Police just executed an unarmed 17 yr old brotha (shot 10 times)

People are still talking about this officer being punched in the face as if it has been proven. If this was a righteous self defense case, we would have seen pictures of the injured cop by now. These people are really showing their intelligence when hearsay has become a fact to them.
 
The fuckery continues:


Post-Dispatch seeks juvenile court records
6 hours ago • By Adam Goodman agoodman@post-dispatch.com 314-340-8258

In response to a number of inquiries today, I wanted to confirm that the Post-Dispatch filed a petition last week with the St. Louis County Family Court seeking the release of any juvenile court records it may have relating to Michael Brown.

The court filing is just one avenue of many in our continuing commitment to cover a significant news story for our community.

We have taken this action as a professional news organization, independently and not in conjunction with any other organization, as we seek to report facts and not rely on innuendo or speculation.
 
People are still talking about this officer being punched in the face as if it has been proven. If this was a righteous self defense case, we would have seen pictures of the injured cop by now. These people are really showing their intelligence when hearsay has become a fact to them.

I don't believe anything I hear about Darren Wilson
 
After Ferguson, U.N. Calls on U.S. to Get Its Act Together on Race Discrimination

un-racialprofiling1-2.png


08/29/2014
PrintEmailRSSFacebookTwitterSee more sharing options
Universal Human Rights
By Jamil Dakwar, Director, ACLU Human Rights Program at 3:06pm

In the last several weeks, the state of Missouri has captured news headlines around the globe: first, with reports coming out of Ferguson of yet another unarmed African-American young man shot and killed by police, and then with accounts of a violent and militarized crackdown on protesters carried out by law enforcement in the aftermath..
Were they depicting a foreign crisis, these images would have been condemned by the U.S. State Department and policymakers as evidence of human rights violations. But when they come out of our own backyard, we don’t call them human rights abuses. They are, at best, labeled police misconduct and civil rights concerns.
After all, America is a champion of human rights. So why is the world so outraged?
Because much of the world is tired of the U.S. double standard when it comes to human rights. It should come as no surprise that people associated images from Ferguson – full of teargas, rubber bullets, and militarized police deployed to suppress protests – with countries with poor human rights records, like Egypt, Bahrain, Israel, and Turkey. Global opinion is informed and influenced by the internet and social media, with domestic human rights abuses quickly and easily disseminated. Even when the violator is a superpower, we are reminded, in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
These sentiments were on full display earlier this month when the United States appeared before a U.N. human rights body to defend its record on racial discrimination. Today, this body — the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination — issued its verdict: a 14-page-long scathing report on the U.S. failure to fully comply with its obligations under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in numerous areas affecting racial and ethnic minorities. While it commended the Obama administration for steps it has taken to combat racial discrimination, it highlighted the gaps between the administration’s stated commitments and the glaring reality of laws and practices that continue to discriminate against and disproportionately impact people of color and indigenous communities.
The committee’s findings are based on hundreds of pages of reports submitted by the U.S. government as well as advocacy groups, which are then produced after a public hearing in Geneva attended by a high-level U.S. delegation. The U.S. review coincided with the protests in Ferguson after the killing of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown, a development that did not go overlooked during the hearing. Members of the committee were also moved by testimonies from the parents of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, who attended the review to share their loss and lessons to be learned from their own tragedies.
The recommendations released today address structural and pervasive forms of discrimination in the United States, which often go overlooked in public debates sparked by the loss of human life due to the unjustified use of force. They offer a blueprint to end racial discrimination and to promote equal opportunity. They include calls to:
End racial profiling by adopting the End Racial Profiling Act and swiftly revising the 2003 Justice Department Guidance on the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies.
Stop the militarized approach to policing, which has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color and to immigration law enforcement, which has led to killings at the border, mandatory detention of immigrants, and deportation without adequate access to justice.
Develop a comprehensive plan to reduce school segregation and address the school-to-prison pipeline.
End racial disparities in the criminal justice system at the federal, state, and local levels.
These recommended reforms aren’t just about changing policy. They’re about addressing the root causes of discrimination. The Race Convention, the report reminds us, “requires States parties to prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination in all its forms,” including legislation and practices that have disparate impact on racial and ethnic minorities.
The United States ratified the convention 20 years ago. It’s time to do it justice.
Learn more about racial discrimination and other civil liberties issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.
 
