Dave Chapelle allegedly ends Dane Cook's standup 1 night

The main issue is the fact that he’s known her since she was 17, though a lot of people are saying 15 and waited until she was 18 to start dating her. That’s grooming right there.
So, you can't "know" a person when they are young, then date them when they are older?
 
What kind of grown man wants to be "friends" with a 16 year old girl??
You're moving the goal posts. The initial objection was that he "knew her" when she was 17, obviously before she was 18. Now you're making a new argument about "being friends with a 16 year old girl."

Well let's address that. Is it possible for an adult to be friends with a 16 year old? Absolutely. Does context matter? Yes. Would it be more socially appropriate for the adult and minor to restrict their interactions to public settings and group settings? Yes. But, it is absolutely possible to be friends without engaging in any inappropriate activities. Would I feel comfortable with my minor children hanging out alone with adults? No. Nor would I allow it. But, if my child was working at McDs and was friends with coworkers, that is normal.

This is why I say context matters.
 
You're moving the goal posts. The initial objection was that he "knew her" when she was 17, obviously before she was 18. Now you're making a new argument about "being friends with a 16 year old girl."

Well let's address that. Is it possible for an adult to be friends with a 16 year old? Absolutely. Does context matter? Yes. Would it be more socially appropriate for the adult and minor to restrict their interactions to public settings and group settings? Yes. But, it is absolutely possible to be friends without engaging in any inappropriate activities. Would I feel comfortable with my minor children hanging out alone with adults? No. Nor would I allow it. But, if my child was working at McDs and was friends with coworkers, that is normal.

This is why I say context matters.

Dane and her weren't working at McDonald's or working anywhere. He routinely invited teenage girls to party with him and his older friends and that's how he met her.

Dane Cook, 50, is accused of inviting girls 'as young as FOURTEEN' to 'game night' parties at his mansion: Fiancée Kelsi Taylor, 23, was first spotted at one of the bashes when she was 17


  • Cook, 50, who this month became engaged to Taylor, 23, has previously said the pair met at one of the parties he regularly hosts at his Los Angeles home
  • Writer Tracie Egan Morrissey pointed out that in 2016 Cook posted a photo from one of his game night parties with Taylor in it where she was 17
  • Morrissey detailed how she found photos of a number of underage girls and women attending Cook's parties and hanging out with the comedian
61153463-11089365-image-a-4_1659889080218.jpg


Kelsi Taylor's first appearance on fiancée Dane Cook's social media. She was 17 in this 2016 photo


We all know what Dane did and most don't feel that it's appropriate.

I don't know you or the circles you roll in, but men I know and most men don't have 16 or 17 year old girls as friends not would they feel it was appropriate.
 
You're moving the goal posts. The initial objection was that he "knew her" when she was 17, obviously before she was 18. Now you're making a new argument about "being friends with a 16 year old girl."

Well let's address that. Is it possible for an adult to be friends with a 16 year old? Absolutely. Does context matter? Yes. Would it be more socially appropriate for the adult and minor to restrict their interactions to public settings and group settings? Yes. But, it is absolutely possible to be friends without engaging in any inappropriate activities. Would I feel comfortable with my minor children hanging out alone with adults? No. Nor would I allow it. But, if my child was working at McDs and was friends with coworkers, that is normal.

This is why I say context matters.



 
You're moving the goal posts. The initial objection was that he "knew her" when she was 17, obviously before she was 18. Now you're making a new argument about "being friends with a 16 year old girl."

Well let's address that. Is it possible for an adult to be friends with a 16 year old? Absolutely. Does context matter? Yes. Would it be more socially appropriate for the adult and minor to restrict their interactions to public settings and group settings? Yes. But, it is absolutely possible to be friends without engaging in any inappropriate activities. Would I feel comfortable with my minor children hanging out alone with adults? No. Nor would I allow it. But, if my child was working at McDs and was friends with coworkers, that is normal.

This is why I say context matters.
@shaddyvillethug , add part-time pedo to the long list of jobs this weird ass nigga got.
 
You're moving the goal posts. The initial objection was that he "knew her" when she was 17, obviously before she was 18. Now you're making a new argument about "being friends with a 16 year old girl."

Well let's address that. Is it possible for an adult to be friends with a 16 year old? Absolutely. Does context matter? Yes. Would it be more socially appropriate for the adult and minor to restrict their interactions to public settings and group settings? Yes. But, it is absolutely possible to be friends without engaging in any inappropriate activities. Would I feel comfortable with my minor children hanging out alone with adults? No. Nor would I allow it. But, if my child was working at McDs and was friends with coworkers, that is normal.

This is why I say context matters.
Whoa! Bro don't over exaggerate the situation. Robert Kelly engaged in illegal consensual sex with underage females. Unfortunately, many of these acts were mostly supported and encouraged by the parents.

Dude did not forcibly have sex with any of those thots.

It's interesting that the thots and parents were cool as long as the money was coming in.

Now Ricky is having faggot incest sex with a minor and you say it's not a big deal.

