Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence about sexual misconduct allegations, UPDATE 9/26 5th ACCUSER & MORE

Sadly dude is going to get confirmed

Can you PROVE that he did anything to keep him from being confirmed ??

Am not saying the “ he say she say”, and he threw ice at a bar, etc..40 yrs ago

I mean.. ANYTHING serious.... Can you ?

Put your feelings for Trump aside and answer that question bruh !
 
This bitch here is white lol

Go ahead and make a slick racist comment now

FUCK YOU ASSHOLE !

you want to abandoned the rule of law in our country because u dislike Trump...

Trump may NOT be a lot of people’s favorite person either because he is BRASH, but we REFUSE to be SHEEP..when it comes to the present state of affairs

Did u listen to BOTH testimonies??

Like really listen.. without a bias ?

Now the third accuser is changing her story by the minute..
 
cracker-ass-cracker-l0qfxf.jpg


FUCK YOU ASSHOLE !

you want to abandoned the rule of law in our country because u dislike Trump...

Trump may NOT be a lot of people’s favorite person either because he is BRASH, but we REFUSE to be SHEEP..when it comes to the present state of affairs

Did u listen to BOTH testimonies??

Like really listen.. without a bias ?

Now the third accuser is changing her story by the minute..
 
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE !

you want to abandoned the rule of law in our country because u dislike Trump...

Trump may NOT be a lot of people’s favorite person either because he is BRASH, but we REFUSE to be SHEEP..when it comes to the present state of affairs

Did u listen to BOTH testimonies??

Like really listen.. without a bias ?

Now the third accuser is changing her story by the minute..
You fucking dunce.
 
You fucking dunce.

Its sooo pathetic how thez BITCH NGAZ coming out the wood works..Y'all some moist ass fudafuckers..

I'm a cracker cause I ANALYZE shit thoroughly and you on the other hand let your hate for Trump cloud your reasoning ????.


In our country, we have LAWS...mudafucker...this is now Uganda :smh:


Yeah, disqualify a person because he threw ice during an argument when he was a teenager.:rolleyes::rolleyes2::rolleyes2:

If what the accuser in the first case claims is proven to be TRUE.. Oh hell yeah.. HE is TOAST.. But the allegation has NOT been proven ma nga

We are still waiting for the report.. But am sorry, just "he say she say" is NOT enough.. IMHO


And YOU KNOW am making sense.. its just that your hate for Trump is really not letting you think reasonably
 
Its sooo pathetic how thez BITCH NGAZ coming out the wood works..Y'all some moist ass fudafuckers..

I'm a cracker cause I ANALYZE shit thoroughly and you on the other hand let your hate for Trump cloud your reasoning ????.


In our country, we have LAWS...mudafucker...this is now Uganda :smh:


Yeah, disqualify a person because he threw ice during an argument when he was a teenager.:rolleyes::rolleyes2::rolleyes2:

If what the accuser in the first case claims is proven to be TRUE.. Oh hell yeah.. HE is TOAST.. But the allegation has NOT been proven ma nga

We are still waiting for the report.. But am sorry, just "he say she say" is NOT enough.. IMHO


And YOU KNOW am making sense.. its just that your hate for Trump is really not letting you think reasonably
Either you're trolling or retarded.

You're picking specific dumb shit to obfuscate the larger point that his proven perjury, childish temperament, and obvious partisanship are all reasons this man is unfit to be a judge at all, let alone a supreme court judge. This is aside from his views on presidential prosecution and self pardon, which are reason enough to say fuck him.

And because you know all that shit and still woofing the garbage you woofing, that's enough reason to say fuck you too.

Bitch.
 
Sooo... that’s means we should believe her ?????
She gave testimony saying that he did it, and her testimony was credible. Does that mean he did it, no.

His testimony was filled with partisan attacks and had at least a dozen provable lies. Does that mean that he did it, no.

But their testimony was in direct conflict, she says she’s 100% sure he did it, he says he’s 100% innocent. That means that one is mistaken or lying, and one is telling the truth.

