, when I didn’t accuse anyone of anything in the first place.”


Los Angeles Police Department officers arrested Premjee after the incident occurred in Fluor Tower in April 2017. Premjee pleaded not guilty to one count of rape by use of drugs and one count of sexual penetration with a foreign object in May.
 
This is still some bullshit, because if you are drunk and a female was drunk, you both fuck, why is it the man who raped the woman? Now dudes have to be pyscotheropist (not to be confused with phyco the rapist) just to figure out if her cognitive skills are impeared to the point that its effecting her judgment to have sex or not, in other words the man has to be accountable for both himself and her, while she has no blame in the matter what so ever.
For example how many of you guys got so drunk you let a homo fuck you in the ass? None, right, you know why? Because men know that we are always accountable for our actions, and if we are dumb enough to get so drunk that we don't know what we are doing, then what even happens after that is our fault!
Maybe if we hold women accountable for their dumb choices, then they will be more cautious and less likely to do some dumb shit like this.
BTW I am not talking about men who deliberately get women drunk or men who prey on drunk women, but in this case she was the aggressor and she was doing exactly what she wanted to do, in that state! So the problem is not him, but rather her for allowing her to get into that state, just like a drunk driver who accidently hits a kid while drunk!
There is an inherent bias against men in situations like this where both people have been out drinking and generally women are not held accountable for their actions.
I am not condoning women being taken advantage of, but does she bare any responsibility for being the aggressor?
 
If you women blackmails you into sex?

That's rape.

If women threatens you to have sex with her or else she will claim rape?

That's rape.

If you are asleep and she starts to have sex with you and you say no or say stop

that's rape.

And real talk I bet a few men on here have been put in at LEAST one of those situations.
 
Bitch should go to jail fuck that!!! :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:

She did even press charges.

This is still some bullshit, because if you are drunk and a female was drunk, you both fuck, why is it the man who raped the woman? Now dudes have to be pyscotheropist (not to be confused with phyco the rapist) just to figure out if her cognitive skills are impeared to the point that its effecting her judgment to have sex or not, in other words the man has to be accountable for both himself and her, while she has no blame in the matter what so ever.
For example how many of you guys got so drunk you let a homo fuck you in the ass? None, right, you know why? Because men know that we are always accountable for our actions, and if we are dumb enough to get so drunk that we don't know what we are doing, then what even happens after that is our fault!
Maybe if we hold women accountable for their dumb choices, then they will be more cautious and less likely to do some dumb shit like this.
BTW I am not talking about men who deliberately get women drunk or men who prey on drunk women, but in this case she was the aggressor and she was doing exactly what she wanted to do, in that state! So the problem is not him, but rather her for allowing her to get into that state, just like a drunk driver who accidently hits a kid while drunk!

He called two Ubers, moving her to two different spots then fucked her while passed out. She went to the hospital and he took a third Uber back to the frat house. She didn't press charges and said he shouldn't go to jail. Fuck you talking about?
 
Fuck the #MeToo movement.

He has to prove that he didn't raped her. And of course as the accusation is made the authorities believe a drunk bitch.
 
Women can be the aggressors and initiate a sexual encounter, and can later on say it was rape (and be believed, just based on their word). It's about perception. I mentioned Taylor Swift to illustrate how a young white woman can sleep with whoever she wants but will not be labeled a "slut."
This is still some bullshit, because if you are drunk and a female was drunk, you both fuck, why is it the man who raped the woman? Now dudes have to be pyscotheropist (not to be confused with phyco the rapist) just to figure out if her cognitive skills are impeared to the point that its effecting her judgment to have sex or not, in other words the man has to be accountable for both himself and her, while she has no blame in the matter what so ever.
For example how many of you guys got so drunk you let a homo fuck you in the ass? None, right, you know why? Because men know that we are always accountable for our actions, and if we are dumb enough to get so drunk that we don't know what we are doing, then what even happens after that is our fault!
Maybe if we hold women accountable for their dumb choices, then they will be more cautious and less likely to do some dumb shit like this.
BTW I am not talking about men who deliberately get women drunk or men who prey on drunk women, but in this case she was the aggressor and she was doing exactly what she wanted to do, in that state! So the problem is not him, but rather her for allowing her to get into that state, just like a drunk driver who accidently hits a kid while drunk!
what kind of dude wants sloppy drunk black out drunk pussy??? and this is the 21st century in the middle of the metoo era...any dudes STILL gettin caught up in that shit today asked for it..
 
what kind of dude wants sloppy drunk black out drunk pussy??? and this is the 21st century in the middle of the metoo era...any dudes STILL gettin caught up in that shit today asked for it..
Blackout drunk means she had to be passed out and carried away, not having convos with her girlfriend and checking someone to your hotel room.
 
