Logical Fallacies and How to Spot Them

I don't believe that human beings evolved from anything other than human beings so I guess I am a retard.



:smh:
go read up on science so u wont be retarded and go read up on the ego so u'll know why u were retarded in the first place
or stick to whatever ur good at and let the adults speak on reality
 
If our consciousness came from a higher consciousness then where did this higher consciousness come from?

logical fallacy above.

scarce few on BGOL (and society in general) are capable of spotting logical fallacies.

i was the first on BGOL to introduce them on the POLITICS board several years ago in discussions with member KOAN and MR SKEPTIC.

in general, attorneys and philosophy majors are pretty good at spotting them.

there are dullards on BGOL who like to accuse others of "ad hominem" to pretend like they are educated, but they always prove their ignorance in the improper labeling of a claim. for the record, it is NOT an instance of ad hominem when a claim is validly refuted AND is accompanied by a claim against the person.
 
atheism1.jpg
 
at this point, only retards do not believe in evolution. And that's not only because I do, it's because it's been proven time and time again. I hear somebody talking about creationism and I file them away in the 'people I will never have a real discussion with' category :dunno:

retards huh?:hmm:

The only retard I see is you for claiming something which was created to propel racism and genetic superiority is 100%truth.

So basically,the OP posted a bunch of pseudo intellectual jargon and you niggas believe it? Niggas are so fucking godamn stupid I swear to fucking gawd I hate you miotherfuckers!:smh:

However,the gaps in evolution have NOT been proven, the same as the gaps in creationist theories havent been proven so why do you idiots continue to bring up a never ending debate?

Do yourself a favor and just shut the fuck up. Thanks.
 
the big bang theory and evolution are inextricably connected, as the beginning of life on earth has to be attributed to SOMETHING. in this case according to science abiogenesis occurred under proper conditions from materials that arrived via the Big Bang.

damn, you up in here talking all this stuff and it seems you aren't hip to the rudimentary subject matter were' discussing.



in the absence of fact there are ONLY beliefs.

did you read what i posted?

NOBODY knows what occurred in the VERY beginning, hell, evolution is theoretic because the tests that need to be done to confirm it CANNOT be done, and its status as fact is all based on observation.

so even based on solid observation, evolution must be defined as theory AND FACT, but not SOLELY FACT.

thats why belief cannot be extricated from this discussion, cause scientific knowledge and facts run out.

What's "all this stuff" I'm supposedly talking about? I haven't expressed my views one way or the other. All I've asked for are facts to support claims made. I'm here for enlightenment so show me where, beyond your or anyone's opinion, the Big Bang Theory and evolution are "inextricably" linked.

If this is one of those internet blah blah blah discussions where niggas mentally masturbate cuz they think they're smart & need to prove it (not necessarily implying you), then ok. I'll leave it alone. But if this is a real intellectual discussion, then some facts (links to scientific articles) need to be put on the table.

Edit: Nobody was really discussing the Big Bang Theory anyway. The discussion was evolution. This maneuver is mentioned as a logical fallacy in the OP's post. :rolleyes:
 
And I just had to say this...i fucking HATE you stupid motherfuckers that act like your intellect is on a pedastool because you believe the white man hoax. You negros are the stupidest fucks in this universe. You idiots dont even know what the FUCK you are talking about.

I am MORE than sure you dumb fucks dont even know about the Piltdown Man do you? NO. Shut the fuck up you pseudo intellectual cretins.
 
Last edited:
i fucking HATE you stupid motherfuckers that act like your intellect is on a pedastool because you believe the white man hoax. You negros are the stupidest fucks in this universe. You idiots dont even know what the FUCK you are talking about.

it's ninjaspit and ad hominem FTW!
 
logical fallacy above.

scarce few on BGOL (and society in general) are capable of spotting logical fallacies.

i was the first on BGOL to introduce them on the POLITICS board several years ago in discussions with member KOAN and MR SKEPTIC.

in general, attorneys and philosophy majors are pretty good at spotting them.

there are dullards on BGOL who like to accuse others of "ad hominem" to pretend like they are educated, but they always prove their ignorance in the improper labeling of a claim. for the record, it is NOT an instance of ad hominem when a claim is validly refuted AND is accompanied by a claim against the person.

Even if you validly refute a claim, isn't making a claim against the person to call question to his character and, therefore, his trustworthiness ad hominem?
 
Even if you validly refute a claim, isn't making a claim against the person to call question to his character and, therefore, his trustworthiness ad hominem?

