How to set back your race

[water]

Again you don't watch Fox news. In a general 24 hour period, the majority of criminals shown either are white or hispanic.

Thanks to Ten.

 

[The Dark Mind]

Thanks to Ten.

My point still stands: Again you don't watch Fox news. In a general 24 hour period, the majority of criminals shown either are white or hispanic.


Wait. Wait a minute...

I just know you didn't just put Barak up as a criminal??? Did you?

 

[water]

....


The title of this thread has just taken on a strange irony.

lol, no bro......... I was referring to the way I stated the last sentence.
Should have put quotes around it.

It would have read:

White logic............

"Let me set a standard for you but I don't want to be held to it."

Anybody on BGOL can vouch for my blackness, just take a look at most of my posts.

However the same cannot be said for "dark Mind"

 

[water]

My point still stands: Again you don't watch Fox news. In a general 24 hour period, the majority of criminals shown either are white or hispanic.


Wait. Wait a minute...

I just know you didn't just put Barak up as a criminal??? Did you?

Meanwhile in another thread DarkMind pretends to be against the white institution he is defending in this thread:

Thus completing the cycle of white hypocrisy..........

 

[The Dark Mind]

Meanwhile in another thread DarkMind pretends to be against the white institution he is defending in this thread:

Really what institution is that???



No it appears that I was agreeing with a statement of fact in the other thread (and it is a fact)


While challenging your outright racist behavior.

But it is interesting that you show the notion that, because I don't believe the way good little negroes are supposed to believe, that I am somehow not black.

Thus exposing the cycle of your white racism..........

 

[water]

Really what institution is that???



No it appears that I was agreeing with a statement of fact in the other thread (and it is a fact)


While challenging your outright racist behavior.

But it is interesting that you show the notion that, because I don't believe the way good little negroes are supposed to believe, that I am somehow not black.

Thus exposing the cycle of your white racism..........

You are funny.

You say I hate white people????? Please use this button and show me where I said that?

Then you call me racist???? Based on whose definition????

Can you please define your understanding of racism and then show me how I am racist.................(if you could, lol)

 

[Chase Bannon]

It's funny to see this thread and a lot of other threads stray from the subject. Facts are facts. Read what you can from those statistics. Do one thing though. Use percentages when you compare races because if you don't you will have confusion. If I didn't use percentages on the statistics orignally stated, my conclusion would draw that white people are doing better and worse than black people. LOL Now how is that possible???? LOL You have to be one or the other. So start using percentages people.

 

[The Dark Mind]

You are funny.

You say I hate white people????? Please use this button and show me where I said that?

Then you call me racist???? Based on whose definition????

Based on the dictionary (please see definition below.)

Can you please define your understanding of racism and then show me how I am racist.................

(if you could, lol)

(Oh yeah I can. LOL)

American Heritage Dictionary
rac·ism (rā'sĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

Your constant statements that my blackness can be questioned because you don't like what I say... The belief that if I am black my character should be a certain way.

You've already fit the first definition of racist.

2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

And even more of your racism

You also fit the second definition of racist.

You are a racist!!!

 

[water]

Based on the dictionary (please see definition below.)


(Oh yeah I can. LOL)

American Heritage Dictionary
rac·ism (rā'sĭz'əm) Pronunciation Key
n.

1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.

Your constant statements that my blackness can be questioned because you don't like what I say... The belief that if I am black my character should be a certain way.

You've already fit the first definition of racist.

2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

And even more of your racism

You also fit the second definition of racist.

You are a racist!!!

Told you you were a funny guy..............

American Heritage Dictionary?????


The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) is an American dictionary of the English language published by Boston publisher Houghton-Mifflin, the first edition of which appeared in 1969. Its creation was spurred by the controversy over the Webster's Third New International Dictionary.

The first edition appeared in 1969, highly praised for its Indo-European etymologies. In addition to the normally expected etymologies, which for instance trace the word ambiguous to a Proto-Indo-European root ag-, meaning "to drive," the appendices included a seven-page article by Professor Calvert Watkins entitled "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" and "Indo-European Roots", 46 pages of entries that are each organized around one of some thousand inferred Proto-Indo-European roots and the English words of the AHD that are understood to have evolved from them.

The second edition, published in 1980, omitted the Indo-European etymologies, but they were reintroduced in the third edition, published in 1992. The third edition was also a departure for the publisher because it was developed in a database, which facilitated the use of the linguistic data for other applications, such as electronic dictionaries. The fourth edition (2000) added Semitic language materials, including an analogous appendix of roots





Still waiting on the black man's contribution in "that" book........

Try again.

You are so typical.

Put down all the versions of dictionaries.

Answer the question:

Can you please define your understanding of racism and then show me how I am racist.................


If you can't do that then I understand......

 

[bigirl]

Kayanation is not racist. Actually in my opinion to have the idiocy and audacity to try and claim there are absolutely no differences between the races is VERY RACIST!!!! I see white people try and do this all the time and It really annoys me. Makes me feel like they are trying to rob everyone of their cultural identities again just like they did back in the day and they want everyone to become some identityless boring vague mass of sheeple. They come with all kinds of bullshit statements like "I don't see color". STOP LYING!!!! As if they would see one of us and "not notice" we are black. I AM SO FUCKING SICK OF THAT KIND OF BULLSHIT AND I PARTICULARLY HATE TO SEE IT ON THIS BOARD.

 

[Ricky715]

The funny thing though is that we get on each other as if we are not improving. We tend to believe what we see in the media and form our own self-destructing image from something that is projected unto us.

Child abuse vs child molestation, it's all subjective but at times we need to understand that blacks don't have a corner on everything that is fucked up.

We have things to work on just like any other group. The goal of this post was to show that we all have shit to work on and blacks don't hold a monopoly on being fucked up, especailly those who have been trained to berate ONLY blacks as if whites shit don't stink.

