FlatEarthers: Is Jupiter flat TOO?

the stars move we don't. If the Earth spun and rotated then the North Star also known as Polaris will also move but it doesn't ....... explain that shit.

So this guy must be lying


Sputnik took off in the middle of Asia nowhere near the equator (Kazakh Republic) explain that? No wait don't explain anything stop while your head


You know what? You're right. Everything you pulled off of Youtube is the gospel truth. Nasa and the gubment been stealing our money to spend it on .... something. Next time I'm at work south of the equator I'll remember the upside down moon I'm seeing is a hologram. Thanks bro, the veil has been lifted and my life is complete now.
 
You know what? You're right. Everything you pulled off of Youtube is the gospel truth. Nasa and the gubment been stealing our money to spend it on .... something. Next time I'm at work south of the equator I'll remember the upside down moon I'm seeing is a hologram. Thanks bro, the veil has been lifted and my life is complete now.
but you expect people to believe you? You focused on the YouTube because thats your scape goat. You claimed "oh rockets fire off near the equator" like its something to it but when I ask you to address Sputnik you divert. You claim the earth spins because the stars spin..... But when I ask you to address Polaris and the fact it stays fixed.... ALWAYS...... you divert. Cool brah leave it alone. You don't even have enough cheerleaders to help you HOMIE.
 
This is very interesting debate. Now, if flat earth is under a dome, where is all of the big winds coming from? Easterlies and Westerlies, is there a big gigantic fan under the dome somewhere? and the big ocean currents like North Atlantic currents? why are the currents there? where are they coming from if not the earths movement?

Also, what makes the pedulum swing? Wasn't that enough proof that the earth moves?
 
yea.. but if you jump while on a plane going 500 mph, you don't really end up in the back of the plane? nor a boat while going at high speeds. or a bus while you're in it. so that's kinda flawed way of thinking.


Also, forgot to mention - wind resistance. If you have two object in a vacuumed tube, they both actually fall at the same pace. Earth's many layer of atmosphere is acting like this protective layer that keeps us shielded from anything coming from space or anything falling off to space.

This also address that other response asking why nothing is flinging out of earth. Although it has been noted that ojects in the equator area are know to weight less then anywhere else.
 
but you expect people to believe you? You focused on the YouTube because thats your scape goat. You claimed "oh rockets fire off near the equator" like its something to it but when I ask you to address Sputnik you divert. You claim the earth spins because the stars spin..... But when I ask you to address Polaris and the fact it stays fixed.... ALWAYS...... you divert. Cool brah leave it alone. You don't even have enough cheerleaders to help you HOMIE.

http://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/north-star-movement


The North Star, also known as Polaris, is known to stay fixed in our sky. It marks the location of the sky’s north pole, the point around which the whole sky turns. That’s why you can always use Polaris to find the direction north.

But the North Star does move. If you took its picture, you’d find that it makes its own little circle around the exact point of the north celestial pole every day. That’s because the North Star is really offset a little – by about three-quarters of a degree – from celestial north.

Where does this movement – or in Polaris’ case, lack of movement – come from? Earth spins under the sky once a day. Earth’s spin causes the sun in the daytime – and the stars at night – to rise in the east and set in the west. But the North Star is a special case. Because it lies almost exactly above Earth’s northern axis, it’s like the hub of a wheel. It doesn’t rise or set. Instead, it appears to stay put in the northern sky.

What’s more, the star we know as Polaris hasn’t been the only North Star.

A motion of Earth called precession causes our axis to trace out an imaginary circle on the celestial sphere every 26,000 years. Thousands of years ago, when the pyramids were rising from the sands of ancient Egypt, the North Star was an inconspicuous star called Thuban in the constellation Draco the Dragon. Twelve thousand years from now, the blue-white star Vega in the constellation Lyra will be a much brighter North Star than our current Polaris.

Polaris could be a name for any North Star. Our current Polaris used to be called Phoenice.
 
You know what? You're right. Everything you pulled off of Youtube is the gospel truth. Nasa and the gubment been stealing our money to spend it on .... something. Next time I'm at work south of the equator I'll remember the upside down moon I'm seeing is a hologram. Thanks bro, the veil has been lifted and my life is complete now.

Brilliant.
 
Ask yourself this...... IF we have TWO MAGNETIC POLES (thats what YOU) believe then why do compasses ONLY point NORTH? Ask yourself why hasn't NO ONE even ATTEMPT to fly around the earth VERTICALLY or "POLE" to "POLE"? Take off from Miami..... Loop around and come back? You got planes flying cold weather ALL THE TIME. You can't walk on your fuckin ceiling upside down so how do people stay on earth in places like Antarctica?

