BGOL Space: Famed Physicist Shuts Down Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists
- Thread starter playahaitian
- Start date
yeah- its the same mountain range - but you don't have enough information or markers / land marks to determine the distance to the range...
If its a mile away - ok - sumtingwong...
but if its 10 or 20 miles away? You can vary angle and move closer to it than the lander without much change... in both pics at the "base" there are delineations that look to my eye like horizons
It's interesting how money is the only thing that separates the 99% from the 1%. Don't the 1% realize they still have to die?
Its 2016...im still waiting on moon rides
Since all you smart mfs claim they went...technology is better than ever since the late 60's
I'll wait for a link so I can purchase one
It's that easy right...i googled it and still can't find shit...mfs talking about going to Mars..how stupid is that when we can't even build a space colony 250,000 miles away and they want to go further....
Stop the bullshit fellas
Since all you smart mfs claim they went...technology is better than ever since the late 60's
I'll wait for a link so I can purchase one
It's that easy right...i googled it and still can't find shit...mfs talking about going to Mars..how stupid is that when we can't even build a space colony 250,000 miles away and they want to go further....
Stop the bullshit fellas
man that point is very uninformed.. yes our technology has advanced but its still not good enough
Mars has gravity similar to Earth - the moon doesn't
1. we don't have the technology to generate artificial gravity on the moon
2. human bodies are not designed to survive in micro gravity. An astronaut just spent a year in space in the ISS -
read for your self how the human body breaks down in prolonged micro gravity https://www.nasa.gov/1ym
3. moon has no atmosphere - so no protection from meteor strikes AND we don't have technology to terraform and create large scale nitrogen /oxygen / carbon dioxide rich environments.
4. Mars has a carbon dioxide rich environment - we have the technology and plant life that can produce oxygen in its environment and eventually hydrogen and water
just THINK
Last edited:
read this:
astronauts spend as little time as possible within the van allen belts. We keep our International Space Station (ISS) below the lower belt and we keep our GPS and communication satellites in the gap between the two belts.
The only time humans have crossed through the Van Allen belts was during the Apollo missions to the moon. The Apollo vehicles only spent about 15 minutes in the most dangerous region and less than an hour total in the belts (each way). Their total exposure within the Van Allen belts during each leg of the journey was about 13 Rads and their shielding absorbed/deflected most of that. The Apollo crews experienced between 0.16-1.14 Rads during their mission.
To give an indication of scale. NASA restricts the career exposure of a male astronaut the age of the Apollo astronauts to around 300 Rads (coincidentally, an exposure to 300 Rads within one hour is the standard for a lethal dose.)
So, the key is to just not spend a lot of time in the belts.
Incidentally, there is a region called the South Atlantic anomaly (SAA) in which the offset between the geomagnetic and rotational axes causes the inner Van Allen belt to dip down lower. Most of the radiation exposure astronauts face in low Earth orbit is when they cross through the SAA. At 225 km the radiation is 100X increased compared to the rest of the orbit at that altitude and at 440 km the radiation is 1000x increased. The protection of the geomagnetic field at low altitude and the danger of the SAA is a big part of the reason why we do not allow the ISS to go higher than it is (as it is, ISS astronauts, in six months, receive about 6 times the maximum recommended radiation dosage for a person on Earth, in a year).
http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/VABraddose.htm
http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2013/space-human-body/
The Moon is a desolate place with no water. No water. No grass. No blue sky. No fresh air or rivers or garden or gravity.
Then there is Earth life.
Moon living would be jail + solitary confinement in a fucking bio-dome.
with the same sick and aging mfers.
Thatscthe while point.... create a space colony so humans can live in the moonThe Moon is a desolate place with no water. No water. No grass. No blue sky. No fresh air or rivers or garden or gravity.
Then there is Earth life.
Moon living would be jail + solitary confinement in a fucking bio-dome.
with the same sick and aging mfers.
Bro you said Mars has a similar atmosphere like earth...
How would we really know that and no one has been there to prove it?
Next they will be manning a mission to another galaxy and you same dudes will be talking about its possible because that galaxy is similar to our solar sytem
ok - I'll assume you do get that we can't currently live in a zero gravity environment -right? why no one seriously considered a colony on the moon.
The same scientists that tell you about what the van allen belts are, will also tell you how we transversed it, how we observe and analyze over great distances etc...
The beautiful thing about science is it is verifiable - you don't rely on grandma's faith or an old book
you can do the work and see it for yourself.
You can learn about something and what its made of by observing it... have you ever been exposed to or heard of spectroscopy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
here is how we use it to analyze the composition of stars planets comets etc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronomical_spectroscopy
So they have known for decades what Mars' atmosphere is- before sending the 2 Mars Landers- now they have done remote analysis of soil and air and atmosphere samples.. in the last 5 years we have discovered a lot about about the planet because of those missions, every month something new comes out of the equipment we have there.