How often must it be said to be understood, the media takes one or two crimes that minorities do and report it over and over again and again. Spend days on black crime while they only spend a few minutes on white crimes, and after a few minutes never mention it again.
The media is the most racist whores in America today. They don't care about the truth they care more about the mighty buck.
Just look at this stupid war that Bushit has gotten us stuck in. Just remember what the media said and says about it.
Bushit and his people have made billions and billions off of the death and distruction of others if that isn't Satan then I don't know what is.

 

[The Dark Mind]

Told you you were a funny guy..............

Was that a response? I know you don't think that was a response. Look kid if that's the best that you can do you might as well quit now. All you just did was prove me right on both counts. All you did with this article was to prove that the American dictionary is accurate. You also proved that you're a very racist individual.

Let's look at what you wrote:

American Heritage Dictionary?????


The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (AHD) is an American dictionary of the English language published by Boston publisher Houghton-Mifflin, the first edition of which appeared in 1969. Its creation was spurred by the controversy over the Webster's Third New International Dictionary.

All this means is was that there was a disagreement over the origin (or etymology) of some words. The definitions of the words were not in dispute.

The first edition appeared in 1969, highly praised for its Indo-European etymologies. In addition to the normally expected etymologies, which for instance trace the word ambiguous to a Proto-Indo-European root ag-, meaning "to drive," the appendices included a seven-page article by Professor Calvert Watkins entitled "Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans" and "Indo-European Roots", 46 pages of entries that are each organized around one of some thousand inferred Proto-Indo-European roots and the English words of the AHD that are understood to have evolved from them.

Which means is very accurate. It uses Indo-European etymologies because English is the Indo-European language.

----------------------------
From Wikipedia:

The Indo-European languages comprise a family of several hundred related languages and dialects [1], including most of the major languages of Europe, as well as many spoken in the Indian subcontinent (South Asia), the Iranian plateau (Southwest Asia), and Central Asia. Indo-European (Indo refers to India) has the largest numbers of speakers of the recognised families of languages in the world today, with its languages spoken by approximately three billion native speakers.[2] The Indo-Iranian languages form the largest sub-branch of Indo-European.[3]

Of the top 20 contemporary languages in terms of speakers according to SIL Ethnologue, 12 are Indo-European: Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, German, Marathi, French, Italian, Punjabi and Urdu, accounting for over 1.6 billion native speakers.
----------------------------

The second edition, published in 1980, omitted the Indo-European etymologies, but they were reintroduced in the third edition, published in 1992. The third edition was also a departure for the publisher because it was developed in a database, which facilitated the use of the linguistic data for other applications, such as electronic dictionaries. The fourth edition (2000) added Semitic language materials, including an analogous appendix of roots

Thus becoming even more accurate!!!



And with that, you've helped prove the accuracy of the American Heritage dictionary.

Thank you!

Again...

definitions of the words were NEVER in dispute just that etymologies or their origins. If you look most dictionaries are in agreement about definitions of words but every now and then they may differ on the history or origin of the word.

But the definitions of English words, especially well known words such as “racist”, are pretty much agreed on by all English dictionaries. So you haven't discredited anything. If anything, what you've just managed to do is prove the credibility of the American English dictionary!!!



But what is so sad is, you’re such a paranoid racist individual, that all you saw was the word Indo-European and immediately you were ready to discredit the entire dictionary.

What's even more sad is that all you did was to demonstrate that, in this area, you're a very un-educated individual.

Most people understand that English is an Indo-European language (if not “Indo-” they at least know it’s “European”) and therefore it would make sense for the words to have Indo-European etymologies.

Was also sad is the fact that you got your article from Wikipedia (yeah I looked up where you got your article from) and right there in the article the word Indo-European and etymology are highlighted!!! All you would've had to do was click on the links and it was taking you to the articles explaining those words.

So let’s recap…

1. the credibility of the dictionary still stands.
2. the definitions of the words were never in dispute, it’s just from time to time people may differ over where the word came from or it’s history.

I'm sorry my friend, you are going to have to try much, much harder then that.

Oh yeah…

and according to American Heritage, Oxford, and Webster’s dictionaries, you’re still a racist.

 

[water]

Was that a response? I know you don't think that was a response. Look kid if that's the best that you can do you might as well quit now. All you just did was prove me right on both counts. All you did with this article was to prove that the American dictionary is accurate. You also proved that you're a very racist individual.

Let's look at what you wrote:


All this means is was that there was a disagreement over the origin (or etymology) of some words. The definitions of the words were not in dispute.



Which means is very accurate. It uses Indo-European etymologies because English is the Indo-European language.

----------------------------
From Wikipedia:

The Indo-European languages comprise a family of several hundred related languages and dialects [1], including most of the major languages of Europe, as well as many spoken in the Indian subcontinent (South Asia), the Iranian plateau (Southwest Asia), and Central Asia. Indo-European (Indo refers to India) has the largest numbers of speakers of the recognised families of languages in the world today, with its languages spoken by approximately three billion native speakers.[2] The Indo-Iranian languages form the largest sub-branch of Indo-European.[3]

Of the top 20 contemporary languages in terms of speakers according to SIL Ethnologue, 12 are Indo-European: Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, German, Marathi, French, Italian, Punjabi and Urdu, accounting for over 1.6 billion native speakers.
----------------------------


Thus becoming even more accurate!!!



And with that, you've helped prove the accuracy of the American Heritage dictionary.

Thank you!

Again...

definitions of the words were NEVER in dispute just that etymologies or their origins. If you look most dictionaries are in agreement about definitions of words but every now and then they may differ on the history or origin of the word.

But the definitions of English words, especially well known words such as “racist”, are pretty much agreed on by all English dictionaries. So you haven't discredited anything. If anything, what you've just managed to do is prove the credibility of the American English dictionary!!!



But what is so sad is, you’re such a paranoid racist individual, that all you saw was the word Indo-European and immediately you were ready to discredit the entire dictionary.

What's even more sad is that all you did was to demonstrate that, in this area, you're a very un-educated individual.

Most people understand that English is an Indo-European language (if not “Indo-” they at least know it’s “European”) and therefore it would make sense for the words to have Indo-European etymologies.

