I looked back at the original PDF. The goal is to close the cost gap for the states that don't have the Medicaid expansion. The infographic wasn't made by the Whitehouse.
BGOL midterms 2022. It begins. Booker says Blacks MUST VOTE
- Thread starter Soul On Ice
- Start date
The Trump Admin committed some international crimes. I let this guy explain it.
Trump stop illegals from crossing the border. Which I don’t have a problem with. Because what about immigrants that paid thousands in lawyer fees and did it the legal way? How do you think they feel ? Why do you think a lot of Latinos are switching to republicans? They hate illegal immigrants too because some of them did it the legal way.
But fuck that that’s not the point!
How the fuck does a illegal alien get access to $450,000 dollars? But black folks that put democrats in office ? Get $ 0?
That’s just how much democrats take the black community for granted. They are willing to look out for illegal aliens before even giving any money to the black community.
No wonder these people look at us like fools and take you for granted. You have to be a sucker at this point!
People are actually defending giving illegal aliens US tax payer money. While black people that actually pay taxes get nothing and the black community is in bad condition. We need money NOT fucking illegals that are not even from the USA
Damn that slave gene is mother fucker.
I'm done. U.S. commits international crimes and no one does jack shit, but now it's different. I swear Ripple needs the lawyers these fucking Illegals got so they can help in their fight against the SEC. Shit is fucking embarrassing that illegals come here acting like refugees simply because their pockets ain't right in their home countries.I asked last year can black folks from Baltimore just go to Canada and claim they are refugees. Crickets. Baltimore had crime stats on par with some of these other places. The gangs the illegals speak on escaping.
Just sick of all the fucking hypocrisy people have when it comes to their sides. Everyone got a list of pleas to cop when their side does some fuckery.
Israel stay violating. U.S. is the only country on the plant that consistently back them. Who enforces shit against Israel? I guess it's the same people who will chin check the U.S., right?
These fucking illegals have more rights walking around than all the black Americans with bench warrants for unpaid tickets. The illegals should be walking warrants. FOH.Meanwhile, all the black immigrants dotting their Is and crossing their Ts on their immigration paperwork and the ones who didn't get quickly dumped at the airport with their shit thrown around. Can they get a check?
We could go back and forth about MFs finding loopholes in immigration. Some people paying to get visas, marrying up, finding a sponsor etc.
You're right that's not the point.
How do we get our federal government to pay money directly to Black Communities within a year without racist MFs trying to openly terrorize those same communities as fast as it's received.
My only answer for bypassing congress to get it is by doing what the illegal immigrants did. SUE the Feds!!! Sue for lack of clean water! Sue for financial discrimination! Sue for hazardous and toxic dumping! Sue for everything that has set back Black Communities for centuries.
I'm for Reparations even though I won't see a dime of it. I will continue to look for candidates at all levels that will support this. I will not join the half of Americans who don't already vote.
I asked last year can black folks from Baltimore just go to Canada and claim they are refugees. Crickets. Baltimore had crime stats on par with some of these other places. The gangs the illegals speak on escaping.
Just sick of all the fucking hypocrisy people have when it comes to their sides. Everyone got a list of pleas to cop when their side does some fuckery.
Israel stay violating. U.S. is the only country on the plant that consistently back them. Who enforces shit against Israel? I guess it's the same people who will chin check the U.S., right?
Meanwhile, all the black immigrants dotting their Is and crossing their Ts on their immigration paperwork and the ones who didn't get quickly dumped at the airport with their shit thrown around. Can they get a check?
Well the reason why the democrats are budding up to illegals is because they know in the future they can’t depend on the black vote anymore. Alot of blacks are waking up to the hustle. I personally know a lot of blacks told me if Biden does not do anything to uplift the black community. They will never vote anymore.
So they are trying to flood the border and they are even trying to pass law so non citizens can vote.
The democrats know they will never give us any reparations so they are trying to delute our vote so in the future they won’t have to depend on blacks anymore
New York Moves to Allow 800,000 Noncitizens to Vote in Local Elections (Published 2021)
New York City will become the largest municipality in the country to allow legal residents to vote if the legislation is approved as expected in December.
You doing like that mean man who was on twitter
I asked last year can black folks from Baltimore just go to Canada and claim they are refugees. Crickets. Baltimore had crime stats on par with some of these other places. The gangs the illegals speak on escaping.
Just sick of all the fucking hypocrisy people have when it comes to their sides. Everyone got a list of pleas to cop when their side does some fuckery.
Israel stay violating. U.S. is the only country on the plant that consistently back them. Who enforces shit against Israel? I guess it's the same people who will chin check the U.S., right?
Meanwhile, all the black immigrants dotting their Is and crossing their Ts on their immigration paperwork and the ones who didn't get quickly dumped at the airport with their shit thrown around. Can they get a check?
That bmore refugee thing is interesting
I wonder if chicagoians can do the same thing
we a state away from the border
Canada ends COVID-19 policy turning back asylum-seekers between border crossings
By Anna Mehler Paperny
TORONTO, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Canada is ending its pandemic-era policy of turning back asylum-seekers trying to cross into the country between ports of entry, according to a revised policy document released on Sunday.