I always knew you was a lame dick in the booty ass clown.
This the nigga you don't leave your kids around

Smh
 
Smh

Like the Sammy mane said
This fuck ass nigga said illegal consensual sex

Think about the thought this nigga had to put into typing that term

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ILLEGAL CONSENSUAL SEX WITH A MINOR

IT'S ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY ARE BELOW THE AGE OF FUCKING CONSENT

THEY ARE TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT TO FUCKING SEX

no lie bro I'll beat that nigga into a coma at his mama's strayer university graduation
 
This fuck ass nigga said illegal consensual sex

Think about the thought this nigga had to put into typing that term

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ILLEGAL CONSENSUAL SEX WITH A MINOR

IT'S ILLEGAL BECAUSE THEY ARE BELOW THE AGE OF FUCKING CONSENT

THEY ARE TOO YOUNG TO CONSENT TO FUCKING SEX

no lie bro I'll beat that nigga into a coma at his mama's strayer university graduation
I don’t believe he has kids bro

shit crazy

I stopped reading after “moving goal posts”
 
Tito the kind of ninja that goes to others parents kids cheerleader tryouts.

"Your daughter is an exceptional young lady, perhaps she would like to intern for me? It would look great on her college applications, and I would gladly provide reference letters for her."
:pedobear:
 
What is illegal Consensual sex?????
I will explain and this explanation can be easily confirmed by any of the attorneys on this board.

Illegal Consensual sex occurs when two individuals agree to engage in sexual activity that is deemed unlawful by a governing body. For example, not every state has Romeo and Juliet laws. These laws, known as "Romeo and Juliet laws" provide that a person can legally have consensual sex with a minor provided that he or she is not more than a given number of years older, generally four years or less. What many people do not know is that not every state has Romeo and Juliet Laws. California is one such state. In California, it is actually considered statutory rape for an 18-year woman to have sex with a 17-year-old boy. Even if the boy instigated the sex and both individuals willingly engaged in the act, the act is still considered Illegal Consensual Sex. Now, let's speak hypotheticals. Two people could be one month apart in age difference. Both can be 17 in August, then one turns 18 in September. This would be considered statutory rape. Though it would be unlikely a prosecutor would want to pursue a case like this. Under the law, it is still technically illegal. But, in some states, some prosecutors do pursue this BS.

My people in Georgia should remember Marcus Dixon.

Marcus Dixon was an 18-year-old high school football star who was falsely accused by a 15-year-old white girl of rape. Dixon was acquitted of aggravated rape because the white girl admitted it was consensual. However, although he was a senior in high school who just turned 18 and she was a sophomore in the same high school who was about to turn 16, it was still illegal. This brother served 10 years in prison before the Georgia Supreme Court overturned his conviction.

Illegal Consensual Sex.
 
Tito the kind of ninja that goes to others parents kids cheerleader tryouts.

"Your daughter is an exceptional young lady, perhaps she would like to intern for me? It would look great on her college applications, and I would gladly provide reference letters for her."
:pedobear:
That’s why he’s so anti Abortion he wants those unwanted baby’s to groom so they can pleasure him when they turn 13
200w.gif
 
I will explain and this explanation can be easily confirmed by any of the attorneys on this board.

Illegal Consensual sex occurs when two individuals agree to engage in sexual activity that is deemed unlawful by a governing body. For example, not every state has Romeo and Juliet laws. These laws, known as "Romeo and Juliet laws" provide that a person can legally have consensual sex with a minor provided that he or she is not more than a given number of years older, generally four years or less. What many people do not know is that not every state has Romeo and Juliet Laws. California is one such state. In California, it is actually considered statutory rape for an 18-year woman to have sex with a 17-year-old boy. Even if the boy instigated the sex and both individuals willingly engaged in the act, the act is still considered Illegal Consensual Sex. Now, let's speak hypotheticals. Two people could be one month apart in age difference. Both can be 17 in August, then one turns 18 in September. This would be considered statutory rape. Though it would be unlikely a prosecutor would want to pursue a case like this. Under the law, it is still technically illegal. But, in some states, some prosecutors do pursue this BS.

My people in Georgia should remember Marcus Dixon.

Marcus Dixon was an 18-year-old high school football star who was falsely accused by a 15-year-old white girl of rape. Dixon was acquitted of aggravated rape because the white girl admitted it was consensual. However, although he was a senior in high school who just turned 18 and she was a sophomore in the same high school who was about to turn 16, it was still illegal. This brother served 10 years in prison before the Georgia Supreme Court overturned his conviction.

Illegal Consensual Sex.
If a child is not old enough to provide legal consent, it by definition cannot be consensual.

Also

It take a certain kind of nigga to go this hard in an effort to illustrate just how close to the line it's okay to play.

You're pretty fucking gross dude.
 
Y'all betta leave @Tito_Jackson alone!

Don't be like his ex's last man, he talked and looked tough at first too.

hasbulla-hasbik.gif


But beef and women have no age number so Tito had to put hands on him and had shit flying all outta dude's in his diaper!

That Daycare ain't been the same since.

steve-harvey-scared.gif
 
I have no one to blame but myself :hmm: I Colin'd 90% of the thread, then read one post, and agreed that it was true.

Maaaan, I go back to read the thread, and found out I aligned myself wit a nigga that's out here tryin to chill with broads that still have curfews.:smh:
Smh
 
Back
Top