I ask you, who is more likely telling the truth? The victim who seemed very credible in her testimony or Kavanaugh, who lied repeatedly about who he was, and how much he drank in high school.

I think any reasonable person weighing the testimony of both would say that on balance, the victims account was more likely to be true.

That’s not enough to convict him of a crime in a court of law, but is enough to keep him off the Supreme Court.

You can’t have a judge on the court that is “more likely than not” to be a sex offender.

But most republicans, and white people are not reasonable. They will just say it’s a “he said” “she said”, and refuse to weigh the credibility of what “he said” vs what “she said”.
 
She gave testimony saying that he did it, and her testimony was credible. Does that mean he did it, no.

His testimony was filled with partisan attacks and had at least a dozen provable lies. Does that mean that he did it, no.

But their testimony was in direct conflict, she says she’s 100% sure he did it, he says he’s 100% innocent. That means that one is mistaken or lying, and one is telling the truth.

I ask you, who is more likely telling the truth? The victim who seemed very credible in her testimony or Kavanaugh, who lied repeatedly about who he was, and how much he drank in high school.

I think any reasonable person weighing the testimony of both would say that on balance, the victims account was more likely to be true.

That’s not enough to convict him of a crime in a court of law, but is enough to keep him off the Supreme Court.

You can’t have a judge on the court that is “more likely than not” to be a sex offender.

But most republicans, and white people are not reasonable. They will just say it’s a “he said” “she said”, and refuse to weigh the credibility of what “he said” vs what “she said”.

Well stated.

Been trying to figure out a way to explain what you just did.
 
She gave testimony saying that he did it, and her testimony was credible. Does that mean he did it, no.

His testimony was filled with partisan attacks and had at least a dozen provable lies. Does that mean that he did it, no.

But their testimony was in direct conflict, she says she’s 100% sure he did it, he says he’s 100% innocent. That means that one is mistaken or lying, and one is telling the truth.

I ask you, who is more likely telling the truth? The victim who seemed very credible in her testimony or Kavanaugh, who lied repeatedly about who he was, and how much he drank in high school.

I think any reasonable person weighing the testimony of both would say that on balance, the victims account was more likely to be true.

That’s not enough to convict him of a crime in a court of law, but is enough to keep him off the Supreme Court.

You can’t have a judge on the court that is “more likely than not” to be a sex offender.

But most republicans, and white people are not reasonable. They will just say it’s a “he said” “she said”, and refuse to weigh the credibility of what “he said” vs what “she said”.

You know what really SCARY about this situation, is that someone else has a TOTALLY DIFFERENT explanation that is 100% OPPOSITE to what u just said..

Wow.. we are really more divided than we could ever imagine.. lol

It’s scary !

Some people did NOT believe her story .. they may feel sorry for her, but they STRONGLY feel there were way many inconsistencies in her story
 
Can you PROVE that he did anything to keep him from being confirmed ??

Am not saying the “ he say she say”, and he threw ice at a bar, etc..40 yrs ago

I mean.. ANYTHING serious.... Can you ?

Put your feelings for Trump aside and answer that question bruh !

I can prove that dude lied multiple times during his confirmation hearing. I can prove that he showed obvious bias against Democrats with his statements and clearly doesn't have the temperament to be a neutral arbitrator.

I'd ask him to recuse himself from any case that I ever had before him... and that's even if doesn't get confirmed and goes back the Federal level.


.......... You really got in to your feelings over this... Here let me help you out..

6269e0afa16e86fa6eba8e478b48ed5c.jpg







Is you feeling better...... now.
 
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE !

you want to abandoned the rule of law in our country because u dislike Trump...

Trump may NOT be a lot of people’s favorite person either because he is BRASH, but we REFUSE to be SHEEP..when it comes to the present state of affairs

Did u listen to BOTH testimonies??

Like really listen.. without a bias ?

Now the third accuser is changing her story by the minute..

This isn't a courtroom... It's a Job interview..

Would you hire someone to a lifetime job ... that's accused of Sexual Assault?
 
Now shit is really getting interesting...



