House Dems introduce bill to provide a $3K per child stipend for families for a year.

Women choose they men... you must forgot... KillaMayne strapped down with VENOMOUS GAME...and if a bitch ain't jivin with my Shawt cut conniving...I cant make her do a dam thang...they choose...what knicca they want...your wife chose you... brah
Nah, bruh. I chose her. I hit her over the head, and dragged her home by her hair caveman style! Ask the streets about Uncle Chuck! I'm G verified!
 
To be honest the people that wrote the bill are not thinking about broken families.

This is for people who pay $800 a month for the Japanese tutor.


Ok this is... this needs some amending because this doesn't sound right or I'm not reading it right

It's basically $500 - $600 a month for each child. The parents go thru an online IRS Portal that will be set up, input their income and then receive the monthly payment.


So now I'm really asking, what about those that pay child support? If somebody paying $800 a month for CS, now the chic could get up to an additional $300 PER CHILD, PER MONTH just because??

If she has 2 kids that's $1400 tax free hitting the account... that's like a 3rd full time job's paycheck... wtf?
 
so single men and older people with grown kids and no income dont matter. cool. good for single women getting an extra check plus support already. I'm sure the money will go to the kid.

i didnt even get a stimulus. you cant depend on the gub for anything. you have to make your own means to make it.
 
Confused by what you are trying to say. Can you rephrase please?

Also what is ironic about it all?

That's the world we're in. Look how the handouts gone up on top of the ones mentioned. Irony is that the multiple income stream plan of the rich is fed down bottom but not so much in the dying middle.
 
fuck the kids...
what I do know is if they give the non tax paying,not even citizen people 1400 an I dont get a check... Mexicans better not go to no check cashing round my way..cause im gonna get it the ski mask way...and I aint playing
 
fuck the kids...
what I do know is if they give the non tax paying,not even citizen people 1400 an I dont get a check... Mexicans better not go to no check cashing round my way..cause im gonna get it the ski mask way...and I aint playing

Ski mask even easier to don....with Covid...I'm wit the same shit... KillaMayne gone eat ..brah
 
Sounding kinda republican. Single women with kids are at a disadvantage.

so single men and older people with grown kids and no income dont matter. cool. good for single women getting an extra check plus support already. I'm sure the money will go to the kid.

i didnt even get a stimulus. you cant depend on the gub for anything. you have to make your own means to make it.
 
Sounding kinda republican. Single women with kids are at a disadvantage.
because of one issue? interesting. you think transgender men should play women's basketball and use women's bathrooms?

Single parents with kids are at a disadvantage. If the father contributes, where is his cut? And how can you ensure the money is going to the child?
 
Confused by what you are trying to say. Can you rephrase please?

Also what is ironic about it all?

The rich get rich off of multiple streams of income (Real Estate, Stocks, High position employment, Arbitrage, etc...) . Lower income subsidies come in multiple streams as well (Social security, Medicare, tax benefits, grants, etc...)

Middle income families are usually tied to demanding jobs or businesses where the time is spent on one good stream of income.

This also ties into credo of the rich. Never trade time for money. Time is priceless. Both the top and bottom spend their time very leisurely...
 
Ignoring the transgender comment b/c this isn't what this thread is about.

Based on your comment about aid, that is how Republicans sound that is why I said it.

Anyways, women are paid less than men and are usually stuck with the kids.

There is no guarantee the money goes to the kid. Those are the brakes.

How about don't go raw? If you can't handle the shit without a check from the gov't, don't have kids man.

Having kids is a CHOICE!!

because of one issue? interesting. you think transgender men should play women's basketball and use women's bathrooms?

Single parents with kids are at a disadvantage. If the father contributes, where is his cut? And how can you ensure the money is going to the child?
 
Thanks. Ok. I see your points now.

The rich get rich off of multiple streams of income (Real Estate, Stocks, High position employment, Arbitrage, etc...) . Lower income subsidies come in multiple streams as well (Social security, Medicare, tax benefits, grants, etc...)

Middle income families are usually tied to demanding jobs or businesses where the time is spent on one good stream of income.

This also ties into credo of the rich. Never trade time for money. Time is priceless. Both the top and bottom spend their time very leisurely...
 
Damned if I know bro. Not sure what you mean by "fault".

