JFK was not shot from the back. How can you deny this?

OK If I accept the driver as one of the shooter I say its more of a barney Fife situation than a planned hit -

The first shot was fired and then with all the commotions the driver turns around and panicked and shot JFk -

No grand conspiracy would have the driver shot unless it was a suicide shooter like the bodyguards of Indira Ghandi.
A ritual in broad daylight ~ JFK had to be neutralized on the spot There was NO PLAN B :)
 
props to the original poster, fuck these dumb assed simpletons on bgol. I've thought about this alot and I was born in 82! Have u read Stephen Kings last book it was called 11/02/67 or some shit all about a time traveler who goes back to the week JFK was shot to prevent it? (Off to look for a link, title is prolly wrong but it was something like that) He doesnt give creedence to the multiple shooter angle but the way he recreated a timeline and facts about Oswald illuminated alot of the country at the time and made me wanna no more. Peace
eBook Link?
 
William Cooper said in his book that it was the driver that shot Kennedy. The film is so poor quality that it appears that way, but you can't really tell for certain...there are some that say the zapruder film has been edited and tampered with....if so, I wonder what the original "unedited" film looks like. Probably something we'll never see.

I've known about da thing concerning da driver ever since I read Behold A Pale Horse but I never really paid any attention to it. Clearly da shot came from da front.

Was Bill Cooper the first to say it was the driver? :confused:
 
i watched the zuprader clip from the OP and the first thing that i noticed was that JFK was in distress before the head shot from the front,,Jackie was holding him and his head was forward/down,,go to about the 25sec mark,,,looks like the car entourage are responding
to JFK being shot from behind,,,,so i look at some related youtube stories on that page and found the following





 
props to the original poster, fuck these dumb assed simpletons on bgol. I've thought about this alot and I was born in 82! Have u read Stephen Kings last book it was called 11/02/67 or some shit all about a time traveler who goes back to the week JFK was shot to prevent it? (Off to look for a link, title is prolly wrong but it was something like that) He doesnt give creedence to the multiple shooter angle but the way he recreated a timeline and facts about Oswald illuminated alot of the country at the time and made me wanna no more. Peace

eBook Link?

:confused:

what's wrong with taking a trip to your local library?
 
i never notice it before but it does look like he was shot by the driver. but it could be an optical illusion. its hard to believe he was shot by the driver (or passenger) and nobody standing on the grass noticed it
They noticed somebody in the entourage with an AR-15, that is why.
Holy shit, as many time as I've seen this film I never noticed that. :smh::eek:

Probably a optical illusion though because in this clip it's clear he didn't appear to be pointing anything in that direction -- but one thing is certain, the shot came from the front no question about that:

Kennedy-Assasination-GIF.gif

Nah, shot came from the back and to the left.


http://www.bgol.us/board/showthread.php?t=763496
 
at 0:50.....looks like his driver turns around...points a gun and fires.
everytime i see this film, thats what i see. alot of people probably have never noticed it.

Stop it bruh like you only one that noticed

William cooper stated this in behold a pale horse
In the movie JFK with Kevin Costner it was stated

:lol:
 
at 0:50.....looks like his driver turns around...points a gun and fires.
everytime i see this film, thats what i see. alot of people probably have never noticed it.
i never notice it before but it does look like he was shot by the driver. but it could be an optical illusion. its hard to believe he was shot by the driver (or passenger) and nobody standing on the grass noticed it
I never noticed it before either. Different perspective I'd say. The worst thing is what is below. I mean, who do you go through to get something like this done? How high does it go? MLK, the downing of the BPP, crack in the ghetto, substandard "standardised" teaching in Black neighborhoods (I know the White kids at St. Ignatius aren't learning the same shit in 10th grade as the kids in the hood. If everything is fixed what do you believe in? Damn
Well just think about it from this perspective. If somebody in our own government had the balls to take out the "most powerful man on earth". Then there is nothing they is willing to do to further their own agenda. From the deaths of MLK, to CIA involvement with crack in ghettos, this should be looked upon as an example that nothing is exempt or not possible. So in other words we cannot fix any other problems in our society without it being sabotage.
 
JFK was killed by the Russians through Harvey Oswald who lived in Russia and Cuba. It was a coup d'etat to change leadership in this country, favorable to them. It is no different when Hugo Chavez is removed from power, or a leader is killed. The U.S has done this in the past many of times, if a country threatens the national interests.

The Russians had lost 27 million people in WWII, and were expecting eventual war with the United States. The satellite communist countries were to create a buffer in case of war again. They were taking preemptive action to strike their enemy and put fear into the executive branch that would dare challenge them again. It would be similar to taking out Hitler.

It would be similar to taking out Saddam first prior to war, effectively disorganizing your enemy. Ironically, Saddam tried to kill President Bush, Sr. after the Gulf War that failed, he was not afraid of nuclear weapons to deter this plot.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top