Biden is the least electable candidate — here's why

There is nothing to be excited about none of them; Biden is full of shit, just like Bernie; but the difference is Bernie would destroy the party if he became the nominee; Dems would loose the house and more seats in the senate; At least with Biden, they will hold their positions even if he lost the national election; and the Dems would be able to regroup after Trump....

I think it's just the opposite bruh. If Biden wins and produces another tepid term of no meaningful progress for the bulk of Americans (in contrast to the amazing financial, legislative and strategic windfalls enjoyed by a sliver of the population who have almost literally bought and paid for these outcomes over 45+ years) it will further disenfranchise and discourage folks from any participation in this fucked up system. Y'all think voter turn out is low now? Wait until 4-8 years of technocratic pablum from corporate Dems. That'll prob pave the way for the emergence of a more shrewd and insane fascist than this retarded orange fuck and his minions. That's assuming Biden can even win which I honestly doubt having watched and listened to this sad old fuck extensively of late. Trump is the fucking worst and he's sundowning harder than a mfer now too but he occasionally gets a good joke off and knows how to play to his cultist base. Dems. Stay. Fucking. Up. :smh:
 
I think it's just the opposite bruh. If Biden wins and produces another tepid term of no meaningful progress for the bulk of Americans (in contrast to the amazing financial, legislative and strategic windfalls enjoyed by a sliver of the population who have almost literally bought and paid for these outcomes over 45+ years) it will further disenfranchise and discourage folks from any participation in this fucked up system. Y'all think voter turn out is low now? Wait until 4-8 years of technocratic pablum from corporate Dems. That'll prob pave the way for the emergence of a more shrewd and insane fascist than this retarded orange fuck and his minions. That's assuming Biden can even win which I honestly doubt having watched and listened to this sad old fuck extensively of late. Trump is the fucking worst and he's sundowning harder than a mfer now too but he occasionally gets a good joke off and knows how to play to his cultist base. Dems. Stay. Fucking. Up. :smh:

You can't beat this through peoples heads...I expect some new progressive party to form as a result of this fiasco.
 
Sharkbait is a agent


He started this thread to build up hype and steam for sleepy joe then act like he a Berber

U demons are crazy as shit


See y’all in November.


-Shady out

Lmao... shut your failed detective ass up bruh. :roflmao3:

"Agent", "Berber"... it's almost like you just picking nouns at random on some ESL shit. Ol Chicago by way of Zamunda lookin ass lmao
 
I guess you guys just don’t want to believe the federal reserve data that she based the article on but hey its all good ,my portfolio is up there so you keep doing what you doing and I will keep doing what um doing , you can’t teach people that don’t want to learn.I have been investing for a while and know the language of money and just about every white person I talk to is knowable of that language , i know the money these people have and 1 in 7 is an underestimation, if I talk to anybody black say about ETFs or mutual funds or shorts and longs or market order vs limit order I get a blank stare or they start bulkshitzzing bout buying property on credit and living in the flow , hey I got my M’s so i give up -good luck.

I don’t believe it and she’s misrepresenting the data. It’s not that 1 of 7 white households have a million in asset, it’s there is enough wealth in the white community for 1 of 7 households to have a million. She later goes on to say that numbers are skewed by the wealthy. She also later states that the average white college educated household has less than 300k in asset. There is no way that the average white person has a million.
 
I think it's just the opposite bruh. If Biden wins and produces another tepid term of no meaningful progress for the bulk of Americans (in contrast to the amazing financial, legislative and strategic windfalls enjoyed by a sliver of the population who have almost literally bought and paid for these outcomes over 45+ years) it will further disenfranchise and discourage folks from any participation in this fucked up system. Y'all think voter turn out is low now? Wait until 4-8 years of technocratic pablum from corporate Dems. That'll prob pave the way for the emergence of a more shrewd and insane fascist than this retarded orange fuck and his minions. That's assuming Biden can even win which I honestly doubt having watched and listened to this sad old fuck extensively of late. Trump is the fucking worst and he's sundowning harder than a mfer now too but he occasionally gets a good joke off and knows how to play to his cultist base. Dems. Stay. Fucking. Up. :smh:
Dude you cant believe that Sanders would have won; you cant believe that; and regardless of who is in office they all will cater to the super rich; "he who has the gold, makes the rules"....so it doesnt matter we will always be picking the lesser of two evils until this country, all of us wakes up...
 
