Health Update: First Convid-19 Vaccine tested in US shows positive immune response (Trump involvement in any part of this process is problematic)

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster



Volunteer who died in AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine trial may have been part of a placebo group

Brazilian health authority Anvisa says a volunteer in a clinical trial of the COVID-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University has died from COVID-19 complications, according to Reuters. Brazilian newspaper O Globo, citing unnamed sources, reported the 28-year-old man from Rio de Janeiro did not take the trial vaccine and suggested he was given a placebo. The clinical trial of the potential vaccine is set to continue in Brazil.
 

MistaPhantastic

Rising Star
Platinum Member
It took them longer than normal to come up with that spin.
They know from the start who is in the placebo group and who is in the vaccine group.
Also, they initially said "complications" instead of death. Well, death is a complication.
These MFs want that Christmas bonus!
 

easy_b

Look into my eyes you are getting sleepy!!!
BGOL Investor
It took them longer than normal to come up with that spin.
They know from the start who is in the placebo group and who is in the vaccine group.
Also, they initially said "complications" instead of death. Well, death is a complication.
These MFs want that Christmas bonus!
This is why the vaccine is not out yet they tried but reality got in the way.
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
In April 1984, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler made a hopeful statement about an HIV vaccine, based on a conversation she’d had with the virus’s co-discoverer, Robert Gallo: she said in a press conference that “We hope to have a vaccine ready for testing in about two years.”[3] Certainly, this prediction was overly optimistic, given that most vaccines take 10-20 years to develop. But 30 years later, why is there no licensed HIV vaccine?



We are all going to die.

It looks like we got another retarded scheme going here to waste my time, and keep me in this country for another decade because you are unable to accept rejection.
 
Last edited:

MistaPhantastic

Rising Star
Platinum Member
In April 1984, U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Margaret Heckler made a hopeful statement about an HIV vaccine, based on a conversation she’d had with the virus’s co-discoverer, Robert Gallo: she said in a press conference that “We hope to have a vaccine ready for testing in about two years.”[3] Certainly, this prediction was overly optimistic, given that most vaccines take 10-20 years to develop. But 30 years later, why is there no licensed HIV vaccine?



We are all going to die.

It looks like we got another retarded scheme going here to waste my time, and keep me in this country for another decade because you are unable to accept rejection.

HIV has been cured. I was at the CROI conference in the room when they announced it to the world. Its a drug cocktail.
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
I got banned from a thread about somebody dying from COVID and called a moron, yet I was one of the most vocal people on here discussing the disease. While everybody else was spinning COVID as being another flu, I was doing detailed analysis based on data coming out of China.
 

jack walsh13

Jack Walsh 13
BGOL Investor

Now that's interesting :puzzled:

qjQr6W.jpg
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Dolly Parton, Country Saint, Funded Moderna’s Coronavirus Vaccine
By Devon Ivie@devonsaysrelax
Photo: Taylor Hill/Getty Images

e4d8bc868fe2a1a669be40a18f7a19d62c-dolly-parton.rsquare.w330.jpg


Vaccine, vaccine, vaccine, vacciiiiiiine, Dolly Parton would be begging to be included in your trial, but she’s an angel and would never ask that. So we will instead, for this very reason: It’s been discovered that the country icon was one of the major funders for Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine, which has proved to be nearly 95 percent effective in early data. (Suck it, Pfizer, with your measly and Kid Rockian 90 percent.) Per The Guardian and confirmed by The New England Journal of Medicine, the Dolly Parton COVID-19 Research Fund donated a whopping $1 million to the Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation in Nashville, Tennessee. Parton befriended one of the institute’s doctors years ago while seeking treatment after a car accident, and initiated her donation earlier this year after being told “some exciting advancements” were being made with vaccines. Her donation is also supporting a convalescent-plasma study, and, presumably, Christmas magic.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
There is no vaccine for misinformation

The COVID-19 pandemic, which has already killed more than 250,000 people in the United States, is raging. This month, however, there was a potential light at the end of the tunnel. Pfizer and Moderna released the initial results of their Phase III coronavirus vaccine trials. Both companies reported their vaccines were more than 90% effective with no serious safety concerns. This far exceeded the government requirement that vaccine candidates be at least 50% effective. Both companies say they plan to ask the FDA for an emergency use authorization this year. It brought hope that, sometime next year, the virus can be brought under control.

But the vaccines only work if enough people take them. And it's far from certain that this will happen in the United States.
A Gallup poll released on Tuesday found that 58% of Americans would be willing to be vaccinated against COVID. That still leaves 42% of Americans who, thus far, would be unwilling to receive a vaccine. The finding represents an improvement from September which found 50% of Americans would not take a COVID vaccine. But the results are "still indicative of significant challenges ahead for public health and government officials in achieving mass public compliance with vaccine recommendations."

It could require 70% or more of Americans to develop immunity to COVID — either through being infected with the virus or a vaccine — for the pandemic to end. So the reluctance of many Americans to be vaccinated could have significant consequences.

Over the last couple of years, the company has announced a series of steps to limit vaccine misinformation on the platform. In March 2019, Facebook said it would "to tackle vaccine misinformation on Facebook by reducing its distribution and providing people with authoritative information on the topic." The company said it would take action against Pages and groups that post "vaccine hoaxes," as identified by the World Health Organization and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In October 2020, Facebook expanded its policy and said it would begin "rejecting ads globally that discourage people from getting a vaccine." Critically, this policy does not apply to organic content. So users can continue to post vaccine misinformation — including misinformation intended to discourage people from getting a vaccine — on Facebook.

While it is clear Facebook has taken steps to reduce the distribution of vaccine misinformation, a Popular Information investigation reveals it continues to find substantial audiences on the platform. Further, Facebook's efforts to counteract vaccine misinformation are often confusing and opaque.

The state of vaccine misinformation on Facebook

It's not hard to find coronavirus vaccine misinformation on Facebook. Bradlee Dean’s Facebook page has over 752,000 followers and is a “super-spreader” of health misinformation. The page features a verified Facebook badge and is listed as “Media/News Company.”