Canada turned at least 544 would-be refugees back to the United States between March 2020 and mid-October. The government did not immediately respond to questions regarding why it was ending the policy now and what if any quarantine rules would apply to asylum-seekers who are not vaccinated.
Canada had said the measure was necessary given health concerns during the coronavirus pandemic. But refugee advocates argued attempts to claim asylum should not be considered "discretionary travel" and pointed to class exemptions Canada made during the pandemic for professional athletes, among others.
"It's a relief to see the measures for refugees align more with our international obligations, and I think it's been clear all along that public health and refugee protection could coexist," said Maureen Silcoff, a refugee lawyer and past president of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, which took the government to court over the policy.
Silcoff said it did not make sense to allow tourists entry, as Canada has begun to do, while barring people seeking protection.
An unknown number of asylum-seekers turned back were taken into indefinite U.S. immigration detention and at least two were deported, refugee lawyers working on their cases say.
Exemptions have been available since the policy began, and in August Canada began allowing more turned-back asylum-seekers to return and file refugee claims as part of what it called a "managed approach to reopening the border."
But advocates said this option was only open to those aware of it or who had legal counsel familiar with Canada's shifting system. The government defended the policy in court last month.
Canada has a Safe Third Country Agreement with the U.S. under which asylum-seekers trying to cross at official ports of entry are turned back. The agreement, challenged twice, was upheld most recently this past spring and may go to Canada's Supreme Court.
By Anna Mehler Paperny
TORONTO, Nov 22 (Reuters) - Canada is ending its pandemic-era policy of turning back asylum-seekers trying to cross into the country between ports of entry, according to a revised policy document released on Sunday.
Canada turned at least 544 would-be refugees back to the United States between March 2020 and mid-October. The government did not immediately respond to questions regarding why it was ending the policy now and what if any quarantine rules would apply to asylum-seekers who are not vaccinated.
Canada had said the measure was necessary given health concerns during the coronavirus pandemic. But refugee advocates argued attempts to claim asylum should not be considered "discretionary travel" and pointed to class exemptions Canada made during the pandemic for professional athletes, among others.
"It's a relief to see the measures for refugees align more with our international obligations, and I think it's been clear all along that public health and refugee protection could coexist," said Maureen Silcoff, a refugee lawyer and past president of the Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers, which took the government to court over the policy.
Silcoff said it did not make sense to allow tourists entry, as Canada has begun to do, while barring people seeking protection.
An unknown number of asylum-seekers turned back were taken into indefinite U.S. immigration detention and at least two were deported, refugee lawyers working on their cases say.
Exemptions have been available since the policy began, and in August Canada began allowing more turned-back asylum-seekers to return and file refugee claims as part of what it called a "managed approach to reopening the border."
But advocates said this option was only open to those aware of it or who had legal counsel familiar with Canada's shifting system. The government defended the policy in court last month.
Canada has a Safe Third Country Agreement with the U.S. under which asylum-seekers trying to cross at official ports of entry are turned back. The agreement, challenged twice, was upheld most recently this past spring and may go to Canada's Supreme Court.
Well the reason why the democrats are budding up to illegals is because they know in the future they can’t depend on the black vote anymore. Alot of blacks are waking up to the hustle. I personally know a lot of blacks told me if Biden does not do anything to uplift the black community. They will never vote anymore.
So they are trying to flood the border and they are even trying to pass law so non citizens can vote.
The democrats know they will never give us any reparations so they are trying to delute our vote so in the future they won’t have to depend on blacks anymore
New York Moves to Allow 800,000 Noncitizens to Vote in Local Elections (Published 2021)
New York City will become the largest municipality in the country to allow legal residents to vote if the legislation is approved as expected in December.www.nytimes.com
You're diluting your own vote by not voting. Texas should be a wake-up call for what happens when the GOP gets power.
I FUCKING HATE POLITICIANS....'ALLUM greedy self servin BITCHES
The fact that domestic crime was worse than the crime 'refugees' were fleeing is telling though. Naturally, that shit doesn't have anything to do with the starbucks where Rachel Maddow hangs out. So people like her can push this bullshit refugee narrative for the dem's illegals while democrat strongholds continue to run policing-for-profit rackets on black people who live in worse conditions than the refugees are fleeing.
So if the illegals are suing, who can the people of Baltimore sue? Everyone in that warzone who has been a victim of policing-for-profit should get a 450k check or run to the UN.
Black voters have been masterfully manipulated into defending/worrying about illegals. This shit is surgical.
The fact that domestic crime was worse than the crime 'refugees' were fleeing is telling though. Naturally, that shit doesn't have anything to do with the starbucks where Rachel Maddow hangs out. So people like her can push this bullshit refugee narrative for the dem's illegals while democrat strongholds continue to run policing-for-profit rackets on black people who live in worse conditions than the refugees are fleeing.
So if the illegals are suing, who can the people of Baltimore sue? Everyone in that warzone who has been a victim of policing-for-profit should get a 450k check or run to the UN.
Black voters have been masterfully manipulated into defending/worrying about illegals. This shit is surgical.
Huh? I only posted an article.
