2015 - 2016 NBA Thread - NBA where amazing happens - all rookie team named!!!

Cool, now what about this part, there were a couple of questions embedded in here you may have missed :hmm:

"I just asked you to point out specifically where ive gotten emotional as you said a few posts back, especially with you directly. And you talk about logic and reason, yet when disagreedwith you project and label with negative descriptions and names... What part of the logic and reason dynamic does that fall under? :confused: "
One I never got emotional over shit, and two I never claimed you got emotional over shit, my claim is that you get off on trying to get people to become emotional.. Remember thats your shtick...
 
ONe way you do it is by doing exactly what you are doing now, creating so many strawmen argument hoping that I slip up and fall for it...
 
ONe way you do it is by doing exactly what you are doing now, creating so many strawmen argument hoping that I slip up and fall for it...
So, Im having a calm discussion with you, asking you to qualify and answer direct statements and accuasations YOU made, and Im creating a straw man argument? There you go projecting again Bruh trying to create a diversion. Either answer the simple questions or admit you were out of pocket and have no valid response to my basic questions and move on. Dont try to use bait and switch deflective tactics Bruh... Not cool...
 
So, Im having a calm discussion with you, asking you to qualify and answer direct statements and accuasations YOU made, and Im creating a straw man argument? There you go projecting again Bruh trying to create a diversion. Either answer the simple questions or admit you were out of pocket and have no valid response to my basic questions and move on. Dont try to use bait and switch deflective tactics Bruh... Not cool...
I answered the question by saying I never been emotional with you nor did I ever accuse you of being emotional... Bringing up something that I never claimed is how strawmen arguments are constructed... Now if I were stupid and took up your bait I would go on and on trying to prove you were more emotional than me....
 
I answered the question by saying I never been emotional with you nor did I ever accuse you of being emotional... Bringing up something that I never claimed is how strawmen arguments are constructed... Now if I were stupid and took up your bait I would go on and on trying to prove you were more emotional than me....
Ok, youbsaid i like to 'turn up the emotions' so... If i am just stating my opinions and it differs from yours and your emotions get elevated based on MY views, that is somehow a function of what I am doing? Cool... Actually makes sense :confused:
 
Ok, youbsaid i like to 'turn up the emotions' so... If i am just stating my opinions and it differs from yours and your emotions get elevated based on MY views, that is somehow a function of what I am doing? Cool... Actually makes sense :confused:
Read again, I said you like turning up emotions in other people, this is why I called you a lamper... I never claimed you got emotional...
 
Read again, I said you like turning up emotions in other people, this is why I called you a lamper... I never claimed you got emotional...
I didnt say you said I get emotional. I said its ironic that if my opinion differs from someone elses, and THEIR emotions get turned up somehow in your opinion thats MY fault :confused:
 
I didnt say you said I get emotional. I said its ironic that if my opinion differs from someone elses, and THEIR emotions get turned up somehow in your opinion thats MY fault :confused:
You said show me where I (you the speaker) got more emotional than me.... Remember this???
I didnt call you a lamper, i jist asked you to point out specifically where ive gotten emotional as you said a few posts back, especially with you directly. And you talk about logic and reason, yet when disagreed with you project and label with negative descriptions and names... What part of the logic and reason dynamic does that fall under? :confused:
 
You said show me where I (you the speaker) got more emotional than me.... Remember this???

More emotional than who?

Also, you have a unique ability to quote posts but avoid the question directed to you in the post you quoted.... Her you go again Bruh in cast you missed it the first time :popcorn:

"if my opinion differs from someone elses, and THEIR emotions get turned up somehow in your opinion thats MY fault? :confused: "
 
I concur OKC havent beaten anyway in the postseason as of late; Thats because they havent had a healthy team in 3 years right; The Spurs didnt lose on a fluke; Clippers had several opportunities in game 2 and 5 to put them away; plus they won twice in SanAntonio thats not a fluke; its just the Clips being the Clips; You kept referring to the game GS/Spurs anytime someone would say GS is great; You kept saying well it wasnt the spurs they beat, blah blah; Spurs arent that great defensively; they can be easily exploited; SelfScience has pointed this out; Again Spurs have always struggled in the past with athletic teams and they will struggle even more so this year, with those same teams...
I called it a fluke because it was a 7 game series win by the Clippers, and it happened in a home game 7 where Paul hit an off balance double clutch hope shot to get a 2 point victory. Thats fluke. And if we are giving OKC the injury excuse for 3 seasons then we have to atleast acknowledge Parker being gimpy last postseason.

Spurs have a higher offensive and defensive rating than any of their title teams... and lead the league in point differential and defensive rating.. Somehow that doesnt matter to you tho. You say they can be easily exploited but they have the 2nd best record in basketball, undefeated at home, and on historical pace in defense and point differential..:lol:

They handedly beat every team in the league this season with the exception of GS... Yet you continue to say their done and arent that great defensively.. You're ignoring stats, facts, and game play and instead just talking out your ass bro. .. And what athletic teams have they "struggled" against in the past..?? They have 5 titles... 3 recent conference final appearances...Been to two finals with this current core... Exactly where is the struggle in that?

