probably one of the most underwhelming surprises that wasn't really a surprise. So, does this mean Sting is going back to TNA?
 
Good to see Ted Dibiase induct Jim Duggan. I remember them along with Matt Bourne in early 80's Mid-South as the heel group The Rat Pack. Just to hear Dibiase's speech will be a great listen for any true wrestling fan of the territories and kayfabe era.
 
I'mma take another shot at WWE's predictability:

Lawler hits Cole for talking shit, GM chimes in and orders some stupid match between King and Cole or King and Alex Riley for WM
 
wow that wasn't predictable now was it..........
Sarcasm.jpg
 
Now I feel better that I didn't buy tickets to Wrestlemania. No Sting match, no Rock match, old man vs. roid man, and now two announcers in a match? The shit ain't worth the trip.
 
:smh: WWE missed a golden opportunity by not pursuing Sting. Think about; The Icon vs. The Phenom. If any match would be perfect Swan-song for either one of them THAT would have been the match.....
 
Now that was wack.A quick ass squash match for the tag titles and the champs made no effort whatsoever to break up the count.And the WWE did what they always do and put the belt on 2 random ass singles wrestlers.
 
:smh: WWE missed a golden opportunity by not pursuing Sting. Think about; The Icon vs. The Phenom. If any match would be perfect Swan-song for either one of them THAT would have been the match.....

WWE booking leaves alot to be desired.....
 
The Miz could probably work as a face not a leading face though.

He could and be a leading face.And he could probably do it without stooping to the corny level of Cena.He could be a smartass face who could basically shoot on his competitors.
 
I thought Rock was gone be on the show weekly now but I guess every other week :dunno:

I think that they're taking the approach that less is more and if he was around every week he'd eventually be taken for granted.Means that Cena and Miz definitely need to step up.I didn't see the Miz's promo but Cena failed.He had some decent lines but the fact that he had to revert back to his old character and not do it in his current state is bad.
 
I think that they're taking the approach that less is more and if he was around every week he'd eventually be taken for granted.Means that Cena and Miz definitely need to step up.I didn't see the Miz's promo but Cena failed.He had some decent lines but the fact that he had to revert back to his old character and not do it in his current state is bad.

I would've liked the promo better if it hadn't been so homo, i mean he calls the rock out fo lipstick and tooth fairy but spends the rest talking about rock kissing his ass and massaging his balls:smh::puke: Also miz was an EPIC FAIL!!!! he had a chance to shine and he completely blew it. I don't think miz is ready to face the rock at all on the mic.

Damn, I remember when tag team titles meant something...that shit was like 15 years ago though.

The tag titles officially became pointless back in 2005
 
The latest RAW stresses just why I don't invest much energy into WWE anymore. And personally, I'm sort of glad they didn't go the Sting vs Undertaker route since all the "good" in the match would've happened BEFORE either man entered the ring.

I know some of you think, "Yeah, but they're vets so they know enough in the ring to pull a good *** match. No one is expecting them to bust out with shooting star presses or anything." But I don't think it would've been even that (MAYBE a ** , and that's if Patterson was HEAVILY involved in the mechanics of the match). The match would've been all build up and basically had been "meh" once they locked up in the ring. The type of match where you show someone all the promos and the build up, but when it come to the match you pull the old, "So...instead of watching this match, let me show you Foley vs Taker again from Hell in the Cell."

One reason Undertaker / Michaels had great matches these last 2 years is because HBK is a wizard in the ring and controlled the pace (they have good chemistry too, but you have to remember they've wrestled each other numerously in different combinations for over 10 years).

With HHH/Taker it could go either way. Their last WM encounter was a solid *** match with HHH carrying Taker to a damn good match. With that said, that was pre-quad tear (and pre-EXTRA roids) HHH. Plus, the match they had 2 years later was HORRIBLY BAD. Another HHH/Undetaker match has no "wow" or sense of newness, but once they get in the ring there is a chance it could be good based on their track records WITH EACH OTHER.

With all that said, they HAVE to have HHH go over or else its a pointless match no matter how good it turns out.