This week, Dr. Carrie Madej joined Dean on Facebook Live and falsely alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine will genetically modify recipients’ DNA. This is a common myth among anti-vaxxers, but has been repeatedly debunked by experts. It is not possible for mRNA vaccines to alter your DNA. Madej adds that this “genetic modification” could lead to humans who are “more cyborg than human” and are “harder to kill,” resulting in a situation she likens to the film “I Am Legend.”
https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F64aa1946-c07d-4efd-a6bb-035e91b00063_670x427.jpeg


Madej also falsely claimed that coronavirus vaccines will contain cancer-causing viruses, bacterium, and HIV. “They're covering this up...The vaccines themselves are causing HIV. We need to be really careful, infections are in there as well,” said Madej. Since Monday, Madej’s interview with Dean has garnered 6,200 views and has been shared at least 160 times.

The Facebook page WorldTruth.TV, which has 1.7 million followers, recently shared a post with the headline “Corrupt Vaccine Industry Has The Motive To Stage A Massive False Flag ‘Outbreak’ To Demand Nationwide Vaccine Mandates.” In the piece, the author argues that vaccine manufacturers are conspiring with the government to spread disease and place the government in “absolute control over your body.”

The Stop Mandatory Vaccination Facebook page has more than 168,000 followers. The page, which mostly shares anecdotes of those who claim “vaccine injury,” is run by Larry Cook – a “healthy lifestyle advocate” who has managed to earn significant income by selling self-published books. He also raised money for his work on GoFundMe before he was banned from the platform last year.

On October 18, the page claimed that “EVERY VACCINATION CAUSES HARM.” A week later, the page asserted that vaccines are “composed of multiple toxic and dangerous ingredients that *always* cause some harm - or cause GREAT HARM - to those who receive them.”

A few hours after Popular Information contacted Facebook for comment, the entire Stop Mandatory Vaccination page was removed. Facebook claimed the removal was a result of the page violating Facebook's QAnon policy.

"We are committed to reaching as many people as possible with accurate information about vaccines, and launched partnerships with WHO and Unicef to do that. We've banned ads that discourage people from getting vaccines and reduced the number of people who see vaccine hoaxes verified by the WHO and the CDC. We also label Pages and Groups that repeatedly share vaccine hoaxes, lower their posts in News Feed, and do not recommend them to anyone," Facebook spokesperson Dani Lever said in a statement to Popular Information.

There was no label on any of the Facebook pages featured in this report that identified them as a source of vaccine misinformation.

Critical information remains hidden from most users

Many articles shared on Facebook feature an “About This Content” label displayed in the corner of the post. The label highlights general information about the outlet that a link is from, notes if the outlet has recently shared false news, and features additional content from the outlet. In essence, it provides users with context on the reliability of a link.

Despite this seemingly important function, however, these information labels are small and barely noticeable. In other words, users can unknowingly interact with misleading or false content unless they notice and click on the label.

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), for example, is one of the nation’s leading sources of vaccine misinformation. Its Facebook page, which has over 209,500 followers, frequently amplifies content from news outlets that push false information.

Yet, when browsing through the page’s feed, the NVIC appears as though it’s a reliable source of information. Although most of the links feature information labels, there is nothing obvious that signals to the user that the content is unreliable.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F2814fe98-d94c-4c60-936b-64a9772518d9_698x748.png


Without clicking on the information label, a user would not know, for instance, that a post came from a site that Facebook’s independent fact-checkers have identified to frequently publish false information.

Additionally, Facebook provides links to more content from the same unreliable sources.

The broader issue is Facebook’s failure to disclose how frequently the NVIC shares information from false news sources. Seven of the 10 most recently shared links on the NVIC’s page, Popular Information found, came from outlets that Facebook’s independent fact-checkers have flagged for misinformation.

YouTube takes aggressive action, lacks follow through

While Facebook allows vaccine misinformation to be published on its platform with somewhat reduced distribution, YouTube recently decided to ban it entirely. On October 14, YouTube announced that videos with claims "about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or WHO" would be removed. "A COVID-19 vaccine may be imminent, therefore we’re ensuring we have the right policies in place to be able to remove misinformation related to a COVID-19 vaccine,” Farshad Shadloo, a YouTube spokesman, told The Verge. YouTube also said it would reduce the spread of "borderline" content about vaccines.

But YouTube's implementation of its policy is lacking. Bradlee Dean's video from Monday, which is full of the kind of information YouTube says it would remove, is still available on the platform and has been viewed thousands of times. Dean's guest, Dr. Carrie Madej, also maintains a popular YouTube page which she uses to spread misinformation about vaccines.

Larry Cook, who ran the Stop Mandatory Vaccinations page on Facebook, maintains a YouTube channel with over 50,000 subscribers.
WorldTruth.tv also has a smaller YouTube channel that includes vaccine misinformation.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe524aeb1-1e6a-4cb2-8976-3fa30f5550df_788x904.png
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Fever, aches from Pfizer, Moderna jabs aren’t dangerous but may be intense for some
By Meredith WadmanNov. 18, 2020 , 6:00 PM

Science’s COVID-19 reporting is supported by the Pulitzer Center and the Heising-Simons Foundation.

SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

Get more great content like this delivered right to you!



This summer, Luke Hutchison, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology–educated computational biologist, volunteered for a trial of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. After he got the second injection, his arm immediately swelled up to the size of a “goose egg,” Hutchison says. He can’t be sure he got the vaccine and not a placebo, but within a few hours, the healthy then-43-year-old was beset by bone and muscle aches and a 38.9°C fever that felt, he says, “unbearable.” “I started shaking. I had cold and hot rushes,” he says. “I was sitting by the phone all night long thinking: ‘Should I call 911?’”

Hutchison’s symptoms resolved after 12 hours. But, he says, “Nobody prepared me for the severity of this.”

Related
See all of our coverage of the coronavirus outbreak
He says the public should be better prepared than he was, because a subset of people may face intense, if transient, side effects, called reactogenicity, from Moderna’s vaccine. Some health experts agree.

