***The Lie called Evolution***

Christians believe that humans were created by their god in his image. If there is intelligent life on other planets, then we are not necessarily the most important, unless they look exactly like humans. For this reason they tend to reject that there is intelligent life anywhere else in the universe., it would also demonstrate that the Bible is bullshit which is too much for them to stomach and it would shatter all of their delusions, at which point they would have no other choice but to start acting responsible for their actions good or bad, instead of saying one of the following: its god will that this happen to me, god gave me this, or the devil made me do this...either way it go It aint gods fault
 
I think evolution is full of shit because why did humans stop evolving and why are there still monkies and apes NOT evolving into human.

Nothing has stopped evolving. Humans are just a second of time compared to the longevity of Earth. Evolving is a gradual process and not something we can witness or document over the existence of humanity.

Earth is older than religion and its concepts.
 
I have no idea why Black people will believe literally everything we hear except two things...

1. Science
2. Logic

......

Bcuz science and logic are for white people:rolleyes:

Don't you think that it makes plenty of sense that a man walked in water or that aliens manipulated some primate DNA to make us, however it's complete nonsense the idea that DNA mutates which gives it's owners small advantages, which gives them a better chance to reproduce, which over time and the accumulation of multiple mutations leads to species branching off?

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

and you're full of shit because people like you keep saying that even though it's been said numerous times that man doesn't come from Monkeys and apes.

Man, Apes, Monkeys, Chimps, Bonobos and any other kind of primate you can name all share a common ancestor- Apes ARE their own evolution. Same with all the others.

Being human is not a GOAL of evolution, because evolution doesn't have a goal. It may seem so, because obviously we have this great intelligence (although your question makes me doubt even that), but the goal of an ape or a dog, or any other animal is not to eventually morph into a human. What it is, IS the latest and greatest species in its evolutionary journey.


Please look that question up and see someone else answer it. It's only the most COMMON misconception about what evolution is. Once you understand that, then you are on your way to understanding REALITY.


If you keep hanging on to the same bullshit question, then theres no doubt you will keep being happy with ignorance.

It's been answered at least 100 times in all the threads you guys ask it, but you never read it.


Heres a question for you though, that even deals with the same dumb reasoning :

If White Americans evolved from Europeans then how come there are still Europeans?

c/s


My man right here is becoming the BGOL Sarah Palin

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

better yet, where's the missing link between humans and primates (if there is one).

Humans are primates
 
Xking,
I actually am a scientist....
You just don't know what to do with that, so you focus on that.

What about the parts when I say that CREDIBLE scientists don't agree with your theories?

Stay on the subject.
 
Xking,
I actually am a scientist....
You just don't know what to do with that, so you focus on that.

What about the parts when I say that CREDIBLE scientists don't agree with your theories?

Stay on the subject.

ok.

what do those credible scientists say?


I actually said the same thing in the other thread. There are lots of things to quibble about as far as evolution is concerned. You have named NONE OF THEM.

And I would ask you to prove that you're a scientist, but the best way for you to do it is to just make sense.
 
Wow,
can't have a day off? May not be in your timezone? What difference does it make where I am now?
WHERE ARE YOU NOW? Are you a scientist?

You don't seem capable of, or able to comment on my point>>>> Credible scientists disagree with your theory. That means your theory is NOT a fact about evolution.
 
Wow,
can't have a day off? May not be in your timezone? What difference does it make where I am now?
WHERE ARE YOU NOW? Are you a scientist?

You don't seem capable of, or able to comment on my point>>>> Credible scientists disagree with your theory. That means your theory is NOT a fact about evolution.


again,


which credible scientists? What do they say? Then we can go in that direction.
 
Here we go:
Jeffrey S. Levinton, “The Big Bang of Animal Evolution,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84

I. Axelrod, “Early Cambrian Marine Fauna,” Science, Vol. 128, 4 July 1958, p. 7

Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1987, p. 229

Stephen Jay Gould, “An Asteroid to Die For,” Discover, October 1989, p. 65

Not only the scientists, their publications and the page numbers.

Now that's out of the way, can we get back to the point? The point is "evolution is a theory, not a fact."
You choose to believe in the theory of evolution... That is OK with me, but don't bash those that don't believe in the evolution theory.
 
