Houston super lawyer Tony Buzbee sues Deshaun Watson

What victim of sexual assault hasn't haggled over hush money instead of contacting the authorities. :smh: :lol:

Seriously, think how about wild this shit is. She now says she can't do her job but was willing to take $100K to "shut up"?

She's 32 and was in good health so lets assume she could do her bullshit massage work at least until she was 52. The "value" of her work was worth $5k per year? :smh::lol:

You have to consider this is the "strongest" victim Buzbee has or he wouldn't have trotted her out there. The others are going to be even more ridiculous.

Cacs will pretend that this shit isn't out there though...
They will act like, NOTHING TO SEE HERE! when it's convenient for them....fuck outta here hoes
 




gif-eating-popcorn-36.gif
 
:yes:

This whole shit is literally hoes being hoes. Watson is a dangerous, serial predator but for the low price of $$$.99 I will shut the fuck up and pretend that none of this happened. :smh::lol:
Fam when money is involved a hoe(s) is willing to fuck a camel and get shitted on. Afterwards the same hoe would post pictures of herself riding the aforementioned camel against a desert backdrop like life is sweet. I feel sorry for negros that trust hoes. History has taught us better.
 
You don't know hoes...

I'm trying very hard to be fair

But while everyone on espn was apparently so shaken by the victim's first live statement

Everyone I know?

And it was mostly women?

They were not impressed or convinced

actually it was the opposite.

I ain't saying she lying by any means

I'm just saying a whole lot of sensible reasonable professional women looked at her side eyed

And that moving gripping emotional plea?

Did not convince EVERYONE

And these same women also think Watson is freak with a serious fetish he need counseling for.
 
Another point that confused me

22 women with names and faces hidden accuse Watson and ask for money and don't go to the cops

That's their right and it's understood

18 women come forward publicly with their names and say he is a massage addict but he ain't no molester

But that is frowned on and seen as bad?

So there is no such thing as a character witness?

So all these so called journalists never seek corroboration when a source that wants to be remain unknown tells them something?

Can someone please explain that part to me?
 
Yo Deshaun you really go on dozens of these "massage sessions " and never ever record even ONE?

I thought that is exactly what athletes and celebrities of your generation do?
 
I will say this here

Why is a white woman or fair skinned woman's tears so apparently gut wrenching for the public...

But black folk tears have absolutely no effect?

Georgle Floyd's trial is on week 2 right now.

Defense is arguing that he was a crackhead that had an overdose. :smh:

People are reliving essentially a public lynching and testifying against a cop on a murder charge. Nobody gives a fuck that it is painful/emotionally damaging or that the witnesses are putting themselves at risk for retaliation from the cops. They are just doing their "civic" duty so a dangerous cop isn't just free to do it again. This is the legal system "working". Fair enough...

Now, contrast that to this shit. The "victims" cant possibly be expected to participate at all because of the pain it would cause. Even identifying them is too much, Watson should already know who is suing him and should settle. He is trying to "shame" them by actually litigating. :smh: You cant possible expect for victims to cooperate in a criminal investigation or trial or you risk making them relive their trauma...:smh:
 
Georgle Floyd's trial is on week 2 right now.

Defense is arguing that he was a crackhead that had an overdose. :smh:

People are reliving essentially a public lynching and testifying against a cop on a murder charge. Nobody gives a fuck that it is painful/emotionally damaging or that the witnesses are putting themselves at risk for retaliation from the cops. They are just doing their "civic" duty so a dangerous cop isn't just free to do it again. This is the legal system "working". Fair enough...

Now, contrast that to this shit. The "victims" cant possibly be expected to participate at all because of the pain it would cause. Even identifying them is too much, Watson should already know who is suing him and should settle. He is trying to "shame" them by actually litigating. :smh: You cant possible expect for victims to cooperate in a criminal investigation or trial or you risk making them relive their trauma...:smh:

Hold on.. I completely understand

I think Watson should have paid too

But if he REALLY thinks he ain't wrong

it can't be that.

So like you said murder victim public lynching right... unfortunately they really have no choice but to go through that process

Even With video evidence witnesses experts etc

It's crazy they have to still testify etc

But we have to accept an ACCUSATION to NOT be scrutinized?

Come on now.

Again I know how devastating assault is and then having to relive it unfortunately I seen children have to speak a few times when I was involved in social work.

It's harrowing unfair and just reopens deep emotional wounds

But to just dismiss the potential for fraud and deceit in this specific situation?

That just isn't fair, I know nothing is but how the hell is someone supposed to defend themselves THEN?

All I think is most reasonable people just want for the real victim to get a lawyer and go to law enforcement FIRST.

I know cops are are messed up I know the fear and the judgement attached. the accused may have power money influence

But never in our society is there a better time to go that route. 2021?