Kavanaugh friend Chris Dudley was arrested in 1985 bar incident, police report shows

(CNN)A 1985 altercation in a Connecticut bar that allegedly involved Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh led to the arrest of one of his close friends at Yale, a copy of an unredacted police report on the incident provided to CNN Tuesday shows.

In the New Haven, Connecticut, police department report, a man named Dom Cozzolino said Kavanaugh hadthrown ice on himand Kavanaugh's friend Chris Dudley had thrown a glass that hit him in the ear.
Dudley denied the allegations, according to the police report, "and Mr. Kavanaugh didn't (want) to say if he threw the ice or not. "
A newly obtained, unredacted version of the report states Dudley "was transported to Union Ave detention facility by prisoner conveyance..." and a large "A" on the report indicates Dudley was arrested, according to New Haven's police chief Anthony Campbell. It's not known whether Dudley was ever charged with a crime.
There is also an "O," indicating "other," next to Kavanaugh's name in the report. The designation signifies anyone who was interviewed by police who may have witnessed the incident or anyone who had been spoken to about the incident, according to Dave Hartman, a spokesman for the New Haven Police Department.
"This is the report of a simple assault. Mr. Kavanaugh is not the subject of this simple assault. He was not the person arrested," Hartman said. "The arrest was made after the victim identified someone else as throwing a glass that hit him in the ear."
Dudley's attorney, Mark Sherman, said Tuesday he believes the report is mistaken and meant to indicate his client was "detained" rather than "arrested."
"To be clear, after investigation, Chris Dudley was never arrested by Yale or New Haven Police, was never charged with a crime, and never set foot in court," Sherman told CNN.
The White House sent out a statement from Dudley, a former NBA player, supporting Kavanaugh Monday, where he said he never saw the Supreme Court nominee blackout while at Yale.
"I will say it again, we drank in college. I was with Brett frequently in college, whether it be in the gym, in class or socializing. I never ever saw Brett blackout. Not one time," Dudley said. "And in all the years I have known him, I have never seen him to be disrespectful or inappropriate with women. I would also like to point out that going out never came before working hard and maintaining our focus on our goals."
His statement came amid an FBI investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct by Kavanaugh, in which Kavanaugh has been accused of drinking in excess. Kavanaugh has denied all allegations of sexual misconduct.
Campbell said Monday that the FBI had not reached out to his department regarding the 1985 report, nor has it reached out before that in any previous backgrounding effort for Kavanaugh.
Hartman said Tuesday that there is no supplemental report on the alleged 1985 incident, adding that it occurred at "a local bar that no longer exists, and unfortunately everyone who was involved from the police end has retired decades ago."
"Without making it sound less important, this is a college town -- things haven't changed in that we deal with these types of incidents on a daily basis," Hartman said. "This was a dispute between two people at a bar and an assault. But it certainly lends to a simple assault rather than an aggravated assault. That's pretty much where we are and I don't see this going any further with the New Haven Police Department."
The New Haven Superior Court confirmed it has no records related to this incident and said the records would have been destroyed per its records "destruction schedule."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/02/politics/brett-kavanaugh-chris-dudley-police-report/index.html
 
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE !

you want to abandoned the rule of law in our country because u dislike Trump...

Trump may NOT be a lot of people’s favorite person either because he is BRASH, but we REFUSE to be SHEEP..when it comes to the present state of affairs

Did u listen to BOTH testimonies??

Like really listen.. without a bias ?

Now the third accuser is changing her story by the minute..
He’s interviewing for a job. This is not a criminal case.
 
Dude......

Key Revelations From Mark Judge’s Addiction Memoir, ‘Wasted’

Writing of drunken blackouts, Judge admits, “I could have done anything and not know it”
kavanaughs-calendar-beach-week.jpg


judge-800x430.jpg


Blackouts. Beach week. Bacchanalia. A pivotal job as a bag boy at a grocery store. When Mark Judge wroteWasted: Tales of a GenX Drunkin 1997, he could hardly have imagined it would be scrutinized, two decades later, in consideration of his football- and drinking buddyBrett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court confirmation.