Gene and Tito = Bob Dole and Jack Kemp
I hear what you are saying. And, generally, that's how bills should work. But, we have to be honest. There have been bills, laws, ordinances, policies, and systems that specifically targeted black folk negatively. There was no "hope to capture" mentality. These oppressive acts by government officials were deliberate and targeted black folks by name.
Now, we are supposed to believe that the idea of creating bills, laws, ordinances, policies, and systems that specifically target black folk positively is now all of a sudden unheard-of. While at the same time witnessing in real time multiple acts that specifically target other groups "by name", benefiting them positively.
If we are going to have an honest conversation, you have to at least acknowledge that.
Lol!!
Well, Kemp did believe that free markets and low taxes work better than government bureaucracies. Which I wholeheartedly agree. He was on the committee to get the MLK and he was really good friends with Coretta. Plus, he was the AFL MVP in 1965. Lol!
Al gore gave us the internet tho
It is weird. The Asians just got a bill in 2021. And that bill arguably targets black Americans on the low. Because most the ass whoppings I'm seeing Asians taking were black against Asian(and that's even in NE Ohio with the few Asians we got) But hell, been tension since I was a teen, but these purple hair cacs on Twitter don't know that shit.
LGBTXYZ. Illegals. Israel. Everyone eats specifically. Black Americans.
"We will give HBCU money and take it out your poor asses through student loans it will take all your life to pay back!!!" All other shit is 'poc" bills that everyone gets a piece of.What is happening with democrats is what they say Reagan coined in the 80s: Trickle down economics. Yeah, democrats are better than the republicans, so black community gets the trickle down benefits. Can those trickle down benefits be denied. No. You'll turn into a hypocrite like the shills if you deny THOSE benefits. Those are also the 'fine print' benefits the folks tend to hit us with when we ask for specifics about what was done for the black community.
But the black community deserves MAJOR SPECIFIC benefits. Not POC(asians/hispanics eat too). And not conflating the alphabet shit with black issues.
It is weird. The Asians just got a bill in 2021. And that bill arguably targets black Americans on the low. Because most the ass whoppings I'm seeing Asians taking were black against Asian(and that's even in NE Ohio with the few Asians we got) But hell, been tension since I was a teen, but these purple hair cacs on Twitter don't know that shit.
LGBTXYZ. Illegals. Israel. Everyone eats specifically. Black Americans.
What is happening with democrats is what they say Reagan coined in the 80s: Trickle down economics. Yeah, democrats are better than the republicans, so black community gets the trickle down benefits. Can those trickle down benefits be denied. No. You'll turn into a hypocrite like the shills if you deny THOSE benefits. Those are also the 'fine print' benefits the folks tend to hit us with when we ask for specifics about what was done for the black community.
But the black community deserves MAJOR SPECIFIC benefits. Not POC(asians/hispanics eat too). And not conflating the alphabet shit with black issues.
Excellent observation by comparing Camille’s ideology with “trickle-down” economics.
Camille’s not going to endorse something that only benefits Black people! Noooooooo!
Keep the pressure on these niggas
#trickledowntangiblesIt is weird. The Asians just got a bill in 2021. And that bill arguably targets black Americans on the low. Because most the ass whoppings I'm seeing Asians taking were black against Asian(and that's even in NE Ohio with the few Asians we got) But hell, been tension since I was a teen, but these purple hair cacs on Twitter don't know that shit.
LGBTXYZ. Illegals. Israel. Everyone eats specifically. Black Americans.
What is happening with democrats is what they say Reagan coined in the 80s: Trickle down economics. Yeah, democrats are better than the republicans, so black community gets the trickle down benefits. Can those trickle down benefits be denied. No. You'll turn into a hypocrite like the shills if you deny THOSE benefits. Those are also the 'fine print' benefits the folks tend to hit us with when we ask for specifics about what was done for the black community.
But the black community deserves MAJOR SPECIFIC benefits. Not POC(asians/hispanics eat too). And not conflating the alphabet shit with black issues.
#trickledowntangibles
the fact that she even said that solidified her status as pro-white but she is a woman so I wouldn’t expect much substance.
Why would you say that? I'm not against our people having legislation targeted just for us, my earlier comment was in regard to the one you quoted, which you appeared to piggy back on, pointing out the hypocrisy. When we have pointed out in the past that legislation has helped black folks, it didn't count because it wasn't ONLY for us. However, when y'all want to spin the narrative that Biden is putting everyone above us, y'all post this stuff regarding Latinos, even though the benefits mentioned are the same benefits black folks, and everyone else gets. It's not ONLY for Latino's but that's how it's being framed for an anti-dem narrative.
The point is to ignore when legislation helps Black people. The ADOS crowd knows that calling something the "Fix Water Pipes in Black Area Only Act" would fail and get held up forever with lawsuits. However that's what they want cause the ultimate goal is for Dems to lose. So they'll tell you the "Fix Water Pipes in NYC Act" didn't do anything for Black people even tho it affect Harlem, BedSty, Jamaica Queens, etc etc.
It's always been a lie to suppress Black votes scam.
VOTE OR DIE
Similar threads
