That's a matter of opinion.
so far he's dead still. Well, he came back, but no one saw him, and he um... left again for some reason.
That's a matter of opinion.
fine. lol. but if u ask me, that debate aint going no where but in circles in this forum. when u consense it all down. faith vs. reason. religion vs science. it ultimately distills to a utilitarian argument. because both are ultimately irrational. at which point the subjectivity, ironically, makes it a useless debate after all.I think that's how you and few others interpret it. I certainly didn't. I don't know why that would bother you so much anyway.
And if it turns out like it's predecessors it's because it's not time for that debate to die yet. Calm down and relax-- stay away from the threads then. Go look at some pussy. You're above and beyond it.
fine. lol. but if u ask me, that debate aint going no where but in circles in this forum. when u consense it all down. faith vs. reason. religion vs science. it ultimately distills to a utilitarian argument. because both are ultimately irrational. at which point the subjectivity, ironically, makes it a useless debate after all.
nah i'm not really concerned about who's fighting who. i'm just interested in the content of the debate. imo, u got fundamentalists on both sides who are equally culpable of fanning the flames. and ur right, we're fortunate we live in a society where we can talk about this shit and keep our heads. we also live in a society that offers us education, in many cases, because religious institutions. yeah, so it goes both ways.that's fine, but you can't stop us from examining points nd moving beyond it. That's also true. Even within religion this is done. I'm all for the discussion. You seem to be pointing at secularists for starting this fight. And truth be told, America having a secularist sector, a place where we can even HAVE these discussions without being killed, is because of secularists, so where do you draw the line?
your sig
but nah... how do you think you got to where YOU are? Discussion and debate. You can be irrational all day, but when you are intolerant of discussion, that's where I draw the line.
nah i'm not really concerned about who's fighting who. i'm just interested in the content of the debate. imo, u got fundamentalists on both sides who are equally culpable of fanning the flames. and ur right, we're fortunate we live in a society where we can talk about this shit and keep our heads. we also live in a society that offers us education, in many cases, because religious institutions. yeah, so it goes both ways.
lil dude isgettin it in.
i agree. but let the discussion be open and honest. humans are wired to act on impulse by default. rational behavior only begins after thinking. not everyone has the luxury or time for that. this has been the case throughout our history. it's why we have structured society. some people are the thinkers other just act. the later make up the majority. it has to be that way or shit wont be stable. when u realize and appreciate this it becomes clear, at least to me, why people, including u and me, cling to their beliefs.
C'mon you know that people are programmed to think in binary terms by default and the best way to get around this it to step back and try to entertain the idea that you may not be completely right(which most people won't even try to acknowledge) so why act surprised when these type of discussions break down into the two camps of thought they always do?what shtick? what's the general premise? that the Bible is full of mythology, allegory, hyperbole, nepotism and politics? When did this become news or rocket science? or is it the fact that i constantly call mf's out on the hypocrisy and double standard?
look dude, at some point people have to start having more sophisticated discussions and grow up out of this silly religion bashing shit. come on.
You see, most of what I call bull shit comes from me thinking rationally and not accepting shit because some middle aged white professor with a grey beard or some Discovery Chanel documentary says it's true.
people will just figure out some other dogmatic belief system and institutionalize it. nature wont change.I believe these discussions we have on religion is important as long as we try not to fall into the trap of believing that if religion went away and everyone became scientifically inclined, that the world would be a better place.
But do YOU understand the so-called math? Or do you just accept wtf school conditions you to? Do you question conventions, theories and models using YOUR OWN rational thinking or do u just study to pass the exam like a "disciplined" child.And when the same information comes from a middle aged Black professor?
![]()
These professors arrives at these conclusions using MATH, accessible to ANYONE. That means if you want to refute their work, you can do so by making YOUR OWN CALCULATIONS. It leaves no room for the subjective. There is no special math native to these professors only.
You "Oswald Bates" niggas on bgol are allergic to formal education that requires discipline. Since you didn't answer the question, I will assume that you are NOT a college graduate and you probably never attended college. Any Astronomy 101 class will give you the basics on how to make YOUR OWN calculations for half of the theories you clowns refute. I'll be damned if I take YOUR WORD over the word of an astrophysicist.![]()
Nigga, I didn't say I worshipped scientists. 1+1=2. That's not an opinion. That's not an abstract concept. THAT IS FACT. I'm going to listen to Neil Degrasse Tyson before I listen to Oswald Bates ass niggas like you.![]()
people will just figure out some other dogmatic belief system and institutionalize it. nature wont change.
