In that 60 minutes interview, Obama said that after the bailouts, his advisers came to him and told him to slow down his agenda. The fear was that with so much money having been committed on TARP and other bailouts, the public would not be ready for something so profound as the overhaul of health care. Obama said even though he knew there would be political cost (lost House and Senate seats), he still pushed for the overhaul of the US health care system. Furthermore, he said he wanted Republican support so badly that he proposed pretty much the same health care proposal that Republicans such as Bob Dole had proposed previously.
His interviewer asked him an important question: "[are] you naive?"
______________________________________________________________
Here is why this is shocking. Obama thought his own interests were so important that he was willing to sacrifice Democrats in the Senate and the House. How can you take positions that deplete your own party's majority in the Congress? You might say the end was more important than the means? Really, if you seek ends that eventually deprive you of the means, ie, lose the House, how is that a positive thing? With super majorities in the Senate, and a huge majority in the House, why would you need to put together legislation intended to please the other side, at the cost deflating your own side? This explains all the other stuff he did, such middle of the road justices, sending troops to Afghanistan and appointing a Republican as Secretary of Defense....
Obama will see how deeply Republicans hate him, and I am not sure he understands the amount of anger felt against him by Democrats at the what transpired. The movement to dislodge the Republicans from power began without him, with people like Howard Dean. He benefitted from it, and then gave it away by reckless policies that gutted his party's majority in Congress.
I have never heard of a more arrogant politician than this....
His interviewer asked him an important question: "[are] you naive?"
______________________________________________________________
Here is why this is shocking. Obama thought his own interests were so important that he was willing to sacrifice Democrats in the Senate and the House. How can you take positions that deplete your own party's majority in the Congress? You might say the end was more important than the means? Really, if you seek ends that eventually deprive you of the means, ie, lose the House, how is that a positive thing? With super majorities in the Senate, and a huge majority in the House, why would you need to put together legislation intended to please the other side, at the cost deflating your own side? This explains all the other stuff he did, such middle of the road justices, sending troops to Afghanistan and appointing a Republican as Secretary of Defense....
Obama will see how deeply Republicans hate him, and I am not sure he understands the amount of anger felt against him by Democrats at the what transpired. The movement to dislodge the Republicans from power began without him, with people like Howard Dean. He benefitted from it, and then gave it away by reckless policies that gutted his party's majority in Congress.
I have never heard of a more arrogant politician than this....