:itsawrap:

This internet personality JUST now read about ad hominem on wikipedia and hes using it in every post to feed his intellectual napoleon complex to make himself FEEL smarter.:lol:
 
:smh:
go read up on science so u wont be retarded and go read up on the ego so u'll know why u were retarded in the first place
or stick to whatever ur good at and let the adults speak on reality

An ounce of practice is worth more than a ton of preaching.:smh:
 
Even if you validly refute a claim, isn't making a claim against the person to call question to his character and, therefore, his trustworthiness ad hominem?

claimant A: female humans get pregnant by eating salty chips

respondent B: you're wrong because you are a complete idiot!


claimant B: female humans get pregnant by eating salty chips

respondent B: female humans get pregnant by sperm fertilizing an egg, you complete idiot!


see the difference?

there is such a thing as "ad hominem argument" which is different from "ad hominem fallacy"
 
This internet personality JUST now read about ad hominem on wikipedia and hes using it in every post to feed his intellectual napoleon complex to make himself FEEL smarter.

sigh.

it's obvious your INFERIORITY complex rendered you hysterical. your emotions having you jumping through imaginary hoops.

see how defensive you became even though my reply was directed to BOTH of you?

:smh:

you betray yourself again by associating "intelligence" and "smarter" with proper identification of logical fallacies.

:cool:
 
And I just had to say this...i fucking HATE you stupid motherfuckers that act like your intellect is on a pedastool because you believe the white man hoax. You negros are the stupidest fucks in this universe. You idiots dont even know what the FUCK you are talking about.

I am MORE than sure you dumb fucks dont even know about the Piltdown Man do you? NO. Shut the fuck up you pseudo intellectual cretins.

Wikipedia says it was a hoax. :dunno:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piltdown_Man
 
claimant A: female humans get pregnant by eating salty chips

respondent B: you're wrong because you are a complete idiot!


claimant B: female humans get pregnant by eating salty chips

respondent B: female humans get pregnant by sperm fertilizing an egg, you complete idiot!


see the difference?

there is such a thing as "ad hominem argument" which is different from "ad hominem fallacy"

So, respondent B in the second case made a valid refutation and added an insult, correct?
 
:lol:

didn't you know that wikipedia is BGOL's go-to source for information?

it's frightening how many BGOL members cite that drivel.

I didn't know anything about it. So when I googled it, it was the first link. What other sources would you recommend?
 
So, respondent B in the second case made a valid refutation and added an insult, correct?

correct.

in the ad hominem fallacy, the argument is ignored while the ARGUER becomes the focus.

while the insult is extraneous in example B, the ARGUMENT was thoroughly attacked and discredited.
 
:lol:

didn't you know that wikipedia is BGOL's go-to source for information?

it's frightening how many BGOL members cite that drivel.

What does the information being from wikipedia have to do with anything? The point is that it was a deliberate HOAX, just like the rest of evolutionary theory you fucking fool. Now youre just pointing out irrelevant things to scrutinize. A bit too tedious for anything intellectual to be discussed. Besides, I only debate with my equals. Good day.
 
What does the information being from wikipedia have to do with anything?

A bit too tedious for anything intellectual to be discussed. Besides, I only debate with my equals. Good day.

thanks for providing proof.

that you would need to pose the question disqualifies you as an equal and firmly places you somewhere far below.

continue your blissful existence.
 
An ounce of practice is worth more than a ton of preaching.:smh:



um ok

putting aside the fact that scientist may be off on some of the details about evolution ur saying the basic idea that things change and changes that help an individual within a species, part of a species or the whole species take better advantage of its available resources is all crap then i can do anything for ya

i admit that there may be some higher life forms playin some sorta roll in things but anybody believes in the crap from the 3 major religions is, like hommie called himself, retarded
 
at this point, only retards do not believe in evolution. And that's not only because I do, it's because it's been proven time and time again. I hear somebody talking about creationism and I file them away in the 'people I will never have a real discussion with' category :dunno:

darn, and i was doing my best not to be a retard.

ah well.
:nerd:
 
cant discuss one without the other!

read up on it!

SHIFTING THE ONUS OF PROOF: This is when your opponent makes a claim, provides no evidence for it, and then expects you to find evidence of it. Your opponent is making the claim, so he should logically have to provide evidence. Shifting the onus (or burden) of proof to you is a fallacy and a very low tactic to engage in.
:hmm:
 
logical fallacy above.

scarce few on BGOL (and society in general) are capable of spotting logical fallacies.

i was the first on BGOL to introduce them on the POLITICS board several years ago in discussions with member KOAN and MR SKEPTIC.


in general, attorneys and philosophy majors are pretty good at spotting them.

there are dullards on BGOL who like to accuse others of "ad hominem" to pretend like they are educated, but they always prove their ignorance in the improper labeling of a claim. for the record, it is NOT an instance of ad hominem when a claim is validly refuted AND is accompanied by a claim against the person.