Judge’saddiction memoirprovides a vivid backdrop of fast times at Georgetown Prep — offering outsiders a lens through which to interpret his and Kavanaugh’s alleged interaction withChristine Blasey Ford, who has accused Kavanaugh of a teenage sexual assault, with Judge an alleged witness. (Kavanaugh has categorically denied Ford’s charges. Judge has said, “I have no memory of this alleged incident.”)

Wastedalso chronicles Judge’s frequent, self-described alcoholic blackouts — and his fears of what he was unable to remember. Judge writes of being “terrified of what I could have done” during one post-high school bender. The book colors Judge’s reliability as an alibi for Kavanaugh. Judge hasreportedlybeen cooperating with the FBI in itsrenewed background investigationof the nominee.

(Judge has alsowrittento the Senate Judiciary committee that he “categorically” denies the allegations of Julie Swetnick, who has accused Judge and Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting incapacitated women: “I have never engaged in gang rape of any woman, including Ms. Swetnick,” Judge wrote. “Even while suffering my addiction, I would remember actions so outlandish.” Kavanaugh has also forcefully denied Swetnick’s allegations.)

What follow are excerpts fromWastedthat illuminate the student culture at Georgetown Prep during that era — and fill in some of the gaps in the timeline of the critical summer of 1982.

Light Fictionalization
Judge’s book uses pseudonyms for people, and even for the high school that Judge and Kavanaugh attended, which becomes “Loyola Prep.”An editor’s note describes Judge’s project:“This book is based on actual experiences. In some cases, the names and details have been changed to protect the privacy of the people involved.”

Alcohol-Soaked Education
Early in the book, Judge introduces readers to the culture of alcohol he witnessed at Georgetown Prep, writing: “It soon became obvious that drinking was one of the major forms of recreation at Prep. On Monday morning the upperclassmen would return from the weekend with stories about keg parties, girls, and hours spent in bars in Georgetown…. At Prep, seniors would often go directly from class to a bar. They would even drink with alumni at football games.” (Despite its name, the school is located in North Bethesda, Maryland, roughly 10 miles north of the D.C. neighborhood of Georgetown.)

“A week-long bacchanalia of drinking and sex”
Judge writes that his struggle with alcoholism began the year before the encounter alleged by Ford. “My immersion into alcohol began at the end of my sophomore year, during beach week,” Judge writes. “Every year when we let out for the summer… all the kids from Catholic school would pilgrimage down to the Eastern Shore for a week-long bacchanalia of drinking and sex, or at least attempts at sex.”

“Bart O’Kavanaugh”
Brett Kavanaugh does not make a direct appearance inWasted, but a similarly named classmate appears, in dialogue Judge recalls with a girl he liked named Mary:

“So how do you like Prep?” Mary asked.

“It’s cool.”

“Do you know Bart O’Kavanaugh?”

“Yeah. He’s around here somewhere.”

“I heard he puked in someone’s car the other night.”

“Yeah. He passed out on his way back from a party.”

Football and Parties
Judge writes of his decision to try out for the football team before his senior year, in part to win favor with of his distant father. Judge also notes that the team liked to rage: “Football players always organized the best parties. It would put me right in the center of action.”

Bagging Groceries
Perhaps the most critical passage inWasted,in the wake of Ford’s testimony, is Judge’s description of getting a job to raise money for football camp at the end of the summer of 1982. In her Senate testimony, Ford described running into Judge after the alleged attack at a Safeway where Judge was working. “If we could find out when he worked there, then I could provide a more detailed timeline as to when the attack occurred,” Ford testified. Ford recalls she ran into Judge at the supermarket about “six-to-eight weeks” after the alleged sexual assault.

According toKavanaugh’s calendar, released as part of his testimony, Georgetown Prep’s football camp started on August 22nd, 1982 — or about seven weeks after a July 1st entry Kavanaugh recorded for getting together for “skis” (presumably “brewskis”) with Judge and other friends, including a boy named P.J., whom Ford said attended the gathering where she was assaulted.“This may — may — be powerful corroborating evidencethat the assault happened, that it happened that day, and that it happened in that place,” said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D.-R.I.) in Senate chambers last week.