“Somebody needs to address the elephant: What about vaccine reactogenicity? While it’s safe, [and] it’s not going to cause any long-term issues … how is that perception going to go with the public once they start receiving it?” says Deborah Fuller, a vaccinologist at the University of Washington, Seattle, whose lab is developing second-generation RNA vaccines against COVID-19. She worries the side effects could feed vaccine hesitancy. “I feel like it’s being glossed over.”

Those concerns arise after a week of good news about coronavirus vaccines: Both Moderna and Pfizer, with BioNTech, announced that their messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines reached 95% efficacy in clinical trials of tens of thousands of people. The trials revealed no serious safety concerns, both companies added.

Both vaccines consist of a snippet of genetic code directing production of the coronavirus’ spike protein, delivered in a tiny fat bubble called a lipid nanoparticle. Some suspect the immune system’s response to that delivery vehicle is causing the short-term side effects.

Those transient reactions should not dissuade people from getting vaccinated in the face of a pandemic virus that kills at least one in 200 of those it infects, says Florian Krammer, a vaccinologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who participated in Pfizer’s pivotal trial. Sore arms, fevers, and fatigue are “unpleasant but not dangerous. I’m not concerned about [reactogenicity],” he says.

And most people will escape “severe” side effects, defined as those that prevent daily activity. Fewer than 2% of recipients of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines developed severe fevers of 39°C to 40°C. But if the companies win regulatory approvals, they’re aiming to supply vaccine to 35 million people globally by the end of December. If 2% experienced severe fever, that would be 700,000 people.

Other transient side effects would likely affect even more people. The independent board that conducted the interim analysis of Moderna’s huge trial found that severe side effects included fatigue in 9.7% of participants, muscle pain in 8.9%, joint pain in 5.2%, and headache in 4.5%. For the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, the numbers were lower: Severe side effects included fatigue (3.8%) and headache (2%).

That’s a higher rate of severe reactions than people may be accustomed to. “This is higher reactogenicity than is ordinarily seen with most flu vaccines, even the high-dose ones,” says Arnold Monto, an epidemiologist at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.

Front-line public health workers should prepare their messages, says Bernice Hausman, an expert on vaccine controversy at the Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine. “Public health professionals are going to have to have a story that gets out in front of [stories like Hutchison’s]—that responds to the way that people are going to try to make that a story about vaccine injury.”

Transparency is key, Hausman emphasizes. Rather than minimizing the chance of fever, for instance, vaccine administrators could alert people that they may experience a fever that can feel severe but is temporary. “That would go a significant way toward people feeling like they are being told the truth.” Adds Drew Weissman, an immunologist at the University of Pennsylvania whose work contributed to both vaccines: “The companies just have to warn people: ‘This is what you need to expect. Take Tylenol and suck it up for a day.’”

Hausman also sees a need to support people who have serious reactions. “The real question is whether or not there is going to be an apparatus set up to support the experience of people going through [experiences like Hutchison’s]. Like a hotline with a nurse triaging … and figuring out if you need to go to the hospital or not. Will your medical expenses be covered if you do? These are important questions.”

Both Moderna’s and Pfizer/BioNTech’s vaccines require two doses separated by several weeks. Reactogenicity is typically higher after a second dose, Weissman says. The side effects “mean the vaccine is working well. … [It] means you had such a good immune response to the first dose and now you are seeing the effects of that,” he says. (Weissman co-invented the mRNA modifications that both Moderna and BioNTech have licensed to make their vaccines, and he receives royalties from the companies.)

“We suspect the lipid nanoparticle causes the reactogenicity, because lipid nanoparticles without mRNA in them do the same thing in animals,” Weissman says. “We see production, in the muscle, of inflammatory mediators that cause pain, [redness], swelling, fever, flulike symptoms, etc.”

Ian Haydon, who received the highest dose of the Moderna vaccine in its first human trial, knows what that’s like. (He received 250 micrograms, but partly in response to reactions like his, the company chose to take forward a lower dose of 100 micrograms.)

Twelve hours after receiving his second injection in May, Haydon got chills as well as “headache, muscle ache, fatigue, nausea,” and had a fever of 39.6°C. He went to urgent care, and later vomited and fainted before the symptoms receded, roughly 24 hours after they started, he says.

But Haydon says his experience was “a small price to pay” for the possibility of returning to normal life. “For me, this was a rough day. But if you compare it to what COVID can do, I think it really pales in comparison.”

Longer term side effects of mRNA vaccines remain theoretical. They include the possibility that people with lupus, whose disease is driven by antibodies against their own genetic code, could experience flare-ups because of the revved up immune response induced by the vaccines, says Sarfaraz Hasni, director of lupus clinical research at the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

But there’s no evidence currently that mRNA vaccines cause autoimmune disease or make it worse, says Betty Diamond, an immunologist and rheumatologist at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research of Northwell Health. “At the moment there’s every reason to suggest that people with autoimmune diseases ought to get either of these vaccines when they get rolled out.”

As for more general public acceptance of the vaccines, Weissman notes that the new shingles vaccine, Shingrix, can also cause significant transient reactions. In a large, pivotal trial of people 50 and older, Shingrix caused severe reactions including pain at the injection site and muscle aches, in 17% of vaccine recipients. Yet demand for that vaccine, licensed in 2017, has been huge.

Hausman says the reported 95% efficacy of both mRNA COVID-19 vaccines bodes well for acceptance. “If you know that a vaccine is really effective, like measles, in making sure you don’t get the infection, then you might be willing to accept a more severe initial reaction.”

Hutchison agrees. Although he hopes better vaccines are on the way, “Given that COVID can kill or incapacitate people, everybody should bite the bullet and expect a rough night,” he says. “Get lots of naproxen.”