People are still talking about this officer being punched in the face as if it has been proven. If this was a righteous self defense case, we would have seen pictures of the injured cop by now. These people are really showing their intelligence when hearsay has become a fact to them.

I ain't taking up for those pricks what so ever, but the date probably was before that news came of no broken eye socket
 
After Ferguson, U.N. Calls on U.S. to Get Its Act Together on Race Discrimination

un-racialprofiling1-2.png


08/29/2014
PrintEmailRSSFacebookTwitterSee more sharing options
Universal Human Rights
By Jamil Dakwar, Director, ACLU Human Rights Program at 3:06pm

In the last several weeks, the state of Missouri has captured news headlines around the globe: first, with reports coming out of Ferguson of yet another unarmed African-American young man shot and killed by police, and then with accounts of a violent and militarized crackdown on protesters carried out by law enforcement in the aftermath..
Were they depicting a foreign crisis, these images would have been condemned by the U.S. State Department and policymakers as evidence of human rights violations. But when they come out of our own backyard, we don’t call them human rights abuses. They are, at best, labeled police misconduct and civil rights concerns.
After all, America is a champion of human rights. So why is the world so outraged?
Because much of the world is tired of the U.S. double standard when it comes to human rights.
It should come as no surprise that people associated images from Ferguson – full of teargas, rubber bullets, and militarized police deployed to suppress protests – with countries with poor human rights records, like Egypt, Bahrain, Israel, and Turkey. Global opinion is informed and influenced by the internet and social media, with domestic human rights abuses quickly and easily disseminated. Even when the violator is a superpower, we are reminded, in the words of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., that “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
These sentiments were on full display earlier this month when the United States appeared before a U.N. human rights body to defend its record on racial discrimination. Today, this body — the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination — issued its verdict: a 14-page-long scathing report on the U.S. failure to fully comply with its obligations under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) in numerous areas affecting racial and ethnic minorities. While it commended the Obama administration for steps it has taken to combat racial discrimination, it highlighted the gaps between the administration’s stated commitments and the glaring reality of laws and practices that continue to discriminate against and disproportionately impact people of color and indigenous communities.
The committee’s findings are based on hundreds of pages of reports submitted by the U.S. government as well as advocacy groups, which are then produced after a public hearing in Geneva attended by a high-level U.S. delegation. The U.S. review coincided with the protests in Ferguson after the killing of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown, a development that did not go overlooked during the hearing. Members of the committee were also moved by testimonies from the parents of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, who attended the review to share their loss and lessons to be learned from their own tragedies.
The recommendations released today address structural and pervasive forms of discrimination in the United States, which often go overlooked in public debates sparked by the loss of human life due to the unjustified use of force. They offer a blueprint to end racial discrimination and to promote equal opportunity. They include calls to:
End racial profiling by adopting the End Racial Profiling Act and swiftly revising the 2003 Justice Department Guidance on the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies.
Stop the militarized approach to policing, which has had a disproportionate impact on communities of color and to immigration law enforcement, which has led to killings at the border, mandatory detention of immigrants, and deportation without adequate access to justice.
Develop a comprehensive plan to reduce school segregation and address the school-to-prison pipeline.
End racial disparities in the criminal justice system at the federal, state, and local levels.
These recommended reforms aren’t just about changing policy. They’re about addressing the root causes of discrimination. The Race Convention, the report reminds us, “requires States parties to prohibit and eliminate racial discrimination in all its forms,” including legislation and practices that have disparate impact on racial and ethnic minorities.
The United States ratified the convention 20 years ago. It’s time to do it justice.
Learn more about racial discrimination and other civil liberties issues: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Interesting. I could have sworn some of us were talking about this prior to all of this and were told things like this didn't matter.
 
