I see. Ok?
What formular is that by which an atom was split? The Energy Mass Equation? E=MC^2?
It did not split the atom, because the equation says that the mass of an atomic element in
question could be converted to energy.
Who has ever seen an atom? Einstein wrote paper in 1905 in which he used the properties of sugar molecules dissolved in water to get a very good approximation of Avogadro’s number (the number of atoms per molar mass of matter =6.02x10^23). Einstein was a physicist of the big dimensions. He vehemently opposed the quantum mechanics that deals subatomic physics, deriding one part of it as “spooky action at a distance”, and derisively declaring of the probabilistic basis of the science that: “God does play dice”.
Einstein was wrong in 100% of the cases in which opposed quantum mechanics; and this truth applies to 100% of those who have proclaimed or promulgated any kind of opposition to quantum mechanics. Literally thousands upon thousands of experiments have been conducted to disprove, or merely test, even the most bizarre predictions of quantum mechanics. There has never been a single experiment done by anyone anywhere, that has ever disproved a single thing predicted by quantum mechanics. It is simply the most sensationally successful scientific theory of all time, that is responsible for at least 95.9% of the things you think are so technologically wonderful today.
You like make declarations when you know nothing. What proof is there that cellphones cause cancer?
Star Trek is fantasy, science fiction. There is no scientific truth that has ever been discovered by Star Trek. Behind the flat glass panels on which they displayed their crude graphics on that show, were cathode ray tubes, because that was the state of the technology at that time. It is that simple. Flat TVs did not happen because of Star Trek, like everything else, they are the benefit of quantum mechanics, as were for that matter, cathode ray tubes themselves.
Science does not work in speculations or public fantasies. Engineering science simply uses things that have been tested and proved. Period, point blank. In engineering, the most important aspect of the knowledge is that it must be proved. No one has ever provided proof of UFOs, it ends there. As for bending light, Einstein postulated that enormous gravity fields could bend light. The way science works is that if you make a claim, you must prove it. It took until the year 1916 for a scientific mission sent to Australia to prove this fact. By using very precise cartographic maps of stars taken before, the scientists were able prove by very sensitive measurements and comparative photography take during that eclipse, that the position of stars in the on the new maps had moved in keeping with the predictions of Einstein. This is because the gravity of the moon, which is directly proportional in size to its mass, is big enough to attract the light coming from the visible stars to it. Because of the distortion of this path of light, the stars appeared to have moved positions on the cartographical maps during the eclipse. The same phenomenon was used to finally explain the perihelion preception observed in the orbit Mercury, that had had perplexed scientists for years. These proofs. which part of his promulgations on his theory of General Relativity, finally helped to cement the genius of Einstein; and he was then awarded a Nobel Prize in 1922, for work he did in 1905, in the discovery of the photoelectric effect. Ironically, the photoelectric effect is now a pillar of the quantum mechanics he spent the latter part of his life disparaging and attempting to disprove.
So my dear, nobody on earth has figured out the way to artificially bend light. Physics says it can be done, but we cannot do it yet.
Nonsense.
Please... stop it.