You WILL be heard. No one in law enforcement wants to be the one who covered up an assault during #metoo.

I just don't like a bunch of arm chair lawyers on TV questioning the validity of legal defense. If Watson defends himself he guilty he doesn't speak he guilty

This is horrible for the victim and accused.
 
I'm trying very hard to be fair

But while everyone on espn was apparently so shaken by the victim's first live statement

Everyone I know?

And it was mostly women?

They were not impressed or convinced

actually it was the opposite.

I ain't saying she lying by any means

I'm just saying a whole lot of sensible reasonable professional women looked at her side eyed

And that moving gripping emotional plea?

Did not convince EVERYONE

And these same women also think Watson is freak with a serious fetish he need counseling for.
That negro is out there bad but IMO he didn't do anything that is prosecutible. Being a freak or reprehensible is not illegal.
 

I think that because of the way this is written it'll get denied.

Yeah there's a possibility that this is being done to assassinate the character of Deshaun Watson, but to say that it's being done to enhance Buzbee's own public profile and enrich himself is bullshit.

In Houston there are names in the judicial system and in the city in general that you just know who they are just off name alone...

Paul Kubosh
Rusty Hardin
Ted Poe
Charles Adams (Big Angry)
Jim Adler

Buzbee is in that category. He don't need money or recognition. He all of that and then some.
 
That negro is out there bad but IMO he didn't do anything that is prosecutible. Being a freak or reprehensible is not illegal.

Here is yet another question...

All them celebrities be freaks

But they got their own private network and circles

Specifically to avoid ALL THIS

Watson ain't in the group chat?
 
That negro is out there bad but IMO he didn't do anything that is prosecutible. Being a freak or reprehensible is not illegal.

This shit has been public knowledge for almost a damn month now. No way in hell the police didn't investigate and reach the same conclusion.
 
Hold on.. I completely understand

I think Watson should have paid too

But if he REALLY thinks he ain't wrong

it can't be that.

So like you said murder victim public lynching right... unfortunately they really have no choice but to go through that process

Even With video evidence witnesses experts etc

It's crazy they have to still testify etc

But we have to accept an ACCUSATION to NOT be scrutinized?

Come on now.

Again I know how devastating assault is and then having to relive it unfortunately I seen children have to speak a few times when I was involved in social work.

It's harrowing unfair and just reopens deep emotional wounds

But to just dismiss the potential for fraud and deceit in this specific situation?

That just isn't fair, I know nothing is but how the hell is someone supposed to defend themselves THEN?

All I think is most reasonable people just want for the real victim to get a lawyer and go to law enforcement FIRST.

I know cops are are messed up I know the fear and the judgement attached. the accused may have power money influence

But never in our society is there a better time to go that route. 2021?

You WILL be heard. No one in law enforcement wants to be the one who covered up an assault during #metoo.

I just don't like a bunch of arm chair lawyers on TV questioning the validity of legal defense. If Watson defends himself he guilty he doesn't speak he guilty

This is horrible for the victim and accused.

:yes:

The thing that is wild to me is that we wouldn't know anything about this shit had he paid them. :smh:

That email about the 100K settlement offer should have been the end of this shit. You can't say I am afraid of him and he has caused me irreparable harm but I am willing to never speak on it again provided I get a check. :smh:

Lets say they honestly believe he is a super predator. They were going to just let him continue to "victimize" people provided that they got their hush money?

No difference in this shit and people who don't report abuse/molestation of children.
 
:yes:

The thing that is wild to me is that we wouldn't know anything about this shit had he paid them. :smh:

That email about the 100K settlement offer should have been the end of this shit. You can't say I am afraid of him and he has caused me irreparable harm but I am willing to never speak on it again provided I get a check. :smh:

Lets say they honestly believe he is a super predator. They were going to just let him continue to "victimize" people provided that they got their hush money?

No difference in this shit and people who don't report abuse/molestation of children.

Somebody please print this post and laminate it.
 
:yes:

The thing that is wild to me is that we wouldn't know anything about this shit had he paid them. :smh:

That email about the 100K settlement offer should have been the end of this shit. You can't say I am afraid of him and he has caused me irreparable harm but I am willing to never speak on it again provided I get a check. :smh:

Lets say they honestly believe he is a super predator. They were going to just let him continue to "victimize" people provided that they got their hush money?

No difference in this shit and people who don't report abuse/molestation of children.
I get it with the money though...

It's like, "I don't want to potentially ruin your reputation... I don't want to go what I perceive as "trauma" again... but I don't want you to go unpunished either... so let's just settle and I'll move on as best as I can."
 
I get it with the money though...

It's like, "I don't want to potentially ruin your reputation... I don't want to go what I perceive as "trauma" again... but I don't want you to go unpunished either... so let's just settle and I'll move on as best as I can."