At this point in his life, Judge describes himself as a problem drunk: “Alcoholics also get into all kinds of trouble because of their drinking,” he writes, “When they supersede their own tolerance, they suffer catastrophic hangovers. These can make getting through the day an Olympic event. This was never more evident to me than when, to raise money for football camp, I spent a few weeks working as a bag boy at the local supermarket…. It was a nightmare. Invariably I would be hungover or still drunk when I got to work at seven in the morning, and I spent most of the first hour just trying to hold myself together. I had stopped eating breakfast a year earlier, so I didn’t have to worry about trying to keep food down after a bender, but sometimes I was so toxic from the alcohol that I would have the dry heaves. Luckily the bathroom was a private room in the back of the store, and I often managed to recuperate there unnoticed.”

Blacking Out
On the weekend before football camp, Judge recalls a getting blackout drunk after taking shots at a bar with friends. Judge writes of waking up, mystified, at a Four Seasons hotel: “The next thing I knew, I was lying on a bathroom floor. I was curled up in the fetal position with saliva running out of the side of my mouth. I sat up and tried to open my eyes. Then I struggled to my feet and looked in the mirror. My hair was sticking straight up, and my face was chalk white and swollen. It looked like a bunched-up pillow. My T-shirt was soaked with sweat. I took a long drink of water, then splashed some onto my face. I slowly walked out to the hall. I was in a hotel or apartment building. I took the elevator downstairs and found myself in a hotel lobby.”

100 Kegs or Bust
Judge’s memoir provides the backstory for the “100 Kegs of Bust” notation that appears in his and Kavanaugh’s senior yearbook entries. In Judge’s telling, his Georgetown Prep cohort was furious at their headmaster for inaugurating a Sunday service project for the school’s seniors to combat “senioritis.” Payback, Judge writes, would come through extravagant beer consumption:

“We have to do something,” I said. “They can’t get away with this our senior year.”

“What are we going to do?” Shane said, laughing. “Drink a hundred kegs and brag about it?”

No one laughed. For a second, no one even spoke.

“It’s brilliant,” I said.

“Wait a minute,” Shane said. “You can’t actually be thinking of”

“A hundred kegs,” I said. “We’re going to drink a hundred kegs, then brag about it.”

Judge writes that as the boys’ senior year progressed, the keg challenge was heartily embraced: “It was Sunday morning, and the night before we had polished off keg number sixty-two. For the past four months, we had thrown parties every weekend as well as after school, and had even snuck a keg into the parking lot during a basketball game.” For Judge, his drinking had gone off the rails: “I had reached the point where once I had the first beer, I found it impossible to stop until I was completely annihilated…. Once I felt the first lilting rise of a buzz, I had to keep drinking until I could hardly walk. Many of the other guys were the same way; while some got sick after just a few beers, the hard-core drinkers could go all night, and often did.”

“I could have murdered somebody”
Judge writes that his blackout drinking continued — and worsened — in the years after graduating from Georgetown Prep. He recalls one night at his favorite bar: “We bought each other several rounds of drinks, and when I looked at the clock it was after midnight. Then, in what seemed like an instant, it was suddenly the next morning…. I had blacked out. I awoke lying on my back. I looked around quickly and determined that I was in my room; then I examined myself. I was fully clothed. I started to panic, terrified of what I could have done during the blackout. I could have done anything and not know it. I could have murdered somebody.”

“Please tell me I didn’t hurt her”
In one of the final blackouts he recounts, Judge describes his behavior at a rehearsal dinner for one of his high school friend’s weddings. He recalls the dialogue, beginning with a friend:

“You put on quite a show. After doing all those shots, you tried to get up on the table and started taking your clothes off, but Shane and I pulled you down. You also tried to make it with one of the bridesmaids.”

“Jesus,” I muttered. “I tried to make out with a bridesmaid? Please tell me I didn’t hurt her.”

“No, in the shape you were in, I don’t think you could have if you had tried, and we would have stopped you. You made a serious lunge at her, then started kissing her toes. We finally just pulled you off and out of the bar.”


https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mark-judge-book-732229/
 
She gave testimony saying that he did it, and her testimony was credible. Does that mean he did it, no.

