Maurkice Pouncey Apologizes to Police for Wearing the Name of a Kid They Killed on His Helmet

Hotlantan

Beep beep. Who's got the keys to the Jeep? VROOM!
OG Investor
Maurkice Pouncey Apologizes to Police for Wearing the Name of a Kid They Killed on His Helmet


zaldcn8fjob3wzjyt4jl.jpg





Former East Pittsburgh police officer Michael Rosfeld was forced out of his job as a University of Pittsburgh cop in 2018, found work in the East Pittsburgh police department soon after, killed 17-year-old Antwon Rose Jr. his first day on the street—shooting Rose three times in the back while Rose ran from him—and was acquitted of homicide.

There is no better example of the rot of American law enforcement—and the dire need for drastic change—than this guy. Effectively get fired from a university for incompetence, but still, be able to find a job and the legal license to kill in the sort of boutique municipality police department that would (obviously) hire anyone with a pulse.

Anyway, before the NFL season began, the Pittsburgh Steelers decided to honor Rose by placing his name on the back of their helmets. Whatever. But for Maurkice Pouncey, who is one of the team captains, this aggressively milquetoast gesture was too radical for him.

In an Instagram post that I’m sincerely shocked hasn’t been deleted yet, Pouncey claimed that he did not “fully comprehend the entire background of the case” and “will make his own decision” on what to wear on the back of his helmet. He concludes with a caption tagging Pittsburgh’s chief of police, the Pittsburgh police department, and two Florida departments (North Miami and Lakeland).




In this 11-sentence-long post, (at least) four of them are lies. The best one begins the second paragraph, where he claims that he was “given limited information” on the “situation regarding Antwon.” No one was “given information” regarding this case. I did not receive an Antwon Rose packet in the mail, and I presume neither did anyone else in Allegheny County. I learned about Antwon Rose the way everyone outside of the Rose family did—either on the news or from someone who saw/read the news. There’s no Minister of Information deciding who’s allowed to see what. If I, or anyone else interested in the case, wanted more information, it was there to be found.

Pouncey is just adopting a performative passivity to convince his friends in law enforcement that he was tricked by people with political agendas. (My favorite lie: “I don’t always feel the need to highlight what I do with police departments” when that’s literally the point of him removing Antwon’s name and writing a manifesto about it.) He’s virtue signaling.

The Pouncey twins (Mike Pouncey plays for the Miami Dolphins) were also best friends with Aaron Hernandez, who might be the only American who killed more Black people than the police do. And if removing Rose’s name from his helmet was just about not “fully comprehending” the full scope of the story and wanting to “repair relationships between police and their communities,” why was Maurkice still riding so hard for a convicted serial murderer?





The difference is that his friends in law enforcement believe that supporting Antwon Rose Jr. is an insult to them, and he shares their sensibility. That’s all this is about. If he were sincere about learning more about the case, why not reach out to Antwon’s mom, Michelle Kenney, who’s 10 miles or just a text away? Or, if the word of law enforcement matters so much, Allegheny County DA Stephen Zappala, who admitted that Antwon “never did anything in furtherance of the crimes in North Braddock.”?

These questions are mostly rhetorical. The answers are obvious. Maurkice Pouncey is aligned with the sort of people who believe it’s wrong to protest when police murder Black citizens. But he won’t just come out and say that. So Maurkice Pouncey, behind all those tats and all that muscle, is a fucking coward.
 
So...this article is not going to mention the crime the young man was involved in that might have made Pouncy apologize?
 
So...this article is not going to mention the crime the young man was involved in that might have made Pouncy apologize?
Maybe because the young man was never convicted of being "involved in a crime" before getting shot three times in the back by his judge, jury and executioner. And if you *sincerely* wanted/needed more info :rolleyes: Google is your friend.... or you could have simply clicked the link provided in the OP here:
Or, if the word of law enforcement matters so much, Allegheny County DA Stephen Zappala, who admitted that Antwon “never did anything in furtherance of the crimes in North Braddock.”?

DA Zappala discusses charges against East Pittsburgh police officer in Antwon Rose shooting


Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr., addressing the charges filed against East Pittsburgh police Officer Michael Rosfeld during a news conference Wednesday morning, was forceful in saying that the shooting of Antwon Rose II was not justified.

"You do not shoot somebody in the back when they are not a threat to you," he said in announcing a charge of criminal homicide against Officer Rosfeld, 30, of Penn Hills. "I find that Rosfeld's actions were intentional, and they certainly brought about the result he was looking to accomplish.

"He was not acting to prevent death or serious injury."


Mr. Zappala spoke for about 35 minutes and cleared Antwon of criminal culpability.

"By all accounts, Mr. Rose never did anything in furtherance of the crimes in North Braddock."
 
Nothing pisses me off more than a tap dancing ass n....a i hope that bitch hoe dont have a son he gone wake up one way or the other
 
Everyday these cops say; 'I just want to get home to my families.' How the fcuk is someone RUNNING from you preventing you from getting home to your family?!?!? Just say; 'I didn't feel like running.' Or; 'I am out of shape and me and running aren't the best of friends.' I just don't get how someone in the IT world can lose an executives contacts and be fired, but killing a kid gets you a paid vacation???
 
Maybe because the young man was never convicted of being "involved in a crime" before getting shot three times in the back by his judge, jury and executioner. And if you *sincerely* wanted/needed more info :rolleyes: Google is your friend.... or you could have simply clicked the link provided in the OP here:

I checked google, couldn't find any articles that told me he wasn't a passenger in a car involved in a drive by shooting that shot another young black man.....