And i honestly dont recall trashing GS chances against the Spurs like you say.. Other than shots i take at Curry and noting the Spurs played them well last season (prior to them playing them this season), i dont recall saying too much this year.

Point remains, that this Spurs team will win a 7 game series against any team you can name except GS. I stand by that, and everything we've seen this season so far supports it.
 
More emotional than who?

Also, you have a unique ability to quote posts but avoid the question directed to you in the post you quoted.... Her you go again Bruh in cast you missed it the first time :popcorn:

"if my opinion differs from someone elses, and THEIR emotions get turned up somehow in your opinion thats MY fault? :confused: "
:smh: Do you even read the bullshit you post? Or is this the troll coming out?
 
:smh: point out specifically where ive gotten emotional as you
<strawman>Remember my answer was I never claimed that you or even I have ever gotten emotional, so this is a moot point and a argument you have to take up with someone who actually gives a fuck...:hmm: </strawman>
 
Turner denies Lebron dunk attempt



Cavs beat Pacers in OT for fifth straight win



Legler: Indiana's wires got crossed at the end



LeBron breaks Jordan's ankles




Kyrie shakes rook, finishes with crafty layup
 
I agree with everything you said; rings are about teams; and thats why GS is about to go on an epic run if they stay healthy and together; but you love LBJ and think hes the best ever right?? To me regardless of rings, LBJ is one of the greats but hes not the greatest; and his play and attitude lately (sometimes) are less than desirable; ive seen better players since ive been watching bball; but LBJ is great though...

No Wilt is the best ever. And Golden State at most has 1 more title run left on them. Enjoy this while it lasts cuz once its time to pay Steph. :itsawrap:
 
Damn man, last year It Is What It Is along with Road Rage and Gene was one of the biggest Cleveland supporters, now he's beefin wit em. Hopped off the wagon. I cant find a single Curry or Golden State post you made in 2014. :lol:
 
What is the fucken question????

You referenced i am a Lamper because I say things to cause an emotional rise out of people. I say first off, what proof do you have that this is my objective and also, if just because my viewpoint differs from someones and they get upset by my opinion since its different from theirs, how is them getting upset my fault?
 
No Wilt is the best ever. And Golden State at most has 1 more title run left on them. Enjoy this while it lasts cuz once its time to pay Steph. :itsawrap:

:lol::lol:You sir sound crazy; But ill play along; So GS wins this year right, because u said they have 1 more title in them; Please tell me who is beating them next year???? Ill wait...And as of right now who is beating them the year after next, etc...Oh this should be good...
 
No Wilt is the best ever. And Golden State at most has 1 more title run left on them. Enjoy this while it lasts cuz once its time to pay Steph. :itsawrap:

Cool I can dig Wilt; but you love comparing MJ and LBJ why?? Also you think GS wont pay Steph:lol::lol:; With the new money the NBA is getting, dude GS really lucked up; they locked up Green and Thompson for the cheap; And steph will get paid trust that; Only player they might lose is Festis...
 
:lol::lol:You sir sound crazy; But ill play along; So GS wins this year right, because u said they have 1 more title in them; Please tell me who is beating them next year???? Ill wait...And as of right now who is beating them the year after next, etc...Oh this should be good...

Its hard to say, the league is constantly changing. In 2014 nobody on this board, yourself included was hollaring Golden State, now they are impenetrable and will win 4 straight titles. :lol: Things change quickly. Winning titles gets harder and harder each year, it doesnt get easier. Once they pay Curry what he's worth they wont have the flexibility to have the deep bench that they have.
 
No Wilt is the best ever. And Golden State at most has 1 more title run left on them. Enjoy this while it lasts cuz once its time to pay Steph. :itsawrap:

GS bout to get Durant :lol:

I'd say they got bout 5-6 more title runs :smh:

Inkoski done on them chips... He's def a first ballot hall of gamer tho
 
You referenced i am a Lamper because I say things to cause an emotional rise out of people. I say first off, what proof do you have that this is my objective and also, if just because my viewpoint differs from someones and they get upset by my opinion since its different from theirs, how is them getting upset my fault?
Well its my opinion based off of my observation and your going on and on with silly questions... Its well documented how you flip flop year after year, last year you was pro Cavs saying everything possible to get under the nerves of Bulls and Heat fans, this year your are anti Cavs saying anything to get under the skin of Cavs fans...
I never said I was upset with your tactics again I just said it was your shtick, what you use to get things popping for your entertainment... P.S. this is why you love popping out the eating popcorn emoji, because this is what your are actually doing in your mind, sitting back and being entertained, like its some movie or something...
Hope that answers your question.... Hit me back when you have something else that is eating your brains, thats enough for now, you rest your head now, I have nothing more to add to the subject!
 
