Jesus was gay...

Question for those offended by this who believe that Jesus is God:

If Jesus returned and said for the next 7 years yall need to prove your faith and devotion by sucking dicks through the tribulation, would/could you say no?

I mean he works in mysterious ways and shit. He always has a plan. He is the source of morality... And on what grounds would you reject this test of your faith?

Good question...

And it will never be answered here.



God has previously made infanticide moral in furtherance of His plan. Ritual sodomy as a tenet of a new end-times covenant with his flock would be nothing to him.

Well, I just turned it into it's own thread, so nobody can claim it was like looking for a needle in a haystack.
 
Well, I just turned it into it's own thread, so nobody can claim it was like looking for a needle in a haystack.

It still won't be answered. It could be a sticky on every board for all of 2010, and all of the responses would be deflections and "My lord would never ask me to do something immoral" type nonsense. Of course, the law changes... and Jesus/Yahweh can make anything moral/immoral at anytime by fiat.

That's the real issue. Does your God through his omniscience have perfect knowledge of absolute morality, or is he through his omnipotence simply able to define anything he wants to be moral and enforce it against weaker beings? That is, is he observing moral law or creating it? Is a thing good because it is good intrinsically, or is good because your God says that it is good?

This is important. I've never understood why we would assume a God would be "good" anyway, just because he said so... wouldn't he himself have to demonstrate his goodness? Or is it enough to be God-fearing, and submit to him like you would to the demands secret police simply because there is no other option for survival? What does good/evil even mean for an omnipotent & omniscient being but obedience/disobedience to his expressed will? I echo Hitchens on this point, imagining biblical Heaven as something like a celestial North Korea.
 
Last edited:
It still won't be answered. It could be a sticky on every board for all of 2010, and all of the responses would be deflections and "My lord would never ask me to do something immoral" type nonsense. Of course, the law changes... and Jesus/Yahweh can make anything moral/immoral at anytime by fiat.

That's the real issue. Does your God through his omniscience have perfect knowledge of absolute morality, or is he through his omnipotence simply able to define anything he wants to be moral and enforce it against weaker beings? That is, is he observing moral law or creating it? Is a thing good because it is good intrinsically, or is good because your God says that it is good?

This is important. I've never understood why we would assume a God would be "good" anyway, just because he said so... wouldn't he himself have to demonstrate his goodness? Or is it enough to be God-fearing, and submit to him like you would to the demands secret police simply because there is no other option for survival? What does good/evil even mean for an omnipotent & omniscient being but obedience/disobedience to his expressed will? I echo Hitchens on this point, imagining biblical Heaven as something like a celestial North Korea.

Man, there were over 200 replies to that thread and I was the only person to answer the question with my final post of the night.

A bunch of dishonest cowards, I'd say.

There was a lot of the "My lord would never ask me to do something immoral" argument-- People claiming the Lord would never tell anyone to do anything against the Commandments. I brought up Abraham and Issac and one person defended that as being pre-Commandments. I brought up the Lord's alleged encouragement of genocide in the King David era (just to pick one) and that person never responded.

You're right that respect for God is all about deference to a greater power... It is obvious that the God character in the Old Testament, which is God to most people, was an extremely immoral and indefensible character.

Interestingly, people were a lot more disturbed by the idea that God would command one to commit a homosexual act than the fact, according to their Bible, that God would command one to murder their infant son.
 
Man, there were over 200 replies to that thread and I was the only person to answer the question with my final post of the night.

A bunch of dishonest cowards, I'd say.

There was a lot of the "My lord would never ask me to do something immoral" argument-- People claiming the Lord would never tell anyone to do anything against the Commandments. I brought up Abraham and Issac and one person defended that as being pre-Commandments. I brought up the Lord's alleged encouragement of genocide in the King David era (just to pick one) and that person never responded.

You're right that respect for God is all about deference to a greater power... It is obvious that the God character in the Old Testament, which is God to most people, was an extremely immoral and indefensible character.

