OK Nate don't do it.
You don't have to answer. Just please don't jump!
![]()
You can have your mingle rights back.
![]()
1) CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THE EXAMPLES POSTED BY tre2k4 ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM?
I think the "logical ones" or really just the people that agree with you have decided to distance themselves away from your black ass who:
Can't see the connection between the OP original problem and related examples, even when the support your argument, let a alone the ones that don't.
Takes it upon yourself to hunt down a video clip of a person performing the order of operations correctly in an example that truly has no relation ship to the original problem or related examples. Proving your lack of understanding of the actual debate between the 2 and the 288.
And you refused to address questions that could possibly vindicate you from your ignorance.
The actual debate has been over for a while many of us who were on one side or the other have decided to admit that the way the problem is written, there is room for different interpretations.
What's been happening for the last several hours is folks discovering that you, one of the main contributers to this debate is a total dumb ass who had no business in the discussion from the jump.
This will be over when you stop posting and displaying your ignorance. I won't stop nigga, I won't.
So lets try this again EVEN THOUGH I KNOW YOU WON'T ANSWER IT
But Ima try to make it painful as fuck for you to keep glossing over!
1) CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THE EXAMPLES POSTED BY tre2k4 ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM?
2) CAN YOU PROVIDE ANY UPDATE ON THE HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT THAT NOBODY GAVE YOU?
3) WHAT THE FUCK DOES THE VIDEO HAVE TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM?
4)
![]()
--------------------------------------------------------------
![]()
I won't stop nigga, I won't!
i didn't look at all of the examples but i know that the first one definitely had a '+' sign in the midst of the equation what I have been saying all along should constitue a 'reset' as much as i was led to believe.
solve this?
48^1 / 2^1(9+3)^1
follow the order of operations. Parentheses? well okay let's do parentheses first because TECHNICALLY you multiply the parentheses first. but it doesn't DO ANYTHING to the problem. it literally MEANS keep this the same. you basically have entered a null value that is always there in the 'real' world of mathematics, so what?
48^1 / 2^1(9+3)
okay we KNOW we can shortcut the order of operations alr
eady because you have entered null values but let's continue and do the next value okay well order of operations says pedmas well... the term outside of the (9+3) value is 2^1 . 2^1 is equal to 2. giving me 2(9+3) under the divding sign.
48^1 / 2(9+3)
the bottom value is then multiplied by distribution. pemdas MULTIPLICATION GET'S PRECENDENCE DAR DAR!!!! you can't combine the two terms until you multiply the 2 through the equation. so what you can combine like terms 9 and 3? you HAVE TO MULTIPLY FIRST!
48^1/(18+6)
parentheses get's precendence and the simplification is 24. pemdas
48^1/(24)
the TERM on the other side of the divding sign is 48^1 unto itself SEPERATE of all things dealing with this equation so it must be simplified before it can be addressed in the equation because it is TIED to the exponent ^1.
48/24....
![]()
"CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW THE EXAMPLES POSTED BY tre2k4 ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM?"
This is not the answer to the question posted by tre2k4. Your reading comprehension is off. Take another look.
no if you look closely it is the "ambiguity" of the ORIGINAL PROBLEM debunked.
answer is TWO by ORDER OF OPERATIONS! you cannot add 9 and 3 before you multiiply.
stop cheating math! lol... shortcuts cost you everytime.![]()
So what's the answer
I don't give a fuck what you think you have nigga. You can be arrogantly dumb as you want, negro. You're wrong.
Nope. It means 42 ÷ 24.. You missed a few classes in 3rd Grade fella.
![]()
this shit is fucking hilarious..
This makes kobe vs jordan, android vs iOS (iphone), christians vs atheists, etc fucking tame... ive never seen anything on bgol as heated at this shit and Ive been on this muthafucka since it launched...lol
OK Nate don't do it.
You don't have to answer. Just please don't jump!
![]()
You can have your mingle rights back.
![]()
I hope some of you aren't helping your kids do homework
Little Maya telling the teacher, but daddy helped me do it.
Teacher just![]()
He won't. He already glossed over it. I guess PEMDAS is PEMDAS until it isn't PEMDAS.
Funny how it works.
I want followup and others to take part in the example I posted also. I truly am curious, and once again I'm fully entrenched in the 288 crew again!
Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally![]()
how are ya'll adding 9 and 3 before you multiply though?
if the parentheses tell you to multiply whatever they touch and we know parentheses get priority then why are you denying that that is the step that would come first? multiply through THEN add those two terms thus ELIMINATING THE PARENTHESES.
when else do you ADD BUT KEEP THE ADDITION SIGN HANGING AROUND? you have to eliminate all cases of parentheses from the equation first and that means starting over P.E.M.D.A.S. for each case of parentheses until they are all eliminated.
no ambiguity about these points....
Parentheses
Exponent
Multiplication
Division
Addition
Subtraction
when did 2(2+x) stop being 4x+4 ?
Official time was 04-10-2011, 08:57 PM, according to the World Atomic Clock in England.
Ima do my part though and donate 50 dollars to the HelpaNiggaLearn Foundation.
![]()
no if you look closely it is the "ambiguity" of the ORIGINAL PROBLEM debunked.
answer is TWO by ORDER OF OPERATIONS! you cannot add 9 and 3 before you multiiply.
stop cheating math! lol... shortcuts cost you everytime.![]()
how are ya'll adding 9 and 3 before you multiply though?
ARE YOU SERIOUS?!
![]()
just think about it dudeORDER OF OPERATIONS. follow the STEPS! so you're telling me that you CAN'T multiply the 2 through that equation (9+3)? if you can you must first. sure i can shortcut and add 9 and 3 and get 12 then multiply by 2 as in this case
2(9+3)=..................2(9+3)=
18+6=....................2(12)=
24............................24
but you are not following the order of operations to do it the second way becuase if are following POSSIBLE steps you must MULTIPLY first. like i said. you're cheating.
You can't, because in this instance it works like thisjust think about it dudeORDER OF OPERATIONS. follow the STEPS! so you're telling me that you CAN'T multiply the 2 through that equation (9+3)? if you can you must first. sure i can shortcut and add 9 and 3 and get 12 then multiply by 2 as in this case
2(9+3)=..................2(9+3)=
18+6=....................2(12)=
24............................24
but you are not following the order of operations to do it the second way becuase if are following POSSIBLE steps you must MULTIPLY first. like i said. you're cheating.
![]()
Man go to bed.![]()
![]()
![]()
Man go to bed.![]()
![]()
Word... peeps can't read. Rule #1 reads:
"Parentheses or any other grouping symbol that encloses operations"
Basically do everything inside the parentheses.
en·close
[en-klohz]
–verb (used with object), -closed, -clos·ing. 1. to shut or hem in; close in on all sides: a valley enclosed by tall mountains.
2. to surround, as with a fence or wall: to enclose land.
3. to insert in the same envelope, package, or the like: He enclosed a check. A book was sent with the bill enclosed.
4. to hold or contain: His letter enclosed a check.
because calculators cannot perform order of operations![]()
...
as i said before MOST calculators do not perform order of operations correctly
a problem written like this
48/2(12) is different from 48/2(9+3) and that is the problem or the misunderstanding you are having. where one is ambiguous and the other is not. you are not following order of operations as we have been saying all along![]()
eh, honest mistake doesn't invalidate my point.
whenever you are given a choice between multiplication and addition you multiply smart ass. just because you know 9 and 3 make 12 doesn't mean you can add them because you can ALSO mutliply a 2 through the equation. so now what do excuse do you have for multiplying 24 times 12?
No nigga no! Don't try to sneak no MOST in there now. I remember getting on you yesterday about this but I forgot who you were. I let that shit go, you should not have brought that shit up again bro.
^^^^^^^Further Evidence.
At some point when you keep making "Honest Mistakes", it's more important for you to be "Honest" with yourself and admit that your are a dumb-ass just like Nate.
You are making him look smart. At least that nigga left.
![]()
48÷2(9+3) = ????
this should be interesting
i see your problem now. you're caught in a mental loop - a prison based on the shape of the symbol and how it's shape is described but you're ignoring it's mathematical potential which is to distribute through by multiplication. and if you have the choice of adding or multiplying what do you do first? parentheses actually mean if you want to get technical FOCUS HERE first. and it tells you which values to focus on by closing the loop.
you're doing nothing to argue the point to the contrary just nit picking irrelevant points about some or all calculators performing orders of operation. googles does not is the bottom line and the only ones that have been shown to state that they expressly do perform them, Texas Instruments, yeild the answer of 2( in every model which possess the technology) when posed this problem as written. dumm ass nigga![]()