Note: I'm not saying I want HHH to end the streak. I don't personally, but if you're going to book yourself into a corner like this, then that's the only direction to go.
 
So what is the rocks contact with the wwe about? Is it a compete or just appearance?

Just appearances.


Revenge for Shawn Michaels? I don't see the connection between these two.

You don't? I think it's a stretch and is clearly hotshotting a "big" match for Mania. HHH is Michaels' best friend and Taker retired him, now HHH wants revenge. Bullshit? Yeah. But I see it.

Of epic proportions. Maybe they can save face by pushing Kane right now and have him meet Sting. Then have Taker beat HHH and Sting beat Kane and then have Taker vs. Sting at Summerslam.

Still holding out, huh?

probably one of the most underwhelming surprises that wasn't really a surprise. So, does this mean Sting is going back to TNA?
Nope.
He might but this isn't connected.

Good to see Ted Dibiase induct Jim Duggan. I remember them along with Matt Bourne in early 80's Mid-South as the heel group The Rat Pack. Just to hear Dibiase's speech will be a great listen for any true wrestling fan of the territories and kayfabe era.


Oh God, yes. I'm pleasantly surprised by this.


I'mma take another shot at WWE's predictability:

Lawler hits Cole for talking shit, GM chimes in and orders some stupid match between King and Cole or King and Alex Riley for WM

This has been talked about since Lawler first got involved with Miz. Lawler/Cole is :puke:

:smh: WWE missed a golden opportunity by not pursuing Sting. Think about; The Icon vs. The Phenom. If any match would be perfect Swan-song for either one of them THAT would have been the match.....

They may have pursued him and just not come to an agreement. Sting has zero interest in going on the road with the WWE schedule.
That match would have been perfect 10 years ago.

Now that was wack.A quick ass squash match for the tag titles and the champs made no effort whatsoever to break up the count.And the WWE did what they always do and put the belt on 2 random ass singles wrestlers.

Just garbage. When I turned my tv to it and saw that I was hoping they didn't put the belts on them. There's just no reason to do it.

He could and be a leading face.And he could probably do it without stooping to the corny level of Cena.He could be a smartass face who could basically shoot on his competitors.

Miz could be a great face but he needs a few more years of being a top heel before they even entertain turning him. He is very similar to Edge when he was first pushed to the top.

The latest RAW stresses just why I don't invest much energy into WWE anymore. And personally, I'm sort of glad they didn't go the Sting vs Undertaker route since all the "good" in the match would've happened BEFORE either man entered the ring.

I know some of you think, "Yeah, but they're vets so they know enough in the ring to pull a good *** match. No one is expecting them to bust out with shooting star presses or anything." But I don't think it would've been even that (MAYBE a ** , and that's if Patterson was HEAVILY involved in the mechanics of the match). The match would've been all build up and basically had been "meh" once they locked up in the ring. The type of match where you show someone all the promos and the build up, but when it come to the match you pull the old, "So...instead of watching this match, let me show you Foley vs Taker again from Hell in the Cell."

One reason Undertaker / Michaels had great matches these last 2 years is because HBK is a wizard in the ring and controlled the pace (they have good chemistry too, but you have to remember they've wrestled each other numerously in different combinations for over 10 years).

With HHH/Taker it could go either way. Their last WM encounter was a solid *** match with HHH carrying Taker to a damn good match. With that said, that was pre-quad tear (and pre-EXTRA roids) HHH. Plus, the match they had 2 years later was HORRIBLY BAD. Another HHH/Undetaker match has no "wow" or sense of newness, but once they get in the ring there is a chance it could be good based on their track records WITH EACH OTHER.

With all that said, they HAVE to have HHH go over or else its a pointless match no matter how good it turns out.

Note: I'm not saying I want HHH to end the streak. I don't personally, but if you're going to book yourself into a corner like this, then that's the only direction to go.


:yes:
 
soooooooooo.................I guess HHH completely forgot Sheamus put him out 4 damn near a year, and Barrett and his gang caused UT to be buried alive and he don't care either...............................smh
 
Back
Top