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/165353222&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>​
 
People are still talking about this officer being punched in the face as if it has been proven. If this was a righteous self defense case, we would have seen pictures of the injured cop by now. These people are really showing their intelligence when hearsay has become a fact to them.

I don't think he was punched, but I think its possible he was hit in the face with the door when they said the door opened and was pushed closed. According to the police dept, his face was swollen and received some sort of damage, there are supposed to be pictures they have, but the autopsy said Mikes hands did not have appear to have thrown a punch.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums
 
What happened when Michael Brown met Officer Darren Wilson

http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2014/08/us/ferguson-brown-timeline/

The officer drives away but then puts the car in reverse and backs up rapidly.

The car slants, almost hitting Johnson and Brown, Johnson tells CNN.

"We were so close, almost inches away, that when he tried to open his door aggressively, the door ricocheted both off me and Big Mike's body and closed back on the officer," Johnson said.

Still in his car, the officer grabs Brown by his neck, Johnson said. Brown tries to pull away, but the officer keeps pulling Brown toward him, he said.
Johnson: "My friend, Big Mike, very angrily is trying to pull away from the officer."

The officer draws his weapon. He says "'I'll shoot" or "I'm about to shoot." "I'm standing so close to Big Mike and the officer, I look in his window and I see that he has his gun pointed at both of us. And when he fired his weapon, I moved seconds before he pulled the trigger. I saw the fire come out the barrel and I instinctually knew it was a gun. I looked at my friend Big Mike and saw he was struck in the chest or upper region because I saw blood spatter down his side."

Johnson: "At no point in time did they struggle over the weapon because the weapon was already drawn on us."

Dorian Johnson, Michael Brown's friend, describes the shooting
Bosley says Brown still has the cigarillos taken from the store in his hand so he was trying to maneuver himself away from the officer.

Tiffany Mitchell, who was picking up a colleague to go to work, said she saw some of the confrontation. Wilson and Brown were "tussling through the window." "It looked as if the kid was pulling away and the officer was pulling him in." "A shot was fired through the window."

Piaget Crenshaw, Mitchell's co-worker, said she saw what happened from her apartment while waiting for Mitchell: "The officer was just trying to pull him into the vehicle – that's just what it looked like."
 
Look who finally decided to say something.....



I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....


she needs to read a prepared speech from a teleprompter to make a statement?!?!?

man i will betcha that she won't even get the nomination.
 
I don't think he was punched, but I think its possible he was hit in the face with the door when they said the door opened and was pushed closed. According to the police dept, his face was swollen and received some sort of damage, there are supposed to be pictures they have, but the autopsy said Mikes hands did not have appear to have thrown a punch.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums

CNN Says Rumor That Michael Brown Fractured Darren Wilson's Eye Socket is False

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ket_not_broken_by_michael_brown_cnn_says.html

The Washington Post reported earlier today that a friend of Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson says Wilson's eye socket was broken during his confrontation with Michael Brown:

The signs of easing tensions came as a family friend of the officer who fatally shot Brown came forward to allege new details of the incident, saying that the officer suffered a fracture to his eye socket in a scuffle with the unarmed teenager before opening fire.

Hospital X-rays of the injury have been submitted to the St. Louis County prosecuting attorney and will be shared with a grand jury now weighing evidence to determine whether Officer Darren Wilson should be charged in the shooting.

That claim appears to have been undermined. For one, the Post is now reporting that prosecutors have not seen any of Wilson's medical records:

[Spokesperson Ed] Magee said that prosecutors have not received any medical records relating to Wilson so far. ​But he said that since Wilson was taken to the hospital, they assume there are medical records and they just haven’t received them yet.