Interestingly, people were a lot more disturbed by the idea that God would command one to commit a homosexual act than the fact, according to their Bible, that God would command one to murder their infant son.


I just tried to make it thru that thread and wow:smh:
half a dozen people exposed their ignorance and inability to use logic. couldnt even make it past the 4th page, too many dumb ass responses to a simple yes or no question.
 
Yahweh in physical form does not partaketh in acts deemed unmanly but his spiritual form, most certainly. The rift between us which permeates your scriptures began for this reason precisely. I, being the most handsome of all became the subject of his affection which landed us into a feud most treacherous (close to 10,352 human years prior to today). As a result Yahweh or Zanastra (His divine name) had his Father banish me from the Council of Divine Entities and made me Spiritual Consultant over a new Celestial Body known as Terra. I begun to turn Terra into an upstart most booming with beings known to you idiots as "Dinosaurs" thus causing Zanastra to become envious. In a move of sheer jealousy he began to throw rocks at my creation causing mass devastation on Terra and ruining my creation. This little wench does this and receives not an excoriation from his Father...to hell with both of them.
 
In 1525 the New Testament, partially translated by Tindale, was printed in Cologne. During the same year 6,000 copies of the Testament were smuggled into England. By the authority of the church they were publicly burned. The Bible was the first book ever to be banned in England.

Why?


If indeed homosexuality was to be condemned Thomas Moore used the word "invert" in 1533. "Invert" was one of the words used to denote homosexuality. So by the time of the writing of the King James version there were several words in use which would have condemned homosexuality. They WERE NOT used! Ask yourself: If there were plain and simple words to mean homosexuality why weren't they used? Simply because homosexuality was not the issue in these passages that the religious right use. Almost every biblical scholar today will agree on that point. (hmmmmmmmmmmm)

Very interesting...


1. The Hebrew Old Testament clearly indicates that King David had a sexual relationship with Jonathan, the son of King Saul.

2. The Hebrew Old Testament clearly documents a sexual relationship between the prophet Daniel and a man named Ashpenaz, and indicates that God put Daniel into that relationship.

3. Much to the embarrassment of the Vatican, the Catholic Boswell has uncovered proof that, up until the fourteenth century, the church was routinely performing wedding ceremonies for same-sex couples.

4. The social tides in Europe began to turn against homosexuality around the thirteenth century. Up until that time, there was no organized opposition to homosexuality, either from society or from the church.

5. The religious tide did not turn against homosexuals until after the social tides. The change in society's attitude toward homosexuals was the only reason the church stopped marrying them and began to persecute them.

6. Boswell found that same-sex marriage continued in certain parts of eastern Europe until the nineteenth century, and that in a few villages, they still continue.

7. King James, who ordered the English translation of the Bible which bears his name, was a homosexual, a fact of which the translators were well aware. This fact displeased them, but since he was the king, they could not express their displeasure openly. Although on the surface, they were careful to be certain that their translation flattered and pleased the king, they also used it to attack him in a way he could not fight.:lol::lol::lol:

I wasn't up on any of this...

I gotta check it out, especially the King David part.

8. There is absolutely no condemnation of homosexuality in the Hebrew Old Testament.
How do you reconcile that claim with "It is an abomination for mankind to lay with mankind"?


10. There is absolutely no condemnation of homosexuality in the Greek New Testament.

Well, of course not, given Elton John's revelations about Jesus.

13. The Greek New Testament, while not condemning homosexuality, does forbid people to attempt to alter their sexual orientation.

What's the scriptural basis for this one?
 
It's a problem to say Jesus was a fag and it's a problem to say that he was fucking bitches. Fuck religion. It's likely that he never existed. Niggas would be better off arguing about unicorns.
How the fuck are you going to debate the sexuality of an imaginary person?
 
omfg_abe_simpson_in_and_out.gif
 
burn in hell. faggots will try and make you think faggotry is normal and can be a worthwhile and gratifying way of life.

listen tho this bullshit if you want to.