Was also sad is the fact that you got your article from Wikipedia (yeah I looked up where you got your article from) and right there in the article the word Indo-European and etymology are highlighted!!! All you would've had to do was click on the links and it was taking you to the articles explaining those words.

So let’s recap…

1. the credibility of the dictionary still stands.
2. the definitions of the words were never in dispute, it’s just from time to time people may differ over where the word came from or it’s history.

I'm sorry my friend, you are going to have to try much, much harder then that.

Oh yeah…

and according to American Heritage, Oxford, and Webster’s dictionaries, you’re still a racist.

My dear sir, what I attempted to draw to your attention is your use of an instrument that serves to perpetuate racism to justify your definition of racism.

You didn't get it.........

Oh well, moving on...........

You didn't answer my question, forgetting all this semantic bullshit, answer my question:



Can you please define your understanding of racism and then show me how I am racist


That's all.

 

[The Dark Mind]

My dear sir, what I attempted to draw to your attention is your use of an instrument that serves to perpetuate racism to justify your definition of racism.

No. What you attempted to do was discredit a credible source in a failed and sad attempt to weasel out, after being pinned with a definition from a credible source that proves what you are.

You didn't get it.........

There was nothing to get. You didn’t offer anything.

Oh well, moving on...........

Uhm, nope. We’re not moving on. What we’re going to do is sit right here and focus on the fact that you are a racist.

You didn't answer my question,

Now you’re just lying. I answered you question thoroughly and completely.

forgetting all this semantic bullshit, answer my question:

There’s nothing semantic about it, that’s the part that you don’t understand. Words have set meanings. You can’t make them up as you go along. That’s the reason you have dictionaries, thesauruses, and encyclopedias.

Can you please define your understanding of racism and then show me how I am racist

Why? My understanding or your understanding is irrelevant.

Why is that? Simple. Because words already have set definitions and meanings. When talking about important issues you must use credible sources and real definitions.

We can’t use kayanation’s definition of the word, we must use the real definition of the word.

 

[water]

No. What you attempted to do was discredit a credible source in a failed and sad attempt to weasel out, after being pinned with a definition from a credible source that proves what you are.


There was nothing to get. You didn’t offer anything.


Uhm, nope. We’re not moving on. What we’re going to do is sit right here and focus on the fact that you are a racist.


Now you’re just lying. I answered you question thoroughly and completely.


There’s nothing semantic about it, that’s the part that you don’t understand. Words have set meanings. You can’t make them up as you go along. That’s the reason you have dictionaries, thesauruses, and encyclopedias.


Why? My understanding or your understanding is irrelevant.

Why is that? Simple. Because words already have set definitions and meanings. When talking about important issues you must use credible sources and real definitions.

We can’t use kayanation’s definition of the word, we must use the real definition of the word.

I think you may want to look further into the highlighted items, your ignorance is showing.



A dictionary is a credible source for the meaning of a word?????

Really???? So according to your theory it would seem that words are created by dictionaries and then put to use by people........

Words have set meanings????

Really???? So words can never change meaning over time?

Look up the word caucasian and tell me the meaning hasn't changed.


Calling me a racist does not have ANY effect on me. Why? I am BLACK and black people CANNOT be racist.

It has a different effect on white people however so you could rant and rave calling me a racist, it doesn't work, lol...........

The fact is black people CANNOT be racist.

 

[The Dark Mind]

I think you may want to look further into the highlighted items, your ignorance is showing.

Uh, no I don’t think so. I would look back over the last 5 or 6 posts if I were you. It is your ignorance that is showing.

A dictionary is a credible source for the meaning of a word?????

Uhm. Yes.

Once again you show you ignorance.

But it’s ok, I will help you once more. Please read…

--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Dictionary

The dictionary is a list of words with their definitions,
--------------------------


Damn. It’s a shame you don’t seem to know this.

Please read more… Educate yourself on what a dictionary is.


--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Dictionary

The dictionary is a list of words with their definitions, a list of characters with their glyphs, or a list of words with corresponding words in other languages. In a few languages, words can appear in many different forms, but only the lemma form appears as the main word or headword in most dictionaries. Many dictionaries also provide pronunciation information; grammatical information; word derivations, histories, or etymologies; illustrations; usage guidance; and examples in phrases or sentences. Dictionaries are most commonly found in the form of a book, but more and more dictionaries are produced as software runs from electronic PDA or a general purpose computer. Some dictionary software are capable of speak out the word it contains, and so being called talking dictionary. Most dictionaries are produced by lexicographers.
--------------------------

Really???? So according to your theory it would seem that words are created by dictionaries and then put to use by people........

Close. Words are defined by dictionaries, so that people can use them accurately.

Words have set meanings????

Yeah, they’re called definitions, .

Oh geez, you’re pitiful.

Really????

Yeah really.

Here you go. Read…

--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Definition

A definition is a form of words which states the meaning of a term. The term to be defined is known as the definiendum (Latin: that which is to be defined). The form of words which defines it is known as the definiens (Latin: that which is doing the defining).
--------------------------

So words can never change meaning over time?

Of course they can. But that’s the key phrase... over time. That’s because it takes time for a large section of the populace to start using the word. And even then it doesn’t guarantee the change in the meaning of the word; sometimes it just adds an extra definition. It’s the reason that some words have multiple definitions. But the definition can not be changed by one or two people on the fly because they want it to mean something different.

Calling me a racist does not have ANY effect on me. Why? I am BLACK and black people CANNOT be racist.

What’s sad is that you believe that lie you just spewed out. Thus showing that you are both truly ignorant, and totally a racist as I have proven earlier.

It has a different effect on white people however so you could rant and rave calling me a racist, it doesn't work, lol...........

Nice try. But it does work. Because no matter how much you lie to yourself, on a basic conscious level, you know you fit the exact definition of the word.

The fact is black people CANNOT be racist.

Sorry black people CAN be racist. And you’re the PROOF!

The simple belief that one group can be evil and another group can’t be evil, because they are a part of a particular race, is outright racist.

That’s horrible all by itself
But your racism doesn’t stop there, it gets worse.

