Child support ain't no joke...

I think they mostly do that for state-sponsored women. It seems to be hard as fuck for a woman who isn't on assistance to get support enforced. Lawyers cost money. Then if she is working she has to take off time for court. All to find out he didn't show up and she has to come back.

The government is the one locking people up and taking their licenses in order to get their money back. :smh: If a guy just switches jobs once he looks at his check and is like :eek:, it's on the woman to hire a lawyer and try to track him down. Government has it's own resources to get its bread back.

What's funny is that two people can be broke but the government only criminalizes one of them.
You know what also sucks? If you get a raise or a bonus, they can get an increase in payments. If you have to take a pay cut, you can't get a reduction.
 
I think they mostly do that for state-sponsored women. It seems to be hard as fuck for a woman who isn't on assistance to get support enforced. Lawyers cost money. Then if she is working she has to take off time for court. All to find out he didn't show up and she has to come back.

The government is the one locking people up and taking their licenses in order to get their money back. :smh: If a guy just switches jobs once he looks at his check and is like :eek:, it's on the woman to hire a lawyer and try to track him down. Government has it's own resources to get its bread back.

What's funny is that two people can be broke but the government only criminalizes one of them.

What did you mean by two people can be broke?
 
That is not true, it's not out of the norm for men to get custody and the woman pay child support these days.
I can go on an on with examples, even other women admitting the system is biased..
But I understand your a dyke and you have your own agenda to push..
 
You know what also sucks? If you get a raise or a bonus, they can get an increase in payments. If you have to take a pay cut, you can't get a reduction.

I think you have to go through the courts for both. I think that's how some men get in more trouble. They naturally assume that if they get less money things are adjusted. Come in months or years later and the judge has no fucks to give if there wasn't a petition. :smh: ... :angry: "Fuck you, pay me!!"

What did you mean by two people can be broke?

Broke father has to pay, but the broke mother gets assistance. Doesn't even have to pay on the hospital bill, but the government will come after the father for birthing costs. System is extremely rigged.
 
I can go on an on with examples, even other women admitting the system is biased..
But I understand your a dyke and you have your own agenda to push..

He has evidence to use against her now. It's not unusual for ex's to falsely accuse each other of abuse so the courts aren't going to just take their word for it.
 
I think you have to go through the courts for both. I think that's how some men get in more trouble. They naturally assume that if they get less money things are adjusted. Come in months or years later and the judge has no fucks to give if there wasn't a petition. :smh: ... :angry: "Fuck you, pay me!!"



Broke father has to pay, but the broke mother gets assistance. Doesn't even have to pay on the hospital bill, but the government will come after the father for birthing costs. System is extremely rigged.
Yet the one who stands to gain the most, is the one with the power to make the decision to keep the child or not..
So in other words both parties get drunk, both parties have ill advise sex, both parties creates the child..
However, only the woman is allowed to decide to keep the child, put it up for adoption (yes she can do that shit with out the father's permission) yet the mother is allowed to take the morning after pill or go for an abortion, but at the end of the day its mostly the mans fault and his life is destroyed for a bad act that was equally committed by both parties, while the woman's life is rewarded for that same bad choice...
 
He has evidence to use against her now. It's not unusual for ex's to falsely accuse each other of abuse so the courts aren't going to just take their word for it.
The thing is men need evidence, but women don't when according to Judge Judy joint custody should be awarded, unless there is evidence of one of them being an unfit parent...
Even when they get visitation rights, often this is what they go through..

Thank god for cell phones and smart fathers exposing these selfish bitch ass mothers!!!!
 
Whats fucked up is many young black males grow up thinking that being a good father and a good man will somehow protect them from the bullshit, when in reality nothing can be further from the truth.. Because if your a good black man and you break up with your baby mother, moving on with your life, looking like you have it going on with out her..
Well you are the ones that normally gets it the most, and often these scorn women become very vindictive using the racist system to tear you down...
And the white supermist are more than willing to comply to her wants..
 
He has evidence to use against her now. It's not unusual for ex's to falsely accuse each other of abuse so the courts aren't going to just take their word for it.
The child was saved because the father was educated and informed how to protect his children from the racist ass system.. This is why I say if you really love children all men and women should be taught how to fight the system and protect their children..
But sadly there are folks who get tight when I educate young black men how to fight for the rights of themselves and their children..
Makes me wonder who side they are really on...
 
I think you have to go through the courts for both. I think that's how some men get in more trouble. They naturally assume that if they get less money things are adjusted. Come in months or years later and the judge has no fucks to give if there wasn't a petition. :smh: ... :angry: "Fuck you, pay me!!"