Also didn't see any quotes from Pouncy saying that the young man deserved to be shot by cops or that the shooting was justified....
 
It's like the Steelers had the pig union choose the name of the person killed by police to place on the helmet. Just to have the argument to undermine all the shit the pigs do. Now I see that the front office did the shit, not the players. :hmm: Yeah, pigs shouldn't be shooting ANYONE in the back, but those slick fucks in the front office knew that the drive-by shooting/background would come up.

These pigs WANT certain cases to be the face of the movement, others not so much. Believe that shit.

And fuck Pouncey. Pigs still shot the kid in the back. The BACK. That point still stands regardless of the other shit.
 
I checked google, couldn't find any articles that told me he wasn't a passenger in a car involved in a drive by shooting that shot another young black man.....

Also didn't see any quotes from Pouncy saying that the young man deserved to be shot by cops or that the shooting was justified....
White people... :dunno:
[/done]
 
Again,are we surprised by this about him and his brother. Let,the record show that his brother let a white man bully another black man while that same white man said the word nigga constantly with no repercussions..Hell,he participated in the bullying instead of telling that white man to chill.

Meanwhile, both brothers defended Hernandez,who killed a black man.
 
seeing my insta-fcbk timeline all the cacs posting this shit on their page ..cos he gives a blackface propagate their bs
 
Last edited:
somehow this went from a team decision to an upstairs decision


Steelers cornerback Minkah Fitzpatrick on Thursday said players "talked briefly" about the helmets and a name, but the decision to put Rose's name on the helmets was "mostly made by everyone upstairs" and not through a team vote.

"It was mostly made from people upstairs and everything else like that," Fitzpatrick said Thursday. "Don't know exactly who. Don't know exactly how. But we did. We knew that we were going to have somebody on the back of our helmets, and it wasn't exactly clear on what it was going to be. It was mostly made by everyone upstairs."
 
I checked google, couldn't find any articles that told me he wasn't a passenger in a car involved in a drive by shooting that shot another young black man.....

Also didn't see any quotes from Pouncy saying that the young man deserved to be shot by cops or that the shooting was justified....

Antwon, who was unarmed, ran after Mr. Rosfeld pulled over the car he was riding in with another teenager. The car, a Chevrolet Cruze, matched the description of one involved in a nearby drive-by shooting about 10 minutes earlier.

So the guy writes an apology letter to the police for honoring someone that was killed by cop and you interpretation is that he isn't necessarily condoning the shooting?

Where in that statement do you get the impression that he felt the shooting itself was wrong?
 
Gooooood

Let the agents reveal themselves

A lot of these athletes do a lot of strong arm undercover works for cops feds via. etc

This agent just revealed himself...

Shaq is one too... They took fraternal order of police oaths

Aka Masonic arm of law enforcement
 
Antwon, who was unarmed, ran after Mr. Rosfeld pulled over the car he was riding in with another teenager. The car, a Chevrolet Cruze, matched the description of one involved in a nearby drive-by shooting about 10 minutes earlier.

So the guy writes an apology letter to the police for honoring someone that was killed by cop and you interpretation is that he isn't necessarily condoning the shooting?

Where in that statement do you get the impression that he felt the shooting itself was wrong?

"A judge has imposed a six- to 22-year sentence in a drive-by shooting that preceded the fatal police shooting of an unarmed black teenager fleeing a Pennsylvania traffic stop last year.

Zaijuan Hester, 18, was sentenced Monday on earlier guilty pleas to aggravated assault and firearms crimes in the June 2018 shooting in North Braddock.

Minutes after that shooting, which wounded two people, police stopped a car matching the suspect vehicle. Hester and 17-year-old Antwon Rose Jr. fled, and Rose was shot and killed by a police officer."


My impression is what he stated - that the apology was for honoring the young man when he didn't know the facts surrounding his death.

I'm not going to assume he thought the shooting was justified because he didn't explicitly state it.
 
The problem with your argument is that it was okay to kill the kid because of a SUSPECTED crime. At the the time of the shooting the cop didn't know if he had the right suspects at that point. The sentence you mentioned came after the other kid was caught and pleaded guilty.

Pouncey didn't condemn it either, so what was he trying to say in your opinion?
 
The problem with your argument is that it was okay to kill the kid because of a SUSPECTED crime. At the the time of the shooting the cop didn't know if he had the right suspects at that point. The sentence you mentioned came after the other kid was caught and pleaded guilty.

Pouncey didn't condemn it either, so what was he trying to say in your opinion?

Nowhere in my argument did I say that.

To be clear - I think its a bad look to honor a young black man who was involved in a drive by shooting of (presumably) other young black men in the name of Black Lives Matter because he was killed shortly after by police.

I'm not gonna make any assumptions about Pouncey's statement. He said what he said.

Neither you, or any other posters in this thread condemned the young man for his involvement in the drive by shooting. Are we to assume that you're ok with young black men shooting each other?
 
Nowhere in my argument did I say that.

To be clear - I think its a bad look to honor a young black man who was involved in a drive by shooting of (presumably) other young black men in the name of Black Lives Matter because he was killed shortly after by police.

I'm not gonna make any assumptions about Pouncey's statement. He said what he said.

Neither you, or any other posters in this thread condemned the young man for his involvement in the drive by shooting. Are we to assume that you're ok with young black men shooting each other?
You dumb as hell, the police can pull you over and say you did any fuckin thing to spin the story they trying to put together. They did that to me when I was 18, and I was 100% square.
 
Back
Top