Joe Budden podcast done? No Rory or Mal for 2nd straight episode

Nah, they aren't "the same." They have a few similarities, but their paths to wealth after initial fame required different lessons to be learned
When I say they are the same, I'm talking about being chaos agents. You don't know where they stand because they keep bobbing and weaving. Rory use to call Joe out on this all the time...Joe.."oh i thought you meant this" Rory: :hmm:

Charlemagne will do the same thing but he never puts himself in a position to be called out on anything because he takes both sides :rolleyes2:...at the end of the day, we still watching and listening.
 
When I say they are the same, I'm talking about being chaos agents. You don't know where they stand because they keep bobbing and weaving. Rory use to call Joe out on this all the time...Joe.."oh i thought you meant this" Rory: :hmm:

Charlemagne will do the same thing but he never puts himself in a position to be called out on anything because he takes both sides :rolleyes2:...at the end of the day, we still watching and listening.
So your issue or belief is that are on the fence? Ive noticed people try to label that as bad, but normally you can see more or less where the person stands on an issue overall. They are just truly open to hearing all viewpoints and open to dialog.

At times, this is a major flaw for Charlemagne and it's hard to say if he does it for views or not. He platforms people who he really shouldn't. Maybe he feels like he is exposing them to the public in a bad light. The issue that I've heard is some of these people come on the platform and make them look dumb. You also potentially provided them with a new supporter. If we are talking politics, most people only care about one issue or their own group. They'll ignore the bad shit if it's even clear/shown in the interview. When I was younger, I thought this was a good thing. Now, not so much. You aren't going to turn a racist in a hour interview and all you did was expand their audience.

Joe usually tries to stay away from important things, so you don't run into that issue as much. At best, he takes the opposite side just to have a discussion. If everyone has the same opinion, it is less entertaining or there is nothing new added.

Also, views can just be complex or change over time. For example, im or i was opposed to having guns in the home, yet I believe we all should have the right to carry. Recently, I've changed my stance on the need for semiautomatic guns. Before I didn't see why regular people would need them. Now with the state of the country and the military basically being used against citizens, I believe we need access to similar weapons to challenge this threat.


I was wrong. Even though i acknowledged racist had gotten in potentially at a high level, I never imagined the military as a whole would behave like robots. Even with the Blacks who love and want to be white, I kind of understand certain behavior during Jim crow and slavery. Maybe you really were in fear of your life or your family. Doing this shit now when it is clear your people are being attacked is crazy to me. So having Black people in the military isn't a balance because of those types of Blacks. This means citizens in general but especially Black people need the best weapons to protect ourselves even from those who may look like us.
 
Back
Top