Re: tobe is SOOOOO clutch! SCIENCE
SOMEtimes, you can't blame just one person. but SOMEtimes you can. it's just simple mathematics.
in taking 33 FGAs, and missing 21 of them, as a single player you are SOLELY responsible for HANDING THE BALL over to the other team at least 15+ times in one game. that is unacceptable and inexcusable. had vince had any TOs that night, he would have been approaching tobe-like levels of stink.
with 15+ changes of possession COMING FROM A SINGLE PLAYER, is it any wonder at all that indiana was able to win that game? let me remind you that the margin of victory was only 2 points! that means that indiana only needed to convert JUST ONE of those extra possessions in order to win the game.
from steve kerr on vince carter's performance last night:
Vince Carter – After taking criticism for a jumper-filled, 12-for-33 night in a Game 1 loss to the Indiana Pacers, Carter played a much more controlled, efficient game in the New Jersey Nets' 90-75 win. Carter shot 12-of-20 and made eight of nine free throws in scoring 33 points as New Jersey evened the series at 1-1. Carter was more aggressive in getting to the rim and the paint area, putting much more pressure on the Pacers' defense than he did in Game 1.
see the difference? fewer FGAs. higher efficiency. 15 point margin of victory.
TimRock said:Vince shot 12 for 33 (i believe) yesterday. Is it his fault they lost? You cant blame just one person, cause its not like theres only person playing defense.
SOMEtimes, you can't blame just one person. but SOMEtimes you can. it's just simple mathematics.
in taking 33 FGAs, and missing 21 of them, as a single player you are SOLELY responsible for HANDING THE BALL over to the other team at least 15+ times in one game. that is unacceptable and inexcusable. had vince had any TOs that night, he would have been approaching tobe-like levels of stink.
with 15+ changes of possession COMING FROM A SINGLE PLAYER, is it any wonder at all that indiana was able to win that game? let me remind you that the margin of victory was only 2 points! that means that indiana only needed to convert JUST ONE of those extra possessions in order to win the game.
from steve kerr on vince carter's performance last night:
Vince Carter – After taking criticism for a jumper-filled, 12-for-33 night in a Game 1 loss to the Indiana Pacers, Carter played a much more controlled, efficient game in the New Jersey Nets' 90-75 win. Carter shot 12-of-20 and made eight of nine free throws in scoring 33 points as New Jersey evened the series at 1-1. Carter was more aggressive in getting to the rim and the paint area, putting much more pressure on the Pacers' defense than he did in Game 1.
see the difference? fewer FGAs. higher efficiency. 15 point margin of victory.