You put forth the notion that if white people engages in negative behavior, they’re racist, but if blacks engage in that exact same behavior, that they are immune from being racist, because they are a part of a particular race and therefore superior and immune.

My God, you sound like David Duke.

 

[BlackSmurf]

See this "White people are worse" shit will never get us far as a people at all.

Are you implying that the truth no longer matters or that we lack the power to enforce it?

 

[water]

Uh, no I don’t think so. I would look back over the last 5 or 6 posts if I were you. It is your ignorance that is showing.


Uhm. Yes.

Once again you show you ignorance.

But it’s ok, I will help you once more. Please read…

--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Dictionary

The dictionary is a list of words with their definitions,
--------------------------


Damn. It’s a shame you don’t seem to know this.

Please read more… Educate yourself on what a dictionary is.


--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Dictionary

The dictionary is a list of words with their definitions, a list of characters with their glyphs, or a list of words with corresponding words in other languages. In a few languages, words can appear in many different forms, but only the lemma form appears as the main word or headword in most dictionaries. Many dictionaries also provide pronunciation information; grammatical information; word derivations, histories, or etymologies; illustrations; usage guidance; and examples in phrases or sentences. Dictionaries are most commonly found in the form of a book, but more and more dictionaries are produced as software runs from electronic PDA or a general purpose computer. Some dictionary software are capable of speak out the word it contains, and so being called talking dictionary. Most dictionaries are produced by lexicographers.
--------------------------




Close. Words are defined by dictionaries, so that people can use them accurately.


Yeah, they’re called definitions, .

Oh geez, you’re pitiful.


Yeah really.

Here you go. Read…

--------------------------
From Wikipedia

Definition

A definition is a form of words which states the meaning of a term. The term to be defined is known as the definiendum (Latin: that which is to be defined). The form of words which defines it is known as the definiens (Latin: that which is doing the defining).
--------------------------


Of course they can. But that’s the key phrase... over time. That’s because it takes time for a large section of the populace to start using the word.

And even then it doesn’t guarantee the change in the meaning of the word; sometimes it just adds an extra definition. It’s the reason that some words have multiple definitions. But the definition can not be changed by one or two people on the fly because they want it to mean something different.





What’s sad is that you believe that lie you just spewed out. Thus showing that you are both truly ignorant, and totally a racist as I have proven earlier.


Nice try. But it does work. Because no matter how much you lie to yourself, on a basic conscious level, you know you fit the exact definition of the word.



Sorry black people CAN be racist. And you’re the PROOF!

The simple belief that one group can be evil and another group can’t be evil, because they are a part of a particular race, is outright racist.

That’s horrible all by itself
But your racism doesn’t stop there, it gets worse.

You put forth the notion that if white people engages in negative behavior, they’re racist, but if blacks engage in that exact same behavior, that they are immune from being racist, because they are a part of a particular race and therefore superior and immune.

My God, you sound like David Duke.

You keep missing my point by deliberately not trying to understand what I am saying and then refering to stuff I never said.

Stop ducking and hiding, answer the few point I made.




You said:
There’s nothing semantic about it, that’s the part that you don’t understand. Words have set meanings. You can’t make them up as you go along. That’s the reason you have dictionaries, thesauruses, and encyclopedias.


A dictionary is a credible source for the meaning of a word?????


Really???? So according to your theory it would seem that words are created by dictionaries and then put to use by people........

Close. Words are defined by dictionaries, so that people can use them accurately.

Words have set meanings????

Yeah, they’re called definitions,

So words can never change meaning over time?

Of course they can. But that’s the key phrase... over time. That’s because it takes time for a large section of the populace to start using the word. And even then it doesn’t guarantee the change in the meaning of the word; sometimes it just adds an extra definition. It’s the reason that some words have multiple definitions. But the definition can not be changed by one or two people on the fly because they want it to mean something different.


What’s sad is that you believe that lie you just spewed out. Thus showing that you are both truly ignorant, and totally a racist as I have proven earlier.


So because I dare challenge your words, I am a racist?????

Seems you have a superiority complex.............


Then you go on to spew your hate based on something I NEVER said????




Wow what is this, care to use a

button????
where did I say or allude to this:

You put forth the notion that if white people engages in negative behavior, they’re racist, but if blacks engage in that exact same behavior, that they are immune from being racist, because they are a part of a particular race and therefore superior and immune.




Just for you education:


In 2003, the NAACP convinced Merriam-Webster lexicographers to change the definition of the n-word in the dictionary to no longer mean African Americans but instead a racial slur. And while the battle to change the n-word in the American lexicon was a long and arduous one our culture’s neo revisionist use of the n-word makes it even harder to purge the sting of the word from the American psyche.

Why?

Because language is a representation of culture. Language reinscribes and perpetuates ideas and assumptions about race, gender, and sexual orientation we consciously and unconsciously articulate in our everyday conversations about ourselves and the rest of the world, and consequently transmit generationally.






You words are very angry..........

Check yourself.

 

[water]

As a side note,

People create words, not dictionaries.

People create words and give them meaning.
These words move into a societies lexicon.
Dictionaries attempt to define/explain them based on their usage in that particular society.

Words can change meaning over time.


Feel free to spout personal attacks and hate but what i just stated above cannot be denied.

 

[The Dark Mind]

You keep missing my point by deliberately not trying to understand what I am saying and then refering to stuff I never said.

LOL!!! No actually it's you who is deliberately not trying to understand. All my posts have been very straightforward. And I've sited all my sources.

And I've made sure respond under your points when responding to the stuff you said.

Stop ducking and hiding, answer the few point I made.

No ducking and hiding here. And I've already answered all your points. You're simply refusing to read.

So because I dare challenge your words, I am a racist?????

Aww. You're trying to deflect again.

Sorry won't play along.

I explained exactly why you are racist.

The simple belief that one group can be evil and another group can’t be evil, because they are a part of a particular race, is outright racist.

That’s horrible all by itself
But your racism doesn’t stop there, it gets worse.