This is such a baffling argument bruh. For one thing Bernie is single handedly responsible for making expanded health care coverage (M4A or some neolib variant), expanded education, increased minimum wage and big ambitious New Deal projects key planks of almost every candidate in the 2020 primaries. He is literally the only one forcing Dems to consider running on progressive, serious platforms and his run in '15 precipitated that. Beyond his obv sincerity having championed these issues for decades when it was far from popular the fallacy in your argument amounts to this notion that "if hasn't been done yet it's not worth pursuing" and that's not a meaningful argument. All progress in this country has been won by popular movements in the face of staunch resistance and I'm honestly thankful af that some of y'all brothers weren't around during the more ambitious and productive movements of our past throwing cold water on everything at all times for literally no reason. Cheer Biden if you want but don't pretend that his candidacy is something to be excited about. And def don't pretend that his sundowning ass is going to present a formidable rejoinder to Trump's clown show presidency :smh:

Dems stay fucking up.
Just of his foreign policy votes alone Sanders shits on Biden. We don't have to bring up anything fucking else. What was the Iraq War vote? Just look at Bernie when the sky was falling under Bush(with the help of democrats like Biden). IMHO the Iraq War vote should disqualify anyone from being president. It's that serious of a fucking mistake OR it was corruption.

Look how wall street responded to Biden. Even CNN had a piece on that shit.

How can Sanders(and others) accomplish shit when a lot of democrats been acting like republican lite the last few decades?

Due to Sanders being dismissive of some black issues, I'm not big on him, but he's clearly better than Biden. Shit ain't even close. They are like different political lifeforms. :smh:
 
We measure wealth in cash cars and jewelry and houses , things we can see , thats because we don’t speak the language of money , for instance do you know what they are saying if you watch cnbc or the Bloomberg channel . Most whites l deal with have brokerage accounts and contribute maximally to their tax sheltered retirement plans , after a few years of that it is relatively easy to get an account value of $1M, we on the other hand borrow and spend to the max which is the surest way to penury, if you don’t say code words like s&p, fed reserve , etf, the market is up or down today , people with money wont talk to you ,so you cant see them, or they will talk money investment words over your head, then they talk back to you bout consumer shitz like what color the new Mercedes come in, or the new stuff on the latest truck.meanwhile they drawing 100k a year interest on they first million which rapidly growing to 2 M, first thing you know they done left the job and retired 45 years old and you still paying car notes and school loans, yes its tru 1 in 7 are worth at least 1 M, having investments myself I can tell in a few words if a person has money without them knowing it , and I can tell most people on this board are totally ignorant about money just by reading the post.
Really?
What would you guestimate my net worth and annual household income to be?
I live in Collierville Tennessee. I'm black..and can I have the name and address of the bank that's handing out 10% on 1mil deposits. Or did you mean 10% ROI in general? Hell if you can gaurantee me that you can get some of this 401k money right now. Dat bitch took a hit from the virus.

1 in 7 cacs are not millionaires.
 
I'm not sure if she knows what she's talking about. The way I read it is it's based on the average, not that 1 out of 7 families are reporting that. That's like if me and twenty of my friends joined a book club with Bill Gates. The average wealth of the book club would be billions but only one of us is a billionaire. I'm sure a lot more people have assets worth a million dollars now but I wouldn't call them millionaires. That would include their homes, whose value could drop 10% tomorrow and their 401k, which value did just drop 11%. They can't even touch that money until they're 59 1/2 without paying a penalty. If you can't put your hands on a million dollars within hours, you're not a millionaire.