NASA Confirms Evidence That Liquid Water Flows on Mars
https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-confirms-evidence-that-liquid-water-flows-on-today-s-mars
Speaking of observable phenomena, what evidence do we have that the moon landings occurred? The only evidence is what NASA provides. Over the course of 6 missions, the greatest feat in human history was not peer reviewed once! Not one time! At no time did NASA give any other entity, domestic or foriegn, access to the raw real time data.
Oh what the fuck is going on in here....... Is this Flat Earth Pt 2.
I just saw the Title and the Page count and I immediately knew the names of the usual suspects in here.
32 pages..... Bring on the Power Point videos.
I just saw the Title and the Page count and I immediately knew the names of the usual suspects in here.
32 pages..... Bring on the Power Point videos.
But I still have some questions that need to be answered...
http://www.bgol.us/forum/index.php?...m-still-here-the-re-up-get-yo-popcorn.886528/
http://www.bgol.us/forum/index.php?...m-still-here-the-re-up-get-yo-popcorn.886528/
You can show me all of that...and I will still ask you this
It's 2016...why have we aint been back
asked and answered..
He can say all that but he can't tell us why if we so far advanced why haven5we been back
Those are are the facts
Why would Nasa return to the moon?
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Not ideal real estate. Not enough necessary resources.
If Humans are looking for a place to colonize then Mars is the closest and best option at this time.
It has water.
Water can be used for human and plant consumption. Water can be used for fuel. Water can be used to produce oxygen.
Mars also had carbon dioxide to support plant life.
At half the gravity of earth, humans will weight half as much as they do on earth and will be able to lift twice as much as on earth.
Humans will be Superhuman.
You can power a fabricated city on Mars with wind power.
Mars has organics.
None of this is true about the moon.
The Moon has no water and no atmosphere.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Been there. Done that.
Not ideal real estate. Not enough necessary resources.
If Humans are looking for a place to colonize then Mars is the closest and best option at this time.
It has water.
Water can be used for human and plant consumption. Water can be used for fuel. Water can be used to produce oxygen.
Mars also had carbon dioxide to support plant life.
At half the gravity of earth, humans will weight half as much as they do on earth and will be able to lift twice as much as on earth.
Humans will be Superhuman.
You can power a fabricated city on Mars with wind power.
Mars has organics.
None of this is true about the moon.
The Moon has no water and no atmosphere.
'Significant Amount' of Water Found on Moon
http://www.space.com/7530-significant-amount-water-moon.html
'Significant Amount' of Water Found on Moon
http://www.space.com/7530-significant-amount-water-moon.html
And the webpage has articles referring the colonization of the moon based on the prospect of finding more water which wasn't an earlier option.
The moon still doesn't have an atmosphere including wind, organics or enough gravity.
Mars' north pole is cover by an abundance of ice. They found a crater on the moon with ice.
No comparison.
if either of you listened to the video -he answered that question too... had nothing to do with costThey say it's too expensive.... apparently Mars is much cheaper
start @ 42:10
stop cherry picking facts
he DID tell you why...your ass didnt listen.
you just PROVED you dont want to be right, you WANT to be crazy.
abd yes i said CRAZY. anybody who doesnt believe the US went to the moon is fucking CRAZY.
Niggas silent as fuck on this leaked footage of them faking the moon landing tho....crickets.
and wanna talk about cherrypicking?
and wanna talk about cherrypicking?
Niggas silent as fuck on this leaked footage of them faking the moon landing tho....crickets.
and wanna talk about cherrypicking?
the vid isn't worth commenting on -
where was the vid found? who vouched for it or or who is the owner? was it authenticated by an expert or witness?
science is verifiable - your vid? not so much.
the only thing out of order is the missing telemetry from the Apollo missions - and that not enough to discredit - but everything you are working with is fantasy...
keep picking fruit
wait...didnt someone post this video???
did they delete it?
cause @ 3 minutes in it tells EXACTLY how they handle the Van Allen belts, which is how we handle all radiation, go thru it REALLY fast.
did they delete it?
cause @ 3 minutes in it tells EXACTLY how they handle the Van Allen belts, which is how we handle all radiation, go thru it REALLY fast.
And this is how I know you're too far gone. Actual footage of the moon landings being faked, outtakes of the same historical footage you've been shown for 50 years where they are CLEARLY ON A MOVIE SET. And CLEARLY FAKING THE BALL EARTH FROM A HIGH-ALTITUDE FLIGHT but y'all steadily defending the ludicrous idea that men flew to the moon in 1969.
Jeeezus Christ. I'm out, have fun!
WTF!?!
Oh Hell Naw!!
Where in that video did it say ANYTHING about going through the belts fast?!? U muthafuckas are LYING thru your teeth!!
Fast!?! FAST??? Are you serious?? You're fucking serious???
Give me the exact mark where he mentions going through the belts fast! This is insane!