Xking,
I actually am a scientist....
You just don't know what to do with that, so you focus on that.

What about the parts when I say that CREDIBLE scientists don't agree with your theories?

Stay on the subject.

WTF??? The "theory" of evolution can be scientifically TESTED. It's possible to expand knowledge and change certain details after much study. Scientists are not against changing their views based on advanced study. NONE of that is possible with the fantasy of religion. NOTHING ever changes (even when the bullshit in The Bible is totally exposed.)
 
38323667221659006306.gif
 
Blunt,
You are right, it can be tested and has been found to be folly by scientific study. The point is, it is just a theory. It is not a fact. Neither is religion a fact.
Believe what you wish, why must one be bashed for the other? Let the religious believe their theory, and the evolutionists believe theirs, and so on.

Just don't get it twisted. Evolution is not a fact.... as was represented in this and other threads. I am cool with those that believe in "design" as those that believe in "evolution."
 
Blunt,
You are right, it can be tested and has been found to be folly by scientific study. The point is, it is just a theory. It is not a fact. Neither is religion a fact.
Believe what you wish, why must one be bashed for the other? Let the religious believe their theory, and the evolutionists believe theirs, and so on.

Just don't get it twisted. Evolution is not a fact.... as was represented in this and other threads. I am cool with those that believe in "design" as those that believe in "evolution."

which scientists again bruh? And what did they find?
 
Holy shit, I hope some of you don't breed... Someone just said if evolution is real, how come we don't see no monkey's turning into people, lol....... fuck the school system is fucking letting us down, BIGTIME!!!!
 
Here we go:
Jeffrey S. Levinton, “The Big Bang of Animal Evolution,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84

I. Axelrod, “Early Cambrian Marine Fauna,” Science, Vol. 128, 4 July 1958, p. 7

Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1987, p. 229

Stephen Jay Gould, “An Asteroid to Die For,” Discover, October 1989, p. 65

Not only the scientists, their publications and the page numbers.

Now that's out of the way, can we get back to the point? The point is "evolution is a theory, not a fact."
You choose to believe in the theory of evolution... That is OK with me, but don't bash those that don't believe in the evolution theory.


first of all, since I don't have those, just quote a few lines for me. Wait, I'll wade through it myself.

One of the people you have listed in their off top is Richard Dawkins- one of the biggest proponents of evolution. He just released a book called "the greatest show on earth"- about evolution


Another is Stephen Gould- who is hardly in opposition to evolution.


I see an author who I don't know, but theres a reference to the Cambrian explosion, which has already been covered, and is not contradictory to evolution.And Levinton covers that ground as well. That's old hat.

Now, question you, mr scientist.

Why couldn't you state that in your own words, instead of quoting some shit that you obviously did a google search for, and did't understand completely what you copied and pasted?

YOU HAD TO HAVE DONE THAT, because theres no way you would've mentioned Richard Dawkins as an argument against evolution.

You're really sad.


And youre right, evolution is a theory. So is gravity. Since you take the word theory so lightly, please jump out of a window a few stories up to test it.
 
Last edited:
Here we go:
Jeffrey S. Levinton, “The Big Bang of Animal Evolution,” Scientific American, Vol. 267, November 1992, p. 84

I. Axelrod, “Early Cambrian Marine Fauna,” Science, Vol. 128, 4 July 1958, p. 7

Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1987, p. 229

Stephen Jay Gould, “An Asteroid to Die For,” Discover, October 1989, p. 65

Not only the scientists, their publications and the page numbers.

Now that's out of the way, can we get back to the point? The point is "evolution is a theory, not a fact."
You choose to believe in the theory of evolution... That is OK with me, but don't bash those that don't believe in the evolution theory.

The fact that you listed Dawkins in there shows that you're completely full of shit. BTW what scientist simply announces that they're a "scientist" with "multiple degrees", instead of just stating their actual fields (geneticist, organic chemist, astro physicist, etc):rolleyes: A person could be a brilliant nuclear physicist but can be completely out of their field when it comes to evolution.
 
