I think you're right about what the companies are doing. But I went by my neighbor and looked a bit of Avatar on his 4k and it looked way better than it does on my 1080p, to me. I add to me, because maybe you're right, and maybe I just wanted/expected it to. Football seems to look better on it too. Of course his TV is 70" and mine is 42", so that, coupled with my excitement at the larger screen may have a lot to do with it. I will have to really give it a more discerning look... when we watch the game tomorrow.![]()
avatar should look better because it was actually shot in 4k (first movie to be shot in it).
football on the other hand is only broadcast at most in 1080i.
we probably won't see 4k television programming for another decade.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 wins this comparison IMHO. Why do I think that
IPhone is doing catchup, and does not fully succeed? It is boasting about
getting features those of us who have Galaxy devices have always had.
I am shocked that all this time, the primitive IPhones did not even have
the ability to default to Wifi when such is present. This is an automatic
feature of my Galaxy Mega, and as soon as I come into my home, it informs
me that all my connections (data and voice) will be over my Verizon wifi
(which is good because I think the T-Mobile data network is becoming
overloaded). For me the cell phone is still a device for voice communication,
and I am appalled at the quality of the IPhone sound in this video. Again,
I have never had an IPhone, and so perhaps I am biased...but it seems
to me that the Galaxy is the more practical device.
most phones didnt have the ability to use voice over wifi until 2013 because carriers didnt want that feature included.
going forward all devices will have this feature.



specs don't mean shit but the new processor is all the rage.