You put forth the notion that if white people engages in negative behavior, they’re racist, but if blacks engage in that exact same behavior, that they are immune from being racist, because they are a part of a particular race and therefore superior and immune.

Also you show the notion that, because I don't believe the way you think a black person should believe, that I am somehow not black and that I use as you said "white logic". As if logic can have a color.

Seems you have a superiority complex.............

No it is you who has a superiority complex. It is you who feels that you have the right to judge who is and isn't white.

Here you are in action..

Here's a quote (1)

White logic............

Let me set a standard for you but I don't want to be held to it.

Here's another quote (2)

Meanwhile in another thread DarkMind pretends to be against the white institution he is defending in this thread:



Thus completing the cycle of white hypocrisy..........

Here's another quote (3)

Anybody on BGOL can vouch for my blackness, just take a look at most of my posts.

However the same cannot be said for "dark Mind"

Also

It is also you who feels that only whites are capable of degenerate behavior such as racism.

Here's another quote (4)

It has a different effect on white people however so you could rant and rave calling me a racist, it doesn't work, lol...........

The fact is black people CANNOT be racist.

Supremacist complex

Then you go on to spew your hate based on something I NEVER said????

Wow what is this, care to use a

button????

Sure! But be careful. The last time you challenged me to quote you, I was able to do so, and you got mad about it.


And besides, I've been quoting you through this entire post. I might as well continue.

where did I say or allude to this:

HERE....

another quote (5)

Calling me a racist does not have ANY effect on me. Why? I am BLACK and black people CANNOT be racist.

It has a different effect on white people however so you could rant and rave calling me a racist, it doesn't work, lol...........

The fact is black people CANNOT be racist.

As you can see here, you put forth the notion that if white people engages in negative behavior, they’re racist, but if blacks engage in that exact same behavior, that they are immune from being racist , because they are a part of a particular race. To make this double standard you would have to claim that one race was inherently superior morally and immune.

Just for you education:

In 2003, the NAACP convinced Merriam-Webster lexicographers to change the definition of the n-word in the dictionary to no longer mean African Americans but instead a racial slur. And while the battle to change the n-word in the American lexicon was a long and arduous one our culture’s neo revisionist use of the n-word makes it even harder to purge the sting of the word from the American psyche.

Why?

Because language is a representation of culture. Language reinscribes and perpetuates ideas and assumptions about race, gender, and sexual orientation we consciously and unconsciously articulate in our everyday conversations about ourselves and the rest of the world, and consequently transmit generationally.

Again this means nothing. Your attempts to deflect away from the point won't work. I've already stated that words change over time. But you can't make words up as you like on the fly.

Or have you forgot that conversation too?
Here's another quote (6)

So words can never change meaning over time?

Of course they can. But that’s the key phrase... over time. That’s because it takes time for a large section of the populace to start using the word. And even then it doesn’t guarantee the change in the meaning of the word; sometimes it just adds an extra definition. It’s the reason that some words have multiple definitions. But the definition can not be changed by one or two people on the fly because they want it to mean something different.

Nice try. But as you see, I have the "quote" button.

You words are very angry..........

No they're not words of anger. Just truthful observations. You probably just feel that they're angry because you are an angry person.

Actually it's sad reading some of your statements and posts because you do sound very angry. You need to get over your dislike of white people. Really.

Check yourself.

There's nothing to check. You're the racist here.

 

[Brown Bear]

150% co-sign on all this! In the Chicago area, when you compare Chinatown to ANY black are in the city, there's more businesses per block in the oriental community by a HUGE margin. They may have stores on the same block doing the same thing, but they all stay in business. I understand they all get together to buy merchandise too so if you're buying from one, you're helping all of them (economies of scale).

I've said it on this board, for awhile and I'll say it again:

1) Stop fretting over the white man. Focus on you!
2) Stop working for others, work for yourself!
3) Buy assets, not toys.

Hell yeah, but on the south side, it's like the Chinese disappeared, and Arabs took their place... ESPECIALLY in the "hunnids" (100s. any street past 100th street... ). Within the last two to three years, I've seen Hooks, Sharks, Captain Hooks, and any other iteration of a fast food fish shack pop up damn near everywhere. Those and the ABC cell phone places. And each and every one of those businesses - all within 2 blocks of each other - are owned and operated by the Arabs/Middle Easterners. One place on 103rd & King Drive just opened up claiming to be a "black owned" restaurant, I'm hoping that the dude that owns that place doesn't sell it to Hooks across the street.

All he'd need to do is clean that place the fuck up! I know it's in the hood and all, but DAYUM!


Good reads, btw Sorry I missed this last year.

 

[water]

It's amazing how the media refuse to understand this also.

Over-represented negative black stereotypes.......

Don't worry about me, I'm trying to even things out in this bitch cause I never heard you or your kind slamming O'reilly or FAUX NEWS with the same reasoning..........

You're not evening anything out. You're just misrepresenting facts and giving false information.

This has nothing to do with O'reilly (whom you obviously don't watch) or Fox News, which you obviously have a stereotypical false view of.

you kinda lost me on this one playa. Faux Noise is one of the most bigoted, racist, right wing news network in the country. Faux being anti-black is way past being stereotypical, its fact.

I'm sorry I lost you that point.

I still think all your points are valid.

But I can't run lockstep with everybody on the Fox News thing. I watch Fox News regularly and most of the people that criticize Fox News barely watch it at all.

When ever ask someone to cite anti-black rhetoric (in context of course), they can't.

They're either taking some clip they saw out of context, or they are just going by what someone else said. In order to critique something you have to watch it regularly enough to know what's going on.

So when people start talking about a two minute event on Fox News, and I've seen the WHOLE 1 hour show, I know whether or not to believe their account of that event.

Yes Fox has some biases. But as for being anti-black... I haven't seen it and I probably watch more than anyone here.

 

[water]

Bikini-clad fireman charged

April 6, 2007

A man wearing a woman's wig and a string bikini has been charged with taking a drunken afternoon romp through a park in Ohio, in the United States, officials said.

