I'm twenty-two, so I'm not too aware of the general sense of the nation toward Colin Powell in the 90s. I've never understood why so many are positively convinced he could've been President, but that's not the point here, just the intro. (Though I'd love to see it addressed.)
It's funny to see people like Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan questioning how Powell could now abandon the Republican party... My question is how the hell he was a Republican in the first place. I understand he served under Republican administrations, but I'm listening to him talk on Meet the Press and before the point where he endorses Obama, his explanation of his worldview leaves no doubt:
* We need to "reach out to the world." Obviously a slam of Bush and the conservative faction that just wants to bulldoze the world and scoffs at global opinion.
* The first thing the incoming President need to do is present a "new image of American leadership in the world." Gee, I'm stumped as to who is better equipped to do that! Though not discused often enough, this is Obama's greatest potential and my main reason for supporting him. Doesn't matter if you don't give two shits about the rest of the world, though.
* "When you help the poorest," you help yourself. Sounds like something Jesus would say, but not a Republican. Powell said this with regard to the need for further efforts to end global poverty; contrast this with a Michael Savage, who lists the $700 billion dollar bailout package right along with $850 billion in foreign outreach as a way of blaming other landmasses on the map for America's hard times.
* Asked by Brokaw for the biggest issue "not on the screen right now" awaiting the next President, Powell answers "education." The wing of the Republican party that could be identified with Ron Paul doesn't even support the idea of a Department of Education. They barely believe in the idea of common rights to education, homeschooling attitudes being a microcosm of the mindset that doesn't give a fuck about the rest of the globe unless it somehow impacts the specific coordinates of their own backyard.
He sounds like a Democrat! Can anybody possibly make a case for this man as a Republican, ideologically?
It's funny to see people like Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan questioning how Powell could now abandon the Republican party... My question is how the hell he was a Republican in the first place. I understand he served under Republican administrations, but I'm listening to him talk on Meet the Press and before the point where he endorses Obama, his explanation of his worldview leaves no doubt:
* We need to "reach out to the world." Obviously a slam of Bush and the conservative faction that just wants to bulldoze the world and scoffs at global opinion.
* The first thing the incoming President need to do is present a "new image of American leadership in the world." Gee, I'm stumped as to who is better equipped to do that! Though not discused often enough, this is Obama's greatest potential and my main reason for supporting him. Doesn't matter if you don't give two shits about the rest of the world, though.
* "When you help the poorest," you help yourself. Sounds like something Jesus would say, but not a Republican. Powell said this with regard to the need for further efforts to end global poverty; contrast this with a Michael Savage, who lists the $700 billion dollar bailout package right along with $850 billion in foreign outreach as a way of blaming other landmasses on the map for America's hard times.
* Asked by Brokaw for the biggest issue "not on the screen right now" awaiting the next President, Powell answers "education." The wing of the Republican party that could be identified with Ron Paul doesn't even support the idea of a Department of Education. They barely believe in the idea of common rights to education, homeschooling attitudes being a microcosm of the mindset that doesn't give a fuck about the rest of the globe unless it somehow impacts the specific coordinates of their own backyard.
He sounds like a Democrat! Can anybody possibly make a case for this man as a Republican, ideologically?