I would normally agree but this isn't a disagreement over a car wreck or home repair etc. If it is a contract dispute or something, settlement makes perfect sense.

If you honestly believed you were sexually assaulted, no way would you even want the money. It would essentially be the price you were willing to accept for being assaulted. :smh:

I see cacs talking all of the time about the "payouts" to the families of victims of police brutality etc. It is a bit apples and oranges because the families don't have the power to "stop" the prosecution but can you honestly imagine any of them saying we will take the $ from the civil case and not even "bother" with the actual criminal case? :smh:
 
So y'all dudes believe all these chicks are lying and they need 20+ women to set him up :hmm:

Nah I believe them but until the woman that says he FORCED her to perform oral sex on him comes forward then the rest of the cases are bullshit. I 100% positive Every massage therapist knows there’s a seedy side to their profession and during their training they were told they would be in situations where a client would want more than a massage and how to handle it. Take the first accuser, Ashley Solis, for example she says Watson repeatedly asked her to touch his genital area but she ignored him and then at one point while she was massaging his thigh he moved his body so his penis touched her hand and she immediately ended the session, she later asked for $100k and was denied. Now imagine reading her report on what happened and then seeing her interview the other day where she is sobbing talking about she has panic attacks and had to stop doing massages. Another said he did the samething to her but she “shrugged it off as nerves” so continued with the massage, she said she had a second AND THIRD session with him where he acted the same way and by the third session she realized he wanted sex so she fired him as a client. Out of the 22 cases all but 2 followed this same scenario, one of the others said he forced her to perform oral sex on him and the other said he asked her to perform oral sex on him and she became confused and did it :hmm:
 
Nah I believe them but until the woman that says he FORCED her to perform oral sex on him comes forward then the rest of the cases are bullshit. I 100% positive Every massage therapist knows there’s a seedy side to their profession and during their training they were told they would be in situations where a client would want more than a massage and how to handle it. Take the first accuser, Ashley Solis, for example she says Watson repeatedly asked her to touch his genital area but she ignored him and then at one point while she was massaging his thigh he moved his body so his penis touched her hand and she immediately ended the session, she later asked for $100k and was denied. Now imagine reading her report on what happened and then seeing her interview the other day where she is sobbing talking about she has panic attacks and had to stop doing massages. Another said he did the samething to her but she “shrugged it off as nerves” so continued with the massage, she said she had a second AND THIRD session with him where he acted the same way and by the third session she realized he wanted sex so she fired him as a client. Out of the 22 cases all but 2 followed this same scenario, one of the others said he forced her to perform oral sex on him and the other said he asked her to perform oral sex on him and she became confused and did it :hmm:
Believe them...
 
Nah I believe them but until the woman that says he FORCED her to perform oral sex on him comes forward then the rest of the cases are bullshit. I 100% positive Every massage therapist knows there’s a seedy side to their profession and during their training they were told they would be in situations where a client would want more than a massage and how to handle it. Take the first accuser, Ashley Solis, for example she says Watson repeatedly asked her to touch his genital area but she ignored him and then at one point while she was massaging his thigh he moved his body so his penis touched her hand and she immediately ended the session, she later asked for $100k and was denied. Now imagine reading her report on what happened and then seeing her interview the other day where she is sobbing talking about she has panic attacks and had to stop doing massages. Another said he did the samething to her but she “shrugged it off as nerves” so continued with the massage, she said she had a second AND THIRD session with him where he acted the same way and by the third session she realized he wanted sex so she fired him as a client. Out of the 22 cases all but 2 followed this same scenario, one of the others said he forced her to perform oral sex on him and the other said he asked her to perform oral sex on him and she became confused and did it :hmm:
One said she got her mace because she feared for her safety and then went back to massaging him :smh: :lol:

I have a legit massage place that I went to regularly pre covid, and like you said, they would call the police immediately if anyone did anything close to what he is alleged to have done.

The easiest solution to all this shit is this: If anyone is too famous, too powerful etc. for you to hold them accountable maybe you shouldn't be interacting with them on any level.
 
Last edited:
I would normally agree but this isn't a disagreement over a car wreck or home repair etc. If it is a contract dispute or something, settlement makes perfect sense.

If you honestly believed you were sexually assaulted, no way would you even want the money. It would essentially be the price you were willing to accept for being assaulted. :smh:

I see cacs talking all of the time about the "payouts" to the families of victims of police brutality etc. It is a bit apples and oranges because the families don't have the power to "stop" the prosecution but can you honestly imagine any of them saying we will take the $ from the civil case and not even "bother" with the actual criminal case? :smh:
I'm not going into the minds and perceptions of a "victim." How they internalize what they perceive as trauma is not for me to decide. If that's what that person feels is the best course of action for them then so be it.
 
Back
Top