Lufthansa flight flew without a pilot for 10 mins after the copilot fainted, and the pilot was locked out of the cockpit

RoomService

Dinner is now being served.
BGOL Investor
bb364353bdd35765b23af7eb1b016d45




A Lufthansa flight with 205 people on board went without a pilot for 10 minutes last year after the copilot fainted while he was alone in the cockpit, according to a new report from Spain’s accident investigation authority.

The captain had briefly left the cockpit to use the lavatory when the copilot fainted during a flight from Frankfurt to Seville, Spain, on February 17, 2024, said the report from the agency, called CIAIAC.

A total of 199 passengers and six crew members were aboard the Airbus A321 at the time, the report said.

The aircraft continued to fly in a stable manner due to autopilot being active, however the copilot did operate controls unintentionally, the report said. It added that sounds consistent with the copilot’s “sudden and severe incapacitation” were recorded on the voice recorder during this time.

An air-traffic controller attempted to reach the copilot up to three times, but there was no response.

The report said the captain returned from the bathroom and tried to open the cockpit door with a regular opening code, which chimes the cockpit. The captain made five attempts at this and a cockpit crew member also placed an intercom call to the flight deck. With no response, the captain used an emergency code to gain access and took control of the aircraft.


Lufthansa told CNN it was aware of the investigation report and that it had cooperated with Spanish authorities. It said its own flight safety department had also conducted an investigation. It said it was unable to comment further on the report.

The copilot received first aid from the crew and a doctor, who was traveling as a passenger, the report said. The copilot regained consciousness and later said he remembered being treated by the crew and doctor.

The captain decided to divert the flight to Madrid’s Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas airport, where he landed approximately 20 minutes later. Once in Madrid, the copilot was transferred to hospital where he remained for a few hours.

An investigation determined that the copilot’s incapacitation was the symptom of a pre-existing neurological condition that he did not know he had and that had not been picked up during his aeronautical medical examination, the report said.

The copilot’s medical certificate has since been suspended, it added.

The Spanish authority detailed the incident as an “extraordinary circumstance,” and said captains were trained for situations where another pilot becomes incapacitated.

Although rare, in-flight incapacitations – including the sudden death of pilots - do occur, the CIAIAC said, citing various reports.

The authority said it identified 287 in-flight pilot incapacitations in a database of transportation occurrence reports, managed by the European Commission, during the 2019-2024 period.

In a 2004 report, the US Federal Aviation Administration identified 39 in-flight incapacitations among American airline pilots over a six-year period between 1993 to 1998.

CNN’s Rosa de Acosta contributed to this report.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com
 
Pilots should have their own lavatory accessible from the cockpit. FOH being locked out of the cockpit because he had to take a shit.and FOH with "codes" to unlock the door, are there no swipe cards or keys to unlock that bitch?
 
Pilots should have their own lavatory accessible from the cockpit. FOH being locked out of the cockpit because he had to take a shit.and FOH with "codes" to unlock the door, are there no swipe cards or keys to unlock that bitch?
That will never happen. Building the plane would become more expensive, and the cheap companies are unwilling to pay for that.
 
& these dayum American companies are fighting to have one pilot only, and this is why you shouldn't have one pilot only.




more info:

Airline pilots outraged over one-pilot proposal​


Press Associates







Airline pilots outraged over one-pilot proposal


One of these pilot stations will be vacant under plan to have single pilot flights.| Shutterstock



WASHINGTON—A federal advisory committee of pro-corporate aviation “experts” is telling the corporate-friendly Trump regime there should be only one pilot, not two, in an airplane’s cockpit. Citing safety reasons, the Air Line Pilots (ALPA) strongly oppose that scheme.

And so do 43 senators, from both political parties.

The plan came to light when ALPA disclosed the lawmakers’ July 24 letter to Trump Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, urging him to reject the scheme. They said having only one pilot in the cockpit while the other rests elsewhere on the plane is dangerous.

Capt. Jason Ambrosi, the ALPA president, agrees vehemently.

Current U.S. regulations require two pilots in the cockpit, and ALPA wants to keep it that way. But European airline bosses are pushing their regulators for only one. Through the International Civil Aviation Organization, they’re pushing the corporate-friendly GOP Trump regime to agree.

“To prevent this risk to safety from reaching our country, we must work together with aviation regulators and stakeholders to discourage it across the globe,” said Ambrosi when ALPA posted a link to the senators’ letter on its website.

“We cannot allow foreign regulators to persuade ICAO to establish global standards for single-pilot operations. That would create market pressures in our nation to adopt practices that undermine safety. (As it is labor shortages and relaxation of regulations are causing dangerous near-accidents in the air over the U.S. on a weekly basis.) And we cannot allow for unsafe conditions for American passengers traveling in and out of the United States on foreign carriers.”

The senators cited current research by the Federal Aviation Administration, which is part of Duffy’s department, and NASA, plus “common sense and experience” of countless pilots.

A single pilot flying the plane would have a much higher workload, and there “would be significant decreases in pilots’ subjective perception of safety and performance,” said the senators, led by Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill.—a badly injured helicopter combat veteran—and Tim Sheehy, R-Mont.

“Redundancy, afforded by two well-trained and well-qualified pilots on the flight deck, is a key guardrail for aviation safety standards. There is no replacement for human talent and judgement… especially for the rare instances when challenges and potential tragedies develop,” the lawmakers said.

An FAA advisory committee late last year sided with the one-pilot-in-the-cockpit idea, burying it in one paragraph in a 71-page set of airline pilot flying and training recommendations. The Transportation Department has not indicated, one way or another, if it agrees.

“One pilot at a time (i.e., pilot flying (PF)) is responsible for controlling the flightpath,” it says. “Controlling the flightpath refers to adjusting the trajectory and energy state of the airplane using any appropriate combination of manual or autoflight inputs. Other pilot(s) on the flight crew should always be ready and able to intervene if necessary. This capability should include normal and applicable non-normal situations.”

The advisory committee did not say how pilot switch-offs, if any, would occur, especially on long flights.

The one-pilot plan mimics, in a way, the open lobbying by another big corporate transportation lobby, the Association of American Railroads. AAR, which represents the big freight carriers as well as smaller lines, has pushed for just having an engineer, and nobody else, on miles-long heavy freight trains.

Rail unions vehemently oppose that and insist on two-person crews. They’ve convinced key states in the nation’s rail system—New York, which is the gateway to New England as well as a commerce giant, Illinois, which is the nation’s rail hub, and Nevada, through which most freight to and from California flows—to mandate two-person crews.


 
Last edited:
Back
Top