His testimony was filled with partisan attacks and had at least a dozen provable lies. Does that mean that he did it, no.

But their testimony was in direct conflict, she says she’s 100% sure he did it, he says he’s 100% innocent. That means that one is mistaken or lying, and one is telling the truth.

I ask you, who is more likely telling the truth? The victim who seemed very credible in her testimony or Kavanaugh, who lied repeatedly about who he was, and how much he drank in high school.

I think any reasonable person weighing the testimony of both would say that on balance, the victims account was more likely to be true.

That’s not enough to convict him of a crime in a court of law, but is enough to keep him off the Supreme Court.

You can’t have a judge on the court that is “more likely than not” to be a sex offender.

But most republicans, and white people are not reasonable. They will just say it’s a “he said” “she said”, and refuse to weigh the credibility of what “he said” vs what “she said”.
What was credible? Seriously? Both seem full of shit, but no one really goes at her story(god forbid you question a female cac in this climate). She states the only other girl wouldn't remember the party because nothing memorable happened to her. So this lady claims this attack happened, she was in fear for her life, and had to leave by going PAST those people and out the door. Her girl wasn't like :confused: "WTF?" Come on man. Ford claims to have went into the fucking street and folks just sitting there? When two girls are together and one bails, the other is on notice -- especially if her friend bails out the door right the fuck in front her. And then Ford magically gets home? :confused:

It's so important to note the only way out the house(by her own damn words) was past them and she lived a 20 minute drive away. If she was truly shook, PJ, her friend, and the other cat would have noticed. Look at this lady. It's like she's on the spectrum or some shit. Think she'd hold it together at 15 after this supposed attack?

If this wasn't aimed at Brett, BGOL would be ripping this lady's story to pieces. I haven't seen someone on the verge of crying who can't produce tears since that cat who murdered his wife and got on the news trying to be all emotional. The dramatic breathing she had? And then Brett had the nerve to produce his own tears? Watching these 2 cacs do their acting is pure fucking comedy.

Fuck Brett. I don't want him to get the confirmation. But that lady Ford? Man listen. It was like watching a bizzaro version of Aunt Clara off bewitched.
 
What was credible? Seriously? Both seem full of shit, but no one really goes at her story(god forbid you question a female cac in this climate). She states the only other girl wouldn't remember the party because nothing memorable happened to her. So this lady claims this attack happened, she was in fear for her life, and had to leave by going PAST those people and out the door. Her girl wasn't like :confused: "WTF?" Come on man. Ford claims to have went into the fucking street and folks just sitting there? When two girls are together and one bails, the other is on notice -- especially if her friend bails out the door right the fuck in front her. And then Ford magically gets home? :confused:

It's so important to note the only way out the house(by her own damn words) was past them and she lived a 20 minute drive away. If she was truly shook, PJ, her friend, and the other cat would have noticed. Look at this lady. It's like she's on the spectrum or some shit. Think she'd hold it together at 15 after this supposed attack?

If this wasn't aimed at Brett, BGOL would be ripping this lady's story to pieces. I haven't seen someone on the verge of crying who can't produce tears since that cat who murdered his wife and got on the news trying to be all emotional. The dramatic breathing she had? And then Brett had the nerve to produce his own tears? Watching these 2 cacs do their acting is pure fucking comedy.

Fuck Brett. I don't want him to get the confirmation. But that lady Ford? Man listen. It was like watching a bizzaro version of Aunt Clara off bewitched.

Fam almost every sexual assault case is like this....

I don't really care about the facts on this one...

My biggest issues are the clear lies that Kavanaugh said about himself and his drinking... and the bias that he showed in his testimony towards democrats. Judges are supposed to be neutral. They will have political leanings.. but they are not supposed to outright show affiliations. Not only did Kavanaugh clearly show his side, but he also said that the confirmation hearing was a deliberate attack by democrats.. and revenge of the Clintons.

As a Lawyer...

There is no fucking WAY that this dude should be on the bench.