Broke father has to pay, but the broke mother gets assistance. Doesn't even have to pay on the hospital bill, but the government will come after the father for birthing costs. System is extremely rigged.
So, the parent who lives with the child has to be treated the same way as the parent who doesn't live with the child? What is your responsibility as a parent? Forget about the rigged system, how the child came about or the type of woman the child came from, there is a child of which you are responsible for creating. What is your responsibility to your child?
 
If the both parents are not able to afford a child, the father goes to jail while the mother is awarded money and a home..
So, you want both parents to go to jail? Who will raise the child if both parents are in jail? You want the mother to be equally punished for her bad judgement, but, who suffers the most in that equation? Is it about making the woman more responsible for her actions or is it about doing the best thing possible to provide the child with a decent upbringing in a loving home? I'm not sure I understand your alternative solution to the problem. We are talking about a child.........a human being which carries your blood and genetics. A reflection of the parents who created him/her.
 
So, the parent who lives with the child has to be treated the same way as the parent who doesn't live with the child? What is your responsibility as a parent? Forget about the rigged system, how the child came about or the type of woman the child came from, there is a child of which you are responsible for creating. What is your responsibility to your child?
Being that a man can have a child that he does not want, something that is impossible for a woman to do...
The burden of finding a father who wants to raise that child is on the mother. She should be able to weed out the guys who just want to smash (which is 90% of the dudes) from the guys who actually want to be a father..
Now even if she chooses to fuck one of these dudes she should at the very least by careful to protecting herself.. Not for the sake of herself, or who's right or wrong, but for the welfare of her child.
But folks are too busy trying to blame and punish, but no one is thinking about the real losers in all of this, that is the children..
 
So, you want both parents to go to jail? Who will raise the child if both parents are in jail? You want the mother to be equally punished for her bad judgement, but, who suffers the most in that equation? Is it about making the woman more responsible for her actions or is it about doing the best thing possible to provide the child with a decent upbringing in a loving home? I'm not sure I understand your alternative solution to the problem. We are talking about a child.........a human being which carries your blood and genetics. A reflection of the parents who created him/her.
What do you think women in countries that don't have child support do??
To answer that question they make sure they get married to real men, and accept the fact that if they produce a bastard child they failed the child and as the result they will live in poverty..
 
So, the parent who lives with the child has to be treated the same way as the parent who doesn't live with the child? What is your responsibility as a parent? Forget about the rigged system, how the child came about or the type of woman the child came from, there is a child of which you are responsible for creating. What is your responsibility to your child?

You're missing the point. What about birthing costs? How come the mother isn't on the hook for that? Let's start with that and then work our way to other things. If both parents are poor, how come one has the responsibility to pay and will be jailed and/or lose their license if they don't pay the government back for birthing costs.

The fuckery starts before the child even gets home.
 
What do you think women in countries that don't have child support do??
To answer that question they make sure they get married to real men, and accept the fact that if they produce a bastard child they failed the child and as the result they will live in poverty..
Road Rage, you are not being realistic. Lol.... You are somehow putting the entire responsibility on the woman. Typical of you, but, unfortunately, that's not how it works in foreign countries. The man is equally responsible for the child and he is well aware of the consequences of having unprotected sex.

For example, a young man gets a young woman pregnant. The young man is definitely not ready to be a father and the young woman is also not ready to be a mother. So, according to you, this is the woman's fault. Lol.

Society dictates the acceptable family unit structure expectations. So, most foreign countries are still pretty traditional for the most part. Which means they still believe and encourage marriage first before children. It doesn't always work out that way, but, these are the values instilled for the most part. Young men are taught by their parents that getting a woman pregnant automatically means marriage, because, it is not acceptable to have children out of wedlock. Young women are taught that getting pregnant means marriage, so, the woman feels a little pressure before she gives it up to whoever. So, this responsibility of having sex automatically becomes both the man and the woman equally.

The alternative options are extremely limited, because, there are not many government programs that will help out single mothers and some families would actually disown their child out of shame for having a child out of wedlock. So, the only other option would be to abort the child and this costs money and discretion.

The reason why those societies promote marriage before children is because they know that children need both parents fully engaged in the upbringing process. Financially, emotionally, physically........ It is necessary for the child to have the full input of both parents in order to have a decent chance at life.

Take responsibility for your actions.
 
You're missing the point. What about birthing costs? How come the mother isn't on the hook for that? Let's start with that and then work our way to other things. If both parents are poor, how come one has the responsibility to pay and will be jailed and/or lose their license if they don't pay the government back for birthing costs.

The fuckery starts before the child even gets home.
How about you reverse roles? So, you take full responsibility for raising the child and then let the government go after the mother for money. Is that fair?
 
Road Rage, you are not being realistic. Lol.... You are somehow putting the entire responsibility on the woman. Typical of you, but, unfortunately, that's not how it works in foreign countries. The man is equally responsible for the child and he is well aware of the consequences of having unprotected sex.

For example, a young man gets a young woman pregnant. The young man is definitely not ready to be a father and the young woman is also not ready to be a mother. So, according to you, this is the woman's fault. Lol.

Society dictates the acceptable family unit structure expectations. So, most foreign countries are still pretty traditional for the most part. Which means they still believe and encourage marriage first before children. It doesn't always work out that way, but, these are the values instilled for the most part. Young men are taught by their parents that getting a woman pregnant automatically means marriage, because, it is not acceptable to have children out of wedlock. Young women are taught that getting pregnant means marriage, so, the woman feels a little pressure before she gives it up to whoever. So, this responsibility of having sex automatically becomes both the man and the woman equally.

The alternative options are extremely limited, because, there are not many government programs that will help out single mothers and some families would actually disown their child out of shame for having a child out of wedlock. So, the only other option would be to abort the child and this costs money and discretion.

The reason why those societies promote marriage before children is because they know that children need both parents fully engaged in the upbringing process. Financially, emotionally, physically........ It is necessary for the child to have the full input of both parents in order to have a decent chance at life.

Take responsibility for your actions.
The responsibility of who a woman brings in the world is all on the woman..
If a man chooses to abort his child he cannot do it..
He cannot force a woman to take the morning after pill, one man tried and is facing life in prison, so, there goes that theory..
If it was both of their responsibility, then he would at least have a 50% say so, and no woman would be able to have an abortion, take the morning after pill or even adopt with out the man say so...
TEll me your able to follow this simple logic..

Now your problem is your mixing up fault with who is more responsible..
Because saying they are equally at fault would be fair..
But saying the man has as much to say and as much power in that baby being born, your wrong..
And with great power comes great responsibility, only thing the women want the power but none of the responsibilities that come along with it..
 
The responsibility of who a woman brings in the world is all on the woman..
If a man chooses to abort his child he cannot do it..
He cannot force a woman to take the morning after pill, one man tried and is facing life in prison, so, there goes that theory..
If it was both of their responsibility, then he would at least have a 50% say so, and no woman would be able to have an abortion, take the morning after pill or even adopt with out the man say so...
TEll me your able to follow this simple logic..

Now your problem is your mixing up fault with who is more responsible..
Because saying they are equally at fault would be fair..
But saying the man has as much to say and as much power in that baby being born, your wrong..
And with great power comes great responsibility, only thing the women want the power but none of the responsibilities that come along with it..
You are lost brother. The man has the CHOICE not to get a woman pregnant if he doesn't think that woman will be a good mother or if he doesn't feel ready to be a father. If you have unprotected sex with a woman, there are chances she could get pregnant. How hard is it for you to understand that simple logic? You act like men have zero control of where they dump their sperm. Are you being held at gun point by the woman? Cmon man.
 
You are lost brother. The man has the CHOICE not to get a woman pregnant if he doesn't think that woman will be a good mother or if he doesn't feel ready to be a father. If you have unprotected sex with a woman, there are chances she could get pregnant. How hard is it for you to understand that simple logic? You act like men have zero control of where they dump their sperm. Are you being held at gun point by the woman? Cmon man.
If a woman gets sperm in her what are her options???
If a man gets sperm in a woman what are his options??
Once the sperm is in her he has not options at all..
Now you get it?
 
If your a red blooded man who actually likes fucking, often the life line that is protecting your future is a thin piece of latex and if that should break your at the mercy of a woman who may want nothing more than to use your sperm for personal gain...
Your only other choices are vasectomies, not fucking or being gay, if thats the choices you are talking about, then we are on two different levels....
 
How about you reverse roles? So, you take full responsibility for raising the child and then let the government go after the mother for money. Is that fair?

If the government handed over custody to fathers like that, there would be a lot fewer children. Believe that. You think some of these men in poverty wouldn't take the deal women in poverty are offered? Daycare vouchers? WIC? Food? Help with housing. Birthing costs covered. Don't have to pay shit back? :eek:

Problem is the mother has to be basically strung out for a man to get custody. That joint custody hustle doesn't count, because the mother ends up with physical custody 9 times out of 10 -- and with the benefits.
 
If the government handed over custody to fathers like that, there would be a lot fewer children. Believe that. You think some of these men in poverty wouldn't take the deal women in poverty are offered? Daycare vouchers? WIC? Food? Help with housing. Birthing costs covered. Don't have to pay shit back? :eek:

Problem is the mother has to be basically strung out for a man to get custody. That joint custody hustle doesn't count, because the mother ends up with physical custody 9 times out of 10 -- and with the benefits.
Dude is cut pasting the Fem bullshit with out proofreading or thinking things out himself..:smh:
 
For those who still think men and women have the same power in creating a child, lets flip the scenario, remember pure logic is able to flip and still be sound...
Supposed a man accidently gets a woman pregnant, and she says she does not want the child, what power does a man have to prevent her from getting an abortion or taking the morning after pill...
Now if the child is both of you guys and everything is equal, like some people trying to say it is. A man should be able to say he choose to keep his baby alive and choose to have it..
But in reality no man, not even a married man has that power to make that choice...
 
For those who still think men and women have the same power in creating a child, lets flip the scenario, remember pure logic is able to flip and still be sound...
Supposed a man accidently gets a woman pregnant, and she says she does not want the child, what power does a man have to prevent her from getting an abortion or taking the morning after pill...
Now if the child is both of you guys and everything is equal, like some people trying to say it is. A man should be able to say he choose to keep his baby alive and choose to have it..
But in reality no man, not even a married man has that power to make that choice...
lol.....do you have any standards? do you live like a cave man? just raw dog any pussy in site? girl looks good but her pussy stinks, you still raw dog? girl looks good but she pops pills and sniffs mad coke, you still raw dog? who makes the decision to raw dog a girl? You or the girl?

I understand that we are humans and we make mistakes. I allow for ONE mistake when concerning having children with an undesirable woman. We all know dudes who have numerous kids all over the place by multiple women....and they wanna complain about child support.
 
Dudes gotta get a second job...or stop going in raw.... 4 support payments.....Damn!
18402636_1530977706932716_2961652909398393530_n_zps9cn5atm1.png

Learn to control ya dick nigga! :smh:

Get your self a thoid job and invest the entire proceeds into XRP ripple :yes: and in 5 years you can be a millionaire
 
lol.....do you have any standards? do you live like a cave man? just raw dog any pussy in site? girl looks good but her pussy stinks, you still raw dog? girl looks good but she pops pills and sniffs mad coke, you still raw dog? who makes the decision to raw dog a girl? You or the girl?

I understand that we are humans and we make mistakes. I allow for ONE mistake when concerning having children with an undesirable woman. We all know dudes who have numerous kids all over the place by multiple women....and they wanna complain about child support.
I want you to read what I wrote then tell me what the fuck you wrote have to do with the stuff I typed?
Your trying to create a strawman argument with shit you pulled out of your ass!! So stop it and save it for the 89< I.Q. mother fuckers who don't know no better!!!
Matter of fact let me help you, I specifically said that if you fuck a woman with a latex condom, all that is stopping your life from getting ruined is the thin piece of latex and hoping that the condom don't rip, because if it does, you have no say so in what happens after that..
Now what the fuck does that have to do with fucking raw and taking coke you RIF reject, mother fucker!!!!
 
You should really wait till you grow up and start getting pussy, before you comment.

Son, I'm retired. And that's not shit compared to paying $1800 a month. You can't pay for the kids then stop fucking RAW. That sorry ass chump change ain't sheeeit! Your lil young ass. Cowboy the fuck up and take care of your responsibilities. Kids are innocent, they don't get to determine parents so if you making em, pay for em too mf. Don't run
 
Son, I'm retired. And that's not shit compared to paying $1800 a month. You can't pay for the kids then stop fucking RAW. That sorry ass chump change ain't sheeeit! Your lil young ass
You don't have to fuck raw for your condom to break, or worse yet you could be married and have a few kids and the wife decides she wants to start living her life..
Take if from me, a guy who used to fuck married women, I know the dirt they do, and if your wife is fucked up you never know the extent of their dirt..
Keep in mind most women don't get caught jacking, because they usually know how to hide their tracks and if they are smart they fuck with smart guys who also know how to hide their tracks..
That said, today its so easy for them to bounce out on the family for a no good dude and footing the husband with the bill... I never did no grimy shit like this, but today there are plenty of no good dudes who have no problems jacking your shit, destroying your family in the process... All I am trying to bring out is us guys have very little rights to protect us and our family.
 
Try doing that to your wife of five years...
Folks need to start thinking like men and less like high school kids chasing tail around the corner...

I remember in HS in NYC all the guys was like this and many boys and girls fell into the trap, having unprotected sex birthing children they didn't want and not even staying together through the relationships. it's sad.
 
I remember in HS in NYC all the guys was like this and many boys and girls fell into the trap, having unprotected sex birthing children they didn't want and not even staying together through the relationships. it's sad.
Another side to all of this is that the youth brains are oversexulaized before we fully understand the seriousness of having children out of wedlock..
Even in this thread, you can tell who are the younger members just by their cavalier and less than serious approach towards this very serious subject.
 
Back
Top