If the earth was spinning 1000 miles or 460 meters per fuckin second BUT NOTHING FLINGS OFF..... Not even WATER. But you throw a wet tennis ball 40 mph and boom look at what you see
lTe9qyP.jpg


If gravity is related to mass water shouldn't fling off shit.
How much gravity does. Tennis ball have?

If youre in a car driving at 80 MPH shouldn't the people on the car be smashed against the rear windows?

In relation to flying North from or.so ut from Miami... is your argument that the earth is only flat at the poles? Because you didn' address the JFK question
 
Also, forgot to mention - wind resistance. If you have two object in a vacuumed tube, they both actually fall at the same pace. Earth's many layer of atmosphere is acting like this protective layer that keeps us shielded from anything coming from space or anything falling off to space.

This also address that other response asking why nothing is flinging out of earth. Although it has been noted that ojects in the equator area are know to weight less then anywhere else.

Actually the magnetic poles shield the earth from radiation and cosmic rays. Some get through especially some of the more destructive radiation like gamma rays. You’re right, there are different parts of the atmosphere as well. To all flat earth believers, we don’t inhabit a planet at relative rest. If we did (no input on other forces, especially gravity) then we would be zipping all over the place and possible shot into space. The earth spins in space on an axis. We call it’s revolutionary period night and day. Flat earthers, y’all funny. I know what you thinking. Gravity. We can't see it huh? So it must be fake too:smh:
 
Last edited:
Ask yourself this...... IF we have TWO MAGNETIC POLES (thats what YOU) believe then why do compasses ONLY point NORTH? Ask yourself why hasn't NO ONE even ATTEMPT to fly around the earth VERTICALLY or "POLE" to "POLE"? Take off from Miami..... Loop around and come back? You got planes flying cold weather ALL THE TIME. You can't walk on your fuckin ceiling upside down so how do people stay on earth in places like Antarctica?

If the earth was spinning 1000 miles or 460 meters per fuckin second BUT NOTHING FLINGS OFF..... Not even WATER. But you throw a wet tennis ball 40 mph and boom look at what you see
lTe9qyP.jpg


If gravity is related to mass water shouldn't fling off shit.

I honestly don't understand how muhfuckas this ignorant manage to pay bills and eat breakfast without choking and shit.
 
I honestly don't understand how muhfuckas this ignorant manage to pay bills and eat breakfast without choking and shit.

If I was that ignorant, there’s no way I would advertise it, but these cats are in a rush to let everyone know.
 
Speaking of stars, the stars you see in the Southern Hemisphere are different from the ones you see in the Northern hemisphere. If the Earth is flat, explain that shit.

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/28/...ing-is-better-in-the-southern-hemisphere.html

SÃo PAULO, Brazil — EARLIER this year, I visited Fernando de Noronha, an island off the northeastern coast of Brazil, only four degrees south of the Equator. When I was walking to a restaurant, I noticed something strange in the night sky: It was Ursa Major, the constellation that Americans call the Big Dipper and the British call the Plough.

The Big Dipper, commonplace in the north, is rarely seen in the Southern Hemisphere, though a friend of mine swears he saw it once from the top of a mountain in São Paulo. According to him, it was just above the horizon.

I’m jealous of those who have the Big Dipper. I also envy those who get to see the Northern Lights, which I saw recently during a trip to Iceland.

But that’s all.

The Dutch-American astronomer Bart Bok used to say: “The Southern Hemisphere holds all the good stuff.” He was probably referring to the fact that we have “the two best globular clusters, the largest and brightest naked-eye external galaxies, the largest diffuse nebula, the largest dark nebula and a Milky Way bright enough under our dark transparent skies to cast shadows during certain times of the year,” in the words of the journalist Luke Dodd.

Here the central parts of the Milky Way are at times directly overhead, visible from horizon to horizon, like an open, brilliant bruise. Here we also have an exclusive look at two of our neighboring galaxies, the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds. They both have a declination — the astronomical measurement of the distance from the celestial equatorof close to 70 degrees south and are circumpolar, which means that they are mostly visible only from this half of the planet. (A high-five to the third world!)

It is true that, as well as Ursa Major, northerners have the constellation Cassiopeia and Vega, the fifth-brightest star in the night sky. Vega has been used as the baseline for the apparent magnitude scale, which describes the brightness of stars,and to calibrate telescopes.

Yet the Southern Hemisphere claims the three brightest stars of the night sky: Sirius, Canopus and Alpha Centauri. Canopus belongs to the Carina constellation, notorious for two things: the Carina Nebula, four times as large and even brighter than the famous Orion Nebula, and the star system Eta Carinae, which is expected to burst as a supernova or hypernova sometime in the next thousand years. (A scientist told the BBC that the explosion would be so bright that you would see it during the day, and you could even read a book by its light at night.) Alpha Centauri and Beta Centauri, the 11th-brightest star, are called “The Pointers,” as they form a line in the sky to the constellation Crux (the Southern Cross). Crux is the smallest of all 88 constellations but one of the most distinctive. It is visible at practically any time of the year in all of the Southern Hemisphere.

Along the eastern edge of Crux is the Coalsack Nebula, a deep dark patch where stars are born. Near the Coalsack is the Jewel Box, a cluster of roughly 100 stars colored red, white and blue, and visible with a pair of binoculars. There’s also Omega Centauri, the largest and brightest globular cluster in the sky, with its topaz, orange and red stars.

Constellations like Sagittarius and Scorpius are best seen in the Southern Hemisphere; the latter lies within the center of the Milky Way, high in São Paulo’s sky. It is possible to see the scorpion from its sting to its claws, including the red supergiant star Antares at its heart.

Professor Neville H. Fletcher, now an emeritus professor at Australian National University, once said: “In astronomy circles it is often remarked — mostly by envious northerners — that God, in creating the universe, perversely located all the most interesting regions of our galaxy in the Southern Hemisphere, but all the astronomers in the north.” As a result, it can be more difficult down here to pick out the shapes for which the constellations were originally named.

The classic example: Orion, the hunter, is not proudly standing on his feet, but rather doing a cartwheel. Also, the brave lion from the constellation Leo looks more like an upside-down turtle. Or maybe a magical lamp. The twins of Gemini are falling to the ground. Boötes, the plowman, and the dog from Canis Major are both tripping. So more creativity is required of us South Americans, Africans, Australians, New Zealanders and other lucky inhabitants of the Southern Hemisphere.

There’s a quote attributed to Mr. Bok, who left Harvard in the ’50s for Australia but often lectured to members of the Royal Astronomical Society in London, that sums it up nicely: “Gentlemen, you live under the wrong half of the sky!”
 
"camera exposure" with a FUCKING TELESCOPE? Yall muthafuckas will believe ANYTHING. So mean to tell me that I CANT SEE THESE LITTLE SPECKS OF LIGHT because of CAMERA EXPOSER? So we didnt IMPROVE SHIT from the 60'S??? And you whole heartedly believe anything that comes at your way
.... Camera exposer. Gullible. "I'll take common sense for $500 Alex"
"Gullible" and "common sense". You have no business using those words...
 
Derivation and Definition of a Linear Aircraft Model (Google it )

Source: NASA.gov
Date: August 1988

Summary

"This report documents the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying over a flat, nonrotating earth."

The question for this report is, where are they going to get a FLAT, NONROTATING EARTH (unless you're living on one). Why waist time and resources on a variable that doesn't exist?
 
Last edited:
Question: if you take a compass and cut off the bottom of the needle will it still point north? I mean you cut off the end pointing south shouldn't it just spin?

Let's do this, attack it to a motor generator and voila free electricity!
 
Beautiful CGI. Just like a bowling ball. oh yeah Tyson said the earth is not round but pear shaped but all the pictures we see its round. And rockets don't work in a vacuum, how did it get there?
 
You know, on the one hand theres an obvious intelligence issue with flat Earthers... but lately I'm struck by the arrogance of it all. I mean the sheer lack of humility is stunning. None of these guys know any math/physics and would probably struggle with basic 7th grade algebra but they're willing to write off hundreds of years of scientific knowledge because they watched a few fucking youtube videos. Flat Earthers are the distillation of our anti-intellectual, know-nothing culture where feelings of self importance are enough to dismiss reality entirely and substitute it for some fantasy where a guy that can't solve for x is suddenly a genius on par with Einstein. Shit is mad depressing. :smh:
 
On a clear night, no matter where you are, you can look up the sky and see the stars.....
so can someone please explain this NASA photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

main_900.jpg
]
 
On a clear night, no matter where you are, you can look up the sky and see the stars.....
so can someone please explain this NASA photo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

main_900.jpg
]

That was explained a few pages back, but the guy who doesn’t know that a telescope and a camera lens is the same damn thing blew the the explanation off. It’s called “exposure”. Best way to explain it, you are in a low light room during the day and decided to take a picture of an object outside of your window with the camera on your phone; depending on what you tap your screen to focus on objects or the room will become darker or lighter. In this case the camera is focused on earth changing the exposure of the stars in the background.
 
Back
Top