Clarence Thomas showed emotion and had out bursts during the Anita Hill testimony, but he never played his hand and directed called it a Democratic assassination.
 
Last edited:
Fam almost every sexual assault case is like this....

I don't really about the facts on this one...

My biggest issues are the clear lies that Kavanaugh said about himself and his drinking... and the bias that he showed in his testimony towards democrats. Judges are supposed to be neutral. They will have political leanings.. but they are not supposed to outright show affiliations. Not only did Kavanaugh clearly show his side, but he also said that the confirmation hearing was a deliberate attack by democrats.. and revenge of the Clintons.

As a Lawyer...

There is no fucking WAY that this dude should be on the bench.


Clarence Thomas showed emotion and had out bursts during the Anita Hill testimony, but he never played his hand and directed called it a Democratic assassination.
I've heard far too many women tell me about sexual assaults and never seen anything close to how she acts, but they were all black women. White women good for that baby voice shit and dramatic breathing when they playing victim. And when you truly in fear for your life, you remember everything about when you got safe. Whether it's sexual assault, a robbery, murder, shooting, plain assault, home invasion, etc. It's like you can't help but not to recall.

I don't like Brett. Not at all. Him getting on the bench before was bad enough, but he'll never forgive democrats for this. He shouldn't be on the bench. Maybe this bar fight will do him in. This is going to be some next level grudge shit if they don't finish the job on him. It has to be finished now at all costs.

Fuck Clarence too.
 
And when you truly in fear for your life, you remember everything about when you got safe. Whether it's sexual assault, a robbery, murder, shooting, plain assault, home invasion, etc. It's like you can't help but not to recall.
.

This is not really true though. I've seen multiple murders right in front me, I've been in a war zone during a war, etc... and I would have hard time telling you the year for most of that shit happened... nothing about what anyone was wearing, the weather that day, etc...i can tell you the look on the shooters face or how it was to see someone take their last breath right in front of you.... what you remember most is how you felt and very little of the other details...

I try to be as bias as possible... but it was Kavanaugh's testimony that pretty much let you know he did that shit... he lied about too much stuff... and come to find out he was creating alibi's with his friends before one of the stories hit the washington post...

this is not really a he-said, she said.... and that's really not why he wont be on the SC if he gets rejected. it will be because of his lies under oath
 
This is not really true though. I've seen multiple murders right in front me, I've been in a war zone during a war, etc... and I would have hard time telling you the year for most of that shit happened... nothing about what anyone was wearing, the weather that day, etc...i can tell you the look on the shooters face or how it was to see someone take their last breath right in front of you.... what you remember most is how you felt and very little of the other details...

I try to be as bias as possible... but it was Kavanaugh's testimony that pretty much let you know he did that shit... he lied about too much stuff... and come to find out he was creating alibi's with his friends before one of the stories hit the washington post...

this is not really a he-said, she said.... and that's really not why he wont be on the SC if he gets rejected. it will be because of his lies under oath
I remember you saying years ago about a lot of the things you experienced. A lot of different events. Shit. I know how you travel now man. You're everywhere. With her, it's just one event though and she can't recall important details. One of the most important was how she got safe.

I can recall clearly the first time someone tried to shoot me. The car pulling up. Cat jumping out with two guns. Asking me 'where I was going'.'why you running' Running through yards long after he bust the last shot. Past a family unloading groceries. Checking myself for bullet wounds. Running all the way to fucking Lee rd. How I got home. How I got there. That's the first time. Clear as fuck. Other similar incidents ain't nearly as vivid.

She claims this one traumatic event where her life was in danger, but can't remember how she got safe.

How many other times was her life in danger? Zero. She's admitted this was the only event. First times are memorable. Only times are memorable.

To be clear, I think Brett is lying about his partying and drinking. But I don't know about this event. I just don't. She has no one backing her. The story as she relayed it defies logic.
 
The minute your friends or family from back in the day found out about your success. They will be hating on you more, crying. If you move, they will chase after you.

No surprise these people are crawling out of the woodwork with these stories. I am dealing with people following and issuing death threats. You have to cut them off and let them know you want nothing to do with them.
 
Back
Top