*Correction, 20 November, 3:45 p.m.: This article has been updated to reflect that severe vaccine side effects are defined as preventing daily activities, and that Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna hope to provide vaccines for 35 million people worldwide by the end of December.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster



Obama, Bush and Clinton say they will take the COVID-19 vaccine publicly to gain public trust

Former US presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton have volunteered to get their COVID-19 vaccines on camera once it's been deemed safe by the Food and Drug Administration in an effort to gain trust from Americans who are hesitant about the vaccine's safety.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster





Leticia-Wright-Anti-Vaccine-Video.jpg

Leticia-Wright-Anti-Vaccine-Tweets.jpg


Leticia-Wright-Anti-Vaccine-Response.jpg


For those who don’t know, “Antivaxxer” is a portmanteau describing people who adhere to a broad range of unfounded conspiracy theories about vaccinations (anti-vaccine). The movement, which grew primarily thanks to a thoroughly debunked scientific fraud that falsely asserted vaccination played a role in autism and also incorporates other false claims, has gained widespread support over the last 20 years with extremely dangerous consequences.

For instance, the return of deadly diseases previously believed to be largely eliminated has been directly linked to a rise in antivaxxer adherents, including multiple outbreaks of measles, tetanus, and even polio. In fact, there was a 30% increase in measles worldwide in 2019, which health experts directly attribute to growing opposition to vaccines.

Also Read:LA Theaters to Stay Closed for 3 More Weeks as COVID-19 Cases Continue to Rise

In short, the growing popularity of anti-vaccination conspiracy theories is literally killing people. Which probably explains why so many of Wright’s fans took issue when she shared a video attempting to discourage people from taking COVID-19 vaccines, and then began arguing about it with her followers.


Wright’s initial tweet was quickly ratio’d — i.e., when replies to a tweet vastly outnumber likes or retweets, almost always an indicator the majority of people object to what was said — as people flocked to essentially beg her to recant. Many pointed out that the video she shared also included transphobic and climate denialist content. Other simply pointed out the irresponsibility of encouraging people not to get vaccinated in the middle of a plague. And activist and author Mikki Kendall explained in a lengthy thread her views on the dangers of conspiracy theories and the people who peddle them, which we’ve embedded in full below.

But a great many just expressed their disappointment through jokes and mockery.

Wright frequently responded to people, but curiously she also occasionally liked tweets calling for her to be fired or for “Black Panther 2” to be canceled.

Representatives for Marvel and Wright didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment from TheWrap. Wright’s Marvel Cinematic Universe coworker Don Cheadle initially quote tweeted her saying “Bye Letitia,” a pun on the phrase “Bye, Felicia” usually used to dismiss unpleasant people. However in a series of follow up tweets Cheadle insisted he meant no ill will and considers Wright “my lil sis.”


















 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Anti-Vaccine Doctor Has Been Invited to Testify Before Senate Committee
The selection of Dr. Jane M. Orient as federal health officials are trying to promote a vaccine to end the coronavirus pandemic prompted harsh criticism from Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York.

06virus-briefing-orient2-jumbo.jpg


Dr. Jane M. Orient is the executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a group that opposes government involvement in medicine.Credit...Scott Schauer
By Sheryl Gay Stolberg
  • Dec. 6, 2020
WASHINGTON — A doctor who is skeptical of coronavirus vaccines and promotes the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as a Covid-19 treatment will be the lead witness at a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Tuesday, prompting criticism from Democrats who say Republicans should not give a platform to someone who spreads conspiracy theories.

Dr. Jane M. Orient is the executive director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a group that opposes government involvement in medicine and views federal vaccine mandates as a violation of human rights.

“A public health threat is the rationale for the policy on mandatory vaccines. But how much of a threat is required to justify forcing people to accept government-imposed risks?” Dr. Orient wrote in a statement to the Senate last year, calling vaccine mandates “a serious intrusion into individual liberty, autonomy and parental decisions.”

In a phone interview on Sunday, Dr. Orient, an internist who received her medical degree from Columbia University in New York, resisted being cast as an “anti-vaxxer” and said she would not get a coronavirus vaccine because she had an autoimmune condition. She added that she opposed the government’s push for all Americans to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, noting that both vaccine candidates — one made by the Pfizer and the other by Modernause a new scientific method.



“It seems to me reckless to be pushing people to take risks when you don’t know what the risks are,” Dr. Orient said, adding: “People’s rights should be respected. Where is ‘my body, my choice’ when it comes to this?”

Her selection as a witness as federal health officials are trying to promote a vaccine as a way to end a pandemic that has killed more than 281,000 Americans prompted harsh criticism from Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the minority leader.


“At such a crucial time, giving a platform to conspiracy theorists to spread myths and falsehoods about Covid vaccines is downright dangerous and one of the last things Senate Republicans should be doing right now,” Mr. Schumer said in a statement on Sunday.

But at least two Republican House members — Representative Andy Biggs of Arizona and Representative Jeff Duncan of South Carolina — appeared to embrace Dr. Orient’s warnings against government mandates. They took to Twitter to express those views.

“Americans should have the freedom to take the COVID vaccine,” Mr. Duncan wrote on Saturday. “Americans should also have the freedom to decline the vaccine.”


A spokesman for the chairman of the Senate committee, Senator Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin, did not immediately return an email message asking why Dr. Orient had been invited to testify.

Federal health officials are trying to enlist lawmakers in a campaign to encourage Americans to accept the new vaccines. An F.D.A. advisory committee will meet on Thursday to review data on the safety and efficacy of Pfizer’s vaccine candidate. If the agency grants the vaccine emergency authorization, rollout could begin shortly after.

In a private briefing with a bipartisan group of senators last month, Moncef Slaoui, the chief scientific adviser to Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s vaccine development program, said that “it would help if senators got vaccinated,” according to a person familiar with the call.
Dr. Orient, who lives in Tucson, Ariz., said on Sunday that she would appear remotely during the hearing on early at-home treatment for Covid-19. She said in the interview that doctors were too often sending patients home with instructions to simply rest and ride out the disease.

The association has also sued the government in an effort to force it to release hydroxychloroquine from the national stockpile for use as a Covid-19 treatment, although the scientific evidence indicates that the drug is ineffective against the coronavirus. The case is currently before a federal appeals court.

Dr. Orient said she intended to use her testimony to call for government guidelines informing doctors about hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for Covid-19 patients, even though the Food and Drug Administration revoked an emergency authorization allowing the drug to be distributed from the national stockpile and has warned that it could harm those patients.