Its hard to say, the league is constantly changing. In 2014 nobody on this board, yourself included was hollaring Golden State, now they are impenetrable and will win 4 straight titles. :lol: Things change quickly. Winning titles gets harder and harder each year, it doesnt get easier. Once they pay Curry what he's worth they wont have the flexibility to have the deep bench that they have.

Concur and agree; But no one knew how Steph and the other GS players would develop; also lets not play the if game; As of right now, who is beating them?? And remember they are still developing; you do realize that right; Steph, Thompson, Barnes, and Green can/will get better; Thats 4 starters getting better; and Festis if they keep him will get better; Oh and they havent hit their prime yet, none of them; Only Iggy, Barbosa, Bogut, and Livingston have hit their primes; Dont forget they still have 4 other players who can play that are young; And that Kevin kid who they got at the in of the draft, can play also; And players will go their to play with them, for less money, just like other teams before; Im telling you right now, EPIC RUN like the bulls and lakers and celtics, WATCH!!!!
 
Last edited:
GS bout to get Durant :lol:

I'd say they got bout 5-6 more title runs :smh:

Inkoski done on them chips... He's def a first ballot hall of gamer tho

I dont see KD going to Golden State to play the Harrison Barnes role. They already got 2 max contracts and bout to hand out another to Steph next year. Someone would have to take a serious paycut.
 
Well its my opinion based off of my observation and your going on and on with silly questions... Its well documented how you flip flop year after year, last year you was pro Cavs saying everything possible to get under the nerves of Bulls and Heat fans, this year your are anti Cavs saying anything to get under the skin of Cavs fans...
I never said I was upset with your tactics again I just said it was your shtick, what you use to get things popping for your entertainment... P.S. this is why you love popping out the eating popcorn emoji, because this is what your are actually doing in your mind, sitting back and being entertained, like its some movie or something...
Hope that answers your question.... Hit me back when you have something else that is eating your brains, thats enough for now, you rest your head now, I have nothing more to add to the subject!
You typed a lot but only offered what youve been doing, making unsubstantiated claims and presenting things as facts while offering concrete, but do you Bruh...

Anyway, like I said before, how does pointing out negatives mean I flip flop? When did I say I was anti Cavs? Please enlighten me Bruh?! If I say LeBron is the best player in the league and later I notice he slacks on defense or isnt playing well that means Im flip flopping? So because you like a player you cant be objective? Thats pure and utter nonsense Dude, all Due Respect!!! Makes absolutely no sense... None!

And as far as the popcorn emoji, you do kbow what it is used for right?! I used it in the context of, we are in a debate and i am waiting for your response so we can continue our dialog. Actually seems like you are reaching Bruh and if Heat fans were annoyed by my posts thats on them. And you call my questions or post silly because they differ from your viewpoint? You are the one initiating negativity Bruh, but Im the problem? :cool:

Also, I can appreciate your attempts at being dismissive at the end of your post too. Almost slipped that by me but I see you Bruh, I see you... Good stuff, really good stuff :cheers:
 
I dont see KD going to Golden State to play the Harrison Barnes role. They already got 2 max contracts and bout to hand out another to Steph next year. Someone would have to take a serious paycut.

Green is not a max contract; And thompson is not either once you factor in the salary cap jump; As of right now the only max contract on the horizon will be Steph; GS will be in good position financially because of luck; Luck has played a part with their team; Green was a 2nd round pick!!!!!!; look at how he is developing; They didnt trade Thompson for Love, great move; Firing M Jackson, another good move; Steph development well enough said..
 
You typed a lot but only offered what youve been doing, making unsubstantiated claims and presenting things as facts while offering concrete, but do you Bruh...

Anyway, like I said before, how does pointing out negatives mean I flip flop? When did I say I was anti Cavs? Please enlighten me Bruh?! If I say LeBron is the best player in the league and later I notice he slacks on defense or isnt playing well that means Im flip flopping? So because you like a player you cant be objective? Thats pure and utter nonsense Dude, all Due Respect!!! Makes absolutely no sense... None!

And as far as the popcorn emoji, you do kbow what it is used for right?! I used it in the context of, we are in a debate and i am waiting for your response so we can continue our dialog. Actually seems like you are reaching Bruh and if Heat fans were annoyed by my posts thats on them. And you call my questions or post silly because they differ from your viewpoint? You are the one initiating negativity Bruh, but Im the problem? :cool:
Before you work yourself up with another rant, ask yourself this simple question, where did I or anyone say you are a problem... If you can answer that I will shut up and call it a day, if you don't answer please go no further, because from that point on you are doing it to yourself...
 
Before you work yourself up with another rant, ask yourself this simple question, where did I or anyone say you are a problem... If you can answer that I will shut up and call it a day, if you don't answer please go no further, because from that point on you are doing it to yourself...
So, accusing me of saying things to get a rise out of people emotionally isnt translated as a negative or a problem.... Especially when you link the context of that statement with me being 'troll like'? Cool, I guess being linked to troll behavior is a positive and a compliment. My bad Bruh, as usual I stand corrected. Maybe I read your multiple posts on that topic describing me wrong.... :hmm:
 
Back
Top