MA
 
Yeah, yeah, fuck that gay Mexican nigga Jesus, the holy spirit, and his followers. I just wanna thank Flawless for re-upping this link here:
4455982101_7ace0abf09_o.gif
 
burn in hell. faggots will try and make you think faggotry is normal and can be a worthwhile and gratifying way of life.

listen tho this bullshit if you want to.

MA

Hmmmm... You're probably struggling with with a sexual identity crisis as I type this. Why else would you be so incensed? And, that "worthwhile and gratifying way of life" business sent up all kinds of red flags. I don't give a fuck if another motherfucker's life-- be he straight, gay or tri-sexual--is worthwhile or gratifying. Why do you? :hmm:
 
No it's true. I remember reading up about this and telling people about this years ago when I was a teenager.

The funny thing is a lot of blacks don't even know who King James is and the person he was. Which makes shit even worse because they follow and don't ask questions.

:(:smh:
 
thanks for reminding me why i slapped ya stupid azz with the 'iggy' button all those months ago :rolleyes:


Costanza
This message is hidden because Costanza is on your ignore list.
 
WTF...I live in an insane world...When was Jesus born?, What color
was Jesus? What concrete real non-fabricated proof was there that he ever existed?

NOW MOFOS SOOO BRAINWASHED NEW ANGLE, THIS NON-TRUTH
WAS NOW GAY...SO SAY'S A MODERN DAY GAY(HOMO) KNIGHTED MUSICIAN!

:hmm:

ANOTHER REASON I'M 100% AGNOSTIC!:dance::dance::dance:
 
thanks for reminding me why i slapped ya stupid azz with the 'iggy' button all those months ago :rolleyes:


Costanza
This message is hidden because Costanza is on your ignore list.

I always find it amusing, in a pathetic self-important way, how people not only feel compelled to announce who they are "ignoring" and even transfer people on and off of "ignore," obviously devoting much focus to these folks.

Motherfucker, put me on ignore, disconnect your Internet, lay down in front of a speeding train, I don't give a fuck!!!
 
Seriously tho. Sometimes I wonder if this is a porn board or an atheist board. One thing for sure, it gets real old seeing atheists time & time again attempt to debunk the truth of Jesus Christ.

Frankly, I don't care what you believe. I just wish you'd stop trying to stuff it down everyone's throats.

Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Basically, post porn or have a glass of shut the fuck up b/c I don't want to hear it anymore.
 
Seriously tho. Sometimes I wonder if this is a porn board or an atheist board. One thing for sure, it gets real old seeing atheists time & time again attempt to debunk the truth of Jesus Christ.

Frankly, I don't care what you believe. I just wish you'd stop trying to stuff it down everyone's throats.

Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Basically, post porn or have a glass of shut the fuck up b/c I don't want to hear it anymore.

You write as if these threads are chasing you around the crib.
If you clicked on it, you're stuffing it down your own throat, cuz the title of this thread is pretty clear.
 
Seriously tho. Sometimes I wonder if this is a porn board or an atheist board. One thing for sure, it gets real old seeing atheists time & time again attempt to debunk the truth of Jesus Christ.

Frankly, I don't care what you believe. I just wish you'd stop trying to stuff it down everyone's throats.

Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Basically, post porn or have a glass of shut the fuck up b/c I don't want to hear it anymore.

then why did you click on the thread title?:lol:
 
Seriously tho. Sometimes I wonder if this is a porn board or an atheist board. One thing for sure, it gets real old seeing atheists time & time again attempt to debunk the truth of Jesus Christ.

Frankly, I don't care what you believe. I just wish you'd stop trying to stuff it down everyone's throats.

Methinks thou doth protest too much.

Basically, post porn or have a glass of shut the fuck up b/c I don't want to hear it anymore.

then why did you click on the thread title?:lol:

Evidently he wanted something stuffed down his throat.

Very Christ-like of him.
 
Back
Top