"The accumulation of white wealth looks set to continue. The average white household, worth about $930,000 in 2016, will accumulate a net worth of more than $1 million by the time the next triennial survey comes out in 2020, Hamilton said. (The reported average is skewed by wealthy outliers. The median white household was worth $171,000 in 2016.) "

If white people with degrees are reporting less than 300k in assets, there's no way that 1 out 7 are millionaires.

Every so often you see something and you gotta point it out..

The last line in bold...you have it wrong.

A person doesn't have to have a million liquid to be a millionaire..just like a billionaire doesn't have to have that much liquid. Your assets DO determine your wealth.

Billionaires have millions in stock shares, more often...own a team worth a few billion.
.real estate.

You're correct about the avg wealth, if you added Gates to your group, and THAT'S what's skewed about the whole rosy economy numbers... there's enough being made at the top of the scale to make it appear the average citizen is doing well.
 
OP needs to edit this title to the "MOST electable" this doesn't mean you like them, that should be obvious by now!

Ole' "Vice" Potus still got some tricks up his sleeve.

450
He got juice like Cornelius Moss from Designated Survivor
:idea: Damn near look just like him.
GettyImages-1131072576-1024x668.jpg
 
Every so often you see something and you gotta point it out..

The last line in bold...you have it wrong.

A person doesn't have to have a million liquid to be a millionaire..just like a billionaire doesn't have to have that much liquid. Your assets DO determine your wealth.

Billionaires have millions in stock shares, more often...own a team worth a few billion.
.real estate.

You're correct about the avg wealth, if you added Gates to your group, and THAT'S what's skewed about the whole rosy economy numbers... there's enough being made at the top of the scale to make it appear the average citizen is doing well.

I understand what you're saying. I realize that most would probably consider themselves millionaires if they have a million combined in a 401k and house value, I'm saying in my opinion, if you have to sell your house to get your hands on money, you're not a millionaire. To me a millionaire is someone who can get their hands on the money quickly, money in stocks (non 401k) and savings.
 
I understand what you're saying. I realize that most would probably consider themselves millionaires if they have a million combined in a 401k and house value, I'm saying in my opinion, if you have to sell your house to get your hands on money, you're not a millionaire. To me a millionaire is someone who can get their hands on the money quickly, money in stocks (non 401k) and savings.

And I respectfully understand what you're saying. But the truth of the matter is that how it works financially..neither you or I get to determine it. This system was set up long before we were born.
 
This is such a baffling argument bruh. For one thing Bernie is single handedly responsible for making expanded health care coverage (M4A or some neolib variant), expanded education, increased minimum wage and big ambitious New Deal projects key planks of almost every candidate in the 2020 primaries. He is literally the only one forcing Dems to consider running on progressive, serious platforms and his run in '15 precipitated that. Beyond his obv sincerity having championed these issues for decades when it was far from popular the fallacy in your argument amounts to this notion that "if hasn't been done yet it's not worth pursuing" and that's not a meaningful argument. All progress in this country has been won by popular movements in the face of staunch resistance and I'm honestly thankful af that some of y'all brothers weren't around during the more ambitious and productive movements of our past throwing cold water on everything at all times for literally no reason. Cheer Biden if you want but don't pretend that his candidacy is something to be excited about. And def don't pretend that his sundowning ass is going to present a formidable rejoinder to Trump's clown show presidency :smh:

Dems stay fucking up.
Now what has Bernie gotten passed during his long time in congress (which consist of more than just dems, progressive, etc..)?
 
Every so often you see something and you gotta point it out..

The last line in bold...you have it wrong.

A person doesn't have to have a million liquid to be a millionaire..just like a billionaire doesn't have to have that much liquid. Your assets DO determine your wealth.

