LOL, whatever man. I'm man enough to admit I misread the intent in some of your posts, but hey, your argumentative as hell, and I'm not the type to pass on a good argument. It's all just healthy debate dog, I hope you don't take shit TOO personal.Greed said:you would agree with me more often if you read what i post instead of using your self proclaimed psychic x powers to look in a room to see what i would say 3 weeks from now.
Only problem I have with that is that misinformation caused deaths. I don't know if the rumors directly affected emergency and support services as is claimed, or if those rumors were used as an excuse for inaction (during and/or after the fact) but someone should be held accountable. That's the part in this that has a racial tinge to it to me. I don't blame the storm on race and I don't think the levees were "bombed", but I DO think that the racial/ poverty component in this made those stories easier to believe and gave those who had no desire to take quick action an excuse to do so.vitrifier said:I don't think you can lay blame on anyone effectively. The hurricane victims didn't know what was going on, there was lack of communication other than word of mouth, and that by itself quickly leads to inaccurate reports. They expressed their concerns to the authorities, who were far outnumbered and incapable of policing the city with their stretched resources. The authorities pleaded through the media to get help, citing what they were told of what was going on. The media reported what they heard from the victims, and what they saw first hand (of course, everything was upgraded slightly because ratings are more important than the truth).
There were no more or less false stories after Sept. 11th, and they had an intact infrastructure. N.O. was a situation where someone needed to step in and take control, and Nagin didn't have the authority, he had control of the police, who were in the same situation the other victims were in.
Basically, there is really no good place to put the blame, and now, it's a moot point because that part is over, and the focus should be on rebuilding and prevention. Nothing worthwhile will come from trying to pinpoint the source of rumors.
I agree. I've been through numerous hurricanes and I can tell you that there is usually chaos and confusion among the people that are affected in almost everyone of them. Add to Katrina the massive flooding that took place, which displaced so many people (without the massive floods a hurricane is far less disruptive), the situation was bound to get ragged -- and I mean ragged from the authorities point of view, the people's point of view and from the point of view of those covering the disaster.vitrifier said:I don't think you can lay blame on anyone effectively. The hurricane victims didn't know what was going on, there was lack of communication other than word of mouth, and that by itself quickly leads to inaccurate reports. They expressed their concerns to the authorities, who were far outnumbered and incapable of policing the city with their stretched resources. The authorities pleaded through the media to get help, citing what they were told of what was going on. The media reported what they heard from the victims, and what they saw first hand (of course, everything was upgraded slightly because ratings are more important than the truth).
There were no more or less false stories after Sept. 11th, and they had an intact infrastructure. N.O. was a situation where someone needed to step in and take control, and Nagin didn't have the authority, he had control of the police, who were in the same situation the other victims were in.
Basically, there is really no good place to put the blame, and now, it's a moot point because that part is over, and the focus should be on rebuilding and prevention. Nothing worthwhile will come from trying to pinpoint the source of rumors.
I don't think it was "Misinformation" ... just plain ole unreliable and unverified hearsay. And, I'm not so certain that it caused any deaths or affected emergency services to any real degree. In the aftermath of a Cat3 or above Cane, there is just confusion and awe anyway.Zero said:Only problem I have with that is that misinformation caused deaths. I don't know if the rumors directly affected emergency and support services as is claimed, or if those rumors were used as an excuse for inaction (during and/or after the fact) but someone should be held accountable. That's the part in this that has a racial tinge to it to me. I don't blame the storm on race and I don't think the levees were "bombed", but I DO think that the racial/ poverty component in this made those stories easier to believe and gave those who had no desire to take quick action an excuse to do so.
I'm using the term misinformation in it's original sense (bad information), not in the malicious sense we normally use it on the politics board (LOL)QueEx said:I don't think it was "Misinformation" ... just plain ole unreliable and unverified hearsay. And, I'm not so certain that it caused any deaths or affected emergency services to any real degree. In the aftermath of a Cat3 or above Cane, there is just confusion and awe anyway.
I think the real question is whether N.O. was adequately prepared to deal with the floods (as opposed to the winds). My experience with canes makes we question whether N.O. could have been much better prepared to deal with the aftermath of Katrina, that is, I doubt seriously that any city in America has the budget to do what it would take to empty a city the size of N.O. ahead of the storm. Not only that, but given the limited advance notice you get and even if you could force everyone out, I doubt seriously that hurricane evacuation routes are capable of handling the traffic. Hell, I've spend 18 hours on the interstate trying to get 250 miles and that was with all lanes going north. Shit is not as easy as it sounds. LOL
QueEx
I couldn't agree with you more. With respect to complacency, I really believe that the little tricks that canes pull on the way in has a lot to do with it. As you know, they don't really travel in straight lines. A large area gets the warning (cities within 100-200 miles sometimes have to go on low level alert early on) and many will be pulled off the list as the storm gets within gets close enough to narrow down the area that will be hit. Couple that with the fact that just as they approach the coast they are notorious for late movement (reminiscent of some of the really good baseball pitcher's fastballs) often to the northeast. The city or area that had been the predicted target and with the most urgent warning to evacuate gets missed or hit a lot less than expected. Let this happen a couple of times and people actually start talking about, "man, that shit can't hit us -- you know its going to make a turn." The result = New Orleans -- because I will bet the farm that had New Orleans been hit with a Cat1 or 2 or the outter bands of a 3 or 4 within the last 4 or 5 years -- a whole lot of those people at the Superdome and the Convention Centre would have been out of town, with or without dough.Zero said:There are literally hundreds of cities in this country sitting under the spectre of one disaster or another and I doubt any of them are really prepared or can even fathom what could happen. I was just watching something on the Discovery Channel last night about Mt. Ranier and how Tacoma and Seattle are both directly in it's path should it decide to pull a St. Helens and blow. When the "the big one" hits the west coast, a similar situation would arise as well. I think it's somewhat arrogant to expect a 100% evacuation or rescue rate when "wrath of God" type events come like this. I think people are just SO far removed from understanding the sheer potential for destruction that nature has that they get complacent and arrogant about just how vulnerable they are.
Yeah, Houston and Galveston are in the same boat. Tons of near misses, but no significant hits in this generationQueEx said:I couldn't agree with you more. With respect to complacency, I really believe that the little tricks that canes pull on the way in has a lot to do with it. As you know, they don't really travel in straight lines. A large area gets the warning (cities within 100-200 miles sometimes have to go on low level alert early on) and many will be pulled off the list as the storm gets within gets close enough to narrow down the area that will be hit. Couple that with the fact that just as they approach the coast they are notorious for late movement (reminiscent of some of the really good baseball pitcher's fastballs) often to the northeast. The city or area that had been the predicted target and with the most urgent warning to evacuate gets missed or hit a lot less than expected. Let this happen a couple of times and people actually start talking about, "man, that shit can't hit us -- you know its going to make a turn." The result = New Orleans -- because I will bet the farm that had New Orleans been hit with a Cat1 or 2 or the outter bands of a 3 or 4 within the last 4 or 5 years -- a whole lot of those people at the Superdome and the Convention Centre would have been out of town, with or without dough.
QueEx
In other words, should construction be allowed in parts of New Orleans ???Fuckallyall said:So, with knowing what we know, should we reubild NO the way NO was ?
Exactly. What sense does it make to spend a Quarter TRILLION (with a T) dollars rebuilding a major metropolitan area below sea level in Hurricane alley. When we tried before, we actually made the risk greater (by making the ground sink lower by pumping water out of the table), and , created an eviromental disaster (by keeping the water from flowing through the marses properly and causing tremendous degradation of the marsh grasses, which otherwise would have absorbed and slowed down the flow of water.).QueEx said:In other words, should construction be allowed in parts of New Orleans ???
QueEx

Plus everybody blames Bush and FEMA.. Though they bear alot of the blame.. The mayor and governor should bear the brunt of it. The governor didn't even bother to run again. Nagin got his family out and they never came back yet they reelected him again. The people of NO were misled and abandoned by their own. As usual we tend to put to the blame on the people we dislike or hate when the people close to us were the ones that let us down.