Dr. Orient’s organization has urged people to be cautious about the vaccine in blog posts with titles like “Should We Line Up for a 90% Effective Vaccine?” In her interview, she raised particular concerns about vaccinations for young people “because the effect on fertility has not been determined.” There is no evidence that any of the leading coronavirus vaccines affect fertility.



Dr. Orient also took aim at Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease specialist, asking, “Why is he dictating care for 340 million Americans?”

 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
THE VIRUS
  • Britain administered the first doses of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine to thousands of people yesterday, kicking off a mass vaccination campaign that will soon spread to North America. One of the first people to get a shot was a resident of Warwickshire named William Shakespeare.
  • A vaccine from the Chinese state-owned drugmaker Sinopharm is 86 percent effective, according to testing data from the United Arab Emirates. China has three other vaccines in late-stage trials.
  • President-elect Joe Biden pledged to get “at least 100 million Covid vaccine shots into the arms of the American people” during his first 100 days in office. He also said he would make mask-wearing mandatory on planes, trains and buses that cross state lines, as well as in federal buildings.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster


What you need to know

- The FDA is expected to approve the Pfizer vaccine for emergency use within days, according to The New York Times

- The recommendation comes one day after the US reported over 3,000 fatalities in a single day, breaking its daily record for COVID-19 deaths

- A report released on Tuesday by the FDA found the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine to be safe and effective




 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Amid history of mistreatment, doctors struggle to sell Black Americans on coronavirus vaccine

Stuart Anderson, left, and Lamont Mitchell of the Anacostia Coordinating Council talk with Totreana Johnson about the pending coronavirus vaccine. Volunteer Tayla Daniel is at the rear of the photo. Johnson said she is willing to take the vaccine, but many other Black Americans are not. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)
By
Lola Fadulu
Dec. 7, 2020 at 5:15 p.m. EST

The Rev. Liz Walker’s job is to minister to souls at Roxbury Presbyterian Church in Boston. But lately it’s her parishioners’ physical health — and their immune systems — keeping her up at night.

Walker, a former journalist who was the first Black woman to co-anchor a newscast in Boston, was so troubled by her congregants’ suspicion of a coronavirus vaccine that she asked Anthony S. Fauci, the government’s top infectious-disease expert, to speak with them.

And he did. In an online forum for which more than 2,800 people signed up, Fauci talked about the vaccine development process and why it was essential for the Black community to get vaccinated. When Walker polled her congregation afterward, at least half were unpersuaded.

“I think it just speaks to the issue of you can’t change people’s minds with one conversation when you are trying to turn people around from decades of skepticism, from decades of distrust,” Walker said. “It is not going to happen overnight, no matter what the urgency.”
AD

The urgency could hardly be greater than at this moment, with the first doses of a vaccine potentially days away from initial distribution, the U.S. death toll approaching 300,000 and the pandemic spiraling out of control across the country.

Black people are nearly three times more likely than Whites to die of covid-19 because of health-care disparities, preexisting conditions and increased exposure at jobs deemed essential. Black children are losing more ground than their peers because of school shutdowns, and Black workers have been devastated by pandemic-related job losses.

Coronavirus is ravaging one of the nation’s wealthiest Black counties

Reed Tuckson is founder of the D.C.-based Black Coalition Against Covid-19, which is campaigning for people to trust a vaccine. (Courtesy Reed Tuckson)

Yet fewer than half of Black Americans say they would get a coronavirus vaccine, compared with 63 percent of Hispanic people and 61 percent of White people, according to a December report from the Pew Research Center. Many Black people say they do not trust the medical establishment because of glaring inequities in modern-day care and historical examples of mistreatment. The spread of misinformation about the vaccine development process hasn’t helped either.

This deep-seated skepticism has led to a burst of confidence-building efforts across the country, some led by the nation’s top Black doctors and scientists and funded by the U.S. government.

So far, the response has been mixed at best, with many Black Americans — like those in Walker’s congregation — saying they want more information or cannot count on the federal government to work in their best interests.

An online town hall in October, organized by the D.C.-based Black Coalition Against Covid-19 and other groups, sparked a flurry of sign-ups to be considered for a vaccine trial through the Covid-19 Prevention Network. But volunteers trying to promote the vaccine outside a nonprofit group’s offices in Southeast Washington last week found many people unconvinced.

“There’s a group that is pretty much anti-vaccine of any kind,” said Barrett Hatches, chief executive of the Chicago Family Health Center, which serves a predominantly Black and Latino community and is promoting the vaccine while administering flu shots or coronavirus tests. “There is a group that is still in a little bit of covid denial, and then there is the group that is skeptical and has its wait-and-see perspective.”

Opinion: U.S. health care has failed Black Americans. No wonder many are hesitant about a vaccine.

Leaders of the Anacostia Coordinating Council talk with Doris Grimes, right, about the pending coronavirus vaccine, as part of a coordinated campaign to build trust in the vaccine in the Black community. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)
'Trusted messengers'
Reed Tuckson, founder of the D.C.-based coalition, said some African Americans are still deeply scarred by the Tuskegee Study, in which federal health officials conducted a secret experiment on Black men to study the progression of syphilis. The men were told they were being treated for “bad blood” but never actually given medicine as they suffered blindness and other severe health problems from the disease.
AD


Tuckson’s group is composed of physicians, faith leaders and other advocates, and it has tentacles in virtually every health group in Washington. Its town halls featured some of the nation’s top health officials answering questions about why the vaccine process was fast tracked, whether Black people were participating in clinical trials, and whether research like the Tuskegee Study could happen in modern times.
The group is hosting a third town hall Tuesday, during which Fauci will speak.

Coronavirus vaccine countdown: What to watch for this critical week

Gary Gibbons directs the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health. (National Institutes of Health)
“We are taking great pains to help folks understand that what existed in the 1930s is very different today, in 2020,” said Tuckson, a doctor and health consultant who is a former D.C. health director and sits on the Howard University Board of Trustees. “That there are research scientists of color who are in positions of authority all across the research and medical enterprise.”
AD


The National Institutes of Health helped fund the town halls, and sent some of its top Black scientists to participate, including Gary Gibbons, head of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, who emphasized the importance of having “trusted messengers” provide “accurate, credible, authentic messages.”

