Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What will the USA give up though?
Why is it that ever other countries have to give up something but never the USA?
Why should the USA have nuclear weapons and continue testing and give no allowance in cutting back on their activity?
Why does world peace have to come at the cost of a few countries giving up their nuclear capacities but never others including Israel?
What will the USA give up though?
Why is it that ever other countries have to give up something but never the USA?
Why should the USA have nuclear weapons and continue testing and give no allowance in cutting back on their activity?
Why does world peace have to come at the cost of a few countries giving up their nuclear capacities but never others including Israel?
Lol...
You're a funny cat Simply_Black!
The answer is obvious and it's because the U.S. and all those major countries are more "Rationale" and "Civil" while the rest of those other countries are more "Irresponsible" and "Savage". Thus they shouldn't have Nukes and should expect those with Nukes to make the best decision, never invade them and ultimately protect the rest of the world.
BTW: I'm being sarcastic here...

The US has had nukes in Korea for more than 60 years. These are
the same nukes which Douglas McArthur wanted to nuke 26 Chinese
cities with during the Korean war. So brazen, crazy and out of control
was he that he actually did practise runs, against the wish president
of the US president. For this reason, the bugger was removed from
command and forced to return to the US.
From the US point of view, this formed the deterrence (together with
1 million landmines) against the overwhelmingly superior numbers
of the North Koreans, who had 1 million men ready to overrun the
40, 000 Americans at the border....
The presence of the nukes was a sore point, and if the deal is that Kim
will get rid of his nukes for the US getting rid of theirs and eliminating
sanctions, Kim has won.
The US position has been that North Korea must unilaterally cough
up the nukes. This is why Obama, Bush etc all refused to meet Kim.
They viewed giving up the US nukes on the Korean peninsula as
blackmail
To be fair, I like the deal where the US denuclearises; why should
they have nukes if North Korea does not? And why does South
Korea need American troops? It is more populous than North
Korea, and has a far superior economy. It has a modern army of
650, 000 that is among the 10 strongest int the world. It does not
need US help to defeat North Korea.
This may be the very first time in your entire BGOL history that you've written something that is both legible and actually substantive.
IMO, more historical than Orange and Lil Kim meeting.

Man please, I do not need your backhanded compliment. JustThis may be the very first time in your entire BGOL history that you've written something that is both legible and actually substantive.
IMO, more historical than Orange and Lil Kim meeting.
Man please, I do not need your backhanded compliment. Just
say and admit that I educated and improved you, and leave it
at that
This may be the very first time in your entire BGOL history that you've written something that is both legible and actually substantive.
IMO, more historical than Orange and Lil Kim meeting.




I’m not going to lie.... I was also tripping when I read that.

I don't buy any real history being made, but if Kim said he would de-nuke, then it's a win for Trump. Because all Trump was going to do is claim a win on some BS dialogue, anyway. He already knows that his base doesn't care about the truth to begin with, so if he starts saying, "I got Kim to give up his nukes..." they'll parrot that even as the missiles drop onto Hawaii....
Made by IHOB
So we agreed to stop military exercises in exchange for......????? Yeah I really think this was a waste of time and money the bigger news is the G7 bullshit he pulled. Also we just helped China expand their territory![]()
I would assume since the great negotiator was representing the US that stoppage is contingent upon completed aspects of NK denuclearization.
Basically Trump wants this on his resumeI read the agreement they signed. it seems like it's an agreement to negotiate further. Essentially, they just wanted to sign something.
I read the agreement they signed. it seems like it's an agreement to negotiate further. Essentially, they just wanted to sign something.
So we agreed to stop military exercises in exchange for......????? Yeah I really think this was a waste of time and money the bigger news is the G7 bullshit he pulled. Also we just helped China expand their territory![]()
To me, this is what pisses me off the most about the people that support him. Trump will straight up admit off the cuff that he's king of bullshit, and these assholes are still ride-or-die for him like he only speaks the truth.
Let me play Devil's advocate here.
They know he's an asshole that shouldn't be anywhere near the white house and that he likely deeply tied with Russia and that he's doing all kinds of illegal shit.
Who else is going to ride "for" them? (Note I use the term for them here loosely)
Honestly, Who else is going to call blacks and other minorities "shit holes" and "son of bitches etc?" They way they publically want to every day.
Who else is going opening institute policies that help to keep the White Man on top?
The look around them and see "scary" progress by minorities and positions of power. Hell, A BLACK MAN become POTUS. How scary is that?
What else can be accomplished?
etc etc etc
Honestly, When you start to think of it in those ways it truly starts to make sense.
clown shit