Holy shit, how does this thread derail into this?
The Bible is verified bullshit. We know that. I think some people just find it scary that in the 21st century people can actually believe that shit. Some of these people are running your government. If the following isn't scary I don't know what is................
A Republican congressman hoping to chair the powerful House Energy Committee refers to the Bible and God on the issue of global warming.
Representative John Shimkus insists we shouldn't concerned about the planet being destroyed because God promised Noah it wouldn't happen again after the great flood.
Speaking before a House Energy Subcommittee on Energy and Environment hearing in March, 2009, Shimkus quoted Chapter 8, Verse 22 of the Book of Genesis.
He said: 'As long as the earth endures, seed time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, will never cease.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...y-planet-God-promised-Noah.html#ixzz16EgMMkhZ
C/S.
I read the Bible when I was in high school. After reading it I immediately became an atheist.
I firmly believe the religious should NOT be in any position of power.
College = East Donkey Tech.I knew you were dumb but damn you a straight fool. You looked into NO other religions? Took no other sample to draw your conclusion? You're a fool.
And what's was the name of that college you go to with the graphic design major? clown college?
I'm curious as to how that will be possible when most of the population of the human race is religious. BTW being an atheist does not stop one from holding batshit crazy beliefs ex. Stalinist Russia & North Korea...
I knew you were dumb but damn you a straight fool. You looked into NO other religions? Took no other sample to draw your conclusion? You're a fool.
The principle story in the bible is far from peaceful. God makes men, gets upset with men, has a son who he sacrifices so that he doesn't kill everyone, and then says "if you don't give me props for killing my son you will burn forever and ever. " Thats violent as fuck.
Those are rare examples. In most cases, it is the religious who use their doctrine to act a fool.
Take our society right now. The only reason we waste valuable political time on gays is because of religious nuts. Who cares if fags marry? Jobs are going overseas, people can't pay the bills, and the religious whack jobs are worried about fags.
I watch nat geo and see primitive cultures so into their religious celebrations they can't even be bothered with inventing tooth paste. Things are centered around appeasing the spirits.![]()
Painting themselves, jumping around acting a fool, and will die from a simple tooth infection.
I wonder how far along man would be if it weren't for religion. It's no wonder a few Atheists were driven batshit crazy and decided to just start offing religous folks.![]()
Religion doesn't deserve any special priviledge and ut ought to be challenged. But to say that if everyone became atheist and learned science that the world would solve all it's problems is just![]()
When decisions, very important decisions that affect the masses are made in the name of a religion, then yes, it deserves scrutiny.
I agree, but my point was that you should be on the lookout for any (potentially) fanatical beliefs and not to get slack with the scrutiny cuz they're atheist and well read in the sciences.
This is simply your interpretation. If you want to make it a linguistic argument I would simply state that thanking someone and worhipping them are two different things. If someone does something for a purely benevolent reason one thanks is sufficient. But if they are doing something for you for an egotistical reason they will be apt to throwing it in your face and hoping that you kiss their feet every time you see them. You see, The Christian God demands that we give him props or we will burn in a lake of fire for eternity. He sounds like a big egotistical asshole if you ask me which makes absolutely no sense. How can you build the universe and then flip out over you creation's doings? God tripping out over me not worshipping Jesus is like me getting mad at my iMac because it doesnt praise me for buying it.God doesn't need props, he doesn't need our praise. Our praise is a form of being thankful and obedience. Ive talked about this before but God hates "religion". No where in the bible does it say create a religion...
people will just figure out some other dogmatic belief system and institutionalize it. nature wont change.
#2: you're still missing the point. Religion isn't the cause, it's a symptom; one of the manifestations of our irrational nature. You can be an atheist and fanatical about race, politics, nationalism, etc. If religion disappeared overnight, ourirrational nature would find another way to express itself. Religion doesn't deserve any special priviledge and ut ought to be challenged. But to say that if everyone became atheist and learned science that the world would solve all it's problems is just![]()
Cats refuse to research where their ancestors came from but will read & believe a book the white man provided to them.
I read the Bible three times, struggled with it the fist two time. After the third time I was finishing my first degree in college and immediately recognized it to be complete, utter, insulting bullshit. I guess Noah put two roaches on the arc also..