Steven Cole, a 46-year-old volunteer firefighter, told an officer he was on his way to a bar to perform as a woman in a contest offering a $US10,000 ($A12,240) prize, the arrest report said.

He pleaded not guilty today to charges of drunken driving, public indecency and disorderly conduct.

Cole was arrested Tuesday after police received a report that an intoxicated man was walking and driving around Heritage Oak Park in Mason. Police said Cole was wearing a blond wig, pink thongs and a red-black-and-white striped bikini with the top filled out by tan water balloons.

His blood-alcohol test registered 0.174, more than twice Ohio's legal driving limit of 0.08, the arrest report said.

"He is obviously humiliated and embarrassed by the entire situation," said Cole's lawyer, Charlie Rittgers, who added that he is investigating the circumstances that led to the arrest.

Cole did not return a call seeking comment. He remained free on his own recognisance until trial, set for May 24.

Cole has been a Wayne Township firefighter since 2000. Township officials said he will be placed on administrative leave.

 

[water]

Keith Richards says he snorted father's ashes

Stones guitarist mixed remains with cocaine — ‘it went down pretty well’

April 4, 2007

LONDON - Keith Richards has acknowledged consuming a raft of illegal substances in his time, but this may top them all.In comments published Tuesday, the 63-year-old Rolling Stones guitarist said he had snorted his father’s ashes mixed with cocaine.

“The strangest thing I’ve tried to snort? My father. I snorted my father,” Richards was quoted as saying by British music magazine NME.

“He was cremated, and I couldn’t resist grinding him up with a little bit of blow. My dad wouldn’t have cared,” he said, adding that “it went down pretty well, and I’m still alive.”

Richards’ father, Bert, died in 2002, at 84.

Richards, one of rock’s legendary wild men, told the magazine that his survival was the result of luck, and advised young musicians against trying to emulate him.

“I did it because that was the way I did it. Now people think it’s a way of life,” he was quoted as saying.

“I’ve no pretensions about immortality,” he added. “I’m the same as everyone ... just kind of lucky.

“I was No. 1 on the ‘who’s likely to die’ list for 10 years. I mean, I was really disappointed when I fell off the list,” Richards said.The rocker, who underwent an operation in New Zealand last year after reportedly falling out of a tree in Fiji, also took a swipe at some of the big musical acts of today.

“Everyone’s a load of crap,” he said. “They are trying to be somebody else, and they ain’t being themselves. Libertines, Arctic Monkeys, Bloc Party? Load of crap, load of crap. Posers, rubbish.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17933669/

 

[water]

Police: Man admits 40 molestations at day care

Husband of woman who ran in-home center allegedly began 30 years ago

April 5, 2007

STE. GENEVIEVE, Mo. - Al McDaniel waited nervously inside the Ste. Genevieve County Sheriff's Department Thursday as detectives interviewed his 6-year-old grandson. McDaniel hoped the interviews wouldn't confirm his worst suspicion — that William Huck Sr. molested the boy at the in-home day-care center Huck's wife operated.Huck was arrested March 25 and has since told authorities he molested 40 kids over 30 years, according to legal documents. He is charged with 13 counts of first-degree child molestation and four counts of statutory sodomy and is jailed on $1 million. Authorities say more charges, perhaps many more, are likely.

Huck does not yet have an attorney. Calls to his home were not returned, and no one answered the door there Thursday.

The alleged confession has people in this tight-knit community 50 miles south of St. Louis shocked and angry, with many wondering if their own children or grandchildren were among the victims.

"I just can't see someone abusing kids like that," McDaniel said. "You want to twist his head off. There's a whole flock of folks who probably have the same attitude about it."

Until late last month, Huck, 60, was simply a retired railroad worker with no criminal record. Authorities say there had never been allegations against him of any sort, much less something as serious as sexually abusing children.

4-year-old gave account to police
That changed March 24, when a couple told police their 4-year-old son had casually mentioned that Huck made him do things. The boy gave a detailed account to sheriff's deputies.

In an interview with deputies, Huck allegedly confessed to abusing the boy 12 times over the past year, and to abusing the boy's sister, now 10, when she attended the center. The current 17 charges all are for alleged abuse of the two siblings.

A probable cause statement said Huck admitted to widespread abuse over three decades. Police believe Huck's wife was completely unaware that anything was wrong.

Ste. Genevieve, founded along the Mississippi River by French settlers in 1735, was the first permanent European settlement in what is now Missouri. The community of 4,500 residents draws thousands of tourists each year for its quaint setting, antique stores, bed & breakfasts and tours of French Colonial buildings, many of which are on the National Register of Historic Places.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17971077/

 

[UltimateLurker]

i wish everyone either knew this, or had enough sense to look it up for themselves...

but we are still the face of CRIME in the US...

...despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

who gets arrested the most?

white males.

who gets sentenced the most?

white males.

who does DRUGS more than any other race in the US?

white people.

who drives drunk more often?

white people.

who commit moving vehicle violations that end in assault or death?

white folks.

who do you think of when the word "criminal" is spoken?

Willie Horton.

fucked up shit.

Ditto.........!
they ONLY make up like majority of th population

 

[The Dark Mind]

Proof that kayanation is biased and does not watch Fox News regularly

His statement

Write FAUX NEWS and all the other media outlets and tell them to report crime as it is represented.
Crime only has a black face.

My response

Again you don't watch Fox news. In a general 24 hour period, the majority of criminals shown either are white or hispanic.

Instant proof of his bias. Anybody who watches Fox even half way regularly or has scoured their website knows this. Most of their criminal reporting involves white criminals, illegal aliens, celebrity gossip, and missing white girls. Black criminals occasionally show up on Fox News, but the ratio is real low, and the crime has to be really bad. But as stated, for the most part, Fox New's criminal reporting involves white criminals, illegal aliens, celebrity gossip, and missing white girls.

His response

Thanks to Ten.

Notice here he doesn't know the context of the story associated with the photo. All he knows is that it is a picture on fox news.

my response

My point still stands: Again you don't watch Fox news. In a general 24 hour period, the majority of criminals shown either are white or hispanic.


