DiamondDeuce said:Thank You finally someone with some sense.
DLH's career was already defined you look at his victories and its a "who's who" of the best boxers in era.
PBF won the fight... but he failed to "impress". Everyone knows that DLH is past his prime... PBF needed to "dominate' DLH to really prove that he was a better champion.
Plus it is easy to understand why there was a bias during the announcing of the fight. DLH has fought and beat the best ... and has been the "people's champ" for over 15 years. DLH has always been "respectful" on camera.
On the other hand PBF has acted like a total NIGGA ever since been on the scene. IF you guys have watched the HBO documentary on the behind the scenes fight stuff..... it is VERY HARD to root for PBF because he acts like such a NIGGA.
Co-sign.
The problem is that people get too caught up in the announcers. Form your own opinion. If you watch enough boxing you know what to look for. Who cares about what the announcers say. You should know who won the fight. I am a De La fan but I know that Mayweather won because he was clearly the better boxer in the later rounds. However up to that point it was all too close. De La faded as he always does due to lack of stamina. Proving it was not the runaway fight that some claim. For those to claim that (Mayweather included), it shows extreme bias on their part.
One more thing, I still dont know why they use Cumpubox. Compubox's stats can be some of the most bs stats given in a fight. I have seen that fight three times since last night and there is no way Mayweather outpunched De LA Hoya 2 to 1. Also Compubox doesnt take into account punches being blacked. There was plenty of defense on both fighters to have that number of landed punches reduced. I still thought it was a great fight. A rematch is in the cards.