And CNN producer Julian Cummings, who last week correctly reported that the release of Wilson's name was imminent, reports that the claim Wilson had a broken eye bone is flat-out incorrect:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Reports that Ofc Darren Wilson had a bruised or fractured eye socket are false. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ferguson?src=hash">#ferguson</a>
A source close to the investigation tells CNN</p>&mdash; Julian Cummings CNN (@JulianCummings) <a href="https://twitter.com/JulianCummings/statuses/502541265335234561">August 21, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Wilson was taken to the hospital after the shooting. He had xrays which came back negative. He was treated for a swollen face. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ferguson?src=hash">#ferguson</a></p>&mdash; Julian Cummings CNN (@JulianCummings) <a href="https://twitter.com/JulianCummings/statuses/502541653346123777">August 21, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

St. Louis County prosecutor Robert McCulloch says the grand jury that will decide whether or not to indict Wilson may not hear all evidence in the case until October.
 
@playahaitian I know he didn't damage his socket, but the chief confirmed his face was swollen, and I think the report from the hospital that said xrays confirmed no damage to the socket did say he had swelling. I was never able to get a good close up in any of the vids, tho usually bruising and swelling gets worse after several hours. I think his getting hit by the door was partly what put him in such a rage to shoot him in the first place.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums
 
@playahaitian I know he didn't damage his socket, but the chief confirmed his face was swollen, and I think the report from the hospital that said xrays confirmed no damage to the socket did say he had swelling. I was never able to get a good close up in any of the vids, tho usually bruising and swelling gets worse after several hours. I think his getting hit by the door was partly what put him in such a rage to shoot him in the first place.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums

Or...or that faggots face wasn't swollen at all and just did it after the fact to gain sympathy and to fit the story on why he killed him.

Sent from my TouchPad using Tapatalk
 
"Mad moment: @RonFinleyHQ makes the tent stand up #DontShoot #Ferguson (photo @sxrensen)"

BwR4lfuCMAEFI_e.jpg
 
Egyptian NGO investigating Ferguson events in the US

Aug. 28, 2014 17:30


2014-08-17T070833Z_363629703_GM1EA8H15YA01_RTRMADP_3_USA-MISSOURI-SHOOTING.jpg



By THE CAIRO POST
CAIRO: A delegation from an Egyptian NGO began an investigation into the Ferguson, Missouri violence Wednesday in the U.S., Youm7 reported.

“The delegation is composed of six Americans, two of whom are of Egyptian origin. They will first meet with members of Michael Brown’s family and [then] protesters,” Dalia Ziada, executive director of Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies (IKCDS), told Youm7 Thursday.

IKCDS has sent a letter to authorities in Ferguson to inform them of the delegation’s work in the city, Ziada said.

“We requested that they suggest policemen for the delegation to meet and enquire about certain points. We are waiting for a response,” Ziada added.

The Egypt-based International Union for Azhar and Sufi Youth told The Cairo Post on Aug. 22 that it aims to dispatch a committee to the U.S. to investigate the events since the killing of Brown.

The two organizations’ statements followed that of the Foreign Ministry on Aug. 19, where it said it is “closely monitoring” Ferguson events.

“United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon’s statements urging all parties to exercise restraint and “shed full light on the killing” reflect international opinion on the situation,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Badr Abdel Atty told MENA.

“People are free to say what they’d like… That’s the beauty of freedom of expression that we hold very dearly here in the United States,” State Department spokesperson Mare Harf said in response to reporters’ questions about Egypt’s comments, the first of its kind in decades.

“That freedom of expression hasn’t, quite frankly, been upheld with the same sort of respect in Egypt. So it’s something we take very seriously and care about,” Harf added.

Although Abdel Atty said the ministry’s statement did not “condemn the events,” there has been a general sentiment in the Egyptian media that the move responds to the U.S.’s “interference” in Egyptian affairs.

“This statement reflects a ‘qualitative development’ in the way the Egyptian administration deals with its American counterpart,” international law expert Mohamed al-Khesehn told The Cairo Post Aug. 19.

Atty’s statement is a clear message to the U.S. that says “I can speak the same way you can, and I can condemn the same way you do,” Kheshen said.

Harf, however, said Egyptian concerns are a “completely separate issue” from U.S. criticisms of human rights violations in Egypt.

Additional reporting by Abdel Latif Sobh and Aya Samir.
 
@playahaitian I know he didn't damage his socket, but the chief confirmed his face was swollen, and I think the report from the hospital that said xrays confirmed no damage to the socket did say he had swelling. I was never able to get a good close up in any of the vids, tho usually bruising and swelling gets worse after several hours. I think his getting hit by the door was partly what put him in such a rage to shoot him in the first place.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums

He felt like a punk. Cause he tried to be tuff.
Wen he realized he wasn't so tuff
He started shooting
 
I don't think he was punched, but I think its possible he was hit in the face with the door when they said the door opened and was pushed closed. According to the police dept, his face was swollen and received some sort of damage, there are supposed to be pictures they have, but the autopsy said Mikes hands did not have appear to have thrown a punch.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums

Camille this is what I've ALWAYS thought.

If he violently and aggressively and forcefully tried to open a door, the force generated when or if it hits a stationary object, ricocheting back to it's closed position would be enough to knock a person out.

Based on the eye witness statements that we've heard so far we know that Wilson was the aggressor. He was probably half out the door when it flew back closed and hit him in the head.

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
New shit going around is that Mike had a juvy charge of murder or attempted murder.They are saying they didnt prosecute him,or didnt have enough evidence but watch as they trickle this shit out!!
 
@playahaitian I know he didn't damage his socket, but the chief confirmed his face was swollen, and I think the report from the hospital that said xrays confirmed no damage to the socket did say he had swelling. I was never able to get a good close up in any of the vids, tho usually bruising and swelling gets worse after several hours. I think his getting hit by the door was partly what put him in such a rage to shoot him in the first place.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre3 using Forums

Trust me with the length of time it took to get the hospital report out.....they can get some clinician to say "swollen face" cause its not easy to prove that someone is lying about that....the excuse they ll use even on the witness stand is "what one person thinks is a swollen face another may not. Its my clinical professional opinion."

And the court will back off.......so the hospital is most likely lying about the swollen face.
 
New shit going around is that Mike had a juvy charge of murder or attempted murder.They are saying they didnt prosecute him,or didnt have enough evidence but watch as they trickle this shit out!!

Yeah we don t have a police report....but all of a sudden we are getting "juvenile records" that they just happen to "not prosecute"

GTFOH
 
Marching under way...


" @rebeccarivals: March getting ready to start. It's crowded in here #ferguson"
BwTCXTeCcAAe953.jpg
 
New shit going around is that Mike had a juvy charge of murder or attempted murder.They are saying they didnt prosecute him,or didnt have enough evidence but watch as they trickle this shit out!!

That's not new. It's a old rumor that so far has been unconfirmed.



I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
shane
spider

we need more like y'all

everyone that's stayed on this shit, stayed objective and on task

thank you guys so much.

i really believe we can save us.
 
'Preciate ya, Sammy....

I'm just trying to keep the facts out there. I knew about that rumor a LONG time ago, but because it was unconfirmed I didn't bother posting it.

The first person I saw reporting it was this guy:

a2Oer_nC_reasonably_small.jpeg

Charles C. Johnson

He's really full of himself. He will quickly remind you that he's an award winning journalist, even tho he once used a fake 24 year old publication as fact to trash someone

(http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2...ke_princeton_newspaper_to_attack_the_nyt.html)

He also posted this today:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/ofstardust">@ofstardust</a> No, because many of the rich black kids at school got into better schools with worse grades. I would be further if I were black</p>— Charles C. Johnson (@ChuckCJohnson) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckCJohnson/statuses/505589388437237761">August 30, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:smh:

I’m just out here working hard every single day, just trying to be the best poster I can be....
 
Back
Top