Billionaires have millions in stock shares, more often...own a team worth a few billion.
.real estate.

You're correct about the avg wealth, if you added Gates to your group, and THAT'S what's skewed about the whole rosy economy numbers... there's enough being made at the top of the scale to make it appear the average citizen is doing well.
Also wyfolks are more likely to have quarter and half million dollar life insurance policies which can add to their assets/portfolios
 
I guess you guys just don’t want to believe the federal reserve data that she based the article on but hey its all good ,my portfolio is up there so you keep doing what you doing and I will keep doing what um doing , you can’t teach people that don’t want to learn.I have been investing for a while and know the language of money and just about every white person I talk to is knowable of that language , i know the money these people have and 1 in 7 is an underestimation, if I talk to anybody black say about ETFs or mutual funds or shorts and longs or market order vs limit order I get a blank stare or they start bulkshitzzing bout buying property on credit and living in the flow , hey I got my M’s so i give up -good luck.
And when you get finished talking... One in seven cacs still won't be millionaires.
 
We measure wealth in cash cars and jewelry and houses , things we can see , thats because we don’t speak the language of money , for instance do you know what they are saying if you watch cnbc or the Bloomberg channel . Most whites l deal with have brokerage accounts and contribute maximally to their tax sheltered retirement plans , after a few years of that it is relatively easy to get an account value of $1M, we on the other hand borrow and spend to the max which is the surest way to penury, if you don’t say code words like s&p, fed reserve , etf, the market is up or down today , people with money wont talk to you ,so you cant see them, or they will talk money investment words over your head, then they talk back to you bout consumer shitz like what color the new Mercedes come in, or the new stuff on the latest truck.meanwhile they drawing 100k a year interest on they first million which rapidly growing to 2 M, first thing you know they done left the job and retired 45 years old and you still paying car notes and school loans, yes its tru 1 in 7 are worth at least 1 M, having investments myself I can tell in a few words if a person has money without them knowing it , and I can tell most people on this board are totally ignorant about money just by reading the post.

Bruh, how many CACs you know under 40?

If we're just going off anecdotal evidence most CACs I know have student loan debt and credit card debt. Many of them are getting help from mom and dad to pay rent and they have roommates - and they're in their 30s. LOL @ retire at 45.
 
But the difference that many black people arent seeing is that once pink mom and/or dad passes, that wealth goes straight to their children.

With black people, (those of us of a "particular" lineage), we are at times supporting our parents financially because they are living cheque to cheque.

When our parents or gran parents die though, we are left with a funeral bill that most have to share the cost to be able to pay.

Those pink baby boomers, through death, are about transfer TRILLIONS to those pinks that you are mocking in your post.

Case in point, I know of a pink grandma who recently died and left her 3 granddaughters 50k a piece. They all used the money to put down-payments on homes.

Black gen-xers or millennials wont be able to compete with this. We are going to be priced out.

Inheritance will be the name of the game in the future.
 
The article is behind a paywall so I'm going to cut and paste it. Maybe I'm reading the article wrong but it looks like what they're saying is that the white only economy is big enough that 1 out of 7 households could have wealth of 1million if the money was evenly distributed but that figure is skewed because of the ultra-wealthy 1%. It looks that 1 of 7 is derived from the average, which is skewed because of the rich. I don't know if I'm saying this correctly but it averages out to 1 out of 7 but that not what it actually is. Again, the Bill Gates scenario would be appropriate.


The accumulation of white wealth looks set to continue. The average white household, worth about $930,000 in 2016, will accumulate a net worth of more than $1 million by the time the next triennial survey comes out in 2020, Hamilton said. (The reported average is skewed by wealthy outliers. The median white household was worth $171,000 in 2016.)
White families vastly outperform African Americans and Hispanics in several key indicators of wealth: homeownership and equity, investments, and inheritance.
White families have nearly 10 times the net worth of black families. And the gap is growing.
Much of the growth in white wealth during the past two decades comes from the doubling of financial assets, including stocks and bonds, as well as pensions and retirement accounts, according to a Washington Post analysis of Fed data. Equity in their primary residences as well as equity in nonfinancial assets such as second homes and other real estate, boats, cars and jewels grew as well, but not as significantly.