You mean how they had a baby or how they single?

However single mothers all by themselves, need aid.

You don't agree?

Hell naw... did they get raped? Why didn't they get married before they had sex? It's they Muffuckin fault.. brah
 
Ignoring the transgender comment b/c this isn't what this thread is about.

Based on your comment about aid, that is how Republicans sound that is why I said it.

Anyways, women are paid less than men and are usually stuck with the kids.

There is no guarantee the money goes to the kid. Those are the brakes.

How about don't go raw? If you can't handle the shit without a check from the gov't, don't have kids man.

Having kids is a CHOICE!!
actually it is since you said i sound republican but I don't agree with every thing Democrat so I want to know if you do. You don't want to because it was a check. Stop using political parties to protect weak arguments.

thank you for being honest. Same goes to her about going raw. It is a choice so why does she get paid for spreading her legs when a responsible person doesn't? That's her responsibility. Instead of fixing the issue, your response is that is is solely the man's responsibility not to go raw and no fault for the woman. That's sexism, which I believe is against Democrat values. And you will give money away without any checks in place to know where it's going. Yeah, that's smart.

If your argument is to help the kids, fine, but I would like for them to have vouchers into school, clothes, and food.
 
Ok. So you don't think single mothers who have to watch their kids and take care of them all alone should get aid?

You know in other countries they get aid?

Daycare, pre-k and baby sitters. How is a child going to get a head start in learning in this global market place?

A woman makes a "mistake" and her and her children are supposed to suffer in it?

These disadvantaged children are human beings brother. They grow up and they live amongst us.


Hell naw... did they get raped? Why didn't they get married before they had sex? It's they Muffuckin fault.. brah
 
Wait you checking me? How you checking me? I missed it. I didn't say you sound like a Republican in everything you believe in. How could I?
We were talking about one specific thing weren't we? That is why I said don't talk about nothing else. I aint talking about that.

Anyways, we live in a society were we have the responsibility to help those in need.

We are all connected so the mother who has kids and needs help should get help.

It is for the betterment of society.

actually it is since you said i sound republican but I don't agree with every thing Democrat so I want to know if you do. You don't want to because it was a check. Stop using political parties to protect weak arguments.

thank you for being honest. Same goes to her about going raw. It is a choice so why does she get paid for spreading her legs when a responsible person doesn't? That's her responsibility. Instead of fixing the issue, your response is that is is solely the man's responsibility not to go raw and no fault for the woman. That's sexism, which I believe is against Democrat values. And you will give money away without any checks in place to know where it's going. Yeah, that's smart.

If your argument is to help the kids, fine, but I would like for them to have vouchers into school, clothes, and food.
 
Wait you checking me? How you checking me? I missed it. I didn't say you sound like a Republican in everything you believe in. How could I?
We were talking about one specific thing weren't we? That is why I said don't talk about nothing else. I aint talking about that.

Anyways, we live in a society were we have the responsibility to help those in need.

We are all connected so the mother who has kids and needs help should get help.

It is for the betterment of society.
you just ignored the latter part of what I said and didn't address how to do it responsibly.
 
Ok. So you don't think single mothers who have to watch their kids and take care of them all alone should get aid?

You know in other countries they get aid?

Daycare, pre-k and baby sitters. How is a child going to get a head start in learning in this global market place?

A woman makes a "mistake" and her and her children are supposed to suffer in it?

These disadvantaged children are human beings brother. They grow up and they live amongst us.
Thanks for saying this.

In other countries, the children are provided an education, an account that only pays for the child and their expenses, and items tracked. Payments to housing, daycare, and bills with a stipend.

Moms just don't get a check to spend on a new weave. If you are just going to give away money, it should be to everyone hurting unless you can show me it's going to the child.
 
Ok this is... this needs some amending because this doesn't sound right or I'm not reading it right

It's basically $500 - $600 a month for each child. The parents go thru an online IRS Portal that will be set up, input their income and then receive the monthly payment.


So now I'm really asking, what about those that pay child support? If somebody paying $800 a month for CS, now the chic could get up to an additional $300 PER CHILD, PER MONTH just because??

If she has 2 kids that's $1400 tax free hitting the account... that's like a 3rd full time job's paycheck... wtf?
Stop nutting in these hoes lil nigga
 
Back
Top