They said the girl he fucked didn't press charges so how can the roommate press charges for some that didn't even happen to her? I remember a similar case a couple of years ago where the video showed the guy and girl making out in the bar and going to the girls apartment, the video from that showed they were only inside a few minutes and then came out together and she later screamed rape, I think he was still charged, let me see if I can find it
I remember this story well.

 
Blackout drunk means she had to be passed out and carried away, not having convos with her girlfriend and checking someone to your hotel room.

She sounded like she was in between

But enough that folk looking knew it was suspect.

That men was old enough to know this was NOT going to end well.
 
He gotta concentrate on classes with the idea he might get expelled or suspended. Bitches do this crazy shit, and stories like this don’t get the exposure they deserve.
 
Blackout drunk means she had to be passed out and carried away, not having convos with her girlfriend and checking someone to your hotel room.
I get that but your missing my point... he basically incriminated himself by saying he thought he may have sexually assaulted her and that she was sloppy drunk leading up to and during sex. Other people saw how drunk she was. So consent is highly questionable and that puts him squarely in a pickle. So for the last 3 years dude's life has been turned upside down and I guarantee you the pussy wasn't worth it.

And thats my point....we don't live in a era where you can get involved in something like that and just walk away anymore. The fucked up part is this incident WILL come back to bite him in the ass again in the future. Especially if he tries to go for something high profile like run for public office or win a prestigious award etc. And it WILL be used to assassinate his character and block him from achieving whatever it is someone DOESN'T want him to have.

The woman involved can get on with her life and get a pass as the victim but he will ALWAYS have that other shoe hanging in the air.

oh you best BELEE dis shit aint over. :smh:
 
Last edited:
Look if I was that drunk and got some chick pregnant would that get me off the hook for child support? If not why?
if you were that drunk you most likely wouldn't get an erection...but lets run thru the scenario

From a guy in his late twenties who got “black-out drunk”:


A few years ago I was at a small party with a few close friends and some other guests. I had been drinking prior to the party and so by midnight I was very intoxicated. Since it was a friend’s house, I decided to go ahead and fall asleep in the spare bedroom rather than continue drinking and get sick/embarrass myself. Around the time I decided to get into bed, I blacked out. I only remember flashes of what happened afterwards.

At some point I got out of bed to get myself some water. I remember having my shorts and shirt still on and going into the kitchen. As I am filling up a glass, I remember talking with a girl in the kitchen. I can not remember what we talked about at all.
I then remember being in the bedroom and her pushing me against the wall while kissing me. Then flashes of moments: I am pushed on the bed; my shorts are off and she is on top of me; and finally I am in the middle of the bed on top of her.

I don’t remember details and have no sense of the time involved, what was said, what anything felt like, or even what I did during those images. I just remember a series of images that do not seem real. I don’t even remember falling asleep.

I woke up in the morning, confused, face down, and naked. She was on the edge of the bed getting dressed. On the floor were two used condoms that I do not remember even having on. She smiled, kissed me quickly on the lips, and said,”That was fun, but I gotta head out this morning. Bye!” She said that in a cheery, normal, not-hungover-at-all voice and walked out the door. I didn’t even respond to her. I just watched her walk out. I did not even know what to say. I still don’t. I still don’t know how to classify this.

Yes, I know that getting black-out drunk is always a bad idea. Yes, I know that drunken one-night stands happen. I also know that I did not want this, and that everyone there knew that I had gone to sleep early because I was too drunk. I also know that when I think back on this I am equal parts angry, disgusted, and disappointed that I didn’t stop it.
For some reason, I decided to tell this story to two separate female partners in the time since. In both cases, they listened attentively, and then responded in almost identical fashion, “If you were on top, then it wasn’t rape.”