Wait. Wait a minute...

I just know you didn't just put Barack up as a criminal??? Did you?

Also notice that we were talking about the black face of CRIMINALS on Fox News. In his rush to prove a point, and because he doesn't watch fox to know what's going on, he posts a picture of Barak Obama.

Only one problem. Barack is not a criminal.

He didn't know the context of the story and this proves it.

. . .

I asked him was he insinuating that Sen. Barack was a criminal.

Notice he didn't answer the question.

 

[The Dark Mind]

Arthur Mann Kills Ex-Girfriend Clara Riddles in CNN Center

At about 1:30 p.m. Tuesday, gunfire erupted inside the headquarters of Cable News Network, CNN. Moments later two people were lying on the ground with gunshot wounds, and the building's public-address system announced that there had been gunfire "with potential casualties."

According to eyewitnesses, a man grabbed a woman by her hair, and dragged her down a hallway near the ground floor escalators. The woman, who appeared to be pregnant, was screaming and crying. When she resisted, the man put the gun to her head and shot her at point blank range.

"We heard the shots, pop, pop, pop," Victoria Opalach, a visitor to the building, told the Associated Press yesterday afternoon. "Everybody stood up and started running."

Yesterday, CNN.com employee, Brad Lendon, said that he had been almost eye-to-eye with the gunman when the shooting took place.

"After he shot the woman, the man looked around, his head turning my way," Lendon said. "Replaying it in my mind now, he didn't seem agitated, wasn't looking around like you would expect someone who'd just shot someone. It wasn't like TV or movies. He looked around almost casually."

As people ran for cover, Capt. Odell Adams, a CNN security guard, shot the gunman. Police have not yet officially commented on the shooting; however, witnesses at the scene told CNN that the man had been shot in the face. Following the shooting, CNN evacuated several of their nearby offices.

As police arrived on the scene, CNN started broadcasting footage across the globe of a bleeding man lying on the ground inside their building. Reporters and visitors alike were stunned by the event, which had caused some to run for their lives. In the aftermath, everyone was busy trying to sort out what had happened.

Soon after the shooting, Arthur Mann and Clara Riddles were carried out of the building to nearby ambulances. According to police, a domestic dispute had triggered the incident. Mann was an ex-boyfriend of the victim. Police did not immediately identify the victim as Clara Riddles, and would only say that she was an employee of the Omni Hotel, which is attached to CNN Center.

Officer covers suspect

According to a spokeswoman for the Omni Hotel chain, twenty-two-year-old Clara Riddles of College Park had been employed for about a year, and her duties included the restocking of minibars in the hotel's guest rooms.

Riddles was pronounced dead on arrival at Atlanta's Grady Hospital.

Black Suspect Taken from Scene

Arthur Mann, who police said is in his late 30s, was in stable condition Tuesday night at Atlanta's Grady Hospital. Last night, he was undergoing surgery, and was in "severely critical condition," the hospital said.

 

[water]

Noted child psychiatrist accused of molestation

Police arrest suspect amid allegations of abuse dating back to 1960s

April 6, 2007


SAN MATEO, Calif. - A child psychiatrist who once headed the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry was arrested amid allegations he had molested male patients dating back to the 1960s.Dr. William Ayres, 75, was taken into custody Thursday at his San Mateo home and charged with 14 felony counts of lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14. The charges involve multiple victims, but authorities declined to say how many.

The arrest followed a four-year investigation.

Ayres, a prominent psychiatrist who retired last year, had been honored in 2002 by the San Mateo board of supervisors with a lifetime achievement award for “his tireless effort to improve the lives of children and adolescents.” He also served as president of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry from 1993 to 1995.

“The real tragedy here is that parents entrusted their children to this doctor for help, and they were victimized while in his care,” San Mateo police Capt. Mike Callagy said. “That’s so tragic.”

Ayres was being held on $1.5 million bail and was scheduled to be arraigned Friday.

His attorney did not return a phone call seeking comment and The Associated Press was not immediately able to reach Ayres’ family.

‘They should not do physical examinations’
Suspicions have dogged Ayres since 2003, when one former patient sued, accusing him of molesting him under the guise of a medical exam on several occasions in the late 1970s when the patient was 13.

In July 2005, the two sides reached a confidential settlement in which Ayres’ attorney said the psychiatrist did not concede any wrongdoing.

Ayres said under oath that he didn’t remember the alleged victim and denied molesting him. He acknowledged that he sometimes conducted physical exams of patients, according to a transcript of his deposition in the lawsuit.

“I do not think there is any standard of care that says it’s inappropriate for a physician who is a child psychiatrist, that they should not do physical examinations,” Ayres said, according to the transcript.

At least two other molestation reports against Ayres arose before the lawsuit, but one was determined to be “unfounded” in 1987, and the other alleged victim wouldn’t cooperate with police, according to court records.

In 2005, at least two other men said Ayres molested them when they were teens in the 1960s and 1970s, but authorities couldn’t proceed with the cases because the statute of limitations had expired, police reports show.

 

[water]

I'm sorry I lost you that point.

I still think all your points are valid.

But I can't run lockstep with everybody on the Fox News thing. I watch Fox News regularly and most of the people that criticize Fox News barely watch it at all.

When ever ask someone to cite anti-black rhetoric (in context of course), they can't.

They're either taking some clip they saw out of context, or they are just going by what someone else said. In order to critique something you have to watch it regularly enough to know what's going on.

So when people start talking about a two minute event on Fox News, and I've seen the WHOLE 1 hour show, I know whether or not to believe their account of that event.

Yes Fox has some biases. But as for being anti-black... I haven't seen it and I probably watch more than anyone here.

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/UY04gIruZ4E[/FLASH]

 

[The Dark Mind]

More proof that kayanation is biased and doesn't watch fox

[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/UY04gIruZ4E[/FLASH]

This is great! I've been waiting for you to post this.

(I wonder what took you so long?)

This has been posted here on BGOL several times and is floating around the net. I figured based on your arguments that you'd eventually get around to posting it.

