Who is to judge?
What if they say pro life and killing babies is important...should that be discussed too?
Should they start discussing me to0?
What about equal pay for women?
And what does any of that have to do with sports?
So where else do you want to hear politics discussed? Weather Channel?
Le Batard devoted three minutes of a three hour program to this topic. Let's not lose that context.
Le Batard spent half that time not even talking about the President's racist attacks but on how sports journalism handles it. He took a meta-approach and his commentary was not "pure politics." Let's not lose that context.
Does the Weather Channel center its programming around personalities who discuss a wide range of issues for several hours a day? If not, that's a flawed comparison. (But the Weather Channel would be both smart and on-topic to incorporate scientific explanations of climate change into its 8,760 hours of weekly programming.)
The slippery slope argument is absurd. This wasn't some niche interest-- This was the most discussed and powerful man in the world engaging in
unprecedented behavior which was the top topic in the nation. Evergreen issues like abortion and equal pay are not good comparisons. And Le Batard has discussed #metoo many times, as have others because there has been obvious sports relevance at times.