I do not know how to respond to that statement. I honestly don’t fully know what to call this story. I just hope that this story is helpful in some way.



A guy can get convicted of rape if he's too drunk to realize a woman is saying no — even if he remembers nothing of the assault or thought the sex was consensual. (And yes, a woman could be convicted of rape in similar circumstances, though the cases are rare.)
 
Fuck the #MeToo movement.

He has to prove that he didn't raped her. And of course as the accusation is made the authorities believe a drunk bitch.
Actually, the District Attorney's Office has to prove that he raped her without her consent. The judge in the criminal court proceedings ruled in Armaan Premjee (the defendant) favor.
He faced a 2nd hurdle trying to get reinstated by USC.
 
Actually, the District Attorney's Office has to prove that he raped her without her consent. The judge in the criminal court proceedings ruled in Armaan Premjee (the defendant) favor.
He faced a 2nd hurdle trying to get reinstated by USC.

Right. I wanted to convey that it seems like in cases of metoo shit the burden of proof is on the accused/defense rather than the prosecution.

Few are for rape. But let's face it, It's he said she said. He's presumed innocent. Supposedly.
 
I looked at the video, this Indian guy is guilty and shows the bias of our criminal justice system towards them. I would have found him guilty. They could have intimidated her to recant, I have seen them do this.

612a3ede9ef1e50018f891a0


 
Right. I wanted to convey that it seems like in cases of metoo shit the burden of proof is on the accused/defense rather than the prosecution.

Few are for rape. But let's face it, It's he said she said. He's presumed innocent. Supposedly.
Trust me, I can understand how you can feel that way in this "me too" era. The unfortunate aspect of "me too" is that cases are being tried in the court of public opinion before actually being tried.
 
I believe that there was consent and there remained consent throughout the unfortunate incidents in this case. There is no indication of any withdrawal of consent. There is a very strong indication that the alleged victim in this case was the initiator of any conduct between the defendant and the alleged victim.
 
I get that but your missing my point... he basically incriminated himself by saying he thought he may have sexually assaulted her and that she was sloppy drunk leading up to and during sex. Other people saw how drunk she was. So consent is highly questionable and that puts him squarely in a pickle. So for the last 3 years dude's life has been turned upside down and I guarantee you the pussy wasn't worth it.

And thats my point....we don't live in a era where you can get involved in some like that and just walk away anymore. The fucked up part is this incident WILL come back to bite him in the ass again in the future. Especially if he tries to go for something high profile like run for public office or win an prestigious award etc. And it WILL be used to assassinate his character and block him from achieving whatever it is someone DOESN'T want him to have.

The woman involved can get on with her life and get a pass as the victim but he will ALWAYS have that other shoe hanging in the air.

oh you best BELEE dis shit aint over. :smh:
Things are so bad that simps are feeling guilty over tipsy fucking. What most likely happen was he was drunk also and couldn't really remember what happened and got spooked thinking he may have been more responsible than he actually was. Because to me, they were both drunk they both fucked each other, and instead of both making a PSI about the dangers of getting pissy drunk, they are looking to place all the blame on the man.
Either they are both guilty or both innocent, the man should not be the defacto one to take the blame when they were both obviously intoxicated.
 
If you women blackmails you into sex?

That's rape.

If women threatens you to have sex with her or else she will claim rape?

That's rape.

If you are asleep and she starts to have sex with you and you say no or say stop

that's rape.

And real talk I bet a few men on here have been put in at LEAST one of those situations.
I have been sleep plenty of times several of my ex girlfriends would be riding me. I had no problem with it. Is it rape, yeah, but I ain't complaining.
 
Are women adults or are they children?
If they are adults, are they not responsible for their own choices and decisions?
Either they have rights or they don't. Part of "rights" is the right to make your own decisions - good or bad.
This is clearly a case of political views vs. actual rights.
Two drunk adults fuck - hell, that's how a lot of you MFs were born!
If you are "too drunk" then as an adult, you need to be responsible for the choices you make.
The drinking seems to be more of the bad choice on her part than the sex, since she didn't go to the hospital for the sex. She also didn't complain or file charges.
This appears to be a case of extreme virtue signaling to me.
People so desperate to look like they are "good people doing the right thing" that they are willing to wreck someone's life in the process, which makes them bad people.
 
Back
Top