And it illustrates EXACTLY what I've been saying about kayanation on this point.

kayanation doesn't actually watch fox news, or knows anything about it. He gets all his information from other web sites or biased sources and videos like this.

Take a look at this video. It's a bunch of sound bites taken out of context and strung together to push a political agenda.


Anybody can do this. And it's blatant.

For crying out loud, a lot of the clips in that vid don't even last 9 seconds. The average sound bite in the news lasts 30 seconds.

Just like the Barack picture above, you posted the vid not knowing the context of clips in the vid. You can take group of videos and if you chop them up right can make them look like anything.

What's crazy is that some of those interviews I personally remember watching and those interviews were anywhere from 7 to 10 minutes long, but instead we get 5 to 8 seconds! This is what you do when you want to splice together some clips to make it look like something it's not. Those of us who have seen the interviews and actually watch Fox regularly (unlike you) know that this is a bunch of garbage.

But what's even worse is even if you don't watch Fox, you should still be able to look at this vid and tell what what the makers of it where trying to do. 5 and 10 second clips??? strung together out of context??? Come on, you can do better.

Like I said before, and this now proves, you don't watch fox news.

Instead of watching Fox News on a regular basis, and thinking for yourself, instead you go to a bunch of biased political web sites to to be told how to think. Pitiful.

THANK YOU for posting this vid and illustrating my point.

 

[water]

Flight canceled after pilot drops F-bombs

Curse-laden cell phone conversation becomes rant at Northwest passenger

April 7, 2007

ROMULUS, Mich. - A Northwest Airlines flight was canceled because the pilot was yelling obscenities during a cell phone conversation while people were boarding, and cursed at one passenger, a federal official said Saturday.The pilot of the Las Vegas-to-Detroit flight was apparently in a heated cell phone conversation in the cockpit, then went into a lavatory, locked the door and continued the conversation, Federal Aviation Administration spokesman Ian Gregor said Saturday.

“Passengers who were boarding the aircraft could hear his end of it,” Gregor said.

Las Vegas police were sent Friday to McCarran International Airport to investigate, Gregor said. Authorities were told that the pilot cursed one passenger who confronted him, Gregor said.

"He was having a fit, swearing up a storm," a passenger on the flight told CNN. "He was saying 'F this' and 'F that.'"

When confronted about it by passengers, the pilot became "obscene" and began cursing at the customers, she said. "He made a big disturbance."

There were 180 passengers and five crew on the flight to Detroit Metropolitan Airport in Romulus, Northwest Airlines Corp. said in a statement.

The name of the captain, who Gregor described as a veteran pilot, wasn’t released.

Gregor said Northwest removed the pilot from the aircraft and returned him to his home base in Detroit for an investigation. He said it was up to Northwest to determine what would happen to the pilot.

Eagan, Minn.-based Northwest issued an apology to passengers and said the incident was under review.

Passengers were accommodated on other flights to their destinations, the airline said. They also were given meals and hotels during any additional time in Las Vegas.

The FAA plans to follow up with Northwest about the outburst, Gregor said.

 

[The Dark Mind]

And the lesson here kiddies is no matter what color you are...

Drugs are BAD for you.

Don't do drugs.

 

[D Town Redd]

i wish everyone either knew this, or had enough sense to look it up for themselves...

but we are still the face of CRIME in the US...

...despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

who gets arrested the most?

white males.

who gets sentenced the most?

white males.

who does DRUGS more than any other race in the US?

white people.

who drives drunk more often?

white people.

who commit moving vehicle violations that end in assault or death?

white folks.

who do you think of when the word "criminal" is spoken?

Willie Horton.

fucked up shit.

PREACH, BROTHA, PREACH!!!!



Fuck More BLACK COLLEGE PUSSY

 

[water]

Denied handgun, alleged killer bought shotgun

Legal loophole apparently helped Mich. accountant carry out office shooting


April 13, 2007

LANSING, Mich. - Despite being denied a permit by police to buy a handgun last month, Anthony LaCalamita III had no trouble buying a shotgun a few weeks later.Police say the accountant bought the 12-gauge shotgun Friday — the day after he was fired — and used it Monday to shoot three people at his former office in a Detroit suburb, killing a secretary and wounding two executives.

LaCalamita, 38, was able to buy the shotgun because Michigan, like all but four states, doesn’t require a permit to buy a shotgun or rifle. The state is one of only 12 states that require background checks for handgun buyers, but those buying shotguns or rifles need only pass an FBI criminal background check.

The discrepency is a legal loophole that needs to be closed, say gun control advocates like Paul Helmke, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence.

“The bottom line is, we make it awfully easy in this country to get weapons,” Helmke said.

Only 15 states do their own background checks on long gun buyers, while 26 do their own checks on people buying handguns, according to the Brady Campaign.

Helmke said more states should do background checks because they have better access to criminal databases than federal authorities do and state checks are often more thorough.

No mental health check
Despite what his estranged wife’s attorney said is a history of depression and mental health problems, there was apparently nothing in LaCalamita’s FBI background check that prevented him from buying the shotgun. It’s left up to applicants to admit on their FBI background check form if they have psychological problems.

When LaCalamita requested a handgun permit last month from the Troy Police Department, the check was much more extensive.

Department spokesman Lt. Gerry Scherlinck said he couldn’t comment on why the department chief turned down LaCalamita’s request for a handgun permit. But he said the department looks at records that go beyond arrests or convictions.

“Theoretically, you could have a clear criminal history but still have contacts with law enforcement that would not rise to the level of an arrest or conviction,” Scherlinck said. A police chief “can use those contacts to deny a permit whether or not those involved arrests that might show up on a criminal history.”

LaCalamita was arraigned Wednesday on one count of first-degree murder, two counts of intent to commit murder, three counts of possessing a firearm in the commission of a felony, and one count of fleeing and eluding police. A not guilty plea was entered for LaCalamita by the judge.

Police say LaCalamita walked into his former office as employees were scrambling to beat the approaching federal tax deadline and opened fire with the shotgun.