“It’s in these dialogues with which we’ve gotten a sense of what is the level of knowledge, awareness, as well as misinformation and concerns,” Gibbons said. “And I think that’s helped with appreciating the level of myth-busting that in essence we need to do.”

Peter Marks, director of the Food and Drug Administration center that oversees vaccines, said he hopes the outreach will help rectify long-standing health inequities in addition to leading to more people getting the vaccine.

“I think we are in the process here of — as part of what I hope to come as a good thing out of covid-19 — this kind of national healing process of trying to address some of these things,” Marks said.

Push — and pushback
Advocates across the nation say a multiyear effort is needed.
AD

Ads encouraging people of color to participate in coronavirus vaccine trials are already on BET, Univision and major television networks. NIH identified 11 states that had the highest concentrations of both covid-19 cases and communities of color, and provided funding to organizations in those communities.

Officials in Jacksonville, Fla., used the NIH funding to partner with groups such as 100 Black Men of America. Health officials in Indiana joined with the Indiana Minority Health Coalition, the Jane Pauley Community Health Center and others to find places where people would feel comfortable getting vaccinated. During a webinar Monday, Baltimore City Health Commissioner Letitia Dzirasa stressed the importance of a media campaign that includes individuals who “look like they were from Baltimore,” citing focus groups from city efforts to encourage people to get the flu vaccine.

“We learned firsthand what the hesitancies were for Baltimore City residents,” Dzirasa said. “We have to address and acknowledge the root cause, and that they’re rational concerns and rational fears.”
AD

It is not clear yet whether all the efforts are bearing fruit. Community leaders say it’s difficult to convince people. Hatches, director of the health center in Chicago, noted that the national response to the development of a vaccine has been highly polarized, and said he was meeting with his leadership team Monday to ensure that everyone was on the same page in being able to endorse the vaccination option.

“Health-care leaders are no different than every other person who is contemplating taking the vaccine,” he said. “One would assume we’re a bit more informed. But even still, there are probably still people who haven’t made their mind up yet as to whether or not they’ll take the vaccine, or whether or not they want to wait a little bit.”

‘Lost generation’: Students, especially the most vulnerable, are sliding backward

Floyd Richards, shown here in Southeast Washington, where community leaders were touting the pending coronavirus vaccine, says he would take the vaccine when it becomes available. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)But Donnell Womack, a construction worker, says he doesn’t trust the government or the vaccine, and will get it only if required to for work. (Michael Robinson Chavez/The Washington Post)

The challenge was clear on a recent chilly day in Southeast Washington, where the Anacostia Coordinating Council set up a table at a local social service organization to speak to passersby about the vaccine. Around a dozen people stopped by, all of them masked. They grabbed snacks, took personal protective kits and listened.
AD


Many said they wanted to wait and see what side effects people had before committing to getting vaccinated. Others had never taken a flu vaccine, and didn’t plan to begin getting vaccinated just because of covid-19.

Donnell Womack, 43, shook his head skeptically while holding a box of donated food from the nonprofit. He said he would only get vaccinated if it were required for his work in construction.

“I don’t trust the government; I haven’t trusted the government for a long time,” Womack said. “I like Biden too, love him, but he hasn’t done anything either.”

Injustice in life, oppression in death: How racism shaped George Floyd’s life

President-elect Joe Biden has vowed to take the coronavirus vaccine on camera to boost public confidence, as have former presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

But Steve White, 59, and Richard McQueen, 54, who also visited the nonprofit to pick up groceries, were unimpressed by those announcements, noting that if anything went wrong, those powerful men would have access to health care that is unimaginable in most low-income neighborhoods.
AD

“I have respect for Obama, and love him to death, but I mean, that’s not a big deal, he’s got the best doctors in the world,” White said.
“And a person like me, I have to wait for an appointment,” added McQueen. “And that takes like what, a month?”

Such sentiments are frustrating for Castina Jewel Watson, a 36-year-old paralegal whose mother died of covid-19 in April.

Watson, who is Black and lives in the District, plans to get vaccinated as soon as possible. But she said she hasn’t met a single person who said they would take the vaccine, including her own relatives. In trying to convince people, Watson has heard conspiracy theories she’s too afraid to repeat.
“Seeing this thing up close and what it does to people, not only people who pass away but people like me who are just left here to deal with the ashes, anything that I can do to try to eradicate it from the planet, I’m totally interested in doing,” Watson said.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Despite new policy, vaccine misinformation is spreading on Facebook and Instagram

On Sunday, semi-trucks filled with millions of doses of a highly-effective COVID vaccine rolled out of a Pfizer facility in Kalamazoo, Michigan. The vaccine, jointly developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, will begin arriving at hospitals and other facilities on Monday. Healthcare workers and nursing home residents will be among the first to be vaccinated.

It is a rare moment of hope in a year of despair. The shots are desperately needed. In the last week, an average of 2,379 Americans died each day from COVID. Over 100,000 Americans are currently hospitalized with the virus.

But, in certain corners of Facebook and Instagram, the delivery of the vaccine is the beginning of a dystopian nightmare. Users are told the vaccines could "cause irreversible genetic damage," contain "brain-eating nanobots," and represent "the rollout of a total surveillance state where [the government] can penetrate deep within your body and see what’s going on." These false claims continue to spread on Facebook and Instagram despite a new policy, announced December 3, that bans "false claims about the safety, efficacy, ingredients or side effects of the vaccines."

Specifically, Facebook pledged to "remove false claims that COVID-19 vaccines contain microchips, or anything else that isn’t on the official vaccine ingredient list."

Right now, demand for the vaccine vastly outstrips supply. But in the coming months that will change. The biggest benefits of vaccination accrue when enough people are immunized that the population achieves "herd immunity" and the virus peters out. So the challenge becomes convincing enough people that the vaccinations are safe.

This is a top concern of Anthony Fauci, the nation's leading infectious disease expert, because it could needlessly extend the length of the pandemic. "My primary biggest fear is that a substantial proportion of the people will be hesitant to get vaccinated. I think there are going to be many people who don't want to get vaccinated right away," Fauci told The Daily Beast. Fauci is even concerned that a significant number of healthcare workers, who will receive priority access, may decline the vaccine.