Did that guy just list Dawkins as an Anti_evolutionist? WOW! Further i hope he realizes that the only way you can be considered a SCIENTIST is if you have published papers...So what papers does this guy with MULTIPLE degrees have published? What are the titles? What fields? Lets test what he claims to know! Oh by the way in 2 semester i will have my B.S in Microbiology and a minor in Anthropology! BROTLOV

Further lets start getting to the Root of these BullShit i'm a scientist, blah blah claim....Post your Degree Audit Page...blank out the appropriate private information, Highlight only the classes you've taken or are currently taken. BROTLOV would you like to go first?
 
Last edited:
Brotlov, watch this video, this guy lists and debunks every single one of your points. It's like he was in this thread.


I know you won't watch it because if you watched anything except Martin reruns you wouldn't be in here making an ass out of yourself.

 
All other shit aside, for me - until the "missing link" is actually found - there is no missing link at all.

Not saying it's impossible, but everyone is taking the link to be a fact, to imply that in that space there HAS to be something - when in fact it could be possible that there's absolutely no link.

Shit for all we know, we could have been engineered by an advanced civilization and brought to this planet. We could have been engineered using DNA from primates.

The crazy shit is as ridiculous as that sounds, there so much unknown that it could indeed be true.
 
Did that guy just list Dawkins as an Anti_evolutionist? WOW! Further i hope he realizes that the only way you can be considered a SCIENTIST is if you have published papers...So what papers does this guy with MULTIPLE degrees have published? What are the titles? What fields? Lets test what he claims to know! Oh by the way in 2 semester i will have my B.S in Microbiology and a minor in Anthropology! BROTLOV

Further lets start getting to the Root of these BullShit i'm a scientist, blah blah claim....Post your Degree Audit Page...blank out the appropriate private information, Highlight only the classes you've taken or are currently taken. BROTLOV would you like to go first?

AYO, that's a thread bruh, make it happen. It may be ocking time...
 
Last edited:
All other shit aside, for me - until the "missing link" is actually found - there is no missing link at all.

Not saying it's impossible, but everyone is taking the link to be a fact, to imply that in that space there HAS to be something - when in fact it could be possible that there's absolutely no link.

Shit for all we know, we could have been engineered by an advanced civilization and brought to this planet. We could have been engineered using DNA from primates.

The crazy shit is as ridiculous as that sounds, there so much unknown that it could indeed be true.

Watch the video I posted a couple posts up....
 
All other shit aside, for me - until the "missing link" is actually found - there is no missing link at all.

Not saying it's impossible, but everyone is taking the link to be a fact, to imply that in that space there HAS to be something - when in fact it could be possible that there's absolutely no link.

Shit for all we know, we could have been engineered by an advanced civilization and brought to this planet. We could have been engineered using DNA from primates.

The crazy shit is as ridiculous as that sounds, there so much unknown that it could indeed be true.

you guys are un fucking real. You go from contesting evolution because you must've heard someone say "missing link" before, again a question thats been answered 100 times and doubting it to saying that being made by an advanced civilization WHO YOU'VE NEVER SEE OR CAN EVEN NAME is just as possible.

Please say you don't have kids..
 
Further lets start getting to the Root of these BullShit i'm a scientist, blah blah claim....Post your Degree Audit Page...blank out the appropriate private information, Highlight only the classes you've taken or are currently taken. BROTLOV would you like to go first?

AYO, that's a thread bruh, make it happen. It may be ocking time...


I agree.

BROTLOV, show dem books bitch!
 
I agree.

BROTLOV, show dem books bitch!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Damn Cold! You think he's Halo's Kin? If so you know hes not posting shit right? Because he dont got shit! We also need him to post his Published work(s) since he's a scientist and all! Hell just the title and the basis of his thesis will do!
 
you guys are un fucking real. You go from contesting evolution because you must've heard someone say "missing link" before, again a question thats been answered 100 times and doubting it to saying that being made by an advanced civilization WHO YOU'VE NEVER SEE OR CAN EVEN NAME is just as possible.

Please say you don't have kids..
Lol. Calm down.

I'm just theorizing myself. It's a wild idea, but my point is we really don't know shit about our history, or the possibilities that extend past our atmosphere, much less throughout the solar system and galaxy.
 
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Damn Cold! You think he's Halo's Kin? If so you know hes not posting shit right? Because he dont got shit! We also need him to post his Published work(s) since he's a scientist and all! Hell just the title and the basis of his thesis will do!

This cat is as fraudulent as Halo. Don't let this shit slide.
 
Back
Top