Burger King Exploits Corporate Tax Donut Hole

[SPECTRE1]

<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/AWu4kfU7Tk0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The business climate is more than tax rates, the Brazilian company that owns Burger King does not want setup their company in an aggressive militaristic state with rampant surveillance making it difficult to develop trade secrets, intellectual property and business strategy. They could have factored other things in their decision besides tax rates and taken an holistic approach. The media is making assumptions that are not supported by any evidence.

The U.S. government will spy on behalf of other companies to advantage them over this company. Already they are unfairly giving them bad press to damage their brand and hurt them to advantage U.S. companies. The U.S. was caught spying on Petrobras to steal trade secrets. Do you think they were going to just sit on it? They gave it to US companies to advantage them.

I have documented my own case of this corporate/government surveillance being used to steal trade secrets that were transferred to potential clients. When I was in Canada, I did not feel like I was being watched for 24 hours. I did not have people making noises as I completed tasks on my computer.

Not only will they get a lower tax rate, but the employees will not face a U.S. Gestapo that uses surveillance to enact terror. Brazil is taking preemptive actions to minimize US presence with respect to the internet such as routing cables. Foreigners are no longer using cloud services or other IT products with backdoors.

I am looking to start a company and the U.S. is least desirable for this fact alone.

 

[Daddy43205]

smh.

 

[SPECTRE1]

These companies may be looking to expand in international markets. Saying you are a U.S. company or have your headquarters in the US is a liability. This company can open stores in Russia, Africa, or Cuba with no issue.


If you are a cloud provider, saying you are based in the US is not a good idea.

1. It is survival of the most efficient, dumping money into the military to fight a war for 10 years will cause your tax rates to rise, we have been taking the brunt with shitty social benefits as compared to other countries.

2. Being a criminal mafia state that is lawless and racist.

3. Having little to no sense of morality.

4. Rampant corruption and state murders.

5. No rule of law.

I am setting up my company, it does not matter if the tax rate is 0% in The U.S., being spied on and dealing with corruption is a deal breaker.


First after finding out you have IP to steal through illegal surveillance, they character assassinate you damaging your reputation through baseless lies, then spy, than steal.

For example, regarding banks and debt instruments, I was called a patent troll and other character attacks, than I was spied upon, than IP is stolen and used without compensation.


Not only is the victim character and good name ruined, they are out of money and time spent researching the matter. This is why Tax Rates don't matter when you see this type of immoral behavior.

 

[thoughtone]

Just a reminder!

As I see it...

thoughtone believes corporations AND capitalism are bad... BUT the Federal government is good (or can be).

Lamarr believes capitalism is GOOD (or can be)... BUT corporations and the Federal government are bad.

I believe corporations, capitalism, and the Federal government are all BAD and there is no redemption in any of them.

I don't believe in absolutes. Without government there is anarchy. Absolute laissez-faire capitalism is parasitic. Too much of either is dangerous. However by design we have control over our government if we don't concede control to the money interests. The sole reason for capitalism is to turn a profit. It is amoral. If I don’t like my government, technically I can petition the government and have a say in changing it. If I have problem with a corporation, I will get arrested for trespassing on private property.

I think I'm more correct.