Much of the hesitancy around COVID vaccines are based on misinformation about their safety — misinformation that continues to spread widely on Facebook and Instagram. For example, a December 11 post on the Children's Health Defense Instagram page says that vaccine manufacturers use "human fetal cells and adult human tumor cells in vaccines" and that "vaccine recipients might later develop cancer." The post then encourages people to use that information to evaluate the "safety and efficacy of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine." Pfizer, however, is an mRNA vaccine. It is developed synthetically and does not use fetal or adult cells. And, there is no evidence that any current vaccine causes cancer.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff44005b7-18e2-4eea-97eb-1e17be569c74_1075x692.png


The post was not removed. Instead, it quickly garnered 4,860 likes, pushing it to the top of the Instagram feed of the Children's Health Defense's 143,000 followers.

Children's Health Defense is not an obscure organization. It was founded by Robert Kennedy Jr. and is one of the nation's most prominent sources of vaccine misinformation. The group, initially called the World Mercury Project, accounted for a large percentage of anti-vaccine Facebook ads, before Facebook banned the practice. If Facebook is not enforcing its new policy against Children's Health Defense, is it enforcing it at all?

In its December 3 announcement, Facebook said it "will not be able to start enforcing these policies overnight." But why not? We are in the middle of a public health crisis that vaccine misinformation is threatening to make worse. Facebook had $7.8 billion in after-tax profits in the third quarter, up 29% from 2019. COVID vaccines will become available to some Americans starting Monday. Further delay could be deadly.

“Earlier this month we began removing false claims about COVID-19 vaccines and as facts about the vaccine continue to evolve, we will regularly update the claims we remove. This is a continued application of our policy to remove misinformation that leads to imminent physical harm. As with all of our Community Standards, any Pages and accounts that repeatedly break these rules will be removed from the platform,” Facebook said in a statement to Popular Information.

A world without truth

With more than 1.5 million followers, WorldTruth.TV is one of the largest super-spreaders of misinformation on Facebook. The page regularly publishes political and health conspiracies.

On December 4, WorldTruth.TV shared an article with the headline “Experts Warn mRNA Vaccines Could Cause Irreversible Genetic Damage.” In the article, the author falsely suggests that mRNA vaccines will alter genetic material.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fced334f8-7b61-40e3-b8a5-6f826fd45bf6_843x656.png


This claim, however, has been widely debunked — mRNA vaccines cannot alter your DNA. “Though both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain synthetic genetic material, they do not genetically modify humans receiving them,” according to a Reuters fact check.

Subscribe now

Despite this, WorldTruth.TV shared this link an additional six times over the past week. None were removed, despite the clear violation of Facebook’s COVID vaccine policy. The sole context provided is an information label represented by a tiny "i" symbol. That symbol, when clicked on, reveals that “Independent fact-checkers say multiple posts from WorldTruth.TV are false.”

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F55bbcafe-6a48-4ac1-9c01-750c1ff5d1df_766x738.png


Other false posts from WorldTruth.TV that remain on Facebook include “Brain Eating Nanobots Being Put in Vaccines Says Whistleblower,” “Wearing A Mask Offers Little If Any Protection From Infection,” and “Treason: QAnon Exposes Obama/Hillary 16-year Coup D’Etat.”

Instafake

On December 5, InnovativeParentingNJ, an anti-vaccination account with more than 2,600 followers, shared an image that featured the headline “Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization.” This claim, reports Politifact and others, is not true. According to Facebook’s new policy, the post should be removed. But this did not happen. Instead, it was blurred and displayed a label that read “False Information.” Users can view the post with a single click.

https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa7630974-9d28-42c3-a5f2-3d610dfdd83a_1600x1278.png


Another Instagram account, exposing_the_truth2day, recently shared an infographic titled the “COVID-19 roadmap.” It stated that “new DNA altering vaccines will create genetically modified humans that can be bioengineered for obedience and sterility.” The account, which has over 18,600 followers, regularly publishes misinformation. Just yesterday, the account published a conspiracy video and falsely stated in the caption that “These mandatory vaccines contain experimental genetically modified DNA-editing substances that will permanently modify the human organism and create a new generation of GMO humans.” It was viewed at least 1,700 times.

Streaming deadly misinformation

On December 4, Sayer Ji, founder of the pseudoscientific health site GreenMedInfo, published a livestream on his Facebook page with Dr. Joel Bohemier discussing how the upcoming vaccine will allow the government to track people. The stream was shared on GreenMedInfo’s page, which has more than 540,000 followers.

During the stream, the two suggested that the vaccine will contain ingredients — “tracking chips you can call them” states Ji — that will contribute to “the roll out of a total surveillance state where they can penetrate deep within your body and see what’s going on.” This is false — tracking chips are not being injected into people.

Bohemier and Ji go on to falsely link vaccination to increasing the likelihood of autism and misleadingly assert that vaccines are turning humans into “genetically modified organisms.” By the end of the hour-long stream, the two encourage people to deliberately walk into stores and restaurants without masks as a form of “nonviolent resistance.”

The stream, viewed at least 11,000 times, was not removed by Facebook.

On Instagram, GreenMedInfo and Ji spread unsubstantiated claims about COVID with even greater frequency, regularly posting about vaccines, the ineffectiveness of masks, and the pandemic being fake. Together, GreenMedInfo and Ji’s Instagram accounts have more than 106,000 followers.


Departing Facebook staffers blast overreliance on artificial intelligence


One reason that Facebook may be so ineffective in removing vaccine misinformation is an overreliance on artificial intelligence. A data scientist who recently departed Facebook worked on the team that dealt with hate speech, which is banned on Facebook. The former employee, according to a report in BuzzFeed, said that of the approximately five million pieces of hate speech posted to Facebook each day less than 5% was removed from the platform. (A Facebook representative disputed that calculation.) “It… makes it embarrassing to work here,” the employee said. The data scientist was among "at least four people involved in critical integrity work related to reducing violence and incitement, crafting policy to reduce hate speech, and tracking content that breaks Facebook’s rules" to leave the company in the past few weeks.