I could not have been far behind you. I have been mentioning logical fallacies for years on here too. Most threads here are full of them. You could spend all day just listing them. I used to reply to some posts and just list off the logical fallacies.
 
I could not have been far behind you. I have been mentioning logical fallacies for years on here too. Most threads here are full of them. You could spend all day just listing them. I used to reply to some posts and just list off the logical fallacies.

i like to have fun with the fallacies on here from time to time. BGOL is a circus for the poorly reasoned argument. requesting logical foundation or well-reasoned conclusion is virtually a lost cause. just the other day i was participating in a thread where one of the users cited the "eyeball test" as evidence.

:(

you can always tell the people with INFERIORITY complexes about their level of education too. they think that understanding logical fallacies is akin to some mental kung-fu; i liken it more to a practical tool akin to spell check or grammar check.

being able to spot logical fallacies in an argument (your own or someone else's) isn't a sign of "intelligence" or "smart"ness, it's merely an indicator that a person is versed in the skill of constructing sound arguments.
 
I don't believe that human beings evolved from anything other than human beings so I guess I am a retard.

When you talk about human beings evolving from animals specifically primates to me that is pure bullshit.

Taking away the religious argument IE. the soul. The abilities that human beings possess have never evolved in the animal world. With the millions of species of animals other than humans why hasn't a reptile gained consciousness why hasn't a fish evolved into a fish human. Why supposedly only primates.

Call it creationism but whatever spurred consciousness in human beings whatever created awareness and gave us dominion over animals and earth created humanity.

So yes I believe in evolution for the animal world but I believe in creationism when it comes to humanity. If animals could evolve into human like creatures then our whole outlook on eating animals using animals for clothes tools and experiments is immoral.

basically.....it's like so dense I can't even attempt to address it any more...
and by you quoting the entire OP what did that achieve moron? :rolleyes:
:smh:
go read up on science so u wont be retarded and go read up on the ego so u'll know why u were retarded in the first place
or stick to whatever ur good at and let the adults speak on reality
LOL!!! It's ridiculous. seriously
retards huh?:hmm:

The only retard I see is you for claiming something which was created to propel racism and genetic superiority is 100%truth.

So basically,the OP posted a bunch of pseudo intellectual jargon and you niggas believe it? Niggas are so fucking godamn stupid I swear to fucking gawd I hate you miotherfuckers!:smh:

However,the gaps in evolution have NOT been proven, the same as the gaps in creationist theories havent been proven so why do you idiots continue to bring up a never ending debate?

Do yourself a favor and just shut the fuck up. Thanks.
LOL!!!! don't be mad at me because you are stupid. I love how eloquently you made your point too :yes: all kinds of N words & retardation in your post
aha! a spirited exchange of ad hominem.

well played!
LMAO!!!!
And I just had to say this...i fucking HATE you stupid motherfuckers that act like your intellect is on a pedastool because you believe the white man hoax. You negros are the stupidest fucks in this universe. You idiots dont even know what the FUCK you are talking about.

I am MORE than sure you dumb fucks dont even know about the Piltdown Man do you? NO. Shut the fuck up you pseudo intellectual cretins.
LMAO :angry: can't express yourself, but think you are going to convince some one to agree with you...wait, what is your point any way? :roflmao:
sigh.

it's obvious your INFERIORITY complex rendered you hysterical. your emotions having you jumping through imaginary hoops.

see how defensive you became even though my reply was directed to BOTH of you?

:smh:

you betray yourself again by associating "intelligence" and "smarter" with proper identification of logical fallacies.

:cool:
LMAO!!!! :dunno:
darn, and i was doing my best not to be a retard.

ah well.
:nerd:
Godspeed/good luck :) LOL
 
um ok

putting aside the fact that scientist may be off on some of the details about evolution ur saying the basic idea that things change and changes that help an individual within a species, part of a species or the whole species take better advantage of its available resources is all crap then i can do anything for ya

i admit that there may be some higher life forms playin some sorta roll in things but anybody believes in the crap from the 3 major religions is, like hommie called himself, retarded

well that makes sense i think the point of contention is that higher consciousness doesnt just evolve and i dont totally agree wit the posters but i am very much in belief that yes humans are tinkered with primates. so i believe without the insults both sides of this arguement are correct
 
Back
Top