sidebar...
he had some of the FINEST women up in that church
can I get an AMEN
he had some of the FINEST women up in that church
can I get an AMEN
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sidebar...
he had some of the FINEST women up in that church
can I get an AMEN
If Jesus had actually ever existed, which I claim he didn't, but does any of that sound like something a Jesus figure would have endorsed??
Jesus probably existed bro. Just saying.
Real shit.sidebar...
he had some of the FINEST women up in that church
can I get an AMEN
Here is the million dollar question .... you're "just saying" based on what proof? I'll make it easier .... How about based on what evidence? If you can provide neither, then what is your assertion based on? Your blind trusting faith in the campfire stories of some medieval, racist, sexist, desert dwelling eurocacs who made up stories with their fertile imaginations and thought everything they couldn't explain had to be a miracle from a giant invisible man who lives in the sky? C'mon man! I anxiously await your response........Jesus probably existed bro. Just saying.
Here is the million dollar question .... you're "just saying" based on what proof? I'll make it easier .... How about based on what evidence? If you can provide neither, then what is your assertion based on? Your blind trusting faith in the campfire stories of some medieval, racist, sexist, desert dwelling eurocacs who made up stories with their fertile imaginations and thought everything they couldn't explain had to be a miracle from a giant invisible man who lives in the sky? C'mon man! I anxiously await your response........
Not even a nickel's worth of truth there, sir in what you said but you're free to believe that. As a matter of fact there.... you're not gonna believe me, maybe you'll believe Bart Ehrman....In addition EVERY critic of Christianity and Jesus from the first century onward (3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th etc etc) had no problem thinking he existed. There wasn't one ancient writer or critic that dissented in that thought. Not one.
Not even a nickel's worth of truth there, sir in what you said but you're free to believe that. As a matter of fact there.... you're not gonna believe me, maybe you'll believe Bart Ehrman....
![]()
For a man who supposedly turned the world upside down, nobody even ever heard of him till the Council of Nicaea over 300 years later!
Seems like you've done your research. I've read and have communicated with Dr. Ehrman. I agree with a lot of his results. Even this one.
"This is not even an issue for scholars of antiquity...The reason for thinking Jesus existed is because he is abundantly attested in early sources...If you want to go where the evidence goes, I think that atheists have done themselves a disservice by jumping on the bandwagon of mythicism, because frankly, it makes you look foolish to the outside world. If that’s what you’re going to believe, you just look foolish." Dr. Bart Ehrman
been a pleasure talkin witcha, bro. stay healthy
I'm not much of a fan of megachurches or their pastors, but he actually did a lot of good work over the years. He never shied away from issues of race, and that "Race, Religion, and Racism" series was outstanding and drew him a whole lot of heat from so called white evangelicals. In fact, I first heard of Dr. Claud Anderson through his appearances on his program. Rest in peace, Dr. Price.
If Jesus had actually ever existed, which I claim he didn't, but does any of that sound like something a Jesus figure would have endorsed??
NOBODY on Earth can "admit" his existence. Choose your words carefully. Anyone is free to believe as they wish but there is not a shred of objective evidence on the planet that supports the existence of Jesus at any time in history, so the opinion of ANYONE on this matter is simply that ... their opinion, based on their faith and their belief system. "That's why they call religions faiths because it is belief without evidence" (Neal deGrasse Tyson) Tell me why the opinion of an Islamic or anyone else should be valued any more than the opinion of my dog concerning issues of nothing but belief, no facts involved?So what's your view on Islam's admission of Jesus' existence?
So what's your view on Islam's admission of Jesus' existence?
NOBODY on Earth can "admit" his existence. Choose your words carefully. Anyone is free to believe as they wish but there is not a shred of objective evidence on the planet that supports the existence of Jesus at any time in history, so the opinion of ANYONE on this matter is simply that ... their opinion, based on their faith and their belief system. "That's why they call religions faiths because it is belief without evidence" (Neal deGrasse Tyson) Tell me why the opinion of an Islamic or anyone else should be valued any more than the opinion of my dog concerning issues of nothing but belief, no facts involved?
No, I'm sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Have you taken any collegiate level sciences yet? To say something DOES NOT exist requires no proof because a negative statement is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE to prove. When one makes the claim that something DOES indeed exist, then the burden of proof falls upon claimant. Only a statement that something does exist, or has existed, or can be made to exist is scientifically provable.So from my pov, I can say it's your opinion that God does not exist and the burden of proof is on you,
So true. I forgot Dr. Claud Anderson made an appearance there.
On another note. Looks like an interesting site in your sig on black baseball. Your site?
No, I'm sorry, but it doesn't work that way. Have you taken any collegiate level sciences yet? To say something DOES NOT exist requires no proof because a negative statement is scientifically IMPOSSIBLE to prove. When one makes the claim that something DOES indeed exist, then the burden of proof falls upon claimant. Only a statement that something does exist, or has existed, or can be made to exist is scientifically provable.
And you asked the question, and I quote: "why attack others based on their belief system? " If you think anything I have said to you in this thread could conceivably be described as an "attack" then you are seeking liberties you frankly didn't earn. It sounds as though you simply don't want to hear opinions that conflict with your own, because you've not endured one solitary word of "attack" from my direction! If so, then kindly quote the words of attack you attribute to me. (waiting) ......... I merely disagreed and stated my reasoning, but I will concede the entire matter at this point because you evidently aren't up to spirited mutually educational debate, you seemingly just want to hear from no one whose opinion doesn't perfectly mirror your own, and that's not something I'm prepared to deliver to anyone. Enjoy your day, sir!