Another departing employee said a major issue was the company's overreliance on artificial intelligence.

AI will not save us. The implicit vision guiding most of our integrity work today is one where all human discourse is overseen by perfect, fair, omniscient robots owned by [CEO] Mark Zuckerberg. This is clearly a dystopia, but one so deeply ingrained we hardly notice it anymore.
“Our current approach to automation is not going to solve most of our integrity problems,” another data scientist said.

Popular Information asked Facebook about the role of artificial intelligence in Facebook's new vaccine policy, and how many employees are involved in enforcement. The company did not respond.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
Moderna vaccine safe and effective, say US experts
Published1 hour ago
Share
IMAGE COPYRIGHTGETTY IMAGES
Moderna's vaccine is safe and 94% effective, regulators say, clearing the way for US emergency authorisation.
The analysis by the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) means it could become the second coronavirus vaccine to be allowed in the US.
It comes one day after Americans across the country began receiving jabs of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.
The news comes as the US coronavirus death toll passes 300,000, according to Johns Hopkins University.
Endorsement of the Moderna vaccine by FDA scientists was announced on Tuesday, two days before the vaccine panel meets to discuss emergency approval.
What were their findings?
The 54-page document said there were "no specific safety concerns" and that serious adverse reactions were rare.
If approved by the team of experts later this week, and by the FDA's vaccine chief, shipments could begin within 24 hours.
The FDA found a 94.1% efficacy rate out of a trial of 30,000 people, according to the document they released.
The most common side effects included fever, headaches, and muscle and joint pain.
Last week, the FDA released similar data from Pfizer before voting to issue approval.

media captionUS Covid vaccine: Three key questions answered
Moderna was founded in 2010 and so far has never had a product approved by the FDA.
The company's stocks have seen a nearly 700% increase so far this year.
How does it differ from the Pfizer jab?
The Moderna vaccine requires temperatures of around -20C for shipping - similar to a regular freezer.
The Pfizer jab requires temperatures closer to -75C, making transport logistics much more difficult.
Like the Pfizer jab, the Moderna vaccine also requires a second booster shot. Moderna's second jab comes 28 days after the first.
The company is based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and has said that if approved, the "vast majority" of its vaccine would be manufactured there.
Pfizer's drug is being manufactured in several countries, including Germany and Belgium.

_115521332_vaccine_compared_v2_640_v2-nc.png


 

Mo-Better

The R&B Master
OG Investor
Look when you figure these vaccines will be taken by hundreds of millions of people, Possibly billions of people, its a safe bet there will be some who will suffer adverse effects from the shots that's inevitable.

Just don't use some flimsy excuse to not take the shot. Unless there's reports of massive rejections take the shot.
 

Helico-pterFunk

Rising Star
BGOL Legend













 

Bluelaser

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Wonder what the charge will be per dose......and of course the drug company will want a drug you need every year
Exactly,
They'll say that the virus is constantly mutating and that you'll have to take additional shots every year to mitigate the outbreak.
 

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster
New York opens vaccine sites in Brooklyn and Queens to target hardest-hit neighborhoods.
Feb. 24, 2021, 11:50 a.m. ETFeb. 24, 2021
Feb. 24, 2021
By Michael Gold


Outside of Medgar Evers College in Brooklyn on Wednesday. The site will provide vaccines to residents in parts of East New York, Brownsville, Bushwick, East Flatbush, Canarsie and Bedford-Stuyvesant.Credit...James Estrin/The New York Times

New York State opened two large vaccination sites on Wednesday in Brooklyn and Queens, part of an effort to boost inoculations in neighborhoods that have been hit particularly hard by the pandemic and where residents include some of those most vulnerable to severe illness from the virus.
The sites, established in partnership with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, were built to “bring the vaccine to the community that needs it most,” said Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo at a news conference at the Queens site, located at York College in Jamaica, on Wednesday. “And we’re going to give that community priority to get the vaccine.”

Each site is expected to provide 3,000 vaccine doses a day; Mr. Cuomo said they are the largest vaccination sites in the state so far.
Appointments are reserved only for eligible people who live in ZIP codes surrounding each location, many of which are home to low-income communities of color and immigrant communities who remain the hardest hit by the virus. After Saturday, the sites will be open to those in the surrounding borough.

At the York College site, the targeted ZIP codes are all in southeastern Queens. They include parts of Jamaica, South Jamaica and Far Rockaway, which were hit particularly hard by the virus and where only 3 or 4 percent of adults have received at least one vaccine dose.
The site in Brooklyn, at Medgar Evers College, will first focus on vaccinating residents in parts of East New York, Brownsville, Bushwick, East Flatbush, Canarsie and Bedford-Stuyvesant, which include some of the poorest neighborhoods in the city and have disproportionately low vaccination rates. It is also open to residents of neighborhoods that have been hit somewhat less severely by the virus, including Crown Heights, Prospect-Lefferts Gardens, Prospect Heights and Clinton Hill, which have large communities of color.

Data released by New York City officials showed that many of the areas being targeted by the state sites had some of the lowest vaccination rates in the city, in some cases lagging significantly behind the share of residents vaccinated in wealthier ZIP codes in Manhattan that have higher proportions of white residents.

Experts say people across the country who live in underserved neighborhoods face a variety of obstacles in getting the vaccine, including registration systems and websites that can take hours to navigate; a lack of transportation; and difficulty getting time off from work to get a shot. Many people in communities of color also are more likely to be hesitant about getting vaccinated, in light of the history of unethical medical research in the United States.

According to the city’s data, white New Yorkers have so far received a disproportionate share of the doses administered. Of city residents who received at least one dose, about 42 percent were white, 15 percent were Latino, 16 percent were Asian and 12 percent were Black. Latino and Black residents were underrepresented: The city’s population is roughly 29 percent Latino and 24 percent Black.

Those eligible to receive the vaccine at the Brooklyn and Queens sites can schedule appointments online, by calling 1-833-697-4829 or by visiting the locations in person between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. Appointments are required.
 
Top