White families are twice as likely as black and Hispanic families to own stocks or mutual funds. Sixty percent of white families invest in the stock market, while less than one-third of black and Hispanic families have any exposure to the stock market, according to Fed data.
Among American households invested in the market, the median value of white-owned investments rose to $50,000 in 2016, indicating a recovery from the Great Recession. The median value of black-owned and Hispanic-owned investments also rose but remained below 2007 values, at about $12,000. All numbers have been adjusted for inflation.

When it comes to homeownership, often the largest component of wealth for American families, nearly three-quarters of white families own their homes, compared with less than half of black and Hispanic families.


Even among homeowners, minority-owned homes had lower values, in part because of racist practices such as redlining that prohibited them from buying residences in many white neighborhoods.
“If you are a black homeowner, you are more likely to have a lower value on your home because of neighborhood segregation,” said Valerie Wilson, director of the Economic Policy Institute’s program on race, ethnicity, and the economy. “Blacks couldn’t purchase in white communities where values were rising faster.”
The average housing wealth for white families was more than twice that of black and Hispanic families in 2016.
White families are more likely to trade up to pricier homes over time, whereas black families are more likely to lose their homes or stay in the same house for a lifetime, said Brendan O’Flaherty, a Columbia University economist who studies the economics of race.

“The idea of a starter house is predominantly a white phenomenon,” O’Flaherty said.
Black and Hispanic families are also much less likely to inherit wealth than their white counterparts. One-quarter of white households reported receiving an inheritance, compared with 8 percent of blacks and 5 percent of Hispanics.
The Republican tax plan, released last week, could further widen the country’s gaping economic divide, delivering major gains for the richest 1 percent of Americans, according to an analysis by the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, a leading group of nonpartisan experts.
“The racial disparities in wealth, which is the paramount indicator of economic opportunity, security and overall well being, remain stark,” Hamilton said. “And if the Trump tax plan, which includes the elimination of the estate tax, is made into law, it will only get even larger.”
Ted Mellnik contributed to this report.
 
Last edited:
He's a CAC like you so sisters are fair game. Trump probably fucked his daughter but you cool with that aren't you?

:lol: @ “CAC like me”.

“Touching” your children is a demented way of thinking but if it happened you should be asking your man “Tragic Johnson” who looks the most suspect to do it. You LA incest, pedos have proven that if the first goes down, it is going down with the son.




:smh:
 
His sister’s or wife’s? Because he can’t even tell the difference anymore.

but BGOL wants him to be POTUS :eek2:
Fucking crazy.

I hope everyone with primaries left are getting out to vote for Bernie. Who also has one foot in the grave.

oh well, hopefully trump gets the Coronavirus at one of his rallies. About the only thing that will stop his re-election
 
It really doesn't matter. Biden is who they want and Biden is who they will get.

If by some stretch he wins, I don't want to see one post how he got in on the black vote and hasn't done shit for black people.

You should vote for him because he got you Clarence Thomas...
 
What a time to be alive.
The cac who's senile and actually is personally responsible for locking up a generation of Black men and women and children, is getting props as a better alternative than the current administration because "theY miGHt dO soMEthiNG In tHE fUtuRe"

:wakeup:
 
Biden was not my choice but if it's between him or Trump? It's Biden easily for me. Trump and the Republicans have been putting white conservative judges on the Supreme Court, loading the Federal Courts with white conservative judges, undoing everything Obama has done. Politics is a dirty game, sometimes you have to vote for someone you don't want to but doing nothing can keep the other guy in office who is far worse. This shit is chess not checkers!
 
Back
Top