Divorced With 4 Kids: New Man Should Financially Pay For Them

If he marries her, they are his family too. Just as if he has children he would expect her to treat them as she would treat her biological children.

If she was a multi-millionaire he would want the money right?

Did you hear what she was saying though? Simply put, I agree with what YOU said, but did you hear what SHE said? :lol:
 
Last edited:
If he marries her, they are his family too. Just as if he has children he would expect her to treat them as she would treat her biological children.

If she was a multi-millionaire he would want the money right?
That's not the point. She is mad because black men don't want to take over her mistake. Man, no black man should be interested in that bullshit. And the whore got the nerve to shame him because he refuses to be a simp. Nawh cuz, I wouldn't give a damn how much money she got, I take my sanity over a problem like that.
 
That's not the point. She is mad because black men don't want to take over her mistake. Man, no black man should be interested in that bullshit. And the whore got the nerve to shame him because he refuses to be a simp. Nawh cuz, I wouldn't give a damn how much money she got, I take my sanity over a problem like that.


I didn't listen to it but how is it a mistake?

If those 4 kids are from a marriage that ended in death, how is that a mistake?

And was this a general question or particular tho this woman ?
 
Did you here watch she was saying though. Simply put, I agree with what YOU said, but did you hear what SHE said? :lol:


I didn't.......I usually don't listen to posts like this because usually its the worst possible example to ask a question like this on.

Like watching the news interview witnesses to some crime or tragedy. It's always clown shit.

Remember that mofokr that said watch you kids or some shit....

My answer was to the general question .





 
That's not the point. She is mad because black men don't want to take over her mistake. Man, no black man should be interested in that bullshit. And the whore got the nerve to shame him because he refuses to be a simp. Nawh cuz, I wouldn't give a damn how much money she got, I take my sanity over a problem like that.

So it's her problem and not the black men who got her pregnant?
 
So it's her problem and not the black men who got her pregnant?
No sir, I never said that. Don't obfuscate, this is the sister trying to shame a motherfucker because the brother did not think he should take care of her and her offspring. Yeah, the brother who knocked her ass up should take care of their children, but the new husband shouldn't have to be on the hook for that. That's why you have child support. Further, if I had children from a divorce I would take care of my own kids. I don't need a motherfucker to do that for me. Nor do I need anybody to stand in for me when my kids need me for anything. But, this is not the rule. Most motherfuckers don't do shit. So, before I got married, I leave them whore to their own devices. I would fuck em, but I wasn't marrying any of them with kids. I would let them know upfront too.
 
No sir, I never said that. Don't obfuscate, this is the sister trying to shame a motherfucker because the brother did not think he should take care of her and her offspring. Yeah, the brother who knocked her ass up should take care of their children, but the new husband shouldn't have to be on the hook for that. That's why you have child support. Further, if I had children from a divorce I would take care of my own kids. I don't need a motherfucker to do that for me. Nor do I need anybody to stand in for me when my kids need me for anything. But, this is not the rule. Most motherfuckers don't do shit. So, before I got married, I leave them whore to their own devices. I would fuck em, but I wasn't marrying any of them with kids. I would let them know upfront too.

So it needs to be explained to you that if you marry a someone with kids, you are now a step parent and the kids are equally your responsibility?
 
She's in some travel or relationship group I am in on facebook... always talking the same type of shit.
 
So it needs to be explained to you that if you marry a someone with kids, you are now a step parent and the kids are equally your responsibility?
No, you don't. This is why I am not a step parent, and anyone who doesn't have children already should not agree to that kind of contract. Also, if you do agree to be a step parent then you agree to helping out, not to become the total caretaker. You may become that. This is the current situation we are in now, but her children are not legally your issue (child/children). If you get divorce from her, then the court system will not come after you for child support, unless you adopt the issues (child/children). So, you aren't truly responsible for taking care of her and the father's problem. even nature ain't with the fuck shit. Most times the father animal kills the offspring of the previous male leader.
 
Last edited:
Just more delusional hoz. As soon as this dumb bitch said "Jesus dying on the cross justifies a man paying for another man's children" I was done! Bitch please!
200w.gif
 
No, you don't. This is why I am not a step parent, and anyone who doesn't have children already should not agree to that kind of contract. Also, if you do agree to be a step parent then you agree to helping out, not to become the total caretaker. You may become that. This is the current situation we are in now, but her children are not legally your issue (child/children). If you get divorce from her, then the court system will not come after you for child support, unless you adopt the issues (child/children). So, you aren't truly responsible for taking care of her and the father's problem. even nature ain't with the fuck shit. Most times the father animal kills the offspring of the previous male leader.
men are supposed to be the head of household..men are tasked with protecting and providing for the FAMILY. If a MAN agrees to marry a woman who already has children and the bio-father isn't taking care of his responsibility then its the new man, by marrying her, who tacitly agrees to take care of the kids. If he doesn't want that responsibility then he shouldn't get involved. :dunno::dunno::dunno:
 
Last edited:
No, you don't. This is why I am not a step parent, and anyone who doesn't have children already should not agree to that kind of contract. Also, if you do agree to be a step parent then you agree to helping out, not to become the total caretaker. You may become that. This is the current situation we are in now, but her children are not legally your issue (child/children). If you get divorce from her, then the court system will not come after you for child support, unless you adopt the issues (child/children). So, you aren't truly responsible for taking care of her and the father's problem. even nature ain't with the fuck shit. Most times the father animal kills the offspring of the previous male leader.

Let me guess you are single?
 
Let me guess you are single?
Let me guess you are single?
No, not single been married for awhile. I'm just not with the dumb shit. To be honest, I wish they still have shotgun marriages, and making the ones who made it take care of their seed. I don't wish for the barefoot and pregnant shit anymore because that shit is stupid. But we need a change. We don't make women accountable to their actions. We let them act all kinds of ways and accept any type of shit. Just like you agreeing with this bullshit.
 
No, not single been married for awhile. I'm just not with the dumb shit. To be honest, I wish they still have shotgun marriages, and making the ones who made it take care of their seed. I don't wish for the barefoot and pregnant shit anymore because that shit is stupid. But we need a change. We don't make women accountable to their actions. We let them act all kinds of ways and accept any type of shit. Just like you agreeing with this bullshit.

Do women force men to have sex with them unprotected? Why are you so bent on blaming women when men are just as responsible and the law is against them?
 
She is correct on one point but her tone and and basis is incorrect. I’m not even gonna talk or think about the God and Jesus talk.

But if she married a man, he does inherit this kids as part of the package. They’re now his family so he’ll do what needs to be done within reason to support them.

If they all go out to dinner, he can’t just pay for her and be looking at her crazy expecting her or the child’s Father to pay for the kids.

At the same token, if there’s sports or other bills that were there before him, then the Mom and the child’s Father needs to handle that. And the new man can help out, if needed.

But all of this is within a serious relationship or marriage. If they’re just dating, then he should do what he feels.
 
No, not single been married for awhile. I'm just not with the dumb shit. To be honest, I wish they still have shotgun marriages, and making the ones who made it take care of their seed. I don't wish for the barefoot and pregnant shit anymore because that shit is stupid. But we need a change. We don't make women accountable to their actions. We let them act all kinds of ways and accept any type of shit. Just like you agreeing with this bullshit.

You want women to be accountable but not men?

You do most women learn what a man is from their fathers.

Many also seek that image in the men they choose.

And while you blame the woman looking for love for her choices you don't place any responsibility on the men that lied to them, made promises to them, and then left them when they got pregnant Not only leaving them but leaving the child/ren

Not admitting that for most their decisions lay into their lack of self-esteem and self-worth. In many cases defined by the men they trusted
 
Back
Top