I know this is beating the horse but it clearly shows a shot coming from the front. Therefore it was a conspiracy and Oswald was not the only shooter. But just take a look at the frames in slow motion and tell me how the hell that impact came from the back. I swear there are some things questionable but nobody with a straight face can say this was all Oswald doing. I could be preaching to the choir but I would also like somebody to come and defend the Warren Commission bullshit story about a single shooter? I frequently visit the sight because I've been interested in the whole event from a preteen. If anybody stay in the area and never visited the sight your missing out on something.
JFK was not shot from the back. How can you deny this?
- Thread starter cb71109
- Start date
It is now 2013 and this is the first stupid post of the year, how can you deny this?!?
got 57min here fam
It is now 2013 and this is the first stupid post of the year, how can you deny this?!?
continue on
Meaning that with ALL that is going on on Earth and in your neighborhood, with millions around the globe celebrating the new year, you choose now to discuss the merits of a second shooter on something that happened 49, err, 50 years ago?!?
the passenger leans back as the driver turns around. But the driver has his left hand on the steering wheel. At that angle the gun would have to be upside down in his right hand. The passenger had a better angle if anything considering he was right handed
Last edited:
Well just think about it from this perspective. If somebody in our own government had the balls to take out the "most powerful man on earth". Then there is nothing they is willing to do to further their own agenda. From the deaths of MLK, to CIA involvement with crack in ghettos, this should be looked upon as an example that nothing is exempt or not possible. So in other words we cannot fix any other problems in our society without it being sabotage.
central time it is
Compared to the other threads what methodology did you use to come to this conclusion?
man ignore those cats.
i never notice it before but it does look like he was shot by the driver. but it could be an optical illusion. its hard to believe he was shot by the driver (or passenger) and nobody standing on the grass noticed it
LOL, EVERYBODY knows as New York goes, so does the USA!!!
But point taken!
Driver. He signalled Passenger to move out the way. It been settled ages ago just like Halle Berry in Monsters Ball. Driver shot JF Halle was weak in pussy for the Oscar
What else is new? Oh! 57 and err'body celebrating in unity ALL OVER THE GLOBE 
Yall outta realize since 911 any official story has been sugarcoated crack of shit! Yall aint seen enough movies til KILLING THEM SOFTLY (2012) 
if u tell a lie enough times....
seems like a no brainer to me... I dont understand all the hate tho...
I mean ok he couldve posted some hoes... but other than that... its a least a three star thread..
just proves truth is not going to be denied in this new phase.
the driver shot jfk and the govt is only a tool for sale to the highest bidder.
I mean ok he couldve posted some hoes... but other than that... its a least a three star thread..
just proves truth is not going to be denied in this new phase.
the driver shot jfk and the govt is only a tool for sale to the highest bidder.
JFK was the ultimate offering in an occult ritual sacrifice at the specific altar
in a similar manner with Lady Diana in London or was it Paris 
Holy shit, as many time as I've seen this film I never noticed that.
Probably a optical illusion though because in this clip it's clear he didn't appear to be pointing anything in that direction -- but one thing is certain, the shot came from the front no question about that:
Last edited:
props to the original poster, fuck these dumb assed simpletons on bgol. I've thought about this alot and I was born in 82! Have u read Stephen Kings last book it was called 11/02/67 or some shit all about a time traveler who goes back to the week JFK was shot to prevent it? (Off to look for a link, title is prolly wrong but it was something like that) He doesnt give creedence to the multiple shooter angle but the way he recreated a timeline and facts about Oswald illuminated alot of the country at the time and made me wanna no more. Peace
Yes...everyone knows this.
Now what are you gonna do about it?...
Now what are you gonna do about it?...
William Cooper said in his book that it was the driver that shot Kennedy. The film is so poor quality that it appears that way, but you can't really tell for certain...there are some that say the zapruder film has been edited and tampered with....if so, I wonder what the original "unedited" film looks like. Probably something we'll never see.
I've known about da thing concerning da driver ever since I read Behold A Pale Horse but I never really paid any attention to it. Clearly da shot came from da front.
I went there this summer as well. Interesting, no doubt.
we was talking about that a couple of weeks ago.
OK If I accept the driver as one of the shooter I say its more of a barney Fife situation than a planned hit -
The first shot was fired and then with all the commotions the driver turns around and panicked and shot JFk -
No grand conspiracy would have the driver shot unless it was a suicide shooter like the bodyguards of Indira Ghandi.
The first shot was fired and then with all the commotions the driver turns around and panicked and shot JFk -
No grand conspiracy would have the driver shot unless it was a suicide shooter like